Reddit mentions: The best books about hadith

We found 72 Reddit comments discussing the best books about hadith. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 17 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.

1. Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World (Foundations of Islam)

    Features:
  • Oneworld Publications
Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World (Foundations of Islam)
Specs:
Height9.03 Inches
Length5.88 Inches
Number of items1
Weight0.95019234922 Pounds
Width0.9 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

2. A Treasury of Hadith: A Commentary on Nawawi’s Selection of Prophetic Traditions (Treasury in Islamic Thought and Civilization)

A Treasury of Hadith: A Commentary on Nawawi’s Selection of Prophetic Traditions (Treasury in Islamic Thought and Civilization)
Specs:
Height7 Inches
Length4.5 Inches
Number of items1
Weight0.49824471212 Pounds
Width0.6 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

3. Peak of Eloquence, Nahjul Balagha

Islam, Shia, Qur'an, Mohammad, Ali, Ahl-Bayt, Ahl Bait
Peak of Eloquence, Nahjul Balagha
Specs:
Height8.75 Inches
Length5.75 Inches
Number of items1
Weight2 Pounds
Width1.75 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

4. Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World
Specs:
Height9.24 Inches
Length6.32 Inches
Weight1.2 Pounds
Width1.15 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

5. The Formative Period of Twelver Shicism (Culture and Civilization in the Middle East)

The Formative Period of Twelver Shicism (Culture and Civilization in the Middle East)
Specs:
Height9.21 Inches
Length6.14 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateDecember 2010
Weight0.80027801106 Pounds
Width0.57 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

6. A Textbook of Hadith Studies: Authenticity, Compilation, Classification and Criticism of Hadith

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
A Textbook of Hadith Studies: Authenticity, Compilation, Classification and Criticism of Hadith
Specs:
Height9.2 Inches
Length6.2 Inches
Number of items1
Weight0.9369646135 Pounds
Width0.9 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

7. Hadith of Bukhari: Volumes I, II, III & IV (Forgotten Books)

Used Book in Good Condition
Hadith of Bukhari: Volumes I, II, III & IV (Forgotten Books)
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateJanuary 2008
Weight2.35 Pounds
Width1.61 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

8. DUAs for Success: 100+ DUAs (prayers and supplications) from Quran and Hadith

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
DUAs for Success: 100+ DUAs (prayers and supplications) from Quran and Hadith
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Number of items1
Weight0.45 Pounds
Width0.28 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

10. The Authority And Importance Of The Sunnah

Islamic Books
The Authority And Importance Of The Sunnah
Specs:
Height8.25 Inches
Length5.5 Inches
Number of items1
Width0.75 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

11. Introduction to Hadith

Introduction to Hadith
Specs:
Height9.13 Inches
Length6.38 Inches
Weight0.93475999088 Pounds
Width0.83 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

12. The Veil And The Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation Of Women's Rights In Islam

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
The Veil And The Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation Of Women's Rights In Islam
Specs:
Height0.56 Inches
Length8.5 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateDecember 1992
Weight0.661386786 Pounds
Width6.69 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

13. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World (The Foundations of Islam)

    Features:
  • NATURAL, DURABLE, THICK LEATHER: This split piece of Full Grain Leather is thick, durable and perfect for your tooling, carving, upholstery, arts and crafts and molding. Made with the highest quality of leather, this leather square has got the perfect thickness for crafting or reinforcing guitar straps, rifle slings, gun holsters, sheaths, belts, knife sharpening strops, and much more.
  • AMPLE SIZE, 1.8MM THICK AND MEDIUM WEIGHT: This piece of leather measures at 12” X 12”, or one square foot. The leather is approximately 1.8mm thick and weighs in at approximately 4 ounces.
  • UNIFORM COLOR: The rich Bourbon Brown color strongly permeates throughout the leather, which is a reliable mark of high-quality, Full Grain Leather. The finish is smooth with a slight sheen. We use a multi-generational family-owned tannery that performs a precise, delicate tanning process ensuring a correct, long lasting hue. Once you cut the leather, you’ll notice the color is uniform throughout.
  • NO HOLES OR QUESTIONABLE MARKS: This leather is the highest in quality that you can find, this isn’t scrap or leftover leather, this is Full Grain, high-quality leather that is cut with you in mind. Any marks that do exist are due to bites, scratches or cuts that the cow endured during its life in the fields.
Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World (The Foundations of Islam)
Specs:
Height8.85 Inches
Length5.75 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateDecember 2017
Weight0.5 Pounds
Width1.1 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

15. Medicine of the Prophet (Islamic Texts Society)

Islamic Texts Society
Medicine of the Prophet (Islamic Texts Society)
Specs:
Height10.5 Inches
Length6.5 Inches
Number of items1
Weight1.1684499886 Pounds
Width1.1 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

16. Slavery and Islam

Slavery and Islam
Specs:
Height9.2 Inches
Length6 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateAugust 2019
Weight1.6 Pounds
Width1.7 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

17. The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History
Specs:
Height10.2 Inches
Length7.3 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateMay 2008
Weight3.25 Pounds
Width1.8 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

🎓 Reddit experts on books about hadith

The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where books about hadith are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Total score: 53
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 38
Number of comments: 14
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 31
Number of comments: 3
Relevant subreddits: 2
Total score: 23
Number of comments: 4
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 16
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 8
Number of comments: 3
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 7
Number of comments: 5
Relevant subreddits: 2
Total score: 7
Number of comments: 3
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 4
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 3
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 2

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Top Reddit comments about Hadith:

u/costofanarchy · 6 pointsr/shia

Here's a list of the key books in the field that I'm familiar with (by name and general contents, I've only actually read a few of them). I'm mainly focusing on what is relevant to the study of Twelver Shi'ism; there aren't many English language books on Zaidism, as far as I'm aware, and for Isma'ilism you can start with the works of Farhad Daftary.

I'll start with important works providing an overview of the area, and then give a rough breakdown by "era" (I may be a bit off regarding the era, and many of these books straddle two or more eras, so be warned). This list does not emphasize geographic studies of Shi'ism in various areas and countries, and rather traces the "core narrative" of the development of Shi'i intellectual history, which is typically thought of as happening in what is now modern day Iran, Iraq, and (especially in the post-Mongol/pre-Safavid era) Lebanon, and to a lesser extent in Bahrain. Once you've read the initial works, you should have a good idea about what's going on in each era, and you can pick and choose what to read based on your interests.

If you have no background in general Islamic history, you should first pick up a book on that subject. Tamim Ansary's Destiny Disrupted is an accessible non-academic book on general Islamic history (with an entertaining audiobook read by the author). If you want something heavier and more academic, Marshall G.S. Hodgson's The Venture of Islam is the classic three-volume reference in the field of Islamic studies, although it's a bit dated, especially in the third volume (covering the so-called "Gunpowder Empires"). Note that the standard introductory text on Shi'ism has long been Moojan Momen's book An Introduction to Shi'i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi'ism, but this book is now a bit dated. Heinz Halm also has some surveys, but I'm less familiar with these; likewise for the surveys of Farhad Daftary (who is better known for his work on Isma'ilism than general Shi'ism).

Surveys, Background, and Introduction

u/txmslm · 5 pointsr/islam

I wouldn't normally recommend an advanced text to someone just thinking about Islam, but you attended seminary and I'm assuming not exactly a novice to the concepts and forms of textual criticism. You might appreciate some context to hadith studies generally to see that there is more basis to it than what it may initially seem like.

you might want to try this book. It's probably one of the best if not the best introduction to hadith sciences in English.

If you prefer learning directly from a person rather than pouring over what can be a dense and difficult text that gives you too much information, you could listen to these lectures. I don't think I've listened these, but the sheikh himself is very deservedly popular:

http://www.halaltube.com/usul-al-hadith

http://www.halaltube.com/sciences-of-hadith




>So, from what I have been reading, there are two categories of certainty for the validity of the hadith. The most certain are categorized as mutawaatir, and these are binding in terms of belief and obedience, right? This class of hadith is based on the number of witness in the chain of transmission that verify the saying or the event - and can also apply to the content of a hadith that may not have as reliable a chain of transmission. But there is also another component to this designation of validity, and that is that the Qur'an was compiled from the same sources as these hadith? So, the reasoning from scholars is that to deny these hadith is to deny portions of the Qur'an?


There are many more than two kinds of categories of certainty. Mutawatir doesn't actually refer to the degree of certainty, it applies to number of narrators that support each chain within a certain hadith, however, both a mutawatir and an ahad (only one narrator at one of the steps within the chain) hadith can be considered 'certain' in regards to their truth value as to whether the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, actually made the statement. Mutawatir typically means that there are 4+ narrators at each step in the chain (scholars differ about the number), but you have to understand that if there is a reliable narrator at each step in the chain, then the hadith itself is still considered reliable.

When you say the Quran was compiled from the same sources, if you mean witnessed by people, then yes, the Quran was recorded according to how people heard the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, recite the Quran. It didn't come down from the sky in book form, it was recited. Every verse of the Quran is considered mutawatir, meaning multiple people testified to each of the verses being considered Quran. There isn't really a "chain" though since it was compiled by people who all heard it directly from the Prophet himself.

>So, without these sources, would we have these verses in the Qur'an? Are there known manuscripts from about the same time or prior that contained these verses independent of these hadith? In other words, are these sources for the mutawaatir hadith the confirmed primary sources for those verses in the Qur'an?

again, by sources, in the Islamic tradition, the best source is the testimony of a truthful and reliable person with an unfailing memory. There were of course texts that had Quran and hadiths written on them, but they are not considered as reliable. Is the writing of a liar or a person prone to error better than the speech of a truthful person not known to err? The ancients Arabs preferred the latter. but to answer your question, the narrators of mutawatir hadith are not necessarily the people relied upon in compiling the Quran.

u/Aiman_D · 3 pointsr/islam

Hadith book collections such as Al-Buhkari are basically a collection of hadiths organized topically. It doesn't provide much in the department of context and what rulings can be derived from each hadith. some hadiths were valid for a set period of time for specific circumstances and then the rule changed later. Scholars call this "Al-Nasikh wa al-Mansukh" and it is found in the hadith as well as the Quran.

My point is that books like Al-Buhkari are meant as raw data for scholars who study the context and the reasons and the conclusions of rulings in the hadith. Not for the layman to causally read through.

If you want to read hadiths that are organized for the layman here are a few suggestions from the sidebar:


---
____LIFE OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD____

u/AndTheEgyptianSmiled · 1 pointr/islam

I like these kinds of questions coz I get to use bulletpoints. I love bulletpoints.


Is it okay to use a video of a guy praying certain prayers....

u/LIGHTNlNG · 5 pointsr/islam

---
QURAN

u/uwootm8 · 3 pointsr/islam

>Very grateful for your reply, uwootm8. I googled "criterion of multiple attestation" in an attempt to learn more about this method. "Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim" will definitely take a look at those too. You mentioned "Ibn Ishaaq", are there other ((early)) Muslim historians who were more scrutinizing to Seerah than him? historians who made sure their stories are (as correct as it can get given the available resources of that time)? Thanks again.

Just FYI the subreddit filters out all submissions from new account, nobody can see them except if they click your username.

I am not certain of how much scrutiny was put in. Given the massive size of ibn ishaaq's collection, I tend to think he wrote everything he heard. There is another early historian named Tabari. He flat out just says that he is not judging anything he hears, he's just writing it down. Perhaps that could indicate how the early historians approached seerah. But, ibn ishaaq is pretty much the primary source nowadays. If you are critical of the work I think you can puzzle out the general life of the Prophet. The Qur'an helps in this regard, as do the hadith.

If you're interested in learning more about hadith, I would recommend this book:

http://www.amazon.com/Hadith-Muhammads-Legacy-Medieval-Foundations/dp/1851686630/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1411856221&sr=8-1&keywords=jonathan+brown+hadith

It's one of the best intro's I've read.

u/haresenpai · 1 pointr/islam

So glad you asked!

An entire science was developed for the authentication of the prophetic traditions, unparalleled to any that have or will ever exist. And it is very interesting. I recommend this very inexpensive book, which you can pick up off of amazon titled A Textbook of Hadith Studies: Authenticity, Compilation, Classification and Criticism of Hadith which should serve as an excellent starting point for answering your questions, along with serve as a good source of information and terminology. Armed with this knowledge, you'll be well equipped to do further research on your own should you be interested, or under the careful tutelage of a scholar.

u/AnotherParaclete · 5 pointsr/islam

The most basic book in Islamic theology is Aqeedah Tahawiyyah. Here's a PDF.

Not quite a book, but after that, I'd recommend this audio series by Yasir Qadhi. Goes into some more tangible aspects of theology. After that, this commentary on Aqeedah Tahawiyyah if you really want to learn about detailed theological matters (this is more philosophical than practical).

It's a decent translation, but I prefer Zaki Hammad's The Gracious Qur'an

Study Qur'an, I'd stay away from. If you want some commentary, I'd recommend Abdullah Yusuf Ali's commentary here.

This is a better book of hadith to start out with.

u/Axiom292 · 5 pointsr/islam

>is Sahih Al Bukhari considered totally checked and true by all Muslims? What about specifically Sunni?

Sahih al-Bukhari is one of many compilations of hadith. All the ahadith within are sahih (authentic) according to the conditions of Imam al-Bukhari. Every hadith in Sahih al-Bukhari is accepted as authentic by all Sunni Islamic scholars, not Shias.

>if you disagree with something that is supposed to be a totally sahih hadith -- is that "haram"?

Yes, to deny a sahih hadith is fisq (transgession). To deny a hadith that is mutawatir (sahih through multiple chains) is kufr (disbelief).

>Is Sahih al Bukhari considered THE definition of the Prophet?

No. Firstly, Sahih al-Bukhari does not contain every sahih hadith - there are hundreds that are not found in Sahih al-Bukhari or even Sahih Muslim (which are together known as the Sahihayn - the two Sahihs). Secondly, we do not reject all other ahadith just because they are not at the level of sahih.

FYI most hadith compilations are not intended for use by layman. There are volumes of books devoted to the interpretation of hadith - Ibn Hajar's Fath al-Bari, for example, is a sharh (commentary) on Sahih al-Bukhari.

Edit:

(Your comments aren't showing up since you're using a new account)

>Do different schools of Islamic thought differ on the answer to these questions? For example Hanafi vs Maliki?

No. Scholars of all four madhhabs accept the ahadith in Sahih al-Bukhari as sahih. However the different madhhabs differ on the interpretation and applicability of individual ahadith.

>I understand compilations like Bukhari were made 100-200 years after the Prophet.

Clarification: Bukhari was not the first compiler of hadith.

>What is the common answer to the question of - how do we know that these actually were his sayings? I know there is the "chain" of relayers, but what is it beyond that?

A hadith has two parts - the sanad/isnad (chain of narrators) and the matn (the text). Scholars of the past memorized thousands of hadiths word for word along with their isnads. The authenticity of a hadith is judged primarily on evaluation of its isnad. It needs to be possible for each narrator to have met each successive narrator. There are volumes of books devoted to ilm ar-rijal - biographical evaluation - which include details of each narrators memory, trustworthiness, piety, knowledge, students, teachers, date of birth and death, etc. Narrators are judged as strong, rejected, unknown, trustworthy, etc. The strength of a hadith is judged by its weakest link. Multiple isnads strengthen a hadith, as do supporting narrations. There is much more to it, please take a look at this book:

Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature by Mustafa Azami

>I understand Kufr to be when one denies the oneness of God or his prophet. Anything else, isn't Kufr -- correct?

Kufr is disbelief. Each verse of the Qur'an is mutawatir (mass-transmitted at every level of transmission). Similarly if a hadith reached the level of mutawatir there is no possibility for error. So just as denying a single verse of the Qur'an is kufr, so too is rejection of a mutawatir statement of the Prophet SAW.

Edit 2:

>thanks very much for the updated reply -- very thorough and i plan to check out the book. Did you ever read this book? If so, thoughts? I read it, but it was my first book on the topic.
http://www.amazon.com/Hadith-Muhammads-Legacy-Medieval-Foundations/dp/1851686630

Glad to be of help. No, sorry, I haven't read Brown's book, but I've seen others recommending it and I've heard only good stuff about his work.

u/Mac8v2 · 3 pointsr/unexpectedjihad

I am Catholic and learned most of what I know about Islam though university classes and independent research. I can give you a list of books I have read about Islam that will get you started.

Oxford English Koran
Obviously the primary text is important to have and the book is pretty small. Much smaller compared to the bible.



Hadith of Bukhari: Volumes I, II, III & IV


Half of Islamic law is derived from the Koran and the other half from the Hadith. The Hadith is the collection of events, and quotes by Mohammad and his followers. This book is huge and you shouldn't try to read the whole since it is just list quotes and who they are by. But it is a good reference source and something to page through.

Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources
Biography of Mohammad using historical sources. Good reference.



Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World Through Islamic Eyes



Brief 350 page run of Islamic history until now as told by a Muslim. I felt the book was a bit preachy and accusatory towards the end but I read it 6 years ago so my memory might be hazy. Still a good read if you want to try to understand how mainstream moderate Muslim scholars see things. It has a good bibliography too.




There are probably a bunch of other ones I am forgetting. Take a look through Amazon and see what else they have. I would only buy books from university presses or published by academics though. They can be dense and difficult but they are peer reviewed which is important since there is so much anti-Islam, pro-Islam publishing out there.








u/TheMuslimShrink · 6 pointsr/islam

CodeReaper,

All statements of the Prophet ﷺ are equal in that if he said it, we follow it without question. However, the recording of those statements is of varying authenticity. They range from certain statements we know for sure he didn't say (called mawdu' or fabricated) to ones we are sure he did say (called sahih or authentic).

The best place to start would be the compilation of 40 hadith written by Imam an-Nawwawi. Here's an edition with commentary or you can read them online here.

Hope that helps,

TheMuslimShrink

u/autumnflower · 2 pointsr/shia

Are you interested in learning about hadith science in general and rijal? I recommend starting with An Introduction to Hadith by Abd Al-Hadi Al-Fadli.

I'm only familiar with these from a personal interest, I'm not a scholar, just read a bunch of books. In this case, I looked up the hadiths themselves since the book reference was given, and pretty much all hadith books are available online (at least in Arabic). It's obvious when a hadith has disconnected chain, and you can look up certain narrators in reference books of rijal (Khoei's book معجم رجال الحديث for ex. is available online), a handful of narrators are very common and you eventually just start remembering some of the names and unfamiliar ones stand out. I've also read a few writings by S. Khoei (ra) discussing certain fiqhi issues and how he arrives at a ruling, just to get a rough idea of how scholars determine rulings.

u/ambition786 · 3 pointsr/shia

This is perfect! Thank you so much for the info and the link as well. I will definitely check those out :) Just in regards to Nahjul Balagha, do you know if this is the full version of it or just a part: https://www.amazon.com/Peak-Eloquence-Nahjul-Balagha-Abu-Talib-dp-0940368439/dp/0940368439/ref=mt_hardcover?

u/wannabeemuslim · 1 pointr/Quraniyoon

>People have already determined for you dedicating their lives to it. You can study their method and know that it is legit.

thats what i mean, there is at least 6 sahih books which i dont know how many pages, or this one :

https://www.amazon.com/Translation-Meanings-Sahih-Al-Bukhari-Arabic-English/dp/9960717313/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1479677606&sr=1-3 ,

9 books,

Fabi-ayyi hadeethin baAAdahu yu/minoona

Then in what statement after it will they believe?quran 77:50

i prefer study the Quran then hadiths

>Do you beat your wife? The Qur'an says you can. Do you obey this?

you can read this, way :

Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great. Quran 4:34Muhammad Asad

or this way :

The men are to support the women by what God has gifted them over one another and for what they spend of their money. The upright women who are attentive, and keep private the personal matters for what God keeps watch over. As for those women from whom you fear a desertion, then you shall advise them, and abandon them in the bedchamber, and separate from them; if they obey you, then do not seek a way over them; God is High, Great. Quran 4:34
[The Monotheist Group] (2011 Edition)

Allah know is best

SLM

u/Lawama · 1 pointr/Christianity

>There's simply no comparison between IGoT and the canonical gospels. In IGoT, Jesus is running around murdering other children.

Again, all I stated was just because it's something is stated in a non-canonized Gospel, doesn't mean it's false.

>The Quran makes no concrete statements about a second coming of Jesus.

Yes it does.

>And indeed, Jesus will be [a sign for] knowledge of the Hour, so be not in doubt of it, and follow Me. This is a straight path. [43:61]

Exegesis:

> This is understood to refer to the second coming of Jesus in the Last Days before the Resurrection, when he will destroy the false doctrines that pass under his name, and prepare the way for the universal acceptance of Islam, the Gospel of Unity and Peace, the Straight
Way of the Quran.

Tafsir Abdullah Yusuf

>The Hadiths are entirely ad hoc explanations of obscure Qur'anic passages. Read the work of someone like John Wansbrough or Gabriel Reynolds.

Completely untrue. His sources are hand selected conspiracists like Patricia Crone who believed Muhammad (pbuh) didn't exist, and John Wansbrough who believes Muhammad (pbuh) is a manufactured myth. Analogous to Jesus (pbuh) not existing conspiracists who are easily refuted. For brief overview of how Hadith are authenticated read this:

http://ponderingislam.com/2015/01/01/the-hadith-critical-methodology-a-brief-look-at-how-hadith-are-authenticated-in-the-islamic-tradition/

If you're interested in an in depth read:

http://www.amazon.com/Hadith-Muhammads-Legacy-Medieval-Foundations/dp/1851686630

And:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Origins-Islamic-Jurisprudence-Civilization/dp/9004121315





u/austex_mike · 2 pointsr/Catholicism

> explain how I'm "just projecting," how my analysis is actually wrong, etc.

I am not saying you analysis is wrong at all. What I am saying is that your analysis is only true for a portion of the Muslim community, and that the reality of many Muslim women is different from what you are describing. Thus, I am saying that the French ban is ineffective because of this reality. But I acknowledge what you describe is true for some.

I am not looking for an argument at all, if that is what you want, go interact with someone else. I am merely stating that I understand your view, but I humbly submit that your view of the issue is not the only view, and that we need to understand the reality of other people. If you want to argue that I am not depicting an accurate description of the reality of many Muslim women, then there is not much I can do about that.

If you want to know more about how Muslim women and the community view the veil I will point you to two authors: 1) F. Shirazi, she is a great authority on Muslim women and is particularly good about the veil and its use in Iran and East over to India. 2) F. Mernissi, who specializes in the role of feminism in Islam. Menissi is especially good about talking about the role of the veil for Islamic identity among Muslim women across north Africa.

u/MegillahThriller · 7 pointsr/Israel

interesting. "Ottomans and Spanish Arabs loved him." Hah, yea right.. Also, Mizrahi Jews got tossed out pretty quickly from Muslim countries.

On "can actually speak real Hebrew." Ummm modern Hebrew exists from the resurrection of Hebrew in the Pale as well as because of Mizrahi influences.

"Speaks weird German language." Can say the same about Ladino as with Yiddish "speaks weird Spanish language."

Seriously, enough inter-Jewish ethnic divisions. How about good old Jewish unity? Can that ever exist in any form?? We all say the same shema, all follow the same Torah, all are eligible for aliyah, and all would be sent to the same ovens.

u/jewiscool · 4 pointsr/islam

I recommend these books:

u/[deleted] · 2 pointsr/islam

Mufti Taqi Usmani (Hafidhahullah) also has an excellent book on this topic - The Authority of the Sunnah

So does brother Jamal Zarabozo (Hafidhahullah) - The Authority and Importance of the Sunnah

u/TechnicalHovercraft · 2 pointsr/islam

Bit cheap using the cover of Prof. Jonathan Brown's upcoming book for the thumbnail: https://www.amazon.com/Slavery-Islam-Jonathan-C-Brown/dp/1786076357 :)

Good article on the topic by Prof. Brown here too: https://yaqeeninstitute.org/jonathan-brown/slavery-and-islam-what-is-slavery/

u/n3wu53r · 11 pointsr/islam

sunnah.com has hadiths from Sunni books

But watch out, you can't just read hadith as a laymen and think you can correctly derive rulings and interpret them like a scholar.

Also check out his other book: http://www.amazon.com/Hadith-Muhammads-Legacy-Medieval-Foundations/dp/1851686630

It has a section about Shia hadith.




>From what I understand, hadiths in Shi'a Islam also deal with the Imams in some way.

In Shiism, the Imams are divinely appointed. If I have an Isnad going to the 10th Shia Imam, were that Imam says "The Prophet ﷺ said ...", according to Sunnis this only proves that the 10th Imam ages later is attributing something to Muhammad ﷺ. The isnad does not go to the Prophet ﷺ or even the tabi'un/companions. However since the 10th Imam is infallible in Shiism, this enough proof. If it is confirmed the 10th Imam said this, he can't be wrong so it's true. If I am wrong, a Shia here should correct me; don't wanna misrepresent.

Also, go out to /r/shia.

u/preludeto · 7 pointsr/TwoXChromosomes

FGM predates Christianity and Islam. It's intertwined with cultural notions of purity and religiosity that go back to days when animism was the dominant form of religion (something that is still the case in many parts of Africa where this is practiced). Why it emerged I think varies from community to community. Many of these same cultures practice male circumcision in ways that are hardly more pleasant (think a dude scraping somebody's foreskin off with a piece of broken glass when they're 16). Though that isn't to excuse this sort of thing at all.

Religion comes up when these cultural practices are put in the context of broader religious/sexual morals.

The issue isn't how to make people doubt their religion (that's counterproductive), it's more how do you encourage a division between the two. For example your typical protestant has no issue eating meat on Fridays, even though during the middle ages this would have gotten you publicly flogged by the local priest.

A lot of people act like women's rights and Islam are somehow incompatible. This is uneducated. You can absolutely make a feminist interpretation of Islam if one wanted to, and people have, just like people have found similar things in Christianity and Judaism.

Any change in a culture has to come from within that culture. This is something I don't think people in the west have ever really figured out.

u/DindusLivesMatter · 3 pointsr/insanepeoplereddit

I'm aware, the picture you posted doesn't mention semites though, just anti-semitism, which I've never once heard be used to refer to Islamophobia. Searching "Islamic Antisemitism" just returns results like this or this, even searching "anti-semitic islamophobia" returns this or this.

u/Deuteronomy · 2 pointsr/Judaism

There is no denying that many traditional Islamic texts drip with venomous antisemitism. For anyone interested in a rather comprehensive presentation indicating as much I recommend Bostom's The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism. It is primarily a presentation of primary texts in translation interspersed and scholarly essays. Denial, whitewashing and downplaying of such a history is simply that. This history long antedates the Israeli-Arab conflict.

u/MrJerry00 · 34 pointsr/europe

let's remember folks, Islamic anti-Semitism existed long before Israel and was this wasn't unnoticed by certain people.

u/ummmbacon · 7 pointsr/Judaism

> We don't like it when anti semites take our religious texts out of context and meaning, so I'm not going to do it with Muslims.

Christians and Muslims had the same problem they needed the legacy of the Jews but not the Jews. The Pauline gospels were taken out of context by Christians to justify their hatred, and blood libel and Replacement theory were common Christian Ideas as were Passion Plays during Easter which sparked pogroms.

Islam also needed the legacy of the Abrahamic faith but not the Jews, both had the problem that the original Abrahamic faith didn't recognize their particular messiah/prophet which was (as they saw it) the inheritor of the faith line. So the existence of the Jews continued to deny the legitimacy of their claims. Islam generally regards the Jews as having "corrupted" the Torah to "hide" the fact that it talks about the coming of Muhammed. Since of course, it must have been foretold for it to be legitimate.

There is quite a bit of clear anti-Semitism outside the texts, which is very well documented:

When I get home to my bookshelf I can pull out dates, etc but here as some books on it:

The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History

Anti-Judaism

The largest issue with both traditions was claims of Jewish ancestry and "Judaising" being used to discredit early followers, in Christianity the used these claims to fight over initial thoughts as they hashed out core tenants of Christianity.

In Islam when they went through their own splits after the death of Muhammed, which some blame on the Jews since Muhammed had taken, forcefully, a "Jewess" as a wife and she eventually poisoned him (according to tradition). They used evidence of Jewish bloodlines of "taints" on particular groups that needed to not be followed or justified their removal. There are also some Suras that speak directly about a convert to Islam from Judaism as trying to "pervert" Islam because of his Jewish roots.

edit:

To add some more the Yellow Star used by the Nazis was first introduced in Baghdad by an Islamic Caliph since Jews (and Christians) were considered Dhimmi (second class citizens).

Also review: Muhammad and the Jews According to Ibn Ishaq by Joseph Spoerl originally published in The Levantine Review 2(1) 84-103 The Journal of Near Eastern and Mediterranean Studies at Boston College

https://jewishaction.com/opinion/legal-ease-whats-the-truth-about-muslim-anti-semitism/

u/Zemrude · 1 pointr/AcademicBiblical

I have stumbled across this book on Hadith, which isn't specifically Quranic, but it does contain a section on academic critical views of the Hadith and their vetting process in Islam.

u/waste2muchtime · 1 pointr/islam

A scholar recently wrote a book on exactly this topic. His name is Jonathan Brown. Check out his book.

Slavery and Islam (Oneworld Academic) https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1786076357/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_6ohsDb1VNJ657

u/mard-e-momin · 6 pointsr/islam

>If slavery is not haram than we have a different religion my friend

Can you tell me from an authentic source if slavery is Haram, with Quran or Sunnah.

It is not. However by ijma of scholars it is haram to reestablish slavery once it's abolished in society.

>If we can not superimpose today's moral

Today's morals accept homosexuality, it's clearly haram in the Quran. Either we follow the Quran and Sunnah or society and our desires.

Islam and Slavery and I recommend a read.

u/urstillatroll · 98 pointsr/GenderCritical

Although I am not a fan of the veil in general, (for a feminist look at the veil I suggest The Veil And The Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation Of Women's Rights In Islam by Fatima Mernissi) but I find it insane that we are letting males who “identify” as female compete against girls, but we are disqualifying girls for wearing hijab. Girls are screwed no matter what they do.