(Part 2) Reddit mentions: The best computer monitors

We found 26,114 Reddit comments discussing the best computer monitors. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 1,932 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.

🎓 Reddit experts on computer monitors

The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where computer monitors are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Total score: 881
Number of comments: 771
Relevant subreddits: 5
Total score: 188
Number of comments: 115
Relevant subreddits: 3
Total score: 180
Number of comments: 113
Relevant subreddits: 5
Total score: 120
Number of comments: 36
Relevant subreddits: 2
Total score: 98
Number of comments: 81
Relevant subreddits: 2
Total score: 75
Number of comments: 40
Relevant subreddits: 5
Total score: 54
Number of comments: 42
Relevant subreddits: 4
Total score: 46
Number of comments: 37
Relevant subreddits: 3
Total score: 39
Number of comments: 39
Relevant subreddits: 2
Total score: 33
Number of comments: 39
Relevant subreddits: 2
📹 Video recap
If you prefer video reviews, we made a video where we go through the best computer monitors according to redditors. For more video reviews about products mentioned on Reddit, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Top Reddit comments about Computer Monitors:

u/joerlegacy · 2 pointsr/AskBattlestations

Regarding Corsair K70 RGB vs Razer Blackwidow Chroma,

Like I said above, the Razer Chroma trifecta, to me, is the best set of peripherals for gaming. However some setups may be better suited for everyday use mixed with gaming. I personally own a Corsair K70 RGB keyboard and only have a few complaints about it. One of the few drawbacks of the corsair keyboard is that it doesn't work with Razer's RGB software. So if you were to get the Razer headset and mouse, but the corsair keyboard you would have to install 2 different pieces of software and configure each software to your liking. If you were to get all 3 Razer peripherals you would only have to install Razer's software and configure that. Depending on your son's patience with this type of thing that may be a big selling point.

A few things I think the Corsair keyboard does better:

  • Volume Wheel. This thing is super handy and whenever I'm using a different keyboard something feels missing from the top right of it.
  • Build Quality. The solid aluminum top of the keyboard feels great.
  • RGB MX key switches. The whole housing of the switch lights up instead of a concentrated LED underneath the keycap. This leads to a more pleasing aesthetic in my opinion.

    Couple of downsides with the Corsair K70 RGB:

  • The software is VERY difficult to learn, but there are plenty of forums where people post their profiles for you to download and use instead of having to figure it out all for yourself.
  • The keyboard requires two USB ports from the computer its attached to. (for power reasons)
  • because of the above note the cable is very thick. Cable is also not detachable which many other keyboards at the 170$+ price range have.

    Regarding a possible replacement for the ROG Swift,

    Truth is that no replacement for that monitor exists currently. It is the best monitor for gaming. You can try going for slightly different setups, but none will none will match the ROG Swift. I personally don't think going for a surround setups(3 monitors) is worth the extra horsepower required to push them. I DO, however believe in peripheral monitors being used for stats and then having ONE designated monitor for gaming. I will detail some possible setups below:

    The first step in the multi-monitor picking process would be to pick a single monitor thats great for gaming. Obviously the ROG swift would be the first choice for this monitor, but since that's not available I'd consider a few high-refresh rate or GSYNC monitors as a substitutes. For a primary gaming monitor I'd say a good minimum size would be 24 inches, but 27 inches would be highly preferred.

    Here are a couple options that I think are pretty good based on reviews:


    Component | Resolution | Size | Refresh Rate | Price | Notes
    -----|---|---|----|----|---
    Acer XB280HK | 3840x2160 | 28 inches | 60hz | $800 | 4K Resolution will be hard to drive at ULTRA settings even with a GTX980, however GSYNC will still make it play amazing. because this is 4K, Windows may not scale as well as a 1440P 27 inch monitor would
    BenQ XL2420G | 1920x1080 | 24 inches | 144hz | $600 | GSYNC! only 1080p and only 24 inches
    ASUS VG248QE | 1920x1080 | 24 inches | 144hz | $220 | Much like the one above it, but without GSYNC, however you can send this monitor into various manufacturers to get it retrofitted with GSYNC.
    BenQ GW2765HT | 2560x1440 | 27 inches | 60hz | $420 | IPS 1440p 27 inches (no GSYNC or 144hz refresh aka not the best for gaming)
    ASUS PB278Q | 2560x1440 | 27 inches | 60hz | $400 | Pretty good 1440p display. No GSYNC or 144hz though so not the BEST for gaming

    Then the next step would be to pick one or two peripheral monitors that are good at displaying static content and have good viewing angles because chances are you'll have it in portrait orientation or will be viewing it at an angle. I'd highly recommend getting a 1080p or higher IPS monitor at 24 inches or larger that has a stand that can rotate the display between landscape and portrait orientations. Here are a couple options that I think would work great.

    Component | Resolution | Size | Refresh Rate | Price | Notes
    -----|---|---|----|----|---
    ASUS PB278Q | 2560x1440 | 27 inches | 60hz | $400 | Although not the best monitor for gaming, this would be good as a peripheral monitor
    BenQ GW2765HT | 2560x1440 | 27 inches | 60hz | $420 | Same as above, but it's an IPS panel meaning that it would be great as a peripheral monitor because of its superior viewing angles
    ASUS VG248QE | 1920x1080 | 24 inches | 144hz | $220 | Because of the cost effectiveness of this monitor and its great stand and refresh rate this would also make a good peripheral monitor. one downside is that it isn't IPS so viewing angles won't be as good.

    Another option that seems a bit more reasonable after seeing the dropped price of the ASUS VG248QE is to get 3 of those and do a surround portrait gaming setup with them. This will be a lower resolution than 4K and thus the GTX980 should drive all 3 fine depending on the game. Game support for 3x1080p in portrait will be sparse however. Configuring a surround setup will be MUCH more difficult than just playing on a single monitor. One big bonus in my mind for this setup is matching monitors, this will make the setup more aesthetically pleasing which may not be a high priority for most, but it is for me.

    I think the best option for a monitor setup for gaming besides having the ROG Swift + a single peripheral monitor would have to be the Acer XB280HK and the BenQ GW2765HT. My one reservation about the BenQ GW2765HT would have to be that my friend has it and in person the color seems a little off, however this may be able to be corrected in settings or it could just be a defect in my friend's unit. Getting just the Acer XB280HK would still be an amazing gaming setup though.

    As for what I have and my reasoning behind it:

    I currently have a LG 34UM95-P. It is basically a 27 inch 1440p monitor stretched out to a 21:9 aspect ratio. This is my one and ONLY monitor on my desk. This is NOT the ideal setup for gaming because the monitor is only 60hz refresh rate and it does not have GSYNC. It is, however, the ideal general workflow monitor in my mind. This screen allows me to have 3 full size webpages up on the screen at once. I can also run a game windowed at 1080p on this screen and have a full size webpage up next to that for netflix or general web browsing. Also, it is one of the best movie watching experiences outside of a theatre or a large 4K television because of the lack of black bars and the very high resolution.

    Pictures for reference: [Picture 1] [Picture 2] [Picture 3]

    Couple issues with gaming on my screen:

  • Many games do not support 21:9 aspect ratio so I play those games either windowed at 1440p or 1080p or fullscreen at 1440p with black bars
  • Because of this monitors low refresh rate and lack of GSYNC, I will get jaggies when my frame rate drops. This is very visually displeasing and takes me out of the immersive gaming experience.

    Again, if you have any more questions please don't hesitate to ask.
u/spicedpumpkins · 11 pointsr/buildapcsales

OK let's use your example. Hang on, this is going to be a long read.

THE BUILD THINKING PROCESS: Have realistic goals for your budget and build the highest resolution to fps ratio you can get for the money with a target of 60fps minimum for at least 75% of the time.

When I make a build I almost always include an adaptive sync monitor (freesync/gsync) in the budget because of exactly your scenario.

When enabled, the average person CANNOT distinguish in the middle of a fight between 130 and 144fps. Now you're going to get that super APM Korean here who will claim they can but on average most people cannot consistently distinguish above even 120hz....Linus tech tips and a bunch of other respected tech youtubers have fleshed this out ad nauseum.

With this in mind, adaptive sync alone can often mitigate loss of frames vs what you actually notice when playing, thus slightly future proofing your needs to upgrade immediately on a new hardware cycle.

When a friend, family member or colleague asks for a pc build the following questions come into play:

  1. What specific games or genre of games will you be playing?

  2. I explain to them what adaptive sync is and usually Show them this video. I also tell them I try to target them at 60fps on average as most people CAN notice below 60fps. At my house I have 1080p 75hz, 1440p 144hz/165hz and Ultrawide 3440x1440p at 120hz set ups for me and my own family and explaining to them these are $1100+, $2000+ and $3500+ builds and let them play with them. I also have built budget builds sub $600 but explain that there won't be an adaptive sync monitor in the build.

  3. Then I ask what's their top dollar budget before tax using roughly $1k, $2k and $3.5k increments and tell them what resolution and refresh rate they are buying into so they have upfront expectations of the best case scenario for frames. I also clearly explain that there will be variable fps depending on what is going on in the game and how graphics intensive it is.

    In addition, I also explain the difference in most games between med, high and ultra settings and what things you could turn off to increase frames and not notice much difference in overall gameplay (e.g. Turn off Hairworks, Reduce shadows appropriately, at higher resolutions there is little need for higher AA, etc.)

    NOW LET'S TALK ABOUT UPGRADE PATH:

    According to most recent Steam Hardware Survey the vast majority of gamers are rocking 1050ti/1060 level of cards. These are 1080p medium to high settings cards that can deliver 30-120+ fps depending on game.

    I tell them there is ZERO need to upgrade even when new hardware comes out IF you are happy with the current FPS of games you are playing. Seriously. Who gives a shit if all they want to play are esports titles like DOTA, LOL, Overwatch, Rocket League, Fortnite, etc and are getting 60fps+ and frankly typically 100+fps in those titles with those GPUs. Why bother upgrading a 3-5 year old system at all if your gaming experience is good and you are pleased with the current results.

    When to upgrade then? When a game comes out that you know you want to play outperforms your current setup and you are willing to pay to meet the performance bar. Depending on title, this MOST of the time doesn't even require anything more than a GPU upgrade if they already have a solid CPU and RAM config.

    I'll give you the perfect example. I had a colleague who was playing mostly esports titles with a 1060ti rocking a i5 4690k with 16GBs of DDR3 but now wanted to start playing more graphic intensive games such as Witcher 3 and Monster Hunter World PC at 60fps+ and he thought he had to buy an entire new computer and came to me. He currently has a 144hz 1080p IPS gsync monitor. I said no way man. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. His rig specific for gaming is still quite playable in most titles. I asked him if he was happy to keep his current playing resolution (1080p gsync) or if MIGHT consider going 1440p in the near future. He said he was sure he wanted to stay at 1080p for now. I suggested he just upgrade to a 2060 for $350ish bucks. He ended up getting a 2060 for a little over $350 and is extremely happy with this upgrade path. Here he thought he was going to have to spend $1500+ and was perfectly happy with the $350 upgrade.

    THE BUILD ITSELF:

    I take my sweet ass time and tell them it will take at least a week before I'm done building when all parts arrive (even though I can knock out most builds in a few hours) so I have no rush on myself as I build PC's for a relaxing hobby and not a job. Some people build legos or models. I like building PC's.

    Long read. I hope it helps save you some money and make a more informed PC building decision.
u/suckaplz · 3 pointsr/thinkpad

T430 owner here - upgraded everything. I'm a developer by trade but also do a ton of spreadsheet work - things like scalability projections, cost/benefit analysis, budgets, etc.

Personal opinion time: the 14in sometimes feels small for this. I have a couple of LARGE monitors at my desk and if I'm doing even moderate spreadsheet stuff I prefer to work on my numbers there. If you're planning on utilizing JUST the laptop screen I would suggest the T430 100%, however I would also suggest budgeting for a larger monitor for use back at a desk for serious work!

I would suggest the 8G RAM for either as it will run modern Windows better - even on Win7 I have noticed a huge difference going from 4G to 8G of ram. Also everyone will tell you SSD is a great idea - these laptops do VERY well with a couple of simple upgrades =D

You may be able to save yourself some cost by buying something that doesn't have the upgrades yet and doing the labor yourself if you're comfortable. There are an insane amount of articles, videos, etc. for cracking into these things if you're comfortable doing your own work.

One other thing - 10 key. I would suggest getting a nice keyboard with a number pad for home too. I don't know how much data-entry you'll be doing but I LOVE the ability to 10 key when I need to!

My overall suggestion:

  • ($250-300 USD) T430 with 8G of memory and SSD
  • ($100-120 USD) 21"-ish monitor - something like this
  • ($55 USD) Mini-dock
  • ($80 USD) A nice keyboard with a number pad like this
  • ($20 USD) A nice mouse for desktop use like this (free scrolling mice are super nice when working with long spreadsheets imo)

    PS: I also REALLY suggest the screen upgrade - it makes a HUGE difference and I found mine for around $40 USD. I feel that it was really worth it!
u/Namesurename · 1 pointr/Amd

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/KmsCpG

Could be cheaper/better if you did not want RGB, but for an RGB build you cant really go lower, overally pretty good, just change drives/power supply and search for another 5700xt, best are PowerColor 5700xt Red Dragon or Sapphire 5700xt Pulse. 3 fan Gigabyte card is fine too.

Go with 1440p, you are NOT on a budget and 5700xt is perfectly capable for it =) Well, it IS hard to find a decend 1440p 144hz non TN Freesync panel, acer 271+ models have issues, otherwise 270 series is great(https://www.amazon.com/Acer-XG270HU-27-inch-FREESYNC-Widescreen/dp/B00VRCLHYS/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Acer+NITRO+VG270U&qid=1568102625&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr0

Case is good, but if you want RGB - front panel is closed, so there is not much place to put it into =)Corsair fans are great if you want fans and a ring, but otherwise they are not great fans and cost a lot, so added another option. And yeah, if you still want to buy corsair fans - just get h510 Elite, would be the same price as h510+corsair fans, looks great and everything is pre-installed.. Otherwise just h510+30$ for fans(option in the list).

for Drives - Ditch HDD, they are slow, noisy and and this build deserve better. Here is your main drive, list does not seem to find it, it's great and reviewed by Tom's Hardware recentlyhttps://www.amazon.com/Silicon-Power-Gen3x4-000MB-SU001TBP34A80M28AB/dp/B07L6GF81L/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=SU001TBP34A80M28AB&qid=1568101817&s=gateway&sr=8-1 $114.99 for 1TB nvme goodness
Second drive can be anything, tho b450 board only have one m.2 so any sata ssd for 1-2 tb is great, added a great option, it seems on sale right now.

Also added another memory option, same just 3600, if you want.

u/polopollo85 · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I used to play WoW on a 2013 15 macbook pro till 2 weeks ago.

I bought a new desktop from a friend. Really powerful to me.

  • Intel Core i5-6600K 3.5/3.9Ghz
  • 16GB RAM DDR4 3000Mhz Vengeance
  • EVGA GTX 1070 8GB
  • SSD 480GB Corsair Force LE
  • And Watercooling (even if not overclocked, as I don't know yet how it works)

    Now that is amazing, it is like I play a new game. (Going from 12-25fps to 90+, and I think WoW is limiting to 100 by default. Anyway).

    ------------------------------------

    My problem is I borrowed his monitor. From what I see, it is a ASUS VS228H-P 21.5" Full HD 1920x1080

    And for those who played WoW, it feels "smaller". My knowledge of screens is limited, but I think when I run WoW on the macbook, the resolution is 2880x1800. I feel I can't go to a smaller resolution.

    Another friend told me "if you are gonna do gaming, you need this monitor". But all I can see is the same "1920x1080" resolution.

    -------------------------------

    What is the advice from this community for a good compromise?

  • I am looking for a 27'' screen.
  • I've heard of 4k. By browsing here and there I found this one which is definitely high end budget to me. People said that under 32'', everything feels "tiny".
  • In a 1st time I'm gonna play WoW on it, then I'll do more adventure games like the Witcher, Tomb Raider, Skyrim, etc. Anything that will be release and be awesome on the "adventure" side. I do not plan to do any MOBA or FPS, I'm too old for this :) My aim is just to play and have fun, not going to the competitive side of games, just enjoying chilling adventure games that I missed by having a mac.

    ---------------------------------

    I start to feel overwhelm by browsing topics I am not familiar with yet (remember, I come from a all-in-one macbook). I need enlightenment, I plan to buy a new monitor around black Friday (in sale or not, $200 would be preferable, definitely under $400). If you guys have heard of a similar situation, and could tell me something like "Yeah I have a similar story and went with this monitor XXX, I highly recommend this to you, {you don't need 4k, you need 4k}, the fps above 60 {matters, not matters} for what you seek for, the price is just {$250, $450 but really really worth it, $350 right in your range!}"
u/AlexBrownRealtor · 1 pointr/buildapc

I would say, if you could spend the money, get this

Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz 27" WQHD (2560x1440) NVIDIA G-SYNC IPS Monitor, (Display Port & HDMI Port, 144Hz) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_z6CACbRHJZAGJ

I purchased this monitor and have been very happy. 27" for me is plenty for gaming. Honestly 32" seems great on paper, but using it tends to make me have to look too far to corners of the screen to be efficient when playing. It's a IPS panel, which will have better colors than a TN. With the IPS you get 4ms response. But let's be honest, noticing the difference between 1ms and 4ms is nearly impossible, and shouldn't matter even to most competitive professional gamers. 1440p is nice, especially for the specs your PC has. It's not that much more hard on your PC to run at 1440p over 1080p, and it's NOTICEABLY more crisp, and allows more screen real estate. (Running at 4k is a different story, that is a difference in FPS drop). This monitor also has G-Sync which is amazing for gaming as well. Super smooth. Also, forget curved. It's just a marketing tool. And even if it wasnt, it's not going to add to your experience at 27"-32" imho

If this is not something you want, I'd say definitely go for 1440p if you intend to have a 27"+ screen. And opt for IPS panels and sacrifice a few ms response. G-Sync is a very nice plus, but may add an extra $70-100 to the monitor. (Not the most important feature, but a great touch, especially if you're not getting the 100+ frames tour desire in some games).

Good luck bud

Also, I'm using the same Asus as you for my secondary.

u/arex333 · 3 pointsr/buildapc

Absolutely. IMO this is way better than a 4k display since having an ultrawide aspect ratio and getting a way wider field of view in games (and also more screen space to work with) is hugely more noticeable than just having everything be a bit sharper. Also it goes to 100hz which is way better than 60 that 4k monitors run at. Keep in mind though, these high end ultrawides are using bleeding edge tech so there can be some quality control issues. Most common with the X34 is backlight bleed in the corners (really only noticeable on a black background) and inability to hold 100hz without flickering. It's been out long enough that as long as your monitor was manufactured recently it shouldn't be an issue. Just keep it in mind in case you have to exchange it. All of the monitors with similar specs have their own QC issues that shouldn't be a good deal as long as you don't get a shit sample.

Other similar monitors are the:

asus pg348q - identical panel, just different casing, stand, and OSD. Basically just choose the cheaper one since they're so similar.

hp omen x35 - it's a bit bigger than the asus and acer, has a steeper curve, and doesn't have the backlight bleed issues, but the panel is VA so the colors aren't as vibrant, and there's issues reported with flickering at 100hz, and image ghosting. I've seen a few people say they preferred the x34 to the omen, but this may depend on which pros and cons you weight more heavily.

AOC Agon AG352UCG - Identical panel to the omen, with all the same pros and cons. This monitor is to the omen what the x34 is to the pg348q. This one seems to be cheaper than all the other 3 (unavailable on amazon for the moment but I saw them on sale a few days ago), so for a budget option it's excellent. It basically makes the omen irrelevant since it doesn't justify the extra cost.

There's also the Acer x34p which is the next generation x34. It has a few nice improvements like a steeper curve, better OSD controls, no more glossy plastic surface, and a native 100hz (rather than an OC 100hz). Hopefully better QC as well. They've delayed it like 4 times and there's still no solid release date, but maybe by the time you've saved up it will be released?

Here is a nice review of the x34 to watch in the mean time. It literally delivers every spec I've been looking for in a monitor. I've seen some pretty nice sales on it, especially on refurb models so just keep your eyes open. Join us at /r/ultrawidemasterrace :) this monitor is a favorite over there so you'll see a lot of people talking about it, and just how great playing games in 21:9 is in general. To add a little more weight to my recommendation, gabe newell and terry crews are both using x34's (terry has 2 of them lol).

u/BiscuitInFlight · 2 pointsr/buildapc

No problem! I'd rather leave people with information instead of vague statements that leave them knowing what to do, but not WHY to do it haha. What's your budget for a monitor looking like? Because you can get a budget-minded 1080p screen like this that has amazing rgb color space accuracy/range at 99%. OR you can spend extra for the 4k and get something like this beast. Each one is great for design in their own rights but, of course, they're on different ends of the spectrum price-wise. It's all up to you, and your wallet! Honestly, if I were gaming on this rig, I'd probably get the budget monitor and put in a couple hundred for a decent gaming monitor as well! The 4k display is amazing if you're doing design, but the 6ms response time is less-than-optimal for competitive gaming. But if you aren't playing pvp-oriented games, you'd be absolutely fine!

Fractal design is well known for their compact and quiet designs, but if you just need something quiet with good airflow, and you've got the budget, I'd recommend getting something like the Be Quiet! Silent Base 800. BQ is one of the leading makers when it comes to insulated cases with amazing airflow and cooling capabilities. Only downside is, usually their cases aren't light at all haha. But as long as you aren't relying TOO much on mobility, they're a great pick!

u/vergingalactic · 1 pointr/hfr

Just throwing in my 2¢.

Thanks for asking. You had a relevant question and you weren't a dick about asking it so no rules broken my friend.

I have had a GN246HL 1080p144 TN for a while and ran it with a GTX 970 + i5-4690.

Assuming you have a recent core i5 then you'll be able to reach 144Hz in many games but you'll need to have a 7700k or something to ensure that the vast majority of games have minimum framerates over 100FPS.

Your 1060 assuming it's the 6GB is powerful enough for 1080p144 so no issues on that front. You'll need to play at medium to high settings in a lot of games to make sure to reach 120-144FPS and above.

With a 144Hz monitor, you are far less likely to see tearing or stuttering than with a 60Hz one. Adaptive sync is wonderful if you drop below 60FPS and want to keep a relatively smooth experience. While adaptive-sync is nice and if you had an RX 580 then I'd say get freesync but G-Sync is prohibitively expensive. If you play at med-high settings and get around 120 FPS or more then you're probably going to be comfortable with V-Sync off and the minimal screen tearing you might see. You can also use V-Sync at 72 FPS and crank the visuals which will provide a surprisingly significantly better experience than 60FPS.

I hope I explained that alright.

Anyways, I'd say my Acer is a decent monitor but that many other 1080p144 monitors are better.

This one at $170 appears to have some QA issues so you might need to return it but it's cheap and decent if it works:

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160313&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-PCPartPicker,%20LLC-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=10446076&PID=3938566&SID=

This one at $230 is probably the best 1080p144 TN monitor you can buy:

https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapcsales/comments/6r61s2/monitor_lg_24gm79gb_1920x1080p_144hz_1ms_freesync/

This one at $280 is the best 1080p144 monitor you can buy:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M1DEEYP/?tag=pcpapi-20

That Samsung CFG70 will have far far better colors and contrast than any TN monitor.

u/mmtree · 1 pointr/buildapc
No problem. I really don't know what monitor, but I HIGHLYYY suggest and almost as this point require you to get an IPS display lol...its BEAUTIFUL. There are some high end gaming ones(qniq or something) which are 1440p, IPS, 27", 120hz refresh rate gaming monitors. I think you can only buy them online though, never used or seen one.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CIZZ0QO/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1 I have this monitor as well as another older 24" TN monitor and the difference is night and day. I really like the one on that amazon page although I wish I had gone 27"(mainly because I have the space for it). I prefer matte finish over gloss, 2-5ms reponse time is the best you can get, and 60hz refresh is the standard(gaming monitors go to 120, but I dont think we have any besides the qniq that are IPS as well).

I7's are fine for multithreaded stuff(photoshop, video processing, animation, etc) and while some games may take advantage, it depends on what games you play. Most of the games right now utilize the GPU more so than the cpu(may change in a few years, nobody knows; i heard witcher 3 recommends an i7). If you WANT to spend the money, an i7 is fine to get. It might come in handy later, it might not which is why I didn't add it. It's not a bad idea, it's just that you may never utilize it fully. The i7 is on sale at microcenter right now so you'd be adding about 80$ to your build which at this point would probably be worth it(normally it's $339). I have a feeling you really want to spend the money and get something that will last so in that case getting 2x8gb of RAM would be worth it as well.

http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-4690K

http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-2187021/true-4790k-4690k-dont-benifit-gaming.html

With the i7 4790k and now I upped you to 16gb of 2x8gb RAM:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Type|Item|Price
----|:----|:----
CPU | Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor | $279.99 @ Micro Center
CPU Cooler | Noctua NH-D15 82.5 CFM CPU Cooler | $99.99 @ Newegg
Motherboard | MSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition ATX LGA1150 Motherboard | $99.99 @ Newegg
Memory | Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory | $119.99 @ Newegg
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive | $188.99 @ Amazon
Storage | Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive | $44.99 @ Amazon
Video Card | MSI GeForce GTX 980 4GB Twin Frozr Video Card | $549.99 @ SuperBiiz
Case | Fractal Design Define R5 (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case | $107.99 @ SuperBiiz
Power Supply | SeaSonic M12II 850W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply | $114.99 @ Amazon
Case Fan | Noctua NF-A14 PWM 82.5 CFM 140mm Fan | $23.99 @ Amazon
Case Fan | Noctua NF-A14 PWM 82.5 CFM 140mm Fan | $23.99 @ Amazon
| Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts |
| Total (before mail-in rebates) | $1674.89
| Mail-in rebates | -$20.00
| Total | $1654.89
| Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-03-13 21:20 EDT-0400 |

edit: http://www.amazon.com/BenQ-GW2765HT-27-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00KYCSRSG/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1426296104&sr=1-1&keywords=benq+27+inch+monitor+2560x1440 This is a decent monitor, I've heard good things about BenQ but never used one myself.

http://www.amazon.com/PB278Q-27-Inch-LED-lit-Professional-Graphics/dp/B009C3M7H0/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1426296300&sr=1-1 This is another Asus one you can look at.

You could also consider getting 2x24" IPS displays and setting them up side by side. The two I've listed below here are 2560x1440p so the resolution is much more than the 24" ones.
u/ottosunday · 1 pointr/Monitors

Here are two monitors I've heard nothing but good things about.
Here's the AOC and here's the Dell.

Both are 23", IPS, LED monitors at 1920x1080 and have 5ms refresh rates (pretty sure they use the same panels internally)

Dell ultrasharps are awesome, but cost you an arm, leg or kidney to afford usually.

For eye strain in particular:

I'd recommend calibrating your monitors to make sure they're at their optimal visual settings for the environment they're used in since out of the box most monitors are off color wise and in brightness levels.

A couple of other alternatives are using a pair of Gunnar Monitor Glasses, which are a bit expensive so I wouldn't recommend buying them retail but they come on sales every now and then on Woot! offs or Woot! sales for about $30 which is where I got mine. They work well and I mostly use them when I know I'm gonna pull an all nighter for papers and will be staring at a screen for a while but I don't use them regularly.

Another free alternative is using Flux software on you're computer so brightness and color intensity adjust to the time of the day, which results in less eye strain and better sleep for those who use the computer before bed. The only downside to it is that it tints the colors on your monitor and reduces accuracy but this can be turned off for a portion of time for things like gaming, photo/video editing or movies.

The last and final thing I'm gonna mention as a side not is Lightpack. Aside from it being incredibly awesome in general for everything from movies, to games, to ambiance it's also supposed to reduce eye strain. It's still in it's Kickstarter phase (I backed it for 2 kits) but when it's released as a consumer product you might want to consider looking into them.

Hope some of this helped!

u/jadiii · 1 pointr/Monitors

For posterity:


I ended up going with an ultrawide, despite the lack of service on the past of some content distributors. Specifically, the LG 29UM68 29-inch 21:9 UltraWide IPS Monitor.


Since the LG 25UM58-P 25-Inch 21:9 UltraWide IPS Monitor was already at my place, I had an emotional reaction to the styling, menu system and single joystick control on the middle of the underside of the monitor, and didn’t really want to go for another manufacturer. I had to counter this bias with a ton of research, and ended up going to Fry’s and Best Buy to check out monitors in person.


It was at this point I realized I could get the LG 29” 29UM68 for $250 at Fry’s, or price match at Best Buy, and there was no 27” panel that came close to what I wanted. So I brought home the 29UM60 (they didn’t have the 68, which has 2 HDMI/1DP ports, as opposed to the 60 which has 1HDMI/1DP), but I knew I’d be testing it and returning it for a *68 online at the same price.


Once I had the 29” widescreen at home, I realized it was exactly what I wanted and for the right price, and so I found a deal at MicroCenter (still available) and Amazon (although that one ended today, sadly) for the 29UM68 at $250, and will be returning the 29UM60 I got at Best Buy.


The personal drawbacks, which are all acceptable to me, include imperfect blacks when watching movies. This is due in part to the inherent qualities of IPS panels including factors like light bleeding, although it is minimal on the 29UM60 and your brain almost immediately ignores it, unless you’re color correcting, etc. (go brain). Will try to test the 29UM60 and the 29UM68 side by side when the 68 arrives. I’ve also heard from an unreliable source that the 68 is am updated version of the 67 that has improved backlight bleed. I can not confirm this at this time, but hey, information. Also, the older 67 is supposed to have 8 bit native color, as opposed to the 68’s 6bit+FRC, but I have not jumped into research on this at all. There is also apparently a 69 version that appears on the Newegg site, which is an updated 67 (as the 29UM68 is the next model of the 29UM58, I postulate), but I have not begun research on the 69 either.


In terms of personal usage. I’ve realized I can live my life finding workarounds to window-boxing (which is black bars around all sides) on services like Netflix, Amazon Prime video, etc, until these services catch up to service Ultrawide users. Also, pillar-boxing (black bars on the sides, E.g. watching a TV show on your ultrawide monitor) is totally fine, and I, at least, adjusted to it as normal very quickly.

Finally, 2560x1080 is a great resolution. I’m powering it with the super budget rig above, and can play story-focused games on it like the The Witcher 3, with cinematic immersion. To be fair, this won’t work for many gamers, especially those who have seen the light of 144hz. Also the resolution is close to the DPI of 1920x1080 on a 24” monitor, which I find comfortable and have enjoyed for the past 6 years.

Conclusion

Coming from a filmmaker, it’s almost a philosophical alignment with widescreen 21:9 as normal/native, over TV’s 16:9 as normal/native, that truly motivated my decision as much as the crazy $250 deal.

Aspect Ratio P.S.

Technically the screen resolution is not 21:9, it’s 64:27 (or 2.370:1). Link goes to wiki article as a jump off point, if you want to learn more about the technical aspects and history of aspect ratios.

edit: duplicated text, syntax, typos, clerical errors, missing words and content.

u/PatriotsWinSB53 · 2 pointsr/nfl

Likely going with the 2080ti over the 2080 because i'll be playing pretty much nothing but 3440x1440 for a long while which can be a fair bit more demanding than normal 1440p, so id rather pony up the extra money and have better performance for a fair while longer than I would with the 2080.

https://www.amazon.com/Dell-Alienware-Monitor-Resolution-Overclocked/dp/B0777RY75V

Ignore that its alienware and ive heard nothing but fantastic things about this monitor. Im 100% going for a 3440x1440p monitor, and the selection on those is a bit more limited so I decided to research for a while and this is the one that came out as my favorite For 3440 100hz, Its pretty tough to find anything below 600 or 700. Im spending a fair bit on hardware and feel like itd be pointless to get anything below 100hz. Im finally in a situation where I can afford to build a PC and have a bit of money to enjoy life with, which is a position ive never been.

All in all id rather pony up some extra $$$ for the premium stuff because I finally can. The monitor is expensive as all hell but its huge, 3440x1440p, and its a IPS with a low response time. Id rather it look pretty AND feel great to play, rather than sticking to 1080p and playing on a much smaller monitor that wont look nearly as nice. Dont get me wrong 4k is nice and all but fuck paying a ton of money to play something at 60fps at best. UW 1440p just feels like the sweet spot with best of both worlds.

u/homietron5000 · 1 pointr/Monitors

Depends on your budget, bud.

I assume you know what things like refresh rate are, and what IPS/TN panels are. If not, [here's] (http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/r/refrrate.htm) a quick definition of what refresh rate is, and a [video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8Y26Uq07Kw) on the differences between IPS and TN panels. Also, consider Freesync. Here's a [video on what that is] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ey-KObDABI).

Now that you've gotten settled, I'll give you some options :)

[Acer XG270HU] (http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XG270HU-omidpx-FREESYNC-Widescreen/dp/B00VRCLHYS/ref=sr_1_1?tag=amazon0606-20&ie=UTF8&qid=1430272001&sr=8-1&keywords=acer+xg270hu+omidpx) $419

[Asus MG279] (http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XG270HU-omidpx-FREESYNC-Widescreen/dp/B00VRCLHYS/ref=sr_1_1?tag=amazon0606-20&ie=UTF8&qid=1430272001&sr=8-1&keywords=acer+xg270hu+omidpx) $600

[LG Electronics 34UM67] (http://www.amazon.com/LG-Electronics-34UM67-34-Inch-LED-lit/dp/B00VBNQJSM/ref=sr_1_2?tag=amazon0606-20&ie=UTF8&qid=1431886478&sr=8-2&keywords=29UM67) $500

[Acer XR341CK] (http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XR341CK-bmijpphz-34-inch-UltraWide/dp/B0111MRT90/ref=sr_1_15?tag=amazon0606-20&s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1436945804&sr=1-15&keywords=3440x1440) ~$1000

[Acer G257HU] (http://www.amazon.com/Acer-G257HU-smidpx-25-Inch-Widescreen/dp/B00QS0AKVK?tag=amazon0606-20) $260 -- this is a really good monitor for the price if you're on a budget. It doesn't have freesync, but it's great for the price if you don't care about screen tear. Hey, that rhymes! LOL

[Acer H277H] (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0148NNKU6/ref=twister_B016E49WWW?tag=amazon0606-20&_encoding=UTF8&psc=1) $280 same goes for this one! it's 1080p so it won't be taxing on your system like 4K would. 1440p isn't that taxing as well if you adjust your settings :)

If you are playing FPS shooters, having freesync could be a beneficial thing for you :) so consider that!

Hope this helps!

EDIT: quick side note! WAIT FOR COMPUTEX BEFORE YOU BUY ANYTHING! I can't tell you how many times people buy hardware before new ones get announced/come out, and then they beat themselves up. Consider these options as a pathway, but you should 1. Do more research on the things you look for in a monitor besides the things I've mentioned before and 2. Wait until something better gets released since you said you are planning to do a PC build in the near future. Wait for AMD's new architecture, named Polaris, to drop. Wait for benchmarks. Wait for monitors at computex to be announced, and then make a decision! :) All these things can help.

Why? Because I'm planning to do a PC build myself in the near future! :)

u/charliefuckstick · 2 pointsr/techsupport

With your CPU usage being that high, open task manager and find out what's using most of your resources. Prebuilts often come with a ton of manufacturer's bloatware.

Otherwise, there's not really a whole lot else worth straight up upgrading in your system right now. The 7700 is a great CPU, and the 1070 is a great GPU. You're at 1080p60, so there's not really a lot more performance you can squeeze out of that resolution/refresh rate for games. Nvidia's RTX cards just launched, but there's really no data for them other than they're the standard improvement over last gen's cards since literally nothing supports ray tracing yet. There's info circulating around AMD putting up GPUs on a 7nm process soon, but same with the RTX cards, it's probably wise to wait until more information is available before deciding on either. However, the 1080ti is likely going to take a dive in price pretty soon given the RTX release and Nvidia coming back into possession of thousands of Pascal boards once the crypto market demand died down. If you decide to step up your GPU, you might want to check into higher resolution and higher refresh panels as well, as there's not really more performance you can squeeze out of 1080p60 by upgrading your hardware. I've got this 1440p144hz panel and this 4k60 panel, and they're both outstanding performers for the price. You'd definitely need to up your GPU to drive them to their full potential, but it kinda sounds like you're thinking about doing that anyway, and like I said there's really not a whole lot more you can get out of 1080p60 that you aren't already getting out of your current hardware.

As for your CPU, not really a whole lot of point in upgrading there. Coffee Lake is just a hardware refresh of Kaby Lake [your CPU family], and Kaby Lake is just a hardware refresh of Skylake. It's a quad-core cpu, but it's hyperthreaded, which means it essentially functions as an 8-core. There's really no reason to put money into upgrading it until something actually better comes along.

But then again, these could all be totally moot points. Building a pc is a lot of fun and a great way to get to know every single bit of hardware in your rig. Given that you've already got a very well-performing pc, it might be worth your while to just put down some cash for an inexpensive pc just to fuck around with, like a Ryzen 3 GT 1030 build. It's a great way to learn more about hardware and how it interacts with your os without having to put down a ton of money, and it isn't necessarily devastating if you break your OS tinkering because all your more important data is elsewhere.

u/quantumm313 · 2 pointsr/buildapc

To save on money I'd definitely go with something like this; the AMD processor shown here has a Radeon Vega 8 integrated GPU so you don't need a dedicated graphics card until (if) you decide to upgrade.

If you take u/x3lr4's advice and upgrade to a gen 3 Ryzen, know you will most likely have to update the BIOS of the motherboard before it will work. It isn't really difficult, but you should be aware that will be a thing to do before you swap it out.

Another way to save a bit of money is to go with 8GB ram instead of 16. It's true that the GPU/CPU will be sharing the system memory with an integrated chip, but the graphics will be more limiting than the RAM.

There's a pretty decent inexpensive monitor from Acer here. Only $89 and still 2k. It has HDMI but no display port. Still though, its good enough for a Vega 8 machine. With these two changes to the above list, you'd save $100 from switching monitors and ~$40 from dropping to 8GB ram. You'd be pushing costs out to when you upgrade rather than when you are loading in, but it would be worth it.

​

A Ryzen 5 2400G has an integrated Vega 11 GPU; this benchmarks much better than the Vega 8 (they are almost if not completely identical hardware, but the 11 has all the features "turned on") and would cost you ~$40 more. If you drop to 8GB ram, I'd say the money would be used better here. You get a better CPU and better graphics, without having to spend the money on a separate card. This still benchmarks worse than the RX570 suggested in another post, but a dedicated card will always be better. This processor still would give you ~78FPS in CS:GO and ~89FPS in LoL. If you want a build with a dedicated graphics card, its hard to beat u/Pillclinton710's list.

u/Zerim · 1 pointr/Bravenewbies

I've been helping people pick computer parts a lot lately, and here's my go-to current build (as in, where I feel price/performance is optimized)--it's usually around $1000, NOT including monitors. I built two for my company (minus the video card), and they are wonderful. If you want to compare: CPUs, GPUs.

>Case: Corsair 200R, $73

>http://www.amazon.com/Corsair-Carbide-200R-Compact-CC-9011023-WW/dp/B009GXZ8MM/

>Cases cheaper than this price point will become flimsy, break, literally cut you, and otherwise fall apart over time. I like the way the 200R is, too--no LEDs, no weird shapes, and 2.5" drive slots.

-

>Motherboard: Asus Z97-A, $145

>http://www.amazon.com/ASUS-Z97-A-DDR3-2600-Motherboards/dp/B00K2MAU5Q/

>This is a medium range motherboard with PWM case fan pins: an extremely quiet combo. It's more important than you think.

-

>CPU: i7-4790K, $336

>http://www.amazon.com/Intel-i7-4790K-Processor-Cache-BX80646I74790K/dp/B00KPRWAX8/

>While we're on CPUs: GHZ MEANS ALMOST NOTHING FOR PERFORMANCE. My 2Ghz i7 in my Mac outperforms my 4Ghz 2500K in my desktop. It's annoying that it's even mentioned in anything but overclocking guides.

-

>Memory: 16GB Corsair Vengeance (2x8GB), $130

>http://www.amazon.com/Corsair-Vengeance-Desktop-Memory-CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10/dp/B006EWUO22/

>I find myself always using >8GB. Task Manager tells me I'm at 9GB with lots apps but no actual games open.

-

>Graphics Card: EVGA GTX 960, $210

>http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Dual-Link-Graphics-02G-P4-2966-KR/dp/B00SC6HAS4/

>The 960 was recently released, but the 750 and the 900 series are very powerful and power efficient, and EVGA makes great cards.

-

>PSU: Corsair CX 600W, $60

>http://www.amazon.com/Corsair-Builder-Watt-EPS%C2%A0-CX600/dp/B0092ML0OC/

>I skimped on a PSU once (it was "Diablotek"). It took my motherboard and a stick of RAM with it when it died.

-

>SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB, $135

>http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2-5-Inch-Internal-MZ-75E250B-AM/dp/B00OAJ412U/

-

>OS: Windows 8.1 Full Version (not OEM), $100:

>http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-8-1-Full-Version/dp/B00EDSI7QO/

Current total: $1189 + tax, way over budget, so...


>The PSU can be replaced with a 500W EVGA for $17 less:

>http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-80PLUS-Certified-ATX12V-100-W1-0500-KR/dp/B00H33SFJU

-

>The SSD can be replaced by a 2TB 7200RPM drive, where you won't need a 2nd HDD but booting will be much slower, for $60 less:

>http://www.amazon.com/HGST-Deskstar-3-5-Inch-7200RPM-Internal/dp/B003GSLDRC/
(and get the sata3 monoprice cable)

-

>The GPU can be replaced by a GTX 750 Ti, for $65 less, but at a ~30% loss to graphics power (although it's still a great card):

>http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-Superclock-Dual-Link-Graphics-02G-P4-3753-KR/dp/B00IDG3IDO

-

>The CPU can be a non-K version (at very little/no performance loss), for $36 less:

>http://www.amazon.com/Intel-Core-i7-4790-Processor-BX80646I74790/dp/B00J56YSLM

>The next step down in terms of CPU is an i5-4690, at ~30% less CPU power, for $80 less. I personally wouldn't go there.

This is at $1015 + tax--still over budget, but going much cheaper really starts to bite into your experiences (and if anyone here can recommend anything to save money, I welcome it).


As for monitors, if you're playing EVE, honestly I'd recommend a 2560x1440 monitor because spreadsheets. However, since those start around $300, my go-to cheaper monitors are the not-bad 22" 1080p ones that can be had for around $140.

>BenQ 24" flicker-free (for comfortable viewing) 1080p TN panel (for faster response times), $140:

>http://www.amazon.com/BenQ-GL2460HM-24-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00IKDFL4O/

-

>Dell 22" 1080p IPS panel (for better colors and viewing angles), $134:

>http://www.amazon.com/Dell-CFGKT-IPS-LED-21-5-Inch-LED-lit-Monitor/dp/B009H0XQPU/

Source: I've done IT for the past few years, and done dozens of computer purchases/builds.

Notes: I don't buy AMD or ATI unless it's an extreme budget build. I don't buy off-brand because I've had parts break and then not have an RMA available; I've had good experience and RMA support with Corsair and EVGA. You don't really need a CD/DVD drive; you can install Windows from a USB key, but if you're unsure, CD/DVD drives are like $15. If you go with Intel/nVidia Maxwell, you won't really need a >500W PSU.

I don't like to skimp on computers much because, economically, if you're spending even 5-10% of your time waiting for your computer and you earn $10-25/hr, $1000 is paid for in somewhere between 2000-250 hours of use, yet the computer will last at least 3-5 years.

u/Paper_Weapon · 1 pointr/starcitizen

I have actually been doing a lot of research on this lately, though my research was more of whether to go ultra wide, or triple monitor. From my research:

4K is not a good option for anyone, what you gain in resolution is nowhere near worth what you lose in performance. It is both tougher to handle for your GPU, and also can only support up to a 60hz refresh rate, which is /not/ where you want to be for a game like this.

1440p, 27" is probably the way to go if you want the best gaming performance for a single monitor. You're going to get awesome resolution, and that will come with a lighting fast 144 hz (165 hz OC) refresh rate. It is going to be smooth and beautiful. If you can afford it, get a monitor with G-sync (assuming you have an Nvidia card) for extra smoothness.

If you want to really get awesome immersion out of a single monitor, go for an ultrawide. You'll probably want 1440p, since the increased aspect ratio can actually look a bit worse if you only get the 1080p, than a 1080p in the 16:9 aspect ratio. The best refresh rate you can get right now is 100 hz (120 hz OC), but most people I think would tell you that 100 hz is plenty (whereas most people would tell you that 60 hz noticeably harms FPS).

If you don't mind a little bezel, and money and desk space are not limiting factors, get a triple 27" 1440p 144hz monitor setup. You will have the best immersion and most utility for other sorts of productivity. Note the money aspect also includes the fact that you need a top GPU (probably 2 in SLI to really get the best FPS out of this setup).

If you absolutely only care about the beauty of your picture, and you don't intend to get in much combat so the FPS hit isn't a big deal, then 4K may actually be right for you.

*edit: I'm probably going with this ultrawide:

https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B01C83BE6U/_encoding=UTF8?coliid=I2MBYT3QTVEXCZ&colid=54F96QSRRDJE

Though I have a nice GPU (980 ti), I only have one, and don't want to get a second in SLI when I plan to just upgrade to the 2-years-ish from now generation when I start to feel the age of this one. I also have a limited deskspace to work with. Because of those factors, I don't think triple monitor is right for me. Because I want to increase the immersive feeling, I feel that then ultra wide is going to be the best option for me. Through research, the top two monitors are the one I linked and the Acer Predator x34. You can't go wrong with either.

u/LBGW_experiment · 3 pointsr/ultrawidemasterrace

Well, you have a few options. Depending on your price range, you can go with 2560x1080 which come in 25" (don't bother), 29" (sweet spot for ppi, same as 24"/25" 16:9 monitors), 34", or 35" (specifically the z35 for g-sync or xz35 for freesync). Benefit of 2560x1080 is being able to generally saturate the max refresh rate of your monitor, given the gpu you have and are going to buy. Only downside I can think of is with making such a long-term purchase as a monitor, you're "only" getting 1080p, but I don't really see that as an issue as others might. Also, most of these monitors only go up to 75hz, only the very high end cards reach any higher, and those are usually either g-sync for the acer x34 which goes to 100hz @ 1440p or the acer (x)z35 which goes to I think 144hz @ 1080p.

There are also 3440x1440 monitors and those usually only come in 34". I can't think of any other sizes, someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Also, do you want curved or not? I don't have an ultrawide but I've been researching them for a couple years now and I think it comes down to the size of the monitor. I think 25" and 29" ultrawides are fine for being flat, since they're only so wide but once you get into 34" territory, it would be such a large screen that it is beneficial to have the curve, which is pretty much what the market really offers: no curved 25" or 29" and most, if not all, 34" are curved. The curve helps keep the same distance from each edge of the screen to your eyes the same. These do come at a higher price, though.

Prices for each respective size

u/HMKS · 1 pointr/bapcsalescanada

I haven't used the e243 myself, but a quick google search shows that it's an IPS monitor at around $270 or so.
You'll get better color quality on an IPS monitor compared to a TN monitor, but it's honestly not much of an issue for me while gaming. I have an IPS monitor next to my XG2401. The XG2401 does an excellent job with it's color/image quality compared to the IPS monitor I have. In general, TN monitors will have a hard time competing with IPS monitors in that regard.

But you'll be running at around 60 FPS on the HP monitor (IPS monitors in that price range generally don't go above a 75 Hz refresh rate). Not that going above 60 FPS is a necessity unless you're extremely competitive and play shooter games or something like League of Legends or similar games. It's always nice having a higher refresh rate, and at a $30 difference I'd say the XG2401 is the clear winner.

Only reason higher refresh rates might not be an issue for your son father (right now) is due to the GPU he's running and what settings he's playing his games on.

Honestly, without getting into too much detail, you'll probably get more out of the XG2401 vs the HP monitor, but it's $25 over budget for you I think.
Going off the reviews alone, it seems like the XG2401 would be a safer bet.

There are other options available though if you decide to do some more research.
ASUS VG245H for instance (although I've never used it and just pulled it off PC Part Picker).
ca.pcpartpicker should give you an idea about what's available. You could also check the sidebar on /r/monitors for recommended monitors and what to look for in monitors.

u/danxorhs · 1 pointr/buildapcforme

Alright let me break down my questions/statements!

u/Shandod · 3 pointsr/buildapcforme

Fantastic list, thank you very much!

Thank you especially for the extra effort to make things quiet.

@CPU Cooler: Sounds like the Thermalright might be best bet, just to save a few bucks for essentially same thing.

@Case: I'll have to compare the cases, but I do like the look of both of them. Nice find.

@PSU: I'd probably just go for the Corsair power supply, not much savings on that EVGA one for the issues you mentioned.

@Monitor: Looks like a fantastic monitor, I'm just finding it hard to stomach the prices on these 144hz monitors. I'm sure they look like butter on the eyes, but that's a steep price. I'm so used to 45hz, I can't even imagine 100 more, haha! I was looking at this monitor, was curious if you could give me your thoughts on it?

Also, thanks for the tip about Adorama! I've never heard of them but that's good to keep in mind. Sales tax adds up.

u/Treq-S · 1 pointr/GlobalOffensive

anyone on here or on /r/pcmasterrace or /r/buildapc would give you the same advice im gonna give you now which is: build a pc.. buy different PC parts by choosing them from different places where they are either given a discount or are most accessible..

if what you're talking about is a pre-built (a whole PC built by a brand which they sells as a whole) it usually comes with a premium price.. and you can usually get better PC with that price if u build instead..

if you want to ONLY play CSGO on your PC then i suggest the following:

CPU: Intel i5 4590 or i5 4690K (if you wanna overclock)

GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 960 (Asus Strix) or AMD Radeon R9 380 (sapphire nitro). Get the 4GB version if you're getting nvidia.

Motherboard: since you're not a power user, I'd recommend a cheap intel B85 chipset.. but if you're overclocking msi's z97 motherboards are pretty nice.

RAM: Gskill/corsair 16 GB DDR3 1600 MHz

Mouse: logitech G502 is one of the best mice around for FPS... if you want you can also get the budget G502 which is logitech G402.

Monitor: now if you're playing CSGO and u want smooth experience, heres where you're gonna have to spend hard.. get a 144 Hz monitor and trust me, you wont ever look back. [look at this monitor by Acer] (http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XB270HU-bprz-27-inch-Widescreen/dp/B00UPVXDA8/?tag=amazon0606-20)... i linked acer since you said you can get a deal from acer...

however, [look at this list of 144Hz monitors] (http://www.144hzmonitors.com/list/) and see which one suits you better.. couple of things to remember though:

  1. if you're getting an AMD card, try to get a monitor which has 'FreeSync' and if you're going for nVidia, get a monitor with 'G-sync'. *note: this isnt necessary but it smoothens the viewing experience by synchronizing the frames produced by GPU with monitors output system (i could explain it but i have a f
  2. IPS panels and better than TN panels (in terms of color and viewing angles) but they also cost more.
  3. dont go for 1080p or Full HD monitors if you're going above 24" inch monitors.. if you're getting a 27", try to get a 1440p (QHD) monitor. Note: this is a personal opinion that above 24" begs little more resolution than 1080p

    this is just a very abridged suggestion about what you should buy.. you definitely will get wayy better suggestions in /r/pcmasterrace and/or in /r/buildapc

    good luck!

    edit: Other peripherals such as power supply, hard drive/ssd, keyboard, casing are not gonna be that important for CSGO so im gonna leave them out of my list for you. you can get advice on them in the subs mentioned above.
u/dotapack · 5 pointsr/learndota2

Going from a 60htz refresh rate to a 120 or 144htz display makes everything with motion on your screen appear to be smoother and less blurry for things happening on the fringes of your eye's immediate focus. I know instantly when I'm on a faster screen because when I move the mouse and follow it with my eyes, it appears to move smoothly without any chop at all. There's a reason why some of the players from past TI's or Majors would immediately upgrade their monitors after the event (there are reddit posts about this), it's because they had no idea such a silky smooth (for everything moving that you're looking directly at) experience could be enjoyed in real time. A good TV will just delay your viewing by a fraction of a second to give you a smooth looking high refresh rate. (it takes enormous graphics power to render 144htz). This is unacceptable in gaming, you need a quality rig/monitor to process and display what you are seeing in real time. But if you have watched sports on a really good TV and noticed how smooth everything is and how much your eyes can relax and take in more information as a result, you can have an idea how much of a blessing it is to have the screen refreshing faster.


I'm spending my precious drinking time (I'm not even wasting time at work) writing this to tell you OP, that the best purchase of my life, including my manual trany pickup truck which I am really fond of, is
my 144 screen. It's an expensive monitor, but I would have spent twice as much to have the joy it brings me every day. When I use any computer besides my gaming rig and move the mouse, I immediately think about how blessed I am to own one of these. Everything is actually smooth on one of these screens, but your eyes are playing tricks on you with a regular screen, telling you it's smooth even though it's not at all.

Edit: This video can help you understand what is going on with a fast screen and your eyes. It's hard to explain in words. https://youtu.be/vNb3X1AM6uI

TLDR: Faster screens (which need faster graphics cards to run) provide endless joy and some advantage as well. If you haven't tried a fast monitor before, find one or a TV that refreshes really fast and allow your eyes to relax for a second and decide if it's going to be a good life purchase.

u/Warskull · 1 pointr/SiegeAcademy

First off, before you even think about investing in a 144Hz monitor, can your GPU give you the framerate you want in this game?

Beyond that, monitor technology is to the point where everything is pretty good. The more expensive ones support things like HDR or are ultrawides.

You have three panel techs, TN, VA, and IPS. TN is the older tech, it is cheaper to make and tends to have better response times. IPS has superior color and viewing angle, but the response times and refresh rates suffer as a result. VA panels are in the middle. You can still get excellent response times on VA and IPS monitors, but they will be a lot more expensive as a result.

Viewsonic and Acer makes some really good 1080p 144Hz monitors. They offer great budget TN panels. You can get 24 inches 1080p for about $200.

Viewsonic is probably the best budget option.

Samsung has some VA panel for a bit more. You'll get a nicer image.

If you have a good graphics card and are ok with spending a bit more Acer has a good 1440p monitor.

If you start going into higher end tech like HDR the prices start to go way up.

u/yperite · 1 pointr/buildmeapc

you're only restricted by price. The 1080 will run everything easily. What I would recommend is something like a 34" 21:9 monitor like this. It's a large monitor, with an odd aspect ratio of 21:9, but I have one and I love it. It is especially great for running excel alongside other programs as the large monitor basically is two monitors, there is just no bezel in the middle. It will make games more fun too, seeing more peripheral. You can get this within your budget by switching that large M2 drive for a smaller one or replacing it with a normal SSD and your cost will be under the $2500. I think the 21:9 monitors are great for productivity, and I just love the look of them as well. There are many so you can shop around and see what you like. But you have a hefty budget and should be fine.

u/dxrion · 8 pointsr/buildapc

i'll save you some time.

 

the top 1080p 144hz 1ms TN Panel they recommend over there on every post that asks, #1 is the Viewsonic XG2401

& #2 is the LG 24GM77-B

they say these two have the best color accuracy for a tn.

 

i recommend the Samsung CFG70

it has better color accuracy than both of those monitors above (because it's a VA panel and not a TN) and colors look as good as on my other IPS display IMO. (IPS panels have the best color accuracy)
and it has great viewing angles unlike a TN panel.
also it's $70 off rn. i really wouldn't pass this offer up as you're getting better color accuracy and better viewing angles for only $20 more than the Viewsonic.

 

good luck (:

u/DeoxyriBROse · 1 pointr/buildapc

(Tried to make a post about this but doesn't seem to go through, probably because it belongs here)

So I'm trying to narrow down choices for monitors under $150, been looking around and also thanks to Techsource's video I've got the four I think I want to choose from, and just wanted to see if anyone else has any feedback. All links are amazon as I have a giftcard Im able to put towards it, unless some crazy sale goes on soon.



  1. > Acer H236HL bid 23-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor
    • Pros: WIDESCREEEEEN
    • Cons: $10 over buget, and easily the most expensive choice. No VESA mount support as well (choosing this monitor would pretty much depend on how the widescreen would actually look vs having dual screens; if I can I'd try to find this one IRL to get a feel for it)


  2. Acer G236HL Bbd 23-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor
    • Pros: cheapest option
    • Cons: no VESA mount support

  3. ASUS VS238H-P 23" Full HD 1920x1080 2ms HDMI DVI-D VGA Back-lit LED Monitor
    • Pros: VESA mount support and has a mail in rebate


  4. AOC i2367Fh 23-Inch IPS Frameless LED-Lit Monitor
    • Pros: VESA mount support, and super narrow bezels



      Im not looking for anything larger than 24, and for the build I plan on I won't be going above 1080p resolution. The 3 non-widescreen monitors I know are super popular, but I included the widescreen because although I plan on gaming I am still in school and in a little over a year will be starting medical school so I would love a widescreen for productivity (though Im not sure if it would be worth a single widescreen vs Dual monitors, since this widescreen is only 23 Im not sure if it would be any different than the other choices).

      Im not sure what to think about the VESA mounting options, as Im not sure if I would end up mounting a monitor so for now lack of VESA isn't necessarily a con.


      Any feedback/advice is appreciated! Thanks!!!!
u/Xazes · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

It depends on what your are looking for and what type of system you have.

First of all for both high resolutions and higher refresh rates you will need a beefier set up than you would for standard 1080p.

The detail you get from a particular resolution is in a way dependent on the size of the monitor. As I understand it 1080p will always be the same amount of pixels regardless of the size of the screen. Therefore as the screen gets bigger you are increasing the area while maintaining the same amount of pixels and decreasing visible detail.

This is much more important for monitors as you sit much closer to them than you do a TV (turn on your TV and stand very close to it, unless it's 4k the image will likely look worse than if you were sitting further away). So as your monitor size gets bigger than higher resolutions show more benefit.

Now what do you want from your monitor? Higher fresh rates and low response times are great for competitive shooters and the like. Depending on your set up and the games you want to play competitively it might be best to stick with 1080p so you can hit those high frame rates.

The higher fresh rate monitors, however, often come in TN panels which have lower color accuracy than IPS. So if you want great colors and are okay with sacrificing some response time you might want to go for that.

Going into 4k you will definitely need a very powerful system to get playable frame rates at higher detail setting. Don't expect to come close to 144fps.

Finally another option is going for an ultra wide monitor, which is what I have in my current setup. These monitors come in 1080p and 1440p though I definitely recommend the latter. Ultra wide monitors offer excellent immersion and extra productivity (more screen space with 3440x1440). Ultra wides do push more pixels than standard 1080p or 1440p so be aware that it will be more taxing on your system. If you do decide to go for an ultra wide I would also recommend that you get the 34 inch variant.

Edit: This is the monitor I currently use: https://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-34-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00PXYRMPE The dell U3415W has an IPS panel at 60hz with 4-5ms response time. I've beaten the new Doom with it and never noticed any input lag. That being said I am very partial to IPS panels and my last monitor had similar specs in that regard so I might just be used to it. Getting an Ultra Wide monitor is probably the single best improvement I've had to my gaming experience.

u/I3igAl · 1 pointr/buildapc

upgrading from 6600k to 6700k will get you the following benefits:
 
500Mhz extra base clock speeds and 300Mhz extra Turbo (irrelevant with overclocking)
2Mb extra L3 cache (Very little to zero impact on anything for personal use, this holds stuff so the cpu doesnt have to talk to the RAM)
HyperThreading to give you 8 cores instead of 4 cores (no effect on games)
 
If you ever are going to use your computer for multi threaded applications like 3d rendering, video editing, and CAD, the 6700k will give you a boost in performance that leads to time saved waiting for stuff to happen. This boost would be nice to have but not crippling to miss out on in any means.
 
If you are rarely or never going to do the above in a serious manner, buy the 6600k and spend the money on a nice pair of headphones, a keyboard, or a big IPS panel monitor; something you will appreciate every time you use it.
 
Regarding Monitors: 144Hz is a totally subjective benefit. It allows you to play games at a true 144 FPS, but you have to have a GPU that can push your games at 144 FPS consistently. You also have to get a TN panel or pay a premium to get an IPS panel (TN has a faster response rate for less blur but IPS has much better colors).
 
I personally bought a Dell P2715Q for the great color, 4k res, and the ability to connect my xbox. a used one from amazon is about half the price of a 144hz gaming monitor.

u/Arp590 · 1 pointr/buildapc

I successfully built the PC last week and everything is good! Thanks again for all your help.
I'm still waiting for the gpu.
BUT I just bought a 4k monitor because I got excited lol.. was $300
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00YD3DBOC/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER

So I have the 144hz monitor that you recommended and a different monitor(will probably return)

What should I do from here? Would it be fine to use this 4k monitor in 1440? It seems this monitor was cheaper than most 1440 monitors.
I would probably play my higher fps games on the original 144hz you recommended and Witcher 3 type games on this 4k monitor.
Should I go for a better gpu? Is 4k an option or would I need like a 1070?
I guess both my monitors would have AMD Free Sync.. so am I stuck with getting an AMD card or would a Nvidia card be fine with this? I thought I read that there was a free sync Nvidia hack to get it to work with it.

u/jaykresge · 3 pointsr/Monitors

I think that the best compromise that I can recommend is going to stretch your budget a little bit, but please let me know if this will work for you.

BenQ GW2765HT - Typically $300-$350

  • [Product Info Page] (http://www.benq.us/product/monitor/gw2765ht/)
  • [Newegg Listing] (https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824014383)
  • [Amazon Listing] (https://smile.amazon.com/BenQ-GW2765HT-27-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00KYCSRSG/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8)
  • [TFTCentral Review] (http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/benq_gw2765ht.htm)
  • [The Wire Cutter] (http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-27-inch-monitor/)

    This is a 27", 1440p, 60hz, IPS-like (AHVA) display. It has solid color pre-sets out of the box, among the better options for a budget, non-calibrated display. It will look significantly better than the TN options in this price range. It also has a fully adjustable ergonomic stand and VESA mounting support.

    It has adequate response times for a 60hz display, as ghosting and overshoot are minimal. Input lag is typical for a non-gaming display, that is slightly better than my Dell U2717D at just under 19ms. This may sound bad, but it's typical, and unless you're a highly competitive gamer, it won't matter. It's better than 99% of televisions.

    It's a great budget display that is well rounded. It doesn't excel in any one area, but it's not delinquent in any one area. It has a solid overall picture quality (and if you're used to <$200 and/or TN displays, the picture may just blow you away).

    For a similar amount, the best you can really do are the 24" (and maybe 27") 1080p 144hz TN and VA sets, which simply do not hold a candle to this display in picture quality, but will beat it in terms of gaming responsiveness. Since you're trying to balance between gaming and semi-professional use, I'd go with the BenQ.

    If you find a way to stretch your budget further, the Dell U2717D is a superior choice. It comes factory calibrated, and uses a Samsung PLS panel that is lower glow, with better overall build quality, and an integrated 4-port USB 3.0 hub. But that will add another ~$100 to the price tag.

    Let me know if this is useful, or if you're dead set on a ~$200 price point, and I'll try to tailor my recommendations to that. Just keep in mind that 1440p is virtually out of the question in that segment.

    EDIT: Also using a GTX 1060 6GB with my Dell, and gaming is enjoyable.
u/Whycanyounotsee · 2 pointsr/smashbros

any benq/asus monitor made after 2014 is the best. you could spend $300+ to get the newest monitors but seriously just buy a $80 benq/asus that supports 1080p+60fps if its just going to be used for netplay. It can also double as a current gen console monitor.

edit: make sure your computer is compatible. if your pc only had DVI/VGA output, don't buy a monitor that only has HDMI input.

here are some you could buy

asus

benq - note you can select a 22inch monitor on this page and get it for $90. Most pro gamers play on 20-24 inch with some using 27.

you can also get some good deals on ebay. a lot of people like upgrading to 120/144/240fps or higher res after gaming for awhile so you can pick up their old perfectly fine monitor.

you can also visit displaylagdatabase website. It has a list of a good number of monitors (literally 100s but theres like 10,000+ monitors so), so if you see a cheap one you like you can check it on here to confirm. Asus and Benq's major niche is the gaming monitor so that's why you can't go wrong for them

u/Leov2 · 6 pointsr/buildapcsales

Just my long two cents but, in games where 144 Hz is actually significant (and attainable if we're being honest, you won't be hitting 144 fps on a lot of modern single player games) you can hit the 144 Hz dreamland with a 1070 or Fury X (I think) at 1440p - so the FreeSync/GSync is less important. You can also use an RX 480 and down scale to 1080p and get 144 fps/Hz that way and then enjoyable performance at 1440p on modern, single player games and get more use out of FreeSync/GSync.

In the only games that really matter with 144 frames (imo) - you can attain the high frames needed with things like the 1070, RX 480 or Fury X one way or another. It's not like you'll need a 1080 Ti to get 144 frames at 1440p on Overwatch, CS:GO, League, etc.

I won't deny FreeSync/GSync are useful, but in my opinion it's more useful in games and resolutions where your card simply can't hit desirable frame rates such as 60 or 144. I once bought a 4K FreeSync monitor where my RX480 was clearly not going to get me 144 frames in any game but I bought it anyways since it was my first AMD card. Getting into FreeSync range at 4K and 1440p was a dream. While my frames were lower than the 60-75 I'd get at 1080p, the game just felt so weirdly smooth thanks to FreeSync.

So don't sweat it that you can't use FreeSync if you play competitive games since your 1070 will have you at, around or above 144 frames. Likewise, a 1070 is good enough to get you great frame rates in other single player games like The Witcher 3.

u/Arctic_Wolf_lol · 1 pointr/fountainpens

Aight, you don't want a 4K monitor unless you have a really solid GPU setup. I'm talking at least a 980Ti (or AMD equivalent) or ideally 1080/1070 if you're looking to sit anywhere near 60fps in current games, let alone anything released in the next couple years. If you have this already, there's quite a few options to choose from. Dell makes a excellent monitors, and ASUS has a 4K version of the ROG Swift (which I've heard mixed reviews about). If you don't have the GPU horsepower I mentioned, or don't mind sacrificing a few pixles for more FPS, I highly recommend checking out these:

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-UltraWide-Widescreen-X34/dp/B016GNX4SE

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009869&cm_re=acer_predator-_-24-009-869-_-Product

The ACER is gorgeous, and can be overclocked to up to 100MHz, the ROG can run it natively, but has been known to have QC issues. Both are excellent monitors, and will have GSync if you're sporting an NVIDIA card (There are freesync equivalents, but as I have Nvidia cards myself, I'm not up to date on those)

--------------

Pros of a high quality monitor:

  • You probably use it more than a pen
  • If you do team games such as Overwatch, LoL, CoD, Counterstrike, etc... you will have a noticeable advantage. (This can be anything from simply more frames in FPS games to actually being able to see more of the LoL map due to the aspect ratio)
  • A monitor is more easily secured (Kensington lock or something similar)

    Cons of a high quality monitor:

  • You'll have to bring it back and forth between college and home if you want to fully enjoy it
  • Someone is more likely to want to steal it over a fountain pen
  • Need to be careful about dorm room parties, or kinda be an asshole to your roommate's friends when they inevitably do stupid shit that almost breaks your monitor


    ----------------------------

    Pros of a high quality pen:

  • Can last for years, often decades, or perhaps even a century
  • It can be a really neat piece of memorabilia because you (should) have it for so long.
  • Should (in theory) give an improved writing experience over cheap-o stuff (though to what extent varies)
  • Great conversation starter! You'll likely have people coming up and asking "Hey man, is that an ink pen?" (and you can handle it from there, I ask what kind of pens they use, if their pens don't use ink, but I'm also annoyed by that phrasing of the 'is it a fountain pen' question)

    Cons of a high end pen

  • You might not really use it (or want to use it, or be able to use it when you want to)
  • Strangers/Passerby's may think you as snobbish or hipster, depending on your appearance
  • A lot easier to steal than a monitor (though less likely to be stolen, imo)
  • more easily lost than a monitor (like, have you ever misplaced your monitor? Set it down a sec and then it's gone? No? I did once... my boss wasn't happy)
u/Illuison · 1 pointr/buildapc

Okay, he's got pretty good hardware. If it was my computer, I'd be looking at 1440p 144Hz G-SYNC monitors. 4k and 1080p monitors are worth considering, I guess, but I think 1440p is where it's at for that GPU

The brand isn't terribly important, as long as the specifications are good. Whether or not curved is better is subjective, but most people like curved monitors. Monitors with IPS panels will have better colors, but non-IPS displays are fine

And if he's going to want to buy a third party stand or wall mount, you need a monitor that's VESA-compatiable. Most of the nice monitors are

On top of that, some guys put effort into making their desk look nice and having all their stuff match. Have a look at his desk and try to get a monitor that looks good with his keyboard/mouse/tower

Finally, as an example of what to look for, here's a monitor I've seen recommended a few times - https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-Abmiprz-2560x1440/dp/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=sr_1_3?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1541263823&sr=1-3

u/FogItNozzel · 1 pointr/buildapcforme
Hi. These computer recommendations are fine, /u/deathaddict 's is pretty solid, though i'd spec 64GB of RAM

That being said, I don't like the monitor choices presented. One of the suggestions here isn't even an IPS monitor, that's bad. I would suggest not using an Asus monitor for editing. Dell or LG make fantastic work station and editing monitors that are much nicer to use than Asus.

I'm not sure how serious you are about editing, if you're professional or not. When it comes to computers i'm a fan of overkill in the build, so if you can swing it the LG 31MU97 is the best you can do on a reasonable budget. Full Adobe RGB and sRGB coverage along with 97% of the DCI-P3 colorspace. Though it is not good for gaming.

I am also a fan of the LG 27UD88-W if you need something cheaper and also want to game consistently.

Even less expensive is the Dell P2715Q, this one is only 8bit but it does a great job in the price range. I use one for my photo work, which is web based so it's fine for me. If I were printing I would buy something better, and 10bit.

I havent used it, but the BenQ BL2711U is apparently very good for its price, too.
Hope this helps!


EDIT:

After some reading the The Asus PB279Q listed in a comment looks good on paper, actually. But I have yet to use an Asus display that didn't have a weird mesh sheen inside of the panel, it's tough to describe. It really messes up the way whites look and i'm not a fan. Maybe this one doesn't have that, but I can't be sure.

I would recommend seeking out computer stores that have the monitors i've listed in this post and looking at them before you buy. That's the easiest way to make an informed decision!
u/thisdude415 · 2 pointsr/LSU

Depends on her major. Either way, portability is key.

Engineering benefits from decently powerful Windows machine, except computer/software engineering, which benefits from Mac. I have a pricey Dell XPS 15 which is highly powerful and quite nice.

Defer to her judgement for other majors. Personally I loved my Mac and found it to be *much* more convenient for most use around campus. WiFi connected faster, it went to sleep and woke up faster, it was super easy to drop files to my friends, etc. The one downside is Microsoft Powerpoint is worse on Mac. A MacBook Pro is probably better than a MacBook Air, but someone else can comment on that. Annoyingly, all Apple laptops have now gone all in on USB-C, which means she needs an adapter for ordinary USB ports. Pick up a USB C to USB 3.0 Hub (like this, which includes ethernet, VGA, HDMI, etc) and a dual mode USB C/3.0 flash drive for her. Finally, Apple gives decent education discounts (see here). You can use this discount at the Apple Store at the Mall of Louisiana. Most accessories are best purchased online, not in store. Apple Care is not a bad idea.

By the way, she gets free Microsoft Office through LSU. Don't buy software for her until she's sure it isn't in the software store (TigerWare)

Before she asks or a sales person suggests, she probably doesn't need an iPad or a new phone for college. If anything, consider getting her a second monitor for her room (they're cheap--like this) and can do double duty for streaming Netflix if she's in a dorm. They're nice when you need to multitask (have notes open while researching), or have your online textbook open on one screen while your homework is on the other, etc)

u/rolfraikou · 5 pointsr/buildapcsales

What the hell does 1ms matter if it's not for gaming? And if you're gaming why the hell are you using 60hz? Do you know how short a millisecond is? For one, only the best of the best would really honestly feel the difference between 1ms and 4ms.

Two, if a millisecond matters that much to you, then 60hz would have to be unusable. I don't see how you wouldn't see the contradiction in this.

Back when we were dealing with 20ms delays on IPS this argument made sense, but my god. The difference between 1 and 4. It's like someone claiming they can taste three more grains of salt on their french fry.

Do you like viewing things? If yes, would you like to see them in more or less color? TN offers you less color. IPS offers you more.

Yes, you can be forced to sit in one perfect angle to view content without issues, which, I will tell you right now, a 27" monitor that is TN, you will see shift sitting any reasonable distance from the monitor at the edges.

Or you can just buy a monitor that isn't shit from the same people.

Just do your neck/back and eyes a favor and get the IPS version for $20 more.

BenQ is known for calibrating their IPS monitors pretty well right out of the box too.

u/Sumo148 · 2 pointsr/RocketLeague

If you're looking into getting a 144hz monitor, you first need to make sure your machine can output fps higher than 144 consistently at the graphic settings you play at. You can turn on a fps counter in Steam. Make sure the fps isn't limited in Rocket League settings.

Most 144hz monitors cost +$200. You also can't use HDMI to take advantage of the higher refresh rate, you would need a DisplayPort cable or DVI cable. A few possibilities you can check out are below:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00B2HH7G0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_1ykdAb3X3PKNE

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M1DEEYP/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_iykdAbF7T639T

Then make sure your display adapter properties enables the higher refresh rate on your new monitor. Test the refresh rate at https://www.testufo.com/refreshrate

Although 75hz seems pretty good at the moment. I don't know if you really need to upgrade now, but if you have the extra cash lying around that's up to you.

If you're talking about a general upgrade to improve fps or to play on higher settings, then you probably want to invest into a better graphics card. Look into a gtx 970 or gtx 1060 (or if AMD rx 480 or rx 580). A 1070 or 1080 is probably overkill for 1080p gaming. Those graphic cards have the power to support higher monitor resolutions like 4K. I would ask your friend for advice first since he's the person that made the computer for you so they know what's compatible and what's best for your build.

I feel like in order to play on a 144hz monitor at least on max settings with Rocket League you would at least need at gtx 1060. Your gtx 560 probably isn't powerful enough to utilize a higher refresh rate monitor like 144hz.

Also make sure your power supply unit has enough wattage to power all your new upgrades. You seriously don't want to skimp out on a cheap PSU because those can blow up and cause fires destroying your PC (or worse your house).

Overall you're probably looking at $300-500 if you're going to buy a new graphics card with a 144hz monitor, depending on if you can find good deals or if you buy new.

u/Silentmoo · 1 pointr/buildapc

I can't really point you to some big great peer reviewed monitor book but I can make a recommendation. I have this monitor and its been great for the two years I've had it. It's not even half your budget however but unless you want to spend more money for 144hz and stuff this is just a good nicely built monitor with great colors and its strong. No dead pixels in the two years I've had it and the stand is pretty sturdy although there isn't much room for adjusting the screen and rotating it. Looks good in my opinion. If you do get it (or any other monitor really) look up some guides on color calibration to get the best settings.

u/jtskywalker · 1 pointr/photoshop

I have this AOC 23-inch which is a lot cheaper and I love it. It has great color. 1080p. Good refresh rate for gaming.

The Dell monitor looks better, physically, I think. And the Dell probably is superior, but if you just want to get up and running, you can get the AOC.

Or, for the same price as the 24-inch dell you can get a 27-inch AOC monitor.

There's this one for $150

  • Faster refresh rate response time (2ms vs 5ms)
  • Cheaper

    And this one for $200

  • IPS = much better viewing angle and better contrast but more expensive
  • refresh rate Response Time: 5ms will still be plenty fast for gaming unless you do really fast paced multiplayer shooters.

    And this one for $238

  • Pretty much the same as the $200 one from what I can see, but has a prettier border / stand.


    EDIT: It looks like from the specs, all of the AOC monitors offer more contrast than the Dell. I wouldn't be surprised, as I am a lot happier with my AOC monitor at home than I am with my Dell monitor at work.
u/bestcommenteverzzz · 1 pointr/buildapc
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Type|Item|Price
----|:----|:----
CPU | Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor | $190.89 @ OutletPC
Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard | $36.98 @ Newegg
Memory | Avexir Core Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory | $69.99 @ Newegg
Storage | Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive | $48.89 @ OutletPC
Video Card | XFX Radeon RX 480 8GB GTR Video Card | $249.99 @ Newegg
Case | Fractal Design Define S ATX Mid Tower Case | $59.99 @ Newegg
Power Supply | SeaSonic 520W 80+ Bronze Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply | $62.99 @ SuperBiiz
Operating System | Microsoft Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit | $79.99 @ Newegg
Monitor | Acer R240HY bidx 23.8" 60Hz Monitor | $119.99
| Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts |
| Total (before mail-in rebates) | $939.70
| Mail-in rebates | -$20.00
| Total | $919.70
| Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-11-21 23:25 EST-0500 |

Monitor is 119.99 with Amazon Prime but you should consider this or this.

The XFX GTR is hands down the best aftermarket rx 480 (check reviews online) available. It's usually near $300.00 but there is an ongoing sale that helps you save $50. So it drops to $250.00 (which is a steal imo).

I'm not usually one for rebate as it takes a while to receive and by then you'll usually have forgotten about it as well so you'll feel that the price is without the rebate. However that's just me, do as you see fit.

Decamarks didn't include windows 10 with his build? It's included in mine. With Rebate and maybe switching of the monitors, you have about $30-50 for an extra SSD of 120 GB for your OS to run off of. I suggest this if you can fit it in your build.

As for the Memory, I went for the cheapest while still maintaining decent ratings, (there are cheaper memory sticks out there). For the PSU, I went with Seasonic as you do not the 750w with the build unless you are planning on SLI in the future. I kept your case the same as that is entirely up to your personal preference. I hope this helps.

Edit: Also if you want a more popular mobo (the one I have in the build currently is fine ), consider this. But keep in mind, this will push the price to the budget of $950 . Counting rebate and everything.

This is what it would look like with the SSD and the Case Fan but it goes a little bit over budget with the HP monitor.
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Type|Item|Price
----|:----|:----
CPU | Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor | $190.89 @ OutletPC
Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard | $36.98 @ Newegg
Memory | Avexir Core Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory | $69.99 @ Newegg
Storage | Kingston SSDNow V300 Series 120GB 2.5" Solid State Drive | $41.89 @ OutletPC
Storage | Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive | $48.89 @ OutletPC
Video Card | XFX Radeon RX 480 8GB GTR Video Card | $249.99 @ Newegg
Case | Fractal Design Define S ATX Mid Tower Case | $59.99 @ Newegg
Power Supply | SeaSonic 520W 80+ Bronze Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply | $62.99 @ SuperBiiz
Operating System | Microsoft Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit | $79.99 @ Newegg
Case Fan | Corsair SP120 57.2 CFM 120mm Fan | $12.99 @ Newegg
Monitor | HP 22cwa 21.5" 60Hz Monitor | $99.99
| Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts |
| Total (before mail-in rebates) | $974.58
| Mail-in rebates | -$20.00
| Total | $954.58
| Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-11-21 23:32 EST-0500 |
u/Staple_Overlord · 3 pointsr/minnesotavikings

So I bought this monitor today. MRSP is $1000, most carry it at $800-$900. I bought it for $670 including shipping from NCIX (it's now back up to $900 but the promo price is still available if you need a link that includes it). It was hella expensive, but I've been wanting one of these monitors for quite a while. I plan on using all that sexy horizontal screen real estate for a ton of productivity purposes. Three word docs side-by-side-by-side? No problem! Need Excel to make A-Z all visible at the same time? Can do! Wanna share SolidWorks or other CAD software with a spec sheet also on the screen? It's perfect for that!

I am a little apprehensive about a couple of things. For one, I could have gotten a curved monitor from Dell for $700. But I'm a bit apprehensive about how the curve with affect straight lines while working in CAD, as well as how backlight bleed would come through. A curved screen sounds super cool, but I don't think a flat screen will be a problem, even though the screen is so wide.

I at least appreciate the thunderbolt ports. It's not 3.0, just 2.0, but I don't even think that matters for me since my MacBook is a couple years old. Also, it has USB quick charge, which will be heavenly I'm sure. I'm excited. The $670 hurt, but I don't have any financial responsibilities to worry about outside of Netflix and Spotify, lol. So I can spend my money any way I please. I'm on pace to make $2800 more this summer, and my financial aid was bumpin, so yayyy go splurging!

But no, really, I'm done spending money for a while.

u/T-In-The-Clutch · 1 pointr/buildapc

For budget level I've seen in person the Viewsonic XG2401 , Acer XF24H (Roommate owns this one) , and Samsung C24FG70 (I own this one) and they're all really good budget monitors. If I had to rank them in terms of display it would be Samsung->Viewsonic->Acer. The Samsung is the only one that is not a TN pane but it is also the priciest. I bought it because I got it on a huge deal at Fry's. the curve is negligible. All 144hz, all 1 ms response time, all 1920x1080 which is all we can hope for at this level of GPU really, maybe a little 1440 but not a whole lot. I would recommend any of the three. We were cautious about the Acer due to lack of reviews but has really impressed us so far. Just have to a do a little fiddling with colors out of the box. Another bonus the Samsung has is the quality as it comes out of the box. It also produces the largest reproduction of color gamut. In my opinion all are very good value and fantastic 144hz entry level monitors. They're no 144hz IPS GSync monitor or anything but they definitely get there job done!

u/Splongus · 2 pointsr/buildapcforme

i noticed you listed your budget in USD but you live in spain... so i went with the USD estimate here. i made a reply down below with some adjusted parts and prices for your region. i hope they're correct but i'm not certain

​

​

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

|Type|Item|Price|
|:-|:-|:-|
|CPU|Intel - Core i5-8400 2.8 GHz 6-Core Processor|$220.88 @ OutletPC|
|Motherboard|Gigabyte - H370M D3H Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard|$84.99 @ Amazon|
|Memory|Corsair - Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-2666 Memory|$109.99 @ Amazon|
|Storage|Samsung - 860 Evo 500 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive|$79.99 @ Amazon|
|Storage|Western Digital - Caviar Blue 500 GB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive|$33.99 @ Amazon|
|Video Card|Gigabyte - Radeon RX 570 4 GB Gaming 4G Video Card|$149.99 @ Newegg|
|Case|NZXT - H500 (White) ATX Mid Tower Case|$69.99 @ Amazon|
|Power Supply|EVGA - BT 450 W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply|$35.98 @ Newegg|
|Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts|||
|Total (before mail-in rebates)|$805.80||
|Mail-in rebates|-$20.00||
|Total|$785.80||
|Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-11-12 20:04 EST-0500|||

  • this cpu has very balanced and decent multithread performance and the single thread performance is very good, both of which are used in music production. games tend to favor single thread performance over multi but both hit the right mark here. intel cpu's play along well with hackintosh, unlike ryzen. this cpu includes a fan and paste, unlike something like the 8600k, which makes it a better deal for this build
  • 16GB is enough RAM to work on very large projects in your DAW
  • the rx 570 can play far cry 5 on ultra at 50-70fps for a good example
  • i went with an extra 500GB HDD since you said you have one already and 1TB HDD space is usually good. stuck in a 500GB SSD also. you did say you wanted 2 SSDs for each windows and hackintosh, but you can partition this into 2x 250GB if that works for you.

    ​

    i couldn't include monitor in the budget nor could i find a decently priced white bezel monitor, but this one is not bad: https://www.amazon.com/Acer-SB220Q-Ultra-Thin-Frame-Monitor/dp/B07CVL2D2S
u/Code_Echo_Chaser · 2 pointsr/buildapc

The 1080 in your system would boost should be running those games at 60fps+ at 1440p, which means you would see a difference when gaming on a 144hz monitor. However most cheap 144hz 1440p monitors are TN panels which tend to have poor contrast and shallow viewing angels. There are 144hz 27inch 1440p monitors that are IPS but they are double the cost of a good 60hz version.

As for 4k they great but will defiantly be as expensive or more expensive than a 1440p monitor with comparable features, although 4k IPS monitors tend to have amazing panels. You can always run your games at 1440p though, which will give you kind of a best of both worlds.


Personally I'd recommend the Benq BenQ GW Series GW2765HT. I own one and don't regret the purchase one bit, it's a quality panel that has excellent color and viewing angels. For 330 USD it's a steal.

https://www.amazon.com/BenQ-GW2765HT-27-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00KYCSRSG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1498852358&sr=8-1&keywords=BenQ+GW2765HT

TL:DR I'd recommend either going for a solid 1440p 60hz, or a 4k 60hz and game at 1440p res for frame rate. Non 1080p 144hz monitors are too expensive. I recommend the BenQ-GW2765HT

u/cphcider · 3 pointsr/buildapcsales

This Dell Ultra HD 4k Monitor P2715Q is what I use for work and it's incredible. I was initially trying to convince my non-gamer boss to let me scoop a 1440/144hz like the one this thread is about, but they wanted everyone to have the same model to track inventory more easily. (It's the firstest of first world problems - boo hoo, I have no choice but to get a 27" 4k Dell.) Anyway, I love it. I think it looks incredible for all non-games, and I honestly thought Destiny 2 looked amazing (I dialed it down to 1440 or 1080 since you're capped at 60 fps; everyone tells me that 144hz will blow my mind, but until I actually experience it, I'm very happy with what I saw during the beta.) I do have to play League in a window, and I scale most other games to 1440 or 1080 - but again, if you're not a gamer, you won't care. The screen real estate you get with a 4k is bonkers. I do a little web dev, so Sublime Text and Chrome side by side, that kind of stuff, is great. FWIW, I also thought 27" was going to be absurd, and I was definitely wrong about that too. (If you're going 4k, you kind of need to go minimum 27" - anything smaller and you might as well go max 1440.)

u/rarrieg11 · 1 pointr/PCBuilds

Keep in mind these are just my amazon searches, so there definitely could be better actual monitors on different websites or better prices elsewhere.

This is the one I have. It’s the cheapest high refresh rate g-sync monitor that I know of. It’s good but the colors aren’t the greatest. It’s still an insane improvement over my $120 Costco 1080p 60hz monitor.

This is basically the best 1440p monitor currently available. It’s got g-sync, an IPS panel, and i think an audio pass through. But, it’s expensive and kind of flashy which may mess up your setup if you care about that.

This is a nice 4K IPS monitor. It’s only 60hz but even with a 1080ti you won’t get above 60fps in many games at 4K with higher settings. Again, it’s expensive.

This is a 4K 144hz monitor with g-sync. You could probably find a way to get a 1080ti, a better monitor, and better cpu for about half the price so...

u/Raptorsatan · 0 pointsr/buildapcforme

CPU: No one really needs 12cores, especially when they only run at 2.5GHz. Here we have 10 Cores putting out 3.1GHz so that you get more processing power with each core allowing you to really make the most out of multiple applications at once.

RAM: 64GB of ram is more than enough to deal with your rendering and having a project compiling while you work on something else and the MOBO is upgradable to 128GB if wanted/needed so there is room for growth.

Storage: A 1TB SSD Allows for quick boot times and fast response when retrieving Small files. The two 6TB are for localized storage when working on massive media projects that require high file size without the need to pull from a server to improve productivity. I'm assuming most of your stuff will be sent to a server when you are finished. Still 13TB is more than most graphic designers/game developers will use in one rendition. You may even be able to get away with a Single 6TB HDD.

GPU: 2880 CUDA Cores per Titan will be used to do Graphic Rendering and Video compiling, meaning your videos and graphics should compile at Mach Speeds. These are some of the most stable and efficient Graphics Cards. If you are not Needing that kind of Beefyness, you can drop down to 2x EVGA GeForce GTX 970 4GB FTW ACX 2.0 Video Cards for about 400$ a pop saving you 1400$ in this build.

Case: I was looking at the other cases people were choosing as much as the brushed metalic is nice, This one provides both style and the proper Airflow you need to keep a rig like this at a decent temp without hooking it up to a dedicated water/Liquid Nitrogen cooling system for your CPU+GPU on top of being at a better price point.

PSU: 1300W Is more than enough, this rig takes about 900W to operate efficiently and this way you still have room to move up if you need to without buying a new PSU. I saw others throwing in 1500W, but that is just needless waste and will draw more power than it'll use, effectively being a power waster.

Monitors: 2 Acers which you can place Vertically and Two Asus which are horizontal will allow for a massive field of view while allowing you to work on any type of graphic. Alternitively you can go with 4x AOC i2367Fh 23-Inch IPS Frameless LED-Lit Monitor for 200$ ea. If you want to create a 4x4 square that is seamless (Basically one big monitor)

Keyboard: Don't need a Pro gaming Keyboard but the Cherry Brown MX switches with be very nice for prolonged typing and will withstand wear and tear.

Mouse: Deathadder is a gaming mouse but a High DPI is important for your job, some people use the zoom method for accuracy when designing but in order to hit those pixels in the big picture it is important to have a high DPI. The Deathadder also has switches on it that will allow you to increase/decrease DPI at will while designing.

Enjoy!


u/xKenkz · 2 pointsr/gaming

Both of these have higher response times for gaming monitors 5ms and 4ms respectively. As gaming is best on 1ms response, but good luck getting an IPS monitor with 1ms. Both are good if the response time isn't an issue for you. I'd be inclined to go with the Asus, I've never had Asus or Acer monitors but having other products from them I always feel like Asus make better quality products than Acer.

In terms of other recommendations, BenQ do some 1ms highly rated monitors and they do some with black equaliser to make it easier to see into dark places from light places, especially useful for FPS. These are not IPS though.
https://www.amazon.com/BenQ-24-Inch-Console-eSports-Monitor/dp/B01H5KKRLO/ref=sr_1_2?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1480956522&sr=1-2&keywords=benq

u/Wtf_socialism_really · 1 pointr/Monitors

You will drop some frames going to a 1440p monitor, but 60-144 hz is a huge difference and pretty much the biggest difference of all right now. It will also help somewhat with aliasing due to the greater number of pixels on screen at once.

If you have any intention of upgrading your GPU at some point, 1440p is an even more attractive option because those GPUs will drive 1440p even better.

Quick edit: I also say I'm very surprised at the cost of that TN panel from ASUS. Their premium on ROG is insane. For that price you can literally get an IPS Acer Predator or save a good chunk of money on the equivalent TN panel

u/b4ux1t3 · 1 pointr/RocketLeague

1440p at 144FPS will feel butter smooth. The question is, do you have a monitor that can support it?

The cheapest one I can think of off the top of my head is an Acer, which is 27" and 700 bucks. That's not bad, all things considered. I'm pretty confident the first build I posted could do 1440p at 144 FPS. Honestly, even the second build could probably stay up in the 100-120 range

If you want buttery smooth gameplay, get a 144Hz monitor and the first build, and you're not going to wanna upgrade any time soon. Depending on how far you're going to sit from the monitor, you might want to get a bigger one than the one I linked.

Now, 4k is great and all, but you're not going to be getting much above 60 FPS on a 4K monitor, mainly because they're expensive as hell. TO give you an idea, this monitor is over a thousand bucks and isn't even technically 4k (though the Amazon page claims it is. It isn't).

Personally, though, I prefer ultrawides. They give you a wider field of view, as someone showed in a gif a couple weeks ago on this very sub. That second monitor right there, paired with the second build I listed, would put you under budget (meaning you could upgrade a bit), has the same pixel width as a 4K monitor, though not as much height, and should run at a pretty decent clip. I'm fairly confident that you could get 120 consistently out of it without overclock.

144Hz is beastly, and you can see the difference, but, trust me, moving up from a PS4, 120Hz is going to look amazing. Source: Have PS4, have 120hz monitor, computer looks better.

EDIT: I gotta hit the sack now, but I'll answer any more questionsin the morning. :D

u/Charizard9000 · 1 pointr/buildapc

so it sounds to me like you'd appreciate an IPS monitor more than a TN monitor with a high refresh and low latency. IPS monitors are really worth it for the great color and picture quality, as well as viewing angles

so that leaves us with the variables size, resolution, and of course price, here are some options:

  • AOC 23" frameless IPS - ~155 @ Amazon, i love the lack of bezel on this monitor, it looks really sleek in person. however, it lacks a DVI connection so you're limited to HDMI. also lacks a VESA mount

  • ASUS 24" IPS - ~190 after rebate on newegg. ASUS monitors have outstanding build quality as well as pictures, and are generally a really go-to brand. again, no DVI port, but IS VESA mount compatible so would be great for a multi-monitor setup.

  • Dell 27" IPS - ~$230 on amazon. this monitor is pretty much the full package with an IPS display, VESA mount, and DVI connection as well as HDMI. this is honestly my pick of the 3, however some people complain about pixel density at 27" for 1080p, so it's not gonna look really crisp from 2 feet away

    any of those are great picks, tell me if you want any more examples of monitors, ips or not
u/Arkbird1000 · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I got the CFG70 and a friend of mine with a 1070 also picked one up when he saw how it performed. Neither of our monitors required further calibration (using by-eye tests such as lagom.nl) out of the box when set to the sRGB profile.

The monitor is not perfect. Mine has that slight purple trailing thing, and I'm pretty sure it's using the older firmware revision. I don't personally use Freesync, even with my 480, as I found that I didn't like it. Just pushing a high frame rate has been better. The stand can also be a bit wobbly.

Friend with 1070 now has two Freesync monitors, having had an LG 4K before he got the CFG70, and is looking at getting another one from Samsung's lineup. What I am trying to get at is that a Freesync monitor with an NVIDIA GPU isn't a bad purchase. Especially when you can comfortably push 144+ at the desired resolution.

Hope I provided something useful. Whatever you go with, I hope you are happy with your purchase!

u/opant108 · 1 pointr/buildapc

May I suggest this 27 inch monitor instead of a 32 inch. It is $100 above your price point but I am fairly certain that you wont be able to find a 32 inch 2K IPS monitor for $500 or less. If you do, I really doubt the quality of that monitor. Last month I built a new PC and upgraded to a 2K monitor. At first I was looking at a 32 inch as well but decided to go for a 27 inch one due to price and found the size to be perfect (many would also say that 2K looks best on a 27 inch display with 4K looking better at 32 inches). Honestly, a 32 inch monitor would be way too large for my day to day use but depending on your setup it might be ok. The monitor I recommended also has a 144Hz refresh rate and I have to say that I find the 144Hz to make a huge difference coming from a 60Hz monitor.

u/brando_1771 · 1 pointr/buildapc

Oh man so close. I’d seriously recommend this Dell 34” UW. It’s a bit beyond a $1k if you get two but man this monitor is incredible. 99% sRGB, IPS panel, 34” Curved UW at 3440x1440p. Even with only 8bit color depth and 78% AdobeRGB it’s still an absolutely stunning monitor. You get two of those bad boys you’re gonna have more screen real estate than you know what to do with.

Alternatively, if you want something a little smaller that’s more color accurate. This BenQ 27” which again, is beyond budget if you get two sadly. But this monitor is a 27” 1440p IPS, with 10bit color depth, 100% sRGB, and 99% AdobeRGB, this Monitor is remarkable for how cheap it is.

Okay so enough out of budget monitors.

This BenQ 27” is another 1440p IPS. 8bit color depth, 100% sRGB, 79% AdobeRGB great specs for a great price of only $299 each!

Normally I wouldn’t recommend a 4k Monitor that’s so small, but if you’re getting 2 you can probably get by with the small size. This Dell 24” is a 4k IPS, it’s 99% sRGB and 79% AdobeRGB, and because of its small size, it has the lowest ppi of all these monitors. At just $354, it’s a great value as well.

Let me know if you have any questions.

u/letaninjawork · 2 pointsr/ultrawidemasterrace

I have the Dell U3415W and a Zotac 1080 Amp Extreme. I can tell you why it is better to go with the 1080 and my experience with it.

First, the Dell U3415W is a fantastic value for the money. An ultrawide for around $650ish, 1440p resolution, great color representation, but the only limiting factor is the 60Hz refresh rate. Not a deal breaker in my opinion.

Now why go with the 1080? Because you might find yourself wanting to add another display or upgrade to a 4K display down the road, or simply because you can. They're not that expensive as they were when launched. I paid $720 for my Zotac GTX 1080 Amp! Extreme Edition from B&H Photo Video as they were out of stock everywhere. Now Amazon has the same card for $550! It's a pretty looking card, cools great, clocked at 2.0Ghz out the box. I have it driving 2 Ultrawides and a 24" in portrait mode. Looks super.


Pictures of my set up and my short review, here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ultrawidemasterrace/comments/65jv6s/samsung_cf791_vs_dell_u3415w_my_impressions_after/

u/AmericanFromAsia · 2 pointsr/PokemonRevolution

Acer R240HY

It's pretty nice. 1/4 inch side bezels. Matte screen. 23.8" 1080p, IPS, 5ms. HDMI, DVI-D, and VGA (no DisplayPort but I use an adapter and it works fine). No built in speakers but there's a headphone/speaker port.

No Vesa mounts. I don't use monitor arms anyway but that could definitely be a deal breaker to some, especially since arms help a lot with lining up monitors but I had planned on just overlapping them anyway.

All in all it's not a bad monitor, but it's pretty basic. I bought it because I wanted a thin bezel for triple monitors and it does that really well. Really you're just paying for the thin bezels.

Previously I had the BenQ GL2460HM but sold it just because I wanted my monitors to match. That one is good as well, but it's TN panel. 2ms response time, had Vesa mounts, a matte screen, and speakers. The speakers weren't great, but they were good enough for regular use and if I wanted ultra gaming sound, I would use headphones anyway.

I don't regret my purchase but it definitely is situational.

u/1amBulletproof · 1 pointr/macsetups

tldr: 4k at 31.5 (i.e. 32") is useable, which I wouldn't necessarily say for smaller sizes, like 27".

I've actually bounced around many monitors, none of which are even close to perfect imo. I'm always looking for a glossy, high-resolution, gigantic display at a low price. This seiki hits 3/4 but has an matte finish I don't love. Also, the design is average (very limited adjustability and thicker bezel by today's standard). I've owned the dell p2715q previously which also had a matte finish AND was too small to use @ 4k easily. It had a better design, though. Previous to that, I had 2x Dell s2415H which had a beautiful design and glossy finish but were low resolution and fairly expensive for what they were. I've owned other similar monitor setups, but this is my favorite so far. I vastly prefer 1 high resolution monitor rather than multiple lower-resolution monitors. I have also exchanged my (excellent) rain Design mStand for a Twelve South BookArc since I prefer using just 1 monitor.

The short version is I'd like a 5k 32+ inch monitor which is glossy and does not cost all of the money. I figured Apple would make something like that soon and instead they're making a 27" version through LG which costs $999. While priced right for the market, it's just too small to use at higher resolutions and I don't have enough money, nor would I prefer, having multiple monitors at that price.

This Seiki 32" is simply the best compromise for me, at the moment.

u/Insanity_Wulf · 1 pointr/buildapc

I plan on buying this monitor. And I'd like to do not have to worry about upgrading for a few years. Most of what I'll be doing is gaming. I just can't stand getting <25 average FPS in fallout 4 and other games which I can't even play such as ARK Survival and StarCitizen.

And I'd like to have it built by the end of the month, since any later and I'll only have a few weeks to enjoy it before life gets in the way.

I figured the stars were aligning when I heard that new cards were coming out and decided to attempt a first build.

I'm not very knowledable when it comes to parts. I've been watching guides but they don't really explain who makes what in good quality.

Edit: I am completely open to suggestion here. I'm not dead set on buying that specific monitor. It's just I saw it upclose at a friends house and it was very nice. But if you know of any better I'd be glad for input.

u/xchris_topher · 2 pointsr/buildapc

If you don't mind my recommendation, I say definitely upgrade your MOBO.... The one suggested is a great idea, and what I just picked up off Amazon for the low!
Check this link to see what MOBO is best recommended for that processor.
http://www.overclock.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=99753

As for the RAM - I grabbed the TridentZ RGB DDR4-3200 as well. I recommend them. If you don't care for the RGB frills, you can get them cheaper I believe.

Also: I definitely recommend the Samsung 960 Pro 500gb, if you can swing it (since you're under budget). You will LOVE the insane difference in speed!!!
https://www.samsung.com/us/computing/memory-storage/solid-state-drives/ssd-960-pro-m-2-512gb-mz-v6p512bw/

Lastly, I noticed you didn't include the monitors in your pricing... If you don't have any already, I recommend grabbing these while they are on sale for $100 cheaper than normal!!!
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

u/AvastYeUpboat · 1 pointr/buildapc

I'm not an expert by any means, but maybe get 1600MHz memory instead?

Also, your current case does not look like it has good airflow. May I suggest a Rosewill CHALLENGER mid-tower? It will be a bit more money, but it should be worth it.

Your PSU will be able to handle everything. Hell, you can probably downgrade the PSU to a smaller wattage (650 watt?), if you're not worried about doing a lot of upgrading.

I'm not sure about the motherboard, since it got very mixed reviews on Newegg (lots of reports of it dying). It should be fine with a warranty, I suppose!

And your card will be fine. Personally I like EVGA. I have an EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and I love the thing.

For ~$750 that's not a bad deal at all, imo.

Good luck on the build and maybe wait for a second opinion on all of this.

Edit: One last thing. Your monitor is iffy. It looks like it has a low resolution and contrast ratio. Also, no DVI or HDMI input. Something like 1920x1080 and 50,000,000:1 is preferable. I use one of these.

u/TaedusPrime · 3 pointsr/buildapc

Since budget isn't a big issue here there isn't much to change unless you want some opinions on another case or something. The nzxt s340 elite or phanteks evolv atx tempered glass are more updated cases and would look slot better built.

You don't need a 1000w pay but meh, it'll last you for this or any other foreseeable build lol.

Other the the case ideas, looks amazing.

Edit: now that I see it. Consider a 34 inch ultrawide gsync option. Gives you slot of screen real estate but without 3 monitors and will give you a much better gaming experience with that 1080ti.

I use this and it's pretty much the best purchase I've made in a while.

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-UltraWide-Widescreen-X34/dp/B016GNX4SE

u/Scofield11 · 1 pointr/buildapcforme

Not really according to the specifications site, the clocks are only slightly higher in the 809$ one, which is nowhere near the difference that would justify the 120$ difference between the two.

​

Unless someone thinks otherwise, go for the less expensive ones.

​

Now, we all forgot to include a monitor, tell me what kind of a monitor do you want ?


I personally recommend 1440p 144Hz, 24 or 27 inches.

​

You must have G-Sync so I have to warn you that your monitor will cost a lot, from 300-700$.

​

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-bmiprz-2560x1440/dp/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=sr_1_2?tag=amazongs-20&s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1519831088&sr=1-2&keywords=Acer%2BPredator%2BXB271HU&th=1


This seems to be the best monitor with those specifications, but it is a whooping 600$.

​

I'd suggesting looking for monitors on your own because it really is your preference, but here's some tips.


You must have G-Sync because you will be buying a GTX 1080 Ti, the bad news is that G-Sync monitors cost a lot but we can't do anything about that.

​

IPS > TN screens, you can definitely buy a TN monitor which will always be cheaper but if you have the money, buy IPS.

​

You don't really need 144Hz but GTX 1080 Ti demolishes every game in performance so getting anything below 144Hz would seem like a waste.

​

Good luck with your build, building a PC is very fun and please don't be scared that you'll accidentally destroy anything, browse around, ask questions, not only will you gain experience but you'll save up money and you'll have fun.

u/masenkablast · 3 pointsr/Surface

I love it for these reasons:

DisplayPort: YOu can daisy chain displayport monitors (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GTV05XG) or buy a MST hub. This will give you the 2 1080pscreen setup that is best for programming. Visual Studio allows you to dock your windows on different monitors so it becomes awesome! Supposedly the i7 should support more displays but 2+ the Surface 3 screen is good enough for me. I heard the i5 can support three 1080p displays but I haven't tried it yet.

Logitech Unifying Receiver: I started using this with my Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga. Simply it allows you to pair a lot of devices with the same single receiver (i have 5 paired). This way when you are mobile you can use your mobile wireless mouse with the device. When you get to your desk your wireless keyboard and mouse at the desk are already synced with the same receiver so you can use a real "coding" keyboard. I'm in love with this setup.

Dock: Ethernet, possibly a different thermal profile (not confirmed) and extra USB ports. I think this is a good investment.

I actually replaced my desktop with my Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga in the past and now with the Surface Pro 3. I am thinking about returning it for the i7 though because I am greedy. Either way both devices are i5 and perform admirably when using Visual Studio 2012/3/4 RC. Visual Studio's dialogs are async now and the performance is more bound by your disk speed than the processor or memory. SSDs FTW. I say go for it because I have no regrets! I am a Microsoft Certified Trainer, courseware author and developer myself and this is my road machine and home machine. My desktop is simply a Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 box that hosts test and dev VMs.

u/itrTribute · 1 pointr/buildapc

So 144hz gaming is amazing. There really is no going back once you have seen it.

...That being said. HDMI 1.3 is required for 144hz even @ 1080p. DVI-D can in theory push that bandwidth but I cannot stress enough to check the manual of that monitor to see what ports it actually supports 144hz on and make sure your video card has that revision port.

I am not trying to belittle your budget but at that price range I am left to assume you may not be running a GTX 1080. If you currently don't achieve greater than 60 fps in games then there will be no benefit to a monitor running @ 144hz.

If you get a nice steady ~60hz at your preferred quality settings, might I suggest a IPS panel? You would benefit from a great picture quality and color accuracy.

https://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-U2414H-Screen-Monitor/dp/B00GTV05XG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1480088511&sr=8-2&keywords=dell+ips

u/TheRealBpants · 1 pointr/buildapc

Looking for some recommendations on what I should upgrade to support UWHD gaming. Right now I am looking at a 3440x1440 monitor (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01C83BE6U/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_U_lrjkDbX9TDBCD). That's kind of what I've settled on right now, but there are so many options it's hard to choose what's best.

I currently have an i5 7600K and 1070. I was thinking about going to a 2070 Super, but maybe I should go to a 2080, or 2080 Super? I'm not playing anything super demanding right now, just some FFXIV, but I did just pick up Monster Hunter World and I know I'll want to play Cyberpunk when that releases.

Staying at or above 60fps is the most important to me. I don't do any competitive gaming. Price isn't really a concern, but I don't want to spend more than I need to either. Thanks for any advice!

u/Noobasdfjkl · 1 pointr/applehelp

There's tons of displays that are superior to the outdated overpriced stuff Apple was pushing. Since you're likely on a Mac, I'll exclude monitors with a higher refresh rate than 60Hz.

This one is a good baseline. It's great if you want a direct replacement for the cinema display (although this monitor features better adjustment).

This one is a great lower res 21:9 display.

This one is a great higher res 21:9 display.

Finally, this one (with it's 28 inch brother) are both excellent UHD monitors.

u/BIGBLOCK22s · 2 pointsr/xboxone

You can go cheaper, bigger, and better. I have an AOC monitor that's 27 inches and is really nice. You do have to do some tweaking cause the picture is bleh out of the box, also the speakers are garbage but I use my Logitech speakers for movies and my headset when I game.

Look for a better option.


https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00CMKOVPQ/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1483086333&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=aoc+27+inch+monitor
(This is the one I own. Works great).

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00IKDFL4O/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1483086452&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=benq+gaming+monitor
( Also a great monitor. A little more money but it's better than the one you posted. BenQ is a great brand for monitors.)

u/ToastedFace27 · 1 pointr/buildmeapc

If you havent seen this monitor yet, i think you should take a look at it. The build is good, I dont see anything wrong with it but I dont think its a good idea to mix ram. I dont know if that would cause problems but if I were you I wouldnt risk it. Evga has had really big priblems with their cards like the vrm overheatkng and even some blowing up. I have an asus 1080 myself and I love it, its pretty quiet and can oc to 2.1 ghz easily. I would also say that you shouldnt get a keyboard like that with a budget like this. Check this keyboard out. Imo brown switches are the best.

u/JordanWrightFilm · 1 pointr/DestinyTheGame

The LG IPS panels are great. fast response time, great viewing angles and good colour reproduction. I prefer a smaller monitor but 27 inch would be perfect if you are looking for something larger. I use the 25 inch ultra wide because I use it as a 2nd monitor for my MacBook occasionally. (it has additional width that isn't in use with the ps4.) it only cost like £150 from amazon. https://www.amazon.co.uk/LG-25UM58-inch-Ultrawide-Monitor/dp/B01BV1XB2K/ref=sr_1_6?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1543156347&sr=1-6&keywords=lg+ultrawide

This would be great for use on the ps4.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/d/Computer-Monitors/LG-24MP88HV-Infinity-Display-Monitor/B01HZLC716/ref=sr_1_15?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1543156347&sr=1-15&keywords=lg+ultrawide

u/jorshrod · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I just bought my first 1440p monitor, it is a 27" BenQ and it is amazing, I cannot believe I didn't do it sooner, also the price is great.

Here's a link: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00KYCSRSG/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I paid $308 for it, ymmv, but a great monitor, superb color depth and response and great picture.

u/Wandrell · 1 pointr/gadgets

Hello guys,

I have a 17 inch laptop and I want to get a new monitor. I will use the new monitor as the main monitor for my laptop, and plug a Nintendo Switch to it.

The important stuffs:

  • Purchasing in Canada (I only looked at Amazon.ca, any other good alternatives?)

  • I think I want an IPS but not fully decided

  • No need for G-Sync/FreeSync; but need HDMI (laptop constraints)

  • Looking for 1080p60 (cant output any higher)

  • Since I will use it for both PC and Switch, I was thinking that having 2 HDMI inputs on the monitor would be great, but not necessary.

  • Main use: Gaming (Dota, Civ, Many Indies, Nothing too demanding)

  • Secondary use: Media, Web (TV Shows & Movies all in 1080p, Reddit, Essay Writing)

  • Budget: $150-$300

    Got these on my list so far: ASUS VS248H-P, ASUS VS239H-P, BenQ GL2460HM, Acer S241HL, ASUS VE247H

    Any help would be greatly appriciated :)

    Thank you!
u/BEEF_SUPREEEEEEME · 2 pointsr/killerinstinct

Quick search found me this one on amazon, in your price range and 24".

Benq/Zowie are pretty much the way to go for gaming monitors in that price range, these days. Super low response time (most important thing for fighting games/most gaming in general), and great picture quality.

Here's a good site for comparing real world response rate results.

This is a link on that site showing the tested stats for the monitor I linked above. As you can see, it's rated "excellent."

See if you can find your TV on there and compare it to the monitors. You'll definitely see a marked improvement :)

Hope this helps.

u/Jesses72390 · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I feel like 1440p 144hz is the sweet spot. If you have to choose between 1440 or 144hz I would in my personal opinion go for 1440p. I upgraded from 1080 60hz to 1440 60hz and I loved it. I then went to 4k 60hz and it was great. Currently I have a 1440p 144hz monitor and it's amazing. Difference between 1080 and 1440 is pretty big. I feel like the performance loss between 1440 and 4k just isn't really worth it. Hope this helps.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00UPVXDA8/ref=yo_ii_img?ie=UTF8&psc=1
This is the monitor I currently use. It also has Gsync if you use an Nvidia card.

u/shannonlowder · 1 pointr/Monitors

I'm in a similar situation. I work 10-12 hours a day on code and data. As a result, I want a 32" 4k monitor without a strong anti-glare coating. That way I can run my monitor at 100% scale and get sharp text. I currently have a Samsung U28E590D that I took the anti-glare off, and the text is very sharp compared to most monitors. Unfortunately, it's a touch too small to run in 100% zoom, so I have it set to 125%. Also, I didn't get a perfect result, there are some dim spots on the monitor that appear to be behind the plastic, but in front of the LCDs themselves.

I have a Dell XPS 9575 with a 4k glossy screen and it has the sharpest text I've seen. Unfortunately, I have to run it at 150% when I work directly on it. I have to drop the resolution to 1080p when I mount it on a monitor arm beside my primary monitor.

My dream is to find a large 4k without that crappy anti-glare coating.

In the past few months, I've tested an LG 32UD59-B . It's coating makes the text look like you're viewing it through bug screen. I've also tried the LG 34WK95U-W, it has the same anti-glare coating. I went to the apple store and looked at an LG UltraFine 5k, While the monitor isn't glossy, it's not as bad a coating as the other two LGs I tried. Unfortunately, it's 27" and as a result, I had to set the zoom to 125% to make the text comfortable from a sitting distance (24").

I also tested an Alienware AW3418DW, It had a strong coating on it that made the text blurry. Also, It wasn't a 4k monitor. I've reached out to Dell, and they claim all their monitors have an anti-glare coating now, so I'm reluctant to order them and then have to return it. I've also visited Local

I'm almost to the point where I'd be willing to pay someone to take one of the best rated 32" 4k monitors and strip the coating off. My hope is someone can get a better result than I did. The other option is to find out who manufactures the panels for one of these high-end 4k monitors, and order one direct from the manufacturer without adding the coating to it.

u/Adell021 · 3 pointsr/RandomActsOfGaming

I realized my monitor is about to give in (seriously, everything I own needs replacing. I just spent half my savings to have my PC fixed).

And a monitor is priority over headphones considering my line of work focuses on visuals rather than audio. On the minute chance that I win, I'm interested in the Acer Predator. A whole lot more expensive (at 1244$) than my original request but I'm really just tossing this out here. And it ships to the Philippines.

I do doubt I'll win, so I want to ask too... what are stocks? I am a clueless gal who barely considers herself an adult. I know I could look it up but I'd rather hear about it from someone who deals with it and (going by your generosity) has been successful with it.

Seriously though, man, generous giveaway. I'm sure you'll make someone very happy.

u/Computeria · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

1080p ultrawide or 1080p 16:9 144hz?

I'm looking at this LG 25UM58-P 25-Inch 21:9 UltraWide IPS Monitor with Screen Split https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BV1XB2K/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_46O4ybHK7MS5T

And this ASUS VG248QE 24" Full HD 1920x1080 144Hz 1ms HDMI Gaming Monitor https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00B2HH7G0/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_JgP4yb2Q6APTV

I am looking to try a nicer gaming monitor to replace my 60hz 1440p VA panel (viewsonic). Will be paired with my 1060 3gb and i7. Birthday is coming up and do not have a lot of money. Was previously set on trying 144hz gaming but what do you guys think? Would trying ultrawide gaming instead be better? The panel certainly looks like it will look better and my system should have an easier time hitting the refresh rate. I can't decide between looks and speed. They'll both be a general improvement over what I have now and losing screen size is a fine tradeoff for me. What are your guys thoughts/opinions?

u/NeonMusicX · 2 pointsr/Gaming_Gear

Ah, I would recommend a BenQ. You can get one, that's 24 inches full HD. Running 144hz and is completely flicker free to reduce eye strain. It also has a black equalizer for visual clarity in dark scenes. Ultra fast 1ms response time. I would highly recommend. I have never owned one, but my friend does, and I have tried it. It will probably be my next monitor. Lot's of ESPORT teams for CS:GO are running this monitor.
Which makes sense, as every second counts. Higher HZ rates, allow for less rubber banding, and more smooth play.
They as well have a 27' Inch version, and some QHD displays. For only 200 dollars, it definitely worth looking into.
Here's a link.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01H5KKRLO/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_img?_encoding=UTF8&colid=KW9QMJQUSPH9&coliid=I18TLXEL5C9Z8N&psc=1

u/fucknmuffin · 1 pointr/Monitors

> XG2402

It's ok. It's well reviewed which is important, but the price is higher than i would go for those specs, and its the biggest absolute budget brand.

It does have speakers integrated which is a nice bonus if you dont have any.

There's no reason to get it over something like this though which is a lot cheaper, bigger, better brand and also has speakers.
https://www.amazon.com/Dell-D2719HGF-Response-Speakers-FreeSync/dp/B07J4SXNQ5/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=1080p+144hz&qid=1562782883&s=electronics&sr=1-3


But really I don't understand why you are buying a new monitor. you have a 1440p 144hz monitor that may have amd freesync. That's already much better than either of these. Maybe explain your usecase. Also i should clarify that many people at 144hz don't really care about freesync gsync as much, they are mostly beneficial at lower hz.




I think this is the monitor for you. exact size you seem to be wanting, g-sync,1080p, speaker, and 240hz!
https://www.amazon.com/Acer-XF250Q-Cbmiiprx-FREESYNC-Technology/dp/B07G3GRFSZ/ref=sr_1_5?keywords=1080p+240hz&qid=1562783128&s=electronics&sr=1-5
slightly pricier, but it seems like money isn't tight for you, and this would actually offer some benefits over that 1440p 144hz monitor you have.

Though perhaps your real issue is your gpu, and you should spend that money upgrading it, if you are getting poor performance.

u/defnot_hedonismbot · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

It looks like a pretty good monitor! TN panel is not as bad as many make it out to be, if you're on a monitor you're probably looking at it with decent viewing angles. I use TN and love it. I'm not sure what your budget is but I feel the Acer XG270HU is worth mentioning, it is $130 more but has support for 144hz. Again, no clue how important that is to you or what your budget is just sharing the monitor that I have. And the monitor you linked is still great.

u/Lunatic_Panda · 8 pointsr/buildapc

I would also probably go 1440 over 4k. The performance benefits are much better, and coming from someone who dropped from 4k to 1440, you wont notice a HUGE difference between them.

GSync is awesome, I love it, and if it fits in your budget, it is definitely worth checking out. I can drop down to 45-50 FPS and never really notice that it is that it has dropped below 60.

The most important things that I could recommend is looking at the games you play and deciding if you want a faster response time or better color reproduction/better viewing angles and what refresh you want to have.

TN monitors are the way to go for faster response time, and many FPS players prefer them for that reason. IPS will get you the best color reproduction and viewing angles, but will be more expensive than a TN counterpart. Both offer refresh of up to 144Hz and there are TN monitors that go as high as 200Hz.

I hope this helps a little in making your decision.

EDIT:

One of my fave 1440p Monitors IPS 144Hz GSync:
http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XB270HU-bprz-27-inch-Widescreen/dp/B00UPVXDA8

And the equivalent TN panel:
http://www.amazon.com/PG278Q-27-Inch-Display-Refresh-Monitor/dp/B00MSOND8C/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1463846407&sr=1-1&keywords=asus+rog+swift

u/mdd86 · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

okay, so this a bit more than the $100 that you want to spend but I thought I'd toss is out. I just picked up this exact monitor my self and frankly love it. I was concerned it would be smaller than I wanted but once I set it up I was quite happy.

https://www.amazon.com/LG-25UM58-P-25-Inch-21-UltraWide/dp/B01BV1XB2K/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1483401477&sr=1-1&keywords=lg+ultrawide+monitor

It performed very well, and is crisp. The ultra wide is actually quite handy, I've been doing a bit of work in autoCAD and have been really enjoying this monitor compared to my old one.

u/dragonandphoenix · 1 pointr/Monitors

Honestly, I decided to wait until new Nvidia GPUs come out, BUT I am def going to get one of the Dell Ultrasharp series. I am going to get this 24 inch:

http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-U2414H-24-Inch-Monitor/dp/B00GTV05XG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1453346344&sr=8-1&keywords=Dell+ultrasharp

OR upgrade to 1440p:

http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-U2515H-25-Inch-LED-Lit/dp/B00SPWPF1O/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1453346344&sr=8-4&keywords=Dell+ultrasharp

I've researched for a while & really asked to question b/c I didn't see them listed as much as some others, but IMO they are the best. I also like the ASUS equivalents as well. Most of what I see are monitors catered towards gaming, and that is great but I also want to have kickass colors & build quality.

To me, my requirements were met with the Ultrasharp series. I have seen some in person and they're awesome. Other monitors in the same category do go on sale more often, but to me the fact that the Ultrasharps do not go on sale is indicative of their quality. I don't need any quicker than 60hz and I really don't want to invest in one of those obligatory Korean Qnix reccomended monitors because you could get a bad panel, and the build quality isn't stellar, plus the Dell's are introductory graphic design monitor too.

My two cents.


u/Advanced- · 1 pointr/ultrawidemasterrace

I was in almost the exact same situation as you.

I had a GTX 960 (Which I upgraded to a 1060 for this monitor) and a 16:9 60Hz IPS display (This One), Considered either #1 or #2 best choice depending on who you ask for 60Hz, IPS, 16:9 displays.

Was it a worthy and noticeable upgrade? Yes. Yes it was. It was much more noticeable then I tought it ever would be. You can check out my First Impressions after using it. Ultimately was one of the best and most noticeable upgrades I have done and I would recommend that upgrade to anyone.

I ended up paying $150 + $10 shipping for mine, so the exact same price as you as well.

As far as getting this and using it for over 6 years, I personally see no reason why you couldn't. Most media is going to stay 1080p as a standard for another 3-5 years guaranteed.

Edit: Also keep in mind this monitor can overclock to 75Hz. Not every single one, it depends on silicon lottery... But there's a decent chance yours can. Mine was able to and I can definitely feel a difference in games between 60 and 75.

u/7Arach7 · 1 pointr/buildapc

I think by FPS you're referring to how may it can show (Hz), which in that case possible to somewhat overclock monitors. If you're into FPS, I would recommend sticking with a higher Hz.

Third-Party 1080s are already coming out (IIRC) so you can probably find them in 1-2 weeks. The new AMD GPUS are being announced on the 1st, and will launch mid-summer (or earlier).

G-Sync and FreeSync do something different. Instead of limiting FPS, they actually adjust the Hz of the monitor. V-Sync is the original - what this did to reduce or eliminate tearing (when the monitor is receiving a new image before it can render the previous one, causing a de-sync image across the monitor) is simply make it so that your computer wouldn't output more than 60/120/144 FPS (depending on monitor Hz). G-Sync and FreeSync both actually move the Hz of the monitor around - if you're at 120 FPS, the monitor will display at 120Hz. 78 FPS? 78Hz. FreeSync works through mostly software, while G-Sync requires an expensive chip (sold by NVIDIA) to be implanted in the monitor (hence the price jump). This is a 27'', 1440p, G-Sync monitor...$$$ This doesn't have g-sync or a super-fast response time, but fits the size build otherwise. G-Sync is outrageously expensive (team red FTW, cfx, freesync).

Eh - You could go for that audio, and it would work. However, I really do think that people benefit from nicer audio. Gaming headsets are okay, but for the most part offer sub-par audio and a shitty mic for their price point, in exchange for "gamery" aesthetics. Something like the Audio-Technica M40X are around $70 and will give you very, very good sound. If you need audio to go along with it, you can either pick up a new audio cable with a built in mic (m40x have detachable cables) or something like the antlion mod-mic.

u/shobgoblin · 1 pointr/buildapc

Thanks for the compliment :). For monitors it depends on your budget. If you can stretch it, go for an Asus or BenQ over the Yamakasi or Qnix. You can't overclock the refresh rate but for your average user the better build quality and warranty is more than worth it. If money is an issue the Korean ones will do just fine. The Asus you named is top notch; I would also recommend this BenQ for your consideration. Don't worry too much about airflow for SLI, especially because the 970 runs pretty efficiently. As long as you don't plan on overclocking heavily I doubt there will be an issue there.

u/xBassDropYETIx · 1 pointr/xboxone

I used a BenQ monitor for about 2 years and it was the best gaming investment I have ever made. Picture and color is great. Response time is superb. Since you aren't using a PC, you can afford this monitor because is only comes with 60hz refresh rate (which is what console can top out at). I highly recommend this monitor if you are testing out whether you like monitors or not. Only downfall is the built in speakers are kinda tinny. If you use a headset primarily or just buy computer speakers for $25-$50, you should be good to go! https://www.amazon.com/BenQ-Console-eSports-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B01H5KKRLO/ref=dp_ob_title_ce

u/mermaidman001 · 4 pointsr/Surface

I'd recommend dell monitors highly. I recently got the 29 inch ultra wide ips monitor for $300. Well worth it in my opinion. Great for my productivity work as a graphic designer and student. It also doesn't hurt that it is optimal for watching movies ;)

edit: http://www.amazon.com/Dell-Monitor-P2715Q-27-Inch-LED-Lit/dp/B00PC9HFO8/ref=pd_cp_147_1?ie=UTF8&refRID=14C9QTAWM7YSKTJGQJ48

This is the dell 27' 4k monitor. Ips monitor and has a matte coating which is excellent for photo editing. Plus adobe sRGB certified. Great monitor.

u/Skybox-O · 1 pointr/battlestations

It's this one I would absolutely recommend it. It's a great monitor. Good response time great refreash rate and great colors because it's an ips panel. The only downside is the quality of ips panels can be tricky and you might have to send it back until you get one with out any bright spots, backlight bleed, or any other problems. I got lucky and got a very nice panel on my first one.

u/freespace303 · 3 pointsr/Monitors

You sure you're not willing to consider 1440p? Because at your budget ($372 usd) 27" 1440p 144hz monitors can be had all day long. If not, I listed some 1080p monitors below as well.

Since you have an Nvidia card, My first choice for you would be the Dell Gsync S2716DGR, which goes on sale for less than $400 all the time. It's pretty much the only Gsync 27" for under $400 consistently. Keep an eye on /r/buildapcsales for the best deals.

After using 2 freesync and 2 gsync monitors, I can't go back. The elimination of stutter/tearing is completely worth it IMO. Framerate dips and spikes are smoothed over as well, making for a very consistant experience.

Also, here are a bunch of Freesync 27" 1440p 144hz choices to consider...

Pixio PX276 - $310/250€

Acer XG270HU - $350

G-Story GS27QR - $330

ASUS PB278Q - $353

Monoprice 124657 - $340

If you insist on sticking to 1080p, here are a few options, all 144hz

Pixio PX325c - 32" - $350

Viotek GN32C - 32"- $300

ViewSonic VX2758-C-MH - 27" - $250

Acer ED273 - 27" - $254

I also recommend checking these sites out, they both have comprehensive lists of the best gaming monitors out right now.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/selector.htm

https://www.blurbusters.com/faq/120hz-monitors/

144monitors dot com (can't link this site on here for some reason, blocks my comment)

u/nebraskapc · 1 pointr/hardwareswap

If you're interested in a trade, I'm looking for the monitor you have and currently have a Acer Predator XB271HU (IPS version) which is 27", IPS, Gsync, 1440p, 144hz. Perfect condition and still have original box.

I'm in Nebraska (53 confirmed trades on hardwareswap and can provide 100% ebay feedback). If this was local, I'd do something like, trade monitor for monitor and I'd throw on like $100 cash for the cost difference. If you're interested in still traded I'd do a straight trade and pay the shiping for yours and my monitors, which is probably going to be about $50 for each because of their size and insurance.

Feel free to PM me if interested.

u/SMYFFL · 3 pointsr/buildapc

Dell almost unquestionably is making the best 4K monitor at the moment with its UP3017Q. OLED is fantastic, and for only ten times more than your budget!

Jokes aside, I do personally like Dell's UltraSharp line for their great IPS panels, professional look, and best in class stands. The P2715Q is probably what you're looking for.

u/pablojohns · 4 pointsr/Dell

WHO did you purchase it from on Amazon? That is key.

If you bought it from Dell (where it sells the seller is "Dell" or "sold and fulfilled by Amazon"), then you should be covered. If it was sold by a 3rd party retailer (3rd party from Amazon), then you may not be covered. The page you linked has the seller as "Sold by Prime-Computer and Fulfilled by Amazon," which means you are not eligible for the 3 year warranty under Dell's terms. If you bought this monitor which is sold from and shipped by Amazon, you would be eligible.

You can easily check this by looking at the purchase receipt/invoice on Amazon. Amazon aggregates customer comments: so just because someone else commented that they're under a 3 year warranty does not guarantee that you are covered by the same if purchased through a different seller on Amazon.

EDIT: If you did not purchase it per the specs I listed above, I am sorry, but you're probably out of luck. Next time, do a bit of research on warranties/price matching/coverages, and you will see that purchasing from a retailer-1st party (Dell.com, Dell sold on and shipped by Amazon) is the key to preserving the 1st party warranty offered by these companies. Just because Amazon purchasers leave reviews and/or answers do not mean they necessarily apply to you.

u/GTPC · 1 pointr/buildapc

I have that monitor (VG248QE) and I can honestly say that it is a fantastic monitor. 144Hz is damn smooth and I honestly couldn't go back to 60Hz. If you play lots of fast paced games it'll make a significant difference. It's a TN panel though, and the viewing angles aren't as good as my previous IPS panel.

Now, you can instead get a 1440p 60Hz Korean panel for around the same price. It's not 144Hz, but a GTX 970 should be able to handle most of those games turned up at 1440p and still get good framerates. Benchmark link.

If it were up to me, I'd pick a 1440p monitor over a 144Hz one any day, but do consider if the games you'll play will run well on a single 970 at 1440p. On the other hand, consider if the games you'll play run at high enough framerates that a 1080p 144Hz monitor will make a difference.

If you want a more basic, cheaper 1080p 60Hz panel, I can recommend you the ASUS VS228H-P which was my previous monitor. It's nothing special, but it's IPS and 60Hz.

If you're thinking, "por que no los dos?", there's the ASUS ROG Swift, a 1440p 144Hz monitor, but it's hella expensive and hard to get.

u/Reprivation · 1 pointr/RocketLeague

Idk what is required to run it smoothly but any pc that costs more than 600 should be able to do it amazingly 😂. Don't actually go that high, look around but that's my advice

Also when buying a monitor, this one is 75 Hz and is the best bang for your buck! Makes playing on my xbox feel ALMOST identical to playing on my 1300 ASUS laptop!

If input lag is your issue make sure you have v sync turned off as well. I used to play on a t.v. with 40-50 ms+ of input lag. This monitor minimizes it to less than 10 which is rated as basically the best you can get

Https://www.amazon.com/BenQ-ZOWIE-inch-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B01H5KKRLO

u/coloombiano · 1 pointr/RandomActsOfGaming

Never too late to join! Thanks for the giveaway and best of luck with any other stock gambling you do!

Always wanted an ultra wide so lets go with this!

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-UltraWide-Widescreen-X34/dp/B016GNX4SE/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

Thanks again and best of luck to everyone else!

u/EZScape · 2 pointsr/speedrun

Personally I use this https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01H5KKRLO/
1 ms input delay, and it's on the cheaper side of lower lag LEDs. As for converters I don't know specifically what you should get, but converting component to hdmi is converted easily and you really won't notice any delay difference so just about any converter is good. Composite on the other hand you're better off just getting a CRT. I just use a random $20 converter I found at Best Buy.

u/SharkOnGames · 2 pointsr/starcitizen

I picked up this monitor late last year and it's been amazing. I no longer need 2 monitors on the desk.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0777RY75V/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1


I have a 4k TV, but prefer gaming on the 3440x1440p ultra wide, it just feels nice thanks to the wide view.


I bought it before upgrading my PC thinking I'd rather have the monitor in place and then the hardware to support it later rather than buying new hardware and being stuck with a smaller monitor at 1080p.


It's native 100hz and can overclock to 120hz plus works great with gsync (nvidia). It completely changed how games play, especially FPS games.

u/Baallzz3d · 1 pointr/leagueoflegends

Sorry for the late response.

​

I got this monitor: https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-bmiprz-2560x1440/dp/B06ZXZ3QBD?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_1#

​

I would say that in terms of league-specific gameplay, I didn't feel too much of a change (slight upgrade, nothing much more), but the monitor has been an absolute wonder for use in pretty much everything else. A lot of other games like MMOs feel nice just to have more room on my screen for quest tracker/other widgets that don't clutter with my skill icons on the hud. I also didn't have 2 monitors before and I didn't think it'd make much of a difference compared to 1 but I really can't go back after having 2; the 1440p is also extremely nice for some movie or video watching too. If you're after the monitor for mostly a change in league, I would say it isn't worth the cost of a 1440p, but especially if you are upgrading from 1 monitor to 2, for use with pretty much anything else you might do on your computer, it's a humongous upgrade.

u/Flintfall · 3 pointsr/ultrawidemasterrace

Ultrawides are still pretty pricey at the moment, but for your criteria I think that the LG 34UM95C is your best bet for the budget.

I will say that 75hz is awesome, freesync is incredible for gaming, and the curved-ness of the panel not only adds immersion but really lets me see everything easier (especially for Audacity). None of those features are needed though, the UM95C will do you fine.

At a slightly higher pricepoint, the curvier Dell Ultrasharp

u/Lotharion · 1 pointr/Monitors

I am using an ultrawide since december (29" 2560x1080 LG29UM67-P 75Hz) but if I lived in USA and got a spare 2K$ I would buy this screen and a GPU right away:

  • http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-34-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00PXYRMPE/
  • http://www.amazon.com/MSI-GTX-980TI-GAMING-6G/dp/B0106QZE62

    Dell has awesome quality control, each of their panels are manually calibrated and they got a support for a single dead pixel and the longest warranty of all screens. It's curved but mind that all IPS might have more or less back light bleed so it mostly comes down to luck. As for the GPU 980ti is currently the best choice right now, you will be able to play games at over 45FPS at mix of high/ultra at 3440x1440 for at least a year or two since now (for instance The Division plays at average 50FPS on ultra with drops to 40, changing shadows from HFTS to HBAO gives over 8 FPS). Why MSI ? It has the highest OC of them all which you don't have to tinker at all if you're not interested into OC'ing it more and I've been using MSI for my last 3 cards with no problems (260, 560ti, 770) so you might consider it a personal advice. If you prefer long warranty then pick EVGA card (up to 6 years).

    Personally I am going to buy a new GPU and a screen when Pascal comes out. Either a new architecture or a used 980ti alongside the monitor I listed. If you don't want to wait then buy something as long as you are fine with the product. The monitors you listed are awesome too but in my opinion G-Sync is a gimmick that solves problems that are already solved by already higher refresh rates and simply is not worth the money you can spend on a better GPU (which will also solve the same problem, except the screen tearing at no V-Sync). /r/ultrawidemasterrace
u/tiggywombat · 1 pointr/techsupport

It's super simple to build your own PC really. You have sites like pcpartpicker and youtube videos to help you, all you have to do is just follow the video guide.

For $400, it's very difficult to find a good prebuilt PC that can run the games you mentioned at 1080p normal settings at 60fps. You'll probably have to play at low settings if your monitor is 1080p.

Best option would be this for $340 - https://www.amazon.com/HP-Pavilion-Desktop-Computer-590-p0020/dp/B07BD4Q46Q?ref_=Oct_RAsinC_Ajax_13896597011_&pf_rd_r=TKKZY9N7NNEYAWZEY2H7&pf_rd_p=d5e8b3af-9303-51f3-9f0f-ce96a426f7c2&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-6&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=13896597011&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER

But it only has 4GB ram which is unacceptable, so you have to add $30 and you'll get an extra 8GB ram which would give you 12GB in total - https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-Single-PC4-21300-288-Pin-Memory/dp/B0734V4SSR/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=8gb+ram+ddr4+2666&qid=1562592956&s=gateway&sr=8-6

This would require you opening up the PC, and installing that one stick of RAM.

So in total this is $370 including a keyboard and mouse, but you have no monitor. Adding a 1080p monitor would cost another $90, which would be something like this - https://www.amazon.com/Acer-SB220Q-Ultra-Thin-Frame-Monitor/dp/B07CVL2D2S/ref=sr_1_18?keywords=1080p%2Bmonitor%2B22%2Binch&qid=1562593800&s=gateway&sr=8-18&th=1

​

All together it would be $460, this is the best I could come up with. When you have more money you could also add in a graphic card like a GTX 1650 or a GTX 1050TI which would allow you to play the latest games no problems. Hope this helps.

u/StorminXX · 1 pointr/xboxone

I got a BenQ. Yes, I know that I can't take full advantage of it with my XBox One, but I will say that it's a beautiful result, and I am very happy with it.

BenQ GW2765HT Monitor

Prior to this, I had an ASUS 24" (I forgot which model), but I sold it because I prefer 27". I will say that the ASUS was also awesome.

u/office_bulgogi · 6 pointsr/buildapc

I have the exact same setup, let me break it down for you like this:

Star Wars BattleFront ULTRA settings in game:
1920 x 1080: 90-100 FPS
2560 x 1440: 60-70 FPS

I wish it ran it faster but it doesn't.
Playing games at 120+ fps is awesome, so you could get 1440p @ 144hz but on older games like counterstrike.

I went with this monitor below, got it for $200 and it keeps me happy for now.
Nixeus Vue 24" 1920x1080 144Hz, AMD FreeSync, 1ms, Adaptive-Sync 30Hz to 144Hz NX-VUE24A

I wish I got that red acer that user: c0horst got, but that would mean your games would run slower.
http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XG270HU-omidpx-FREESYNC-Widescreen/dp/B00VRCLHYS

u/PotsnobsUnited · 1 pointr/FIFA

> Thanks for all the help guys! This was great!

> I have it narrowed down to 2 monitors - please help me select from among these two:

> The Benq - http://amzn.to/2pWn8jW This is the more expensive one, and also smaller by 3 inches. It's a shade under $200, and is the preferred brand by gamers it appears. However, I'm a nerd and like big screens (I'm moving from a 55" 4K TV) so the next one caught my eye.

> The ASUS - http://amzn.to/2qvJ1sj This is the monitor I use at work - its 27" vs 24", and still offers 2 ms response time. I feel like this one would allow me to see more of the pitch, while not sacrificing ms's.

> So, that's what I got - what do you guys think?!?! Leave me thoughts or just comment 1 or 2 so I can get this sorted. Thanks again Fifa Reddit, I don't care what the rest of the internet says about us, we are alright man.

u/Gilianz · 1 pointr/Monitors

This kind of comes down to preference. Personally, I like a 2 monitor setup as you can always have something else on the other screen. The two monitors are a little bit different because the LG monitor does have freesync, which is only good if you have an AMD GPU. The Acer monitor on the other hand will have a 1440p resolution compared to the 1080 of the LG. The other thing to consider is the amount of money you are spending. The LG will give you enough room for a game and twitch chat on the side, since not all games run at a 21:9 ratio. But you would have to spend $400 more for the dual monitor setup.

If I were you and wanted to spend the $800 in total I would go with this Acer monitor, that is if you have an AMD GPU for freesync. Then get a cheaper 27" monitor on the side, be it a 1080 or 1440 resolution monitor. The reason I would spend the $600 on that monitor is because it will have an IPS panel, great for color if you are playing scenic games, and will achieve the 144hz refresh rate that most people will say is good. For the second monitor you could get something like this though arguably it would be nice to have matching monitors.

u/kokolordas15 · 1 pointr/CabaloftheBuildsmiths
You can save about 30-40 dollars from microcenter if you want to look into that(cpu/mobo combo)

Either build will be able to stream extremely well

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-bmiprz-2560x1440/dp/B06ZXZ3QBD fast ips gsync panel.It looks like you will be gaming in low light enviroments(night) so you maybe want to look into VA panels for better contrast(blacks specifically).You will be giving up some motion clarity though.

PCPartPicker Part List

Type|Item|Price
----|:----|:----
CPU | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor | $326.99 @ SuperBiiz
CPU Cooler | Scythe FUMA 2 51.17 CFM CPU Cooler | $59.99 @ Amazon
Motherboard | MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX ATX AM4 Motherboard | $114.99 @ B&H
Memory | G.Skill Ripjaws V 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 Memory | $134.99 @ Newegg
Storage | Sabrent Rocket 1 TB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive | $118.98 @ Amazon
Video Card | Asus GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11 GB ROG Strix Gaming Video Card | $1109.99 @ Newegg
Case | Rosewill Cullinan V-Silent ATX Mid Tower Case | $69.99 @ Newegg
Power Supply | EVGA 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-modular ATX Power Supply | $79.98 @ Amazon
Keyboard | SteelSeries Apex 100 Wired Gaming Keyboard | $19.98 @ Amazon
Mouse | SteelSeries Rival 310 Wired Optical Mouse | $31.00 @ Amazon
| Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts |
| Total | $2066.88
| Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-11-26 04:33 EST-0500 |
u/scoobs0688 · 2 pointsr/nvidia

I would pass on that LG, the resolution isn't going to push your 2080ti much at all. If you're set on ultra-wide, I'd go with this instead This might be (totally is) the best ultra-wide monitor on the planet. Pricey but its simply stunning.

Personally, I don't think ultra-wide is worth it. If you think you can go without it, and would love to save yourself a few hundred dollars, check out this monitor... 1440p 165hz, it is incredible

u/22jk · 1 pointr/buildapc

Nice build!

I really like your cable mangement job. I would recomend you upgrade your gpu+Monitor first. Then you should get an ssd. That way the things you see more often will be good. While i mean going for an ssd first is fine it wont make as much an upgrade as getting a better gpu. Either way you still got a good build!

For the monitor upgrade i recomend this http://www.amazon.com/VS228H-P-22-Inch-Full-HD-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B005BZNDOO/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1382318456&sr=1-1&keywords=Asus+vs228h-p I have 3 of them and they are amazing!

u/zixmanroll · 1 pointr/buildapc

I'm thinking about getting a monitor to hook up my Dell XPS 13 to. Which one should I get? I was looking for monitors sub $150, and these four are what I've found so far:

Acer R240HY

ASUS VX228H

HP Pavillion 22CWA

ASUS VS228H-P

My thoughts about the monitors: I like the VX228H for dual HDMI (it'd be nice to be able to switch between laptop and switch without unplugging and switching cables from the monitor every time, but not having it isn't a dealbreaker), the Acer and HP both look nice too (I like me some small bezels), and the VS228H-P I'm not too sure about.

I plan on using this monitor for general use, slight gaming, and with the switch, so nothing too crazy.

ALSO, to connect the laptop to the monitor, do I have to buy this USB C to HDMI cable to connect the two? Or is there another, better way? Thanks!

u/Atmozfears · 1 pointr/Monitors

Thanks a lot for helping a random stranger on the internet. I have been doing some research of my own and here is what I found.

NCX is a user that frequently comments on this subreddit and I have read some of his stuff.

He mostly recommends the HP 25xw. The problem is I have no way of buying it in Germany. Amazon only lets me buy the 24xw or the 27xw. Do they have the same panel, just in different sizes? Apparently they are extremely similar https://www.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/4qi9gj/should_i_buy_the_hp_25xw_or_27xw/d4tttwt

He also recommends the Philips 257E7 however I can't buy that in Germany.

He posts a link to some website that reviews monitors but it is down for me.

However I have also read that a 25 inch 1080p should be the limit. If you go any bigger, 1080p doesn't do it anymore. This thread however says it looks great https://www.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/4px8hw/is_the_hp_27xw_worth_it/


Something like this https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-U28E590D-28-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00YD3DBOC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1474735601&sr=8-1&keywords=Samsung+U28E590D is also in my budget.


Edit: I have researched some more and stumbled upon AMD's FreeSync. My current card doesn't support it. You know what? I think I will actually buy a new gpu if it helps me use a better monitor. Your thoughts?

u/lukeman3000 · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

Yep; the Define Mini C is sleek, relatively small, and minimalistic. It looks kind of monolithic with the way the power LED is. I also like to leave the top panel on so I can sit my controller and headphones on it.

Thanks, btw. I've spent the past few weeks working six days a week in order to save up extra money to justify the new build. Instead of upgrading my current PC I'm just going to build a new one and sell the old one as one unit - less of a headache that way I think.

As far as monitors are concerned, I highly recommend this one. It's what I have. The fluidity of motion on this monitor (not to mention the resolution bump from 1080 to 1440) is insane. It's almost surreal how great games look on this thing when playing at high FPS. The fact that it has g-sync is also awesome.

If you're coming from 720 (and presumably 60 Hz), you won't believe how good this thing looks. To say that it will be a giant upgrade would be an understatement.

u/HxHfeitan · 1 pointr/RandomActsOfGaming

Hey, congratulations! Hope the profit keeps on continuing. You deserve it from the hardwork and it's so kind of you to do this. I've been using a 12-yr old LCD monitor and it's starting to give up on me and my Christmas wishlist is this or any kind of monitor if I win: https://www.amazon.com/PG278Q-2560x1440-G-SYNC-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B01C83BE6U/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1478048670&sr=1-1&keywords=asus%2Brog%2Bswift&th=1

or
Overwatch game so that I can play it with friends. :

u/Vushivushi · 4 pointsr/pcgaming

160-180 is closer to 200 than 100, but I didn't even get to cover ultrawides, that's where it really goes up.

wqhd ultrawide g-sync



wqhd ultrawide freesync

Top 5 g-sync monitors on Newegg are $1000 vs $520-800 freesync monitors. The best selling ultrawide on Amazon is the $1000 ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q G-sync. Best selling freesync ultrawide is the $700 ASUS Designo MX34VQ.

General price difference (in the U.S.) isn't $100. It's $150 for FHD, $150-300 for WQHD, $200-500 for UWQHD. The rising cost premium is due to G-Sync largely being available only on premium gaming brands that seek higher margins on higher cost panels.

u/progz · 1 pointr/Monitors

Get this one: https://www.asus.com/us/Monitors/VG245H/

https://www.amazon.com/24-inch-FreeSync-Monitor-VG245H-Response/dp/B01JGYM5H6/ref=sr_1_13?crid=1ICGACA8GVIRH&keywords=60hz+1080p+monitor&qid=1556399125&s=gateway&sprefix=60hz+1080%2Caps%2C136&sr=8-13 (Brand New)

​

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07HRGVV12/ref=dp_cr_wdg_tit_rfb (amazon warehouse, i bought stuff from their warehouse and the shit always works good. I even bought a monitor that was in great condition and even saved money.)

​

That monitor has speakers as well. Newer monitor tech as well, so it be worth it. There are difference compare to older monitor panels, to new one, etc.

u/zrsly · 1 pointr/FortniteCompetitive

This is what I got and I love it. It had one stuck pixel but I wiped it with a microfiber cloth and it goes away. Otherwise it's great quality for a 27" 144hz at a pretty good price. That's if you're not dead set on 1440p tho.

u/Rocket_Potato · 1 pointr/buildapc

Hi, I'm planning on getting a new monitor and graphics card pretty soon. Right now I have a Samsung SyncMaster P2350 (23", 1080p, 60hz) and a 780ti SC. My graphics card will be upgraded to either a 1080ti in Q1 2017, or the Titan Pascal if I can find a good deal on it.

My real question is which monitor to get? I want an upgrade from 23 inches and 1080/60 and was thinking something along the lines of 27 inches, 1440p at 144hz. I'm going to be using it for gaming, so I'd like a 1ms response time.

I was thinking about this Acer monitor but I wanted opinions on other products before I pulled the trigger on anything.

1440p is definitely a "must have", while the refresh rate can either be 120hz or 144hz. 1 or 2ms response time is ideal. Panel type (TN vs IPS) I am not too knowledgeable about, but I'm open to suggestions and reasons for/against a panel type. G-sync is not required. Budget is flexible, and I may consider an $800+ monitor, so don't hesitate to throw all suggestions out there.

Thanks everyone!

u/deardeergod · 2 pointsr/buildapc

I got the Asus VS248H-P 24-Inch Full-HD LED-lit LCD Monitor last year and have been pretty happy with it. The only complaint I have for it is that it does not move up and down, only tilts. It has DVI, VGA, and HDMI ports but only comes with 3-foot DVI and VGA cables. I have been using it with HDMI and it looks great after some minor fiddling with the settings. I bought it used for ~$100 and was very happy to see it come with the protective tape still on. Would recommend.

u/ss3s · 2 pointsr/sweden

Wow that is pretty awesome! Here in the US even your 1 year warranty claims through the manufacturer could take well over a month to resolve. A lot of the time they will tell you to fuck off even if you are within your 1 year warranty because they will claim some BS reason that you voided your warranty. Consumer rights in the US are a fucking complete joke, the consumer doesn't mean jack shit here.

I look forward to purchasing some electronics then in Sweden! Just wish some of the things I need (like Dell Ultrasharp monitors) weren't so expensive :(. Dell P2715Q 4K monitor is 7000 SEK in Sweden versus 3400 SEK (390 USD) in the US.

u/redroverdover · 1 pointr/buildapc

Okay so here's the deal. You could essentially go for 4K 60 hz, or go for 2k 144hz. Unless you want to spend way more for a 4k 144hz monitor. But that's very pricey. From $700 to $1400, but the best ones definitely at the higher end. That's completely out of budget. At the same time, 1080p 60hz is terrible for us because we don't see any benefit from our 2080ti.

So we either want to go for frame rate at 2k, or 4k at a much lower frame rate of 60hz.

You will find most people choose frames. You will definitely see a huge difference. Your games will be 100hz and up at 1440p. You also want a gsync monitor for your Nvidia card.

So in your budget for best overall monitor I would choose:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=ox_sc_act_image_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

And here's the 4K 60 hz version

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B018MYTF4W/ref=ox_sc_act_image_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

u/BlueArmistice · 0 pointsr/GearVR

The price isn't that steep when you account for the included games and controller being nearly $200 worth of stuff at retail. But I suspect they came in high and needed to bundle some extras to make the price/value workout. We are effectively paying $400 for the headset and $80 for the controller (what Amazon sells it for) + 2x$60 for launch games. But also remember that the real competition is a really a good gaming monitor like this.

But yea, GearVR gets to have a pretty cool and clear niche now. Which is sweet.

u/VarthDaver · 1 pointr/pathofexile

This. Even with overclocked TitanX's you will have FPS dips in PoE, it is just not able to utilize it well. That said, G-Sync excels in mid to low range fps dips.

They aren't cheap, but the 27" Acer XB270HU bprz with G-SYNC would be my strong suggestion. I run these personally, and love them.

edit: Just pre-ordered my rift a few minutes ago, will let you know in March. I have seen no notes about GGG making PoE rift compatible though (please correct me if I am wrong), and it does require custom coding. I would not put a lot of hope into this for PoE. It is not the type of game that benefits.

u/Mines_of_Moria · 1 pointr/Monitors

alienware 1900r: https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B0777RY75V/ref=twister_B07K77FQ91?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

LG 27GL850-B (just went up for preorder, no reviews yet)
https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07TD94TQF/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

im debating which of those to get myself. im going to get a 2080 super to power.

people seem to think 32 is too big for 1440p but i sorta feel like i'd love the extra real estate over the better stats but i'd like to hear opinions

u/trix4rix · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

Great budget IPS, though personally I believe color accuracy and brightness to be very important. With that said I can highly recommend this AOC monitor which will be brighter, better color reproduction, and better build quality, though it lacks VESA mounts, and is $20 more expensive.

u/20mcgug · 0 pointsr/Showerthoughts

The Build

Monitor

You are obviously brainwashed apple user. While it may look pretty it is an overpriced POS. This build is much faster than what you would get with an iMac for the same price. This build matches the $1999 price tag of the iMac however it is much more powerful. You can build one for ~$1000 that is still better, however I wanted to show you how much you can get for the same price as the Crapple machine. I am curious as well, why would you need a 5k monitor? Is it to boast to your friends about? If that's the case building your own computer will make you sound smart and you can boast about that.

u/Wirthlesss · 1 pointr/buildapc

Nice build. You don’t need to buy windows. Don’t waste money on that. Also, I’d upgrade the psu to a 650w gold rated, but thats just my opinion. You can probably get away with a 550.

I run a 32 inch at 1920x1080 and it looks great to me. I came from console as well so I don’t know much of the difference. If you’re dead set on 27 inch, here’s a good option. 144hz, 1080p, only a 2ms response time. Honestly, I don’t think you need 1440p. Theres some other good 24 inch monitors out there for good prices.

u/Upstairs_Chris · 2 pointsr/flightsim

I have this monitor, and I absolutely love it. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PXYRMPE/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Xplane 10 and FSX both see the resolution and have settings for it, so no problems there.

I previously had a 27'' 1920x1080 monitor and it was okay. This new one is 3440x1440 and its made a world of difference in all my sims. Can't recommend it enough if you can get it. Do remember that 3440x1440 is a signifincant amount more pixels that 1920x1080. So you'll need a beefy GPU to run it. I personally have a 980TI 6GB.

These other guys advocate these tripple monitor setups and such, and while I am sure that is the fucking tits, money is still an object for me. Also, I do lot of other things and play many other types of games on my PC where a triple monitor wouldn't be so great. So this is what's best for me. However, I used to have a very small 17'' old LCD, the square kind and I used that for the 2d panels like GPS and Comms in FSX and that was perfect.

u/DaLegendaryNewb · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I'm running an xg270hu, 1440p 144hz with freesync for just under 400 USD. I'll be honest the colors aren't mesmerizing but they're slightly better than my old ~100 dollar monitor, and it definitely doesn't look great at an angle but that doesn't bother me as I have it sitting directly in front of me. Freesync is was amazing with the high refresh rate since it's hard to run games at 144+ fps consistently, that is until I switched to team green. I would still recommend it if you're okay with a tn panel and it's in your price range.

u/onliandone · 6 pointsr/buildapcforme
The strongest gaming processor is the 7700K. Won't matter much on 4K, but also no reason not to get it. Strongest gpu is the GTX 1080 Ti, useful for 4K.

pc-kombo shared list

Type|Item|Price
----|:----|:----
CPU | Intel Core i7-7700K | $338.39 @ superbiiz
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z270-Gaming K3 | $124.99 @ newegg
Memory | Corsair Vengeance LPX blau DDR4-3000 CL15 (16 GB) | $139.99 @ Amazon.com
Storage | Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB 64MB 7.200rpm SATA600 (2 GB) | $64.45 @ superbiiz
SSD | Samsung 960 EVO Series NVMe 250GB TLC - (250 GB) | $129.99 @ newegg
Video Card | Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OC | $684.79 @ superbiiz
Case | NZXT H440 V2 Midi-Tower - weiß/schwarz Window | $106.99 @ superbiiz
Power Supply | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 (650 W) | $89.49 @ superbiiz
CPU Cooler | be quiet Dark Rock 3 | $65.99 @ superbiiz
Operating System | Windows 10 Home 32/64-bit USB Flash Drive | $106.99 @ superbiiz
| Total | $1852.06
| Generated by pc-kombo 29.04.2017 |

This also has a nice case (with window), a good cpu cooler, 16GB of fast ram and a very high quality psu.

Possible display would be https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-U28E590D-28-Inch-LED-Lit-Freesync/dp/B00YD3DBOC (no gsync, but on 4K as far as I saw that would be too expensive).
u/koscum · 2 pointsr/buildapc

IMHO, better overall image quality is better than higher refresh rate. Sure, 144Hz is amazing, but it often comes with the price of having to use TN panels that often have poor viewing angles and tend to have a worse image quality than a decent IPS panel. G-Sync is just a gimmick that can help if you experience screen tearing, but that it's often better to simply upgrade your graphics card.

I highly recommend Dell's Ultrasharp series; I have Dell U2515H and it's amazing.

If you really want a monitor with IPS panel @ 144 Hz with G-Sync, here's one: https://www.amazon.com/Acer-XB270HU-bprz-27-inch-Widescreen/dp/B00UPVXDA8/. The price is, well, pricey.

u/gregriegler · 2 pointsr/Monitors

the clamp might be an issue with weight and all, but if you get one that's bolted to the desk, and not just tension screw, you might be better off. I have the Dell UltraSharp U3415W 34-Inch Curved LED-Lit Monitor, it's got good color representation, pretty close if not 1:1 for my 15" MacBook Pro. The newer version has a bit more curve to it than this one that I have. It also has several USB ports - though you have to run a USB line back to the computer of course, the ability to run 2 different inputs into the monitor for a bezel-less split screen. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PXYRMPE

I don't have exact experience with that Samsung monitor you referenced, but we do have a few of the nearly same monitor in a 27" standard 1080p resolution and the colors are good, though they are a bit more contrasty.

My set up... messy: https://imgur.com/a/wtTJg8T

u/Spacechicken82 · 5 pointsr/ultrawidemasterrace

I would think that the LG 34UC88-B which has been coming down in price lately would be a good mix between style, gaming, and general media consumption. I owned one for about 6 months and always got compliments on it when friends and guests came over.

It can be overclocked to 75hz and if you get a newer RX 470/480 video card you will be able to utilize the Freesync technology quite well with it. I drank the team green kool-aid so I ended up trading out for the ASUS PG348Q monitor for Christmas. It can be found for the mid-to-high $600's if you're patient. They're currently $799 on Amazon or BHPhotoVideo(tax free outside NY).

Other popular choices in this range would be:

u/ShadowSystem64 · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-27-Inch-Curved-Monitor-C27FG70/dp/B01M1DEEYP/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1503619912&sr=8-1&keywords=27in%2B144hz%2Bquantum&th=1

Best of the best for a 1080p display. If you can stomach paying $279 dollars for it you will have a gorgeous panel and a fluid 144hz with free sync. Worth the buy if you can find the money.

https://www.amazon.com/Designo-MX279H-1920x1080-Frameless-Monitor/dp/B00B17C5KO/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1503620213&sr=1-3&keywords=27in+1080p+ips

This is my monitor but i honestly wish i would have coughed up the extra money for the samsung one since it offers so much more.

u/donoho · 2 pointsr/ffxiv

4k on a 40-43" should be great.

I played for a 3 months on a Dell Ultra HD 4k Monitor P2715Q 27-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor (3840 x 2160) and loved it, except for the ^^^^^tiny Quest/Dialogue Text. Even with all UI elements set to 140%, some elements are just too small to be effective at that size screen (e.g. cooldown toolbar).

I've recently switched to a Dell UltraSharp U3415W 34-Inch Curved LED-Lit Monitor (3440 x 1440 Pixels), and although I miss the detail/scale, it makes for a better play experience.

u/jallsopp · 1 pointr/pcmasterrace

The two main things to look at would be thin bezels and IPS or VA panels.

If you specifically need 25", the only 'suitable' monitor that I'd recommend is a HP 25XW. Those HP's seem to be really nice. They have a thin bezel and IPS. The only problem would be that there isn't a vesa mount option if you wanted them on arms.

Other than that, there are quite a few 23" models but 2 which I'd give a go are the Dell S2316M and the AOC i2367Fh. Both Dell and AOC are really popular monitor brands for a good reason. Both are IPS, have thin bezels, and look nice. I'm sure the Dell is a new model so it will be available for a while now.

u/apriarcy · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

It doesn't look like a bad monitor. I personally don't care for 21:9 aspect ratio monitors. The industry standard is basically 16:9 so almost all games will support it. I recently purchased this monitor and I couldn't be more pleased with it. It's slightly more than the one you linked but it is adjustable, has a 75hz refresh rate, 1ms response rate and has FreeSync (I see you have a supported GPU). With some minor adjustments the colors on this monitor are bright and vibrant. I'm very pleased with it.

u/MasterIndie · 1 pointr/oculus

Something like this should be good. Basically any desktop PC with a GTX 1660 ti graphics card should be good. Other good graphics cards are a GTX 1070, GTX 1070 ti, GTX 1080, GTX 1080 ti, RTX 2060, RTX 2070. For a bit less money that is ok but not great, there's the GTX 1660 or the GTX 1060 6GB. All of those graphics cards should have the DisplayPort built right in.

You'll also need a monitor or just use your TV. Here's a cheap monitor and here's a cheap 27 inch monitor. Many PCs come bundled with a mouse and keyboard, but if they don't here's a cheap red dragon mouse/keyboard. If you want a nicer mouse or keyboard, anything by logitech is fantastic.

oh yeah, you've probably also already heard of it, but there is also the Oculus Quest headset. It doesn't have as many games and doesn't have as good of graphics, but it's totally wireless and doesn't require a PC at all.

u/thegreenllama777 · 2 pointsr/graphic_design

I'm a fan of Dell's monitors. They have pretty good color accuracy. This one has been good to me (and it's well within your budget). 4K, 60hz.

Dell's UltraSharp line of monitors are also good.

Edit: Looks like there is a newer version of the specific model I linked above. Smaller bezels and whatnot.

u/topher78714 · 1 pointr/RandomActsOfGaming

First congrats on your increased financial situation, and secondly thank you for the giveaway!

As for my entry I am hoping to win a new monitor....the Acer Predator X34 to be exact. Here is the link for purchase and thank you again!

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-UltraWide-Widescreen-X34/dp/B016GNX4SE%3Fpsc%3D1%26SubscriptionId%3DAKIAICE7LOAJMK3SSLPA%26tag%3Dpcm_contextual-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB016GNX4SE


Price is about $1,200

u/Sfm_masterish · 1 pointr/tf2

Here is my full set with literally everything including controllers if you want to play PC/console like for only $600. This is probably the best bang for your buck and i Ben looking around for parts for couple of weeks now.
(Pcpartpicker.com for good prices)
Mouse: $12
http://amzn.to/1TvjDLx

Keyboard: $25
http://amzn.to/1XVyqjP

2x Joysticks ($20)

http://m.ebay.com/itm/2x-2-4G-USB-Wireless-Dual-Vibration-Gamepad-Controller-Joystick-For-PC-Laptop-US-/272335471216?hash=item3f68758270%3Ag%3AlVAAAOSw-itXqbA5&_trkparms=pageci%253A543b49c6-7249-11e7-b3bb-74dbd180f031%257Cparentrq%253A80ccd14a15d0ab12744ae1a8fffac697%257Ciid%253A6

Headset: (ear buds for the wiiin)

Windows: First get a usb stick.
Then download the installer from here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10ISO
Then you put the installer inside a 8 gb usb stick. Then you follow the instructions the installer tells you.


Monitor:$100
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005BZNDOO/ref=mp_s_a_1_18?ie=UTF8&qid=1500629792&sr=8-18&refinements=p_85%3A2470955011&rps=1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=pc+gaming+monitor&dpPl=1&dpID=41VGT5KS2ML&ref=plSrch

Gtx 1050 ti ($150)
https://m.newegg.com/products/N82E16814125916?nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-_-na-_-na-_-na&AID=11552995&PID=8092836


MSI B250M PRO-VD
($65)
(USA Link) - http://amzn.to/2tNG8qw

Intel Pentium G4560 ($82)
(USA Link) - http://amzn.to/2tSOlun


Ballistix Sport 8GB DDR4 ($70)
(USA Link) - http://amzn.to/2tKdtmm


EVGA 430w ($35)
(USA Link) - http://amzn.to/2tSnIFR


WD Blue 1tb ($50)
(USA Link) - http://amzn.to/2tSo3s0


Thermaltake Versa H15 Case ($40)
(USA Link) - http://amzn.to/2tJZpt3

I always wonder what people thing of this set, I call it "you just wasted $300 on a console" build.

Edit: everything is bran new, you can probably get a good 100-200 off from used parts. Enjoy the build, it can run AAA title no problem but won't get any of that 4K stuff, gets pretty much any title at high-medium at 1080p 60fps or more. Maybe less on new titles like wolfEinstein

u/Analbub · 2 pointsr/Monitors

The 1060 max-q isn't powerful enough for gaming at 1440p on any new or demanding game, so I wouldn't recommend it unless you plan on upgrading in the future or plan on building a desktop at some point that is more powerful. Also if you primarily game I would recommend 144hz over 1440p. I would stick with either 1080p 60 hz or 1080p 144hz, but the 1060 probably won't be able to fully use that 144hz on most games. I have the msi gs65, which has 1060 max-q as well, and it has a 1080p 144hz panel in it, and I get 100 fps and above on less demanding games, but any AAA or graphically intensive game struggles to get above 60. My final thoughts before recommendations would be an ips or va panel over a tn, because the response time downgrade is (imo) worth it for the amazing color reproduction. Also at 144hz i find that g-sync and freesync are not that useful and find the additional price not worth it. If you are only gaming and doing competitive games then TN is fine though. Anyway, here are my recommendations

​

If you aren't into competitive games and want good colors for watching videos and/or photo editing:

1080p 60hz: Dell U2414H

1080p 144hz: Acer ED273

​

If you are into competitive gaming and want the fastest response time here are a few options:

AOC G2460PF

Viewsonic XG2402

Acer XFA240

u/GrandmaTheyFreeMe · 1 pointr/Monitors

I just bought a couple Acer XG270HU for $300 each at Best Buy. Loving them so far. It's got this bronze/orange colored plate on it though so make sure that's not a problem for you. Cheapest 1440p 144 Hz monitor I could find with G-Sync/Freesync. Pretty happy so far. Only cons for me are colored plate and the fact the monitors can not rotate left/right on their stands. You have to rotate the entire stand. Also they can not adjust height. With all that being said they are 5/5 for me.

u/Adam_w_g · 2 pointsr/ultrawidemasterrace

I'm in the market for an UltraWide in the UK as well, and the prices here are just stupid compared to the US...The one I really want is Alienware AW3418DW but I'm waiting for a good sale on it as the "refreshed" version AW3420DW just dropped in the US and supposedly will be available in Europe 18.10.2019.At the moment AW3418DW in the US is $839 = £674But in the UK the same model costs £999 = $ 1242Amazon US Amazon UKThat is basically double the price for the same item, I know that there are differences with taxes etc but this is just ridiculous. And this trend can be spotted with different brands like ACER and ASUS.I'm holding off until I spot a great deal on either the AW3418DW or Predator X34P, and would recommend you to do the same. Hope this helps


Edit: Btw If you are looking at the Z35P, not so long ago (2-3 weeks) it was discounted on Box for ~£550, so everything you pay above that is overpaying.

u/YouSoVayne · 2 pointsr/Amd

I'd go for the 144hz personally. Even if you're not able to take full advantage of it, eventually you'll get to a point where you've upgraded enough of your components to be able to do so. Until then, Freesync will fill in the gaps.


I have an RX580 paired with an FX8350 (I know I know :p) and I'm getting 75hz on my 2560x1080 monitor on GTA5, Witcher 3, and Final Fantasy 14. I surprisingly didn't have to turn too many settings down either, GTA5/Witcher are running on ~high settings and FF14 ultra settings and I get between 70-75 frames in all of them. Paired with a 3600 I'm thinking I'll be able to get over 100fps with ease considering my archaic 8350 can do 75fps.


Definitely go for the 144hz monitor, especially since it's $20 more for nearly double the frames.


If you do decide to go with a 75hz monitor, don't grab the one you linked. I recommend looking at this one


https://www.amazon.com/LG-25UM58-P-25-Inch-21-UltraWide/dp/B01BV1XB2K/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=lg+25+ultrawide&qid=1565818969&s=electronics&sr=1-1


I've had this monitor for ~4 years now and it's been amazing. Compared to the 75hz one you linked, this one saves you $80, it's ultrawide, and it can be overclocked to 75hz easily. I've had mine overclocked for roughly a year with zero issues.

u/Soulshot96 · 2 pointsr/Monitors

Couple options for the 27 inch panel:

Asus MG279Q(IPS Freesync 4ms, 144hz, not as good as the PG, but it's cheaper, and works better with your AMD GPU thanks to freesync): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236466

This Acer(not too pretty imo but 144hz 1ms Freesync and cheap): http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XG270HU-omidpx-FREESYNC-Widescreen/dp/B00VRCLHYS/ref=sr_1_1?tag=amazon0606-20&ie=UTF8&qid=1430272001&sr=8-1&keywords=acer+xg270hu+omidpx

If you really want to save money, there is this Asus monitor(24 inches, 144hz, but TN, and only 1080p): http://www.amazon.com/Asus-VG248QE-24-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00B2HH7G0/?tag=amazon0606-20

You'll have to look at these monitors for compatibility with Vesa mounts and stuff.

As far as Ultrawides go, that is a bit trickier, you might want to either stretch the budget, or cut into the $600 for the 144hz a bit to get both. I'll post suggestions anyway.

A Dell IPS 1440p ultrawide no freesync though afaik and rather expensive: http://www.amazon.com/Dell-UltraSharp-34-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00PXYRMPE?tag=amazon0606-20

Crazy territory here, but this Acer has 75hz, 1440p, ips, freesync and a slick design, but its expensive as hell:
http://www.amazon.com/Acer-XR341CK-bmijpphz-34-inch-UltraWide/dp/B0111MRT90/ref=sr_1_15?tag=amazon0606-20&s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1436945804&sr=1-15&keywords=3440x1440

And a slightly cheaper but still pricey 1440p ips ultrawide from LG:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824025066&cm_re=1440p_ultrawide-_-24-025-066-_-Product

Look through, find some you like that both fit into your $1200 overall budget, make sure they would fit on a mount, find a mount, and go.

u/SenselessCross5 · 1 pointr/techsupport

I definitely have my pc hooked up to my monitor's usb hub, and use it to connect my kb+m.

are you trying to have the monitor connected to two devices simultaneously, and have the monitor be smart enough to send the kb+m signals to whatever device is being displayed? or would you be happy with having one cable (say usb c) that connects the hub/monitor to the computer, and just swapping that over?

​

EDIT: after looking at your monitor on Amazon and LG, it seems to me like those ports don't transfer data, and instead are meant to just be powered ports.

So my monitor (https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-bmiprz-2560x1440/dp/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1540511212&sr=1-1&keywords=acer+predator+xb271hu) actually has a cable that has to be connected to the computer, so that the kb+m are eventually connected to the pc. Do you have any cables like that? or is the display cable the only cable from your monitor to pc?

​

EDIT(2): okay, I found this page in the manual:

https://imgur.com/n33iaef

which implies that usb data can be sent over the usb c cable. so feasibly if you plug the kb+m into the monitor, and plug the usb-c cable into whichever computer you are using, it should send data to that computer. You will still need to swap the usb-c cable whenever you want to change computers, but hopefully that helps.

u/aloafofbreaddd · 4 pointsr/FortniteCompetitive

Honestly I would try and save another 100 dollars and get this 144hz monitor. You will be happy you did it. You gotta trust us on this one.


Asus VG245H 24 inchFull HD 1080p 1ms Dual HDMI Eye Care Console Gaming Monitor with FreeSync/Adaptive Sync, Black, 24-inch https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01JGYM5H6/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_kGEwCbE2ZGVQX

u/llsixtooll · 1 pointr/Monitors

I briefly had the Asus VG248QE (a day) which has a TN panel. Colors were just awful, considering that I paid $250 for it, I couldn't stomach the terrible color reproduction. Banding and dithering was painfully obvious. Needless to say, having not spoiled myself with 144Hz gaming, I decided to stick with a 60Hz monitor and went with two Dell U2414H's to replace my returned VG248QE. Beautiful, crisp colors, on a vibrant IPS display that just produces a great visual for your eyes to feast on. All wrapped up in some of the thinnest bezels in the business which would be a big plus if you're thinking triple. With a wealth of inputs (no DVI unfortunately but it didn't matter in my case, DVI to HDMI cable does the trick) and a reasonable price, I would definitely recommend it. This review might sway you one way or another. I'll also add that they're VESA compatible making them perfect for mounting.

u/callitgood · 1 pointr/buildapc

Okay, this seems like a really awesome idea and kinda fun so a few things I have still been indecisive on:

• An RGB mechanical keyboard

-Cheap is nice

-I'm looking at the Corsair K70;

• An RGB Mouse

u/Teroniz_Nightengale · 1 pointr/unrealengine

I highly suggest giving the Dell 34" 1440P Ultrawide a shot. I've been using for around half a year now and I've been loving it. It's worked amazingly well for UE4, Maya...well... pretty much everything. You can find it on amazon for $750 atm. I also suggest keeping your 27". You can't have too many monitors when it comes to production.

Here's a small example of the space.

It's also a great monitor to game on.





u/ajpearman9 · 1 pointr/ffxiv

I play mostly MMOs and RPGs and I have [this ultrawide from Dell](Dell UltraSharp U3415W PXF79 34-Inch Curved LED-Lit Monitor https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00PXYRMPE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_.dp6ybDRVZ2JE).

I got it for $600 after rebate a year and a half ago. It's absolutely perfect for games that have a lot of UI clutter, because I can move all the unimportant things to the sides and have a really wide, beautiful view of everything compared to 16:9 monitors.

The only concern is that it takes a high end GPU to push such a high resolution. I have a Nvidia 980ti and will definitely upgrade at some point because it can't push high framerates in some of the more ridiculous games. FFXIV runs beautifully though! :)

u/IntricateSunlight · 3 pointsr/Monitors

I have a 1060 as well and I use this BenQ model . Actually I have the older model that this model replaced (the new one is actually cheaper!) and I am going to get a new one to complete my dual monitor setup since I just got a new desk with room to support it.

I've been using this monitor for about 2-3 years and it has been absolutely outstanding. I'm a 1080P gamer with no intentions to go beyond that anytime soon and this monitor fits every need I have.

1ms reponse time. Zero screen tearing. No burn in from constant use. Great color expression. Easy on the eyes with long time usage. No reflections or glare. And a bunch of built-in options and features for enhancing gaming that I've never really used personally.

If you are looking for a good monitor for 1080p I recommend this one.

u/theacaciastain · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I just purchased my first 144hz monitor. Samsung C24FG70. It has connections for HDMI and DP. The HDMI can only do 120hz but has 125% rgb. I should be getting it in the mail tomorrow. My question is, should I expect to notice a huge difference between 120/144hz? I love vivid colors, and 120fps would obviously be easier to hit than 144fps, if there isn't much of a difference between the two, it would be worth it to stick with the 120hz right? Coming from a 60hz monitor.

u/herogerik · 1 pointr/pcgaming

I just recently bought the Acer Predator XB271hu and after turning it on for the first time I did not notice any difference between the "feel" on it and the 60hz monitor I have sitting next to it that I've had for 5 years. It was very underwhelming at first, especially for the money I had just invested into it.

I suddenly remembered reading a post over at r/pcmasterrace for people to double check their monitor settings both on the monitor itself, and then also in the OS. Once I went into the OSD for the Predator, sure enough, it came out of the box set to 60hz! As soon as I told it to switch to 144hz it was like my eyes were opened and I almost shed a tear at how much better everything looked and felt!

I've also recently had 2 friends who just got 144hz monitors due to me regaling them about about the benefits for both gaming and general use. (one got the Dell S2716DG and the other got the Asus PG279Q) They both had the same experience as well. It's not really an issue, seeing as it's just a few button presses to correct it, just annoying when manufacturers don't send their monitors off at their ideal refresh rate.

u/aloushiman · 1 pointr/Monitors

hi all! The recommendations given below by you all, would they be good for my rig: RTX 2080, i7-8700km 16GB Ram? I've been looking all over for a new monitor, preferably a 1440p, 144hz 27inch with G-sync. Any recommendations please?

Here's my current amazon & best buy list:

LG 27GL83A-B: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07YGZL8XF/ref=ox_sc_saved_title_2?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/lg-ultragear-27-ips-led-qhd-freesync-monitor-with-hdr-black/6358119.p?skuId=6358119 - I believe that this is the new LG on (GLA50)

ASUS ROG PG279Q 27" https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B017EVR2VM/ref=ox_sc_saved_title_3?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

Acer Predator XB271HU https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06ZXZ3QBD/ref=ox_sc_saved_title_9?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

Would appreciate any feedback or opinion please!

u/tkim91321 · 33 pointsr/buildapcsales

Have this. Phenomenal monitor. However, I would recommend Alienware AW3418DW for $30 more. The Alienware one has an updated panel and Dell's warranty is the shit.

Just be prepared to play the panel lottery. I had to go through 3 before I found one where the bleed/glow was at acceptable levels.

Also note: FREE delivery: Dec 17 - Jan 16 as of this comment posting.

u/FrontpageWatch · 1 pointr/longtail

>EDIT:
>
>I can understand the use of referral links and lots of people say they don't care. Nor do I honestly, except he wasn't contributing to this subreddit. He posted the exact setup 9 months (and 8 months) ago, this means he's here for the sole purpose to gain profit.
>
>Sure, he spent a lot of money, it's not disruptive, it's victimless, it doesn't hurt anyone and it's not a big deal. But it seems as if he's only here to earn money, he didn't even show a walkthrough of the computer build, he isn't a regular, he doesn't contribute to discussion. He posted multiple times like I've already mentioned and nothing has changed in all those posts.
>
>He's not here to show people his setup, he didn't even build anything. He's here to profit off us. Multiple posts of the same setup with all the affiliate links in every post, including links to something like a phone...
>
>Also, the problem is links like this act as infections. For approximately 24 hours (I think) after you've clicked a referral link, he will get a portion of the sale on anything you buy, so if you click a link to see the price of the something or investigate, he will earn money off everything you purchase in the next 24 hours off Amazon.
>
>_
>
>So earlier today I came across this post.
>
>I thought it was a bit suspicious how he documented absolutely every part of this "build" even though it isn't a build, it's a battlestation.
>
>He has since removed all information from his Reddit post, presumably after I commented about the Amazon links found in the post.
>
>It didn't look right because he provided links to every single item in this setup. All Amazon affiliate links, for him to make money off us.
>
>Not so bad though, right? Well, his Reddit username is "BlackWhite01", his Imgur username is "blackandwhitebattlestation", and he's been posting this absolutely identical set up on both Imgur and Reddit multiple times for a year.
>
>He did not intend to show off his battlestation, or even his computer build, he intended to come here and make money off of /r/battlestation and /r/buildapc mainly, but he's posted to a lot of other subreddits as well - presumably to pay off this setup and the ridiculous chair ($1,500).
>
>What really pisses me off is that he's also included affiliate links to stupid products like his phone. His phone?! It's fucking /r/buildapc.
>
>Alright, so there's a run down of all his Imgur and Reddit post history.
>
>Please do not click on any of the Amazon links, I've posted all items without any affiliations below.
>
>--
>Imgur
>--
>
> Submitted Imgur albums!
>
>
Imgur Album 1.
>
> Imgur Album 2
>
>
Imgur Album 3
>
> Imgur Album 4
>
>
Imgur Album 5
>
> Imgur Album 6
>
>
Imgur Album 7
>
> Imgur Album 8
>
>--
>Reddit
>--
>
>
/u/BlackWhite01 - archive link: /u/BlackWhite01
>
> Reddit Post 1
>
>
Reddit Post 2
>
> Reddit Post 3
>
>
Reddit Post 4
>
> Reddit Post 5
>
>
Reddit Post 6
>
> Reddit Post 7
>
>
Reddit Post 8
>
> Reddit Post 9
>
>
Reddit Post 10
>
>* Reddit Post 11
>
>_

>
>
>Below is a list of all the items found in the pictures. These links are NOT affiliate, I spent an enormous amount of time to provide you with the unaffiliated links.
>
>This subreddit and others shouldn't be focused on making money, it should be the exact opposite, just sharing our hobbies, enthusiasm, skills and to have open discussions without the aim being to profit.
>
>Screw this guy for trying to profit.
>
>Items
>--
>
>PC Specs:
>
>Type | Name | Link
>----|----|----
>Processor | Intel i7-4790k | Link
>Memory | Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB | Link
>Storage | Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | Link
>Motherboard | ASUS ATX DDR3 1600 LGA 1150 | Link
>CPU Cooler | Corsair Hydro Series | Link
>Video Card | ASUS GTX 980 STRIX 4GB | Link
>Case | NZXT H440 | Link
>PSU | Corsair RM750 | Link
>PSU Sleeved Cables | Corsair Power Cable Kit | Link
>
>Fans:
>
>Type | Name | Link
>---|---|----
>Front Intake | Noctua NF-F12 | Link
>CPU Cooler | Corsair SP120 | Link
>Rear Exhaust | Corsair AF140| Link
>
>Lights:
>
>Name | Link
>---|---|----
>RGB Lights | Link
>White Lights | Link
>
>Accessories:
>
>Type | Name | Link
>---|---|----
>Monitors | Dell UltraSharp 23.8" | Link
>Mounts | VideoSecu Articulating Arm | Link
>Mouse | Logitech Wireless Performance Mouse | Link
>Mousepad | Zalman Accessory AMP1000 | Link
>Keyboard | Rapoo Black KX 5.8GHz | Link
>Phone | Motorola Moto X 16GB | Link
>Phone Stand | Cooler Master JAS | Link
>Speakers | Harman Kardon SoundSticks | Link
>Webcam | Logitech HD Pro Webcam | Link
>Headphones | Samsung LEVEL | Link
>Headphone Holder | Ikea Bjärnum Folding Hook | Link
>Strip for Holder | Command Mounting Refill Strips | Link
>White Videocard Backplate | Performix 11207 Plasti-Dip | Link
>RAM Light Bar | Corsair Dominator Platinum LightBar Kit | Link
>
>Other:
>
>
>
>Type | Name | Link
>---|---|----
>Desk | Euro Style Donald Desk | Link
>Chair | Embody Chair by Herman Miller | Link
>Clock | Modern Clocks | Link
>Lights | Philips 259982 | Link
>Wire Cover | Omnimount CMK | Link
>
>Triple Monitor Wallpapers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

u/sashadkiselev · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace
I recently also made a build of around the similar budget and I got this monitor. https://www.amazon.com/LG-25UM58-P-25-Inch-21-UltraWide/dp/B01BV1XB2K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1486282828&sr=8-1&keywords=lg+25um

I also went from gaming on a laptop and the surround view is amazing. That resolution runs very near to max settings at 60fps on my 3GB 1060 so if you are planning to get either of the 1060s or either of the 480s you will be able to easily handle this resolution. But I have to note that I had a choice between this and a normal 1080p monitor. I did not have one bought already.
This build would fit your budget perfectly.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Type|Item|Price
----|:----|:----
CPU | Intel Core i5-7600K 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor | $232.99 @ SuperBiiz
CPU Cooler | Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler | $29.99 @ SuperBiiz
Motherboard | Asus STRIX Z270-E GAMING ATX LGA1151 Motherboard | $192.98 @ Newegg
Memory | Mushkin Blackline 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory | $83.99 @ Newegg
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive | $97.88 @ OutletPC
Storage | Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive | $49.33 @ OutletPC
Video Card | PowerColor Radeon RX 480 8GB Red Devil Video Card | $219.99 @ Newegg
Case | NZXT S340 (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case | $65.99 @ SuperBiiz
Power Supply | EVGA 500W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply | $43.99 @ SuperBiiz
Monitor | LG 25UM58-P 25.0" 2560x1080 75Hz Monitor | $172.99 @ Amazon
| Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts |
| Total | $1190.12
| Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-05 03:26 EST-0500 |

You can freely change some of the components if you don't like how they look, ie different manufacturer of RAM or of the GPU. But this build overall is probably the best bang for your buck at the moment. Total price does include the monitor
u/amateurBuildsman · 1 pointr/buildmeapc

I know I’m not OP, but this build is right in my budget. This post here might give more information on what I’m looking for in particular, but what you provided seems very good for me.

If I’m using this monitor and decided on using the build you provided above, would you suggest switching that out? Not super knowledgeable on this so would like your insight and what made you decide the way you did!

Thanks so much for the help :)

u/Dempsonator · 1 pointr/CoDCompetitive

I have the BenQ Gl2450hm but I can't seem to find it on amazon.com (as opposed to amazon.co.uk) but this seems like a good option: http://www.amazon.com/BenQ-GL2460HM-24-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00IKDFL4O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419366737&sr=8-1&keywords=benq+gl2450

In terms of astros, I can't personally comment about quality because I don't have a pair. However my friend managed to get a pair of A50s including everything that comes with them for £120 because he got them after being refurbished. If you want some Astros on a budget then refurbished seems like the way to go because my friend has nothing but praise for them.

u/probablyblocked · 1 pointr/buildapc

I would get the 3200mhz ram instead since the cpu will run faster then as well, but 3000 is still adequate. Prices are

Personally the monitor is fast enough and possibly overkill for most gamers.. but I'm concerned about it being a TN panel and you could probably support a 21:9 monitor which I prefer for gaming, its seriously helpful in overwatch and its hilarious when the other team doesn't have it but you do. I would also go with an ips so thst I don't get eye strain like I do with tn. My default for a new build is this though it's a bit more expensive.

https://www.amazon.com/LG-25UM58-P-25-Inch-21-UltraWide/dp/B01BV1XB2K

u/coldtires · 2 pointsr/xboxone

Watch out some G-Sync monitors are known to have compatibility issues with 1440p detection on Xbox, I've seen one or two but it's not all monitors. Worst case scenario you get stuck with 1080p.

So don't throw out any packing material in case you need to return it.

For a high quality 1440p G-Sync get the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q which is IPS.

https://www.amazon.com/PG279Q-DisplayPort-Adjustable-Ergonomic-EyeCare/dp/B017EVR2VM/

​

Now that Nvidia allows Freesync to be used you could consider a 1440p Freesync monitor instead.

This Acer is 27" 1440p IPS with a Freesync range of 40-144Hz, to use with Nvidia GPU, enable G-Sync compatible, keep v-sync enabled in games, install Rivatuner server and enable frame rate lock below max range so 138fps, that gives best results.

https://www.amazon.com/Acer-XG270HU-omidpx-FREESYNC-Widescreen/dp/B00VRCLHYS/

Xbox can also use that Freesync range with 40-60hz support in 60hz output mode and maybe even 40-120Hz with 120Hz output mode though known 120Hz Freesync support on Xbox is rare & it wont be till next gen Xbox we see high frame rate titles up to 120fps.

See AMD Freesync database for more product options and filters.

https://www.amd.com/en/products/freesync-monitors

u/coolfire1080P · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

Budget and use case would help.


Do you enjoy competitive shooters / mobas, or single player spectacle games?




If you have a golden duck that shits out money, the best of the best currently is the ACER xb270hu

(from what i've heard has better QA than the ASUS PG279Q - of which has the same specs.)



But it's highly unlikely that you'll reach 144fps at 1440p in any reasonably intensive titles with a 970.

u/pier25 · 1 pointr/Monitors

The U2715H is great for amateur photography, or for working on sRGB. At 1440p you have plenty of space and the IPS panel is pretty good. It's not retina, but that little extra pixel density bump from 1080p looks good enough for me.

If you are a pro you should probably buy a wide gamut monitor to be able to work on Adobe RGB (provided that you shoot on RAW).

If you are more concerned about resolution, you should be able to get a 4K monitor such as the Dell P2715Q for that budget although you should check if OSX supports HiDPi mode with that monitor or text will be unreadably small. I don't really know how good is color reproduction but it should be good enough unless you need critical color accuracy (in which case get a wide gamut monitor and work on Adobe RGB).