(Part 2) Reddit mentions: The best civil rights & liberties books
We found 45 Reddit comments discussing the best civil rights & liberties books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 23 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
21. The Democratic Party's War on Men: Gynocentrism
Specs:
| Height | 9.02 Inches |
| Length | 5.98 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Weight | 0.39 Pounds |
| Width | 0.27 Inches |
23. It Is Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom
Specs:
| Height | 1.3 Inches |
| Length | 9.1 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Width | 6.1 Inches |
🎓 Reddit experts on civil rights & liberties books
The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where civil rights & liberties books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature
Shuffle: random products popular on RedditTop Reddit comments about Civil Rights & Liberties:
Summary
21. The Democratic Party's War on Men: Gynocentrism
Specs:
| Height | 9.02 Inches |
| Length | 5.98 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Weight | 0.39 Pounds |
| Width | 0.27 Inches |
23. It Is Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom
Specs:
| Height | 1.3 Inches |
| Length | 9.1 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Width | 6.1 Inches |
okay...
I'm sure the French Frenchman is correct but it's also a simple google to see OP is wrong. and OP's translation is the exact title of a book.... [Nice try, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano.] (http://www.amazon.com/Dangerous-Right-When-Government-Wrong/dp/B00A16SG4U)
What Has Government Done To Our Money? - Murray Rothbard
The Politically Incorrect Guide To The Great Depression & The New Deal - Robert Murphy
Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse - Tom Woods
It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong - Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Ron Paul looks good at a quick glance, but the deeper you look into his politics, the more insane he seems (not the same type of insanity as some other politicians, but insane nonetheless).
I used to be pro-Paul right up until I stopped listening to the sound-bites that everyone likes to put out, and started digging into his beliefs. Edit :: One of the biggest things that turned me away from him was some of the nonsense he wrote in his book. There are too many things to list here, but I suggest that anyone who thinks he would be a good President take a good, hard read into that book of his and ask yourself if that is the type of person you truly want as your President. :: End Edit
I would be very worried having Ron Paul as a President.
Hehe. No wonder MR is failing or treading water. Too many MRAs are either leftist ideologues themselves, or gelded wusses. (And I'm no conservative - just a realist.)
One need not be conservative to understand the left has waged a half-century-long war on men:
https://www.amazon.com/Democratic-Partys-War-Men-Gynocentrism/dp/1500136131
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/128406/war-men-daniel-flynn
http://www.redstate.com/diary/youfamissim/2012/09/05/the-democrat-war-on-white-men-an-essay/
http://drginaloudon.com/2016/06/6862/
http://blog.eagleforum.org/2015/09/the-democrat-war-on-men.html
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/10/30/Democrats-Just-Lost-Phony-War-Women
Yet every one of the loonies I named is quite open about his/her rabid bigotry against males:
Moore: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stupid_White_Men
Hildebeest:
>Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children. Conference on domestic violence in San Salvador, El Salvador (17 November 1998). http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html
Sotomayor: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/xxfactor_xxtra/2009/06/white_men_cant_judge.html
Ginsburg: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/justice-ginsburg-we-need-all-female-supreme-court
Does the left really think it can wage a half-century of still-ongoing social and legal war against white males and against men's human rights - continuing under the guise of demonising "white male privilege" - and not lose the votes of those same voters the left attacks? Do they really think they can instill quivering fear or twisted guilt in every male?