Reddit mentions: The best mental health books

We found 63 Reddit comments discussing the best mental health books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 22 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.

1. I Am Not Sick I Don't Need Help: How to Help Someone with Mental Illness Accept Treatment

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
I Am Not Sick I Don't Need Help: How to Help Someone with Mental Illness Accept Treatment
Specs:
Height8.5 Inches
Length5.75 Inches
Weight0.6 Pounds
Width0.75 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

2. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason

    Features:
  • Vintage
Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason
Specs:
ColorWhite
Height7.94 Inches
Length5.18 Inches
Weight0.50044933474 Pounds
Width0.56 Inches
Release dateNovember 1988
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

3. The Essential Difference: The Truth About The Male And Female Brain

Used Book in Good Condition
The Essential Difference: The Truth About The Male And Female Brain
Specs:
Height9.75 Inches
Length6.25 Inches
Weight1.15 Pounds
Width1 Inches
Release dateJuly 2003
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

4. Bedlam: Greed, Profiteering, and Fraud in a Mental Health System Gone Crazy

Bedlam: Greed, Profiteering, and Fraud in a Mental Health System Gone Crazy
Specs:
Height9.5 Inches
Length6.5 Inches
Weight1.35 Pounds
Width1 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

5. Dark Shades of Illusions

    Features:
  • Free Press
Dark Shades of Illusions
Specs:
Height7.99211 Inches
Length4.99999 Inches
Weight0.53131405142 Pounds
Width0.5051171 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

7. Making Monsters

Making Monsters
Specs:
Height9.5 Inches
Length6.5 Inches
Weight1.41316309942 Pounds
Width1.25 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

10. Search For The Real Self: Unmasking The Personality Disorders Of Our Age

    Features:
  • Harper Row
Search For The Real Self: Unmasking The Personality Disorders Of Our Age
Specs:
Height9.4 Inches
Length5.8 Inches
Weight0.6 Pounds
Width0.7 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

12. Nowhere to Go: The Tragic Odyssey of the Homeless Mentally Ill

Nowhere to Go: The Tragic Odyssey of the Homeless Mentally Ill
Specs:
Weight1.4 Pounds
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

14. Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche
Specs:
Height9.25 Inches
Length6.25 Inches
Weight1.1 Pounds
Width1.25 Inches
Release dateJanuary 2010
Number of items28
▼ Read Reddit mentions

15. Madness Explained: Psychosis and Human Nature

PENGUIN GROUP
Madness Explained: Psychosis and Human Nature
Specs:
Height7.75 Inches
Length5 Inches
Weight0.98546631114 Pounds
Width1.1 Inches
Release dateDecember 2005
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

17. The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct (Revised Edition)

The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct (Revised Edition)
Specs:
Height8 Inches
Length5.5 Inches
Weight0.661386786 Pounds
Width0.75 Inches
Release dateOctober 1984
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

18. Exploring Madness: Experience, Theory, and Research

    Features:
  • HarperOne
Exploring Madness: Experience, Theory, and Research
Specs:
Height0 Inches
Length0 Inches
Weight0.85 Pounds
Width0 Inches
▼ Read Reddit mentions

19. Crazy in America: The Hidden Tragedy of Our Criminalized Mentally Ill

Crazy in America: The Hidden Tragedy of Our Criminalized Mentally Ill
Specs:
Height8.25 Inches
Length5.5 Inches
Weight0.8 Pounds
Width0.78 Inches
Release dateMay 2007
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

20. The Seduction of Madness: Revolutionary Insights into the World of Psychosis and a Compassionate Approach to Recovery at Home

The Seduction of Madness: Revolutionary Insights into the World of Psychosis and a Compassionate Approach to Recovery at Home
Specs:
Height8.7 Inches
Length0.9 Inches
Weight1 Pounds
Width5.6 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

🎓 Reddit experts on mental health books

The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where mental health books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Total score: 35
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 11
Number of comments: 3
Relevant subreddits: 2
Total score: 11
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 6
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 5
Number of comments: 3
Relevant subreddits: 3
Total score: 5
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 3
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 2
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 1
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: -1
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Top Reddit comments about Mental Illness:

u/RoundSparrow · 3 pointsr/SuicideWatch

Howdy. Thanks for talking about it. It sound bad man, you seem to be really crying out and wanting to get into trouble one way or another. I entirely understand that, I'm not condemning it as much as just mirroring it back.

I saw you post this on another thread:

> i have "girl feelings" often, so i get you.

I'm pretty much that way. Let me share a bit about myself. Just to build some context on some advice. In fact, I consider myself way over-empathetic compared to "average" of current society. There are some recent studies that say Aspergers people (mostly males with extreme brains, this book is about Aspergers: http://www.amazon.com/Essential-Difference-Truth-about-Female/dp/0738208442 ) can have too much empathy. Genetics, environment, I don't know... but I'm a bit curious of this current emo trend in society.

It has really helped me in my relationships with people to be dramatic in content - not presentation - with my talking. To pull out legendary stories and say - yes, I'm not crazy, I'm just a bit extreme in my thinking. If you get good at it, most accept it. In many ways, this past 12 months has been a major social improvement in my life.

Prior to this, people liked to praise me as a computer genius, but they don't understand that my brain is this way - it isn't something I can choose to "turn off" in other areas of life. I have developed a rather unique and different way of looking at life. To carry books with me ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1843105373/ is a small on I carry ) in my laptop bag. I don't use it very often, but at times it helps to explain to people that there really are genetic issues that don't just go away. We manage them, we do our best.

From Wikipedia: "Compassion is a human emotion prompted by the pain of others. More vigorous than empathy, the feeling commonly gives rise to an active desire to alleviate another's suffering."

It might sound simplistic... but helping people, local homeless - people here. Has given me an outlet for my empathy! Instead of suppressing it, I drain it. And now I'm divorced and dating - looking for a partner in the crime of life - I am up front within the first few days as to my issues. Essentially, I'm a bit on the higher-maintenance scale. It's freedom now, I can be more myself, and actually get help from my friends instead of having to constantly try to conform / be something I'm not.

I share all this in hopes you can look at the parts of your own life and see if perhaps there is some way you can get your wife or a good friend to truly understand you have lifelong problems. that you don't react to stress like most do, it isn't fun - but it eats at you. some people thing stress is motivation, a "punish" and "whip" approach to motivation. For me, it's the opposite. I much prefer to be gently and repeatedly encouraged more like a child. I don't give a shit if people consider me a bit childish, it's real, you bring it up with my genetics or nature or god - but I'm sick of having so many people fix me.

> i imagine a Glock 9mm. the barrel forced past my tonsils as i supress the gag reflex and pull the trigger. "the cop method" of going out.

I've never had anything like this. That's far beyond what I feel. You really need to consider putting a big halt or change in your life... it's clear you are letting this image sear into your head. Time to eject.

We can keep talking, I'm not beyond even talking to your wife on the phone or what. Can we sort out a person in your life you can keep talking to daily on the phone or something? You need a buddy until you get past this. It can be people here on reddit, but ideally your wife is doing her best. it's clear you have a long-term problem, and people want quick fixes, but sometimes it isn't quick fixes. Somebody permanently in a wheelchair doesn't get "quick fixes", it's a lifestyle change. Do you think you are dealing with life-long issues here.... that need more than quick fixes?

The western man is supposed to be unique, all about individuality - but I find right now it's not really desired. Everyone just wants you to be a breadwinner, a quiet person (don't express your opinion unless it agrees with mine seems the current norm). Unless you are famous or really good looking or really cool - you don't compete with the people on TV, music, movies. I'm generalizing here, but these technologies are only 100 years old - and an iPod carrying around all this self-selected content does have a real impact on society and human to human interaction. How much, nobody can precisely measure, but I see it. I do a lot of travel (Austin, Chicago, New Orleans, Seattle, San Francisco all since September)

On this message (my response here), I know I'm all over the board a bit. Partly me today (I'm in a hurry, and a few things on my mind), but partly I'm trying to scatter your mind a bit with some new approaches to this - you gotta break this dead-end thinking you are on - and you know it.

u/OCDHUBBY · 5 pointsr/OCD

Learn as much as you can about OCD, and do you best to retain your roll as a loved one.


Bibliotherapy is helpful. So read up, as much for yourself as them.

Here's a great book that touches on some forms of OCD.

I've found this structure of communication during severe episode of OCD helpful:

LEAP: Listen, Empathize, Agree, Partner.

Reflective listening is key. Hear out your friend/family member completely, genuinely, and act like a reporter who is trying to learn all you can without judgement about what they live with. "It sounds like you don't want to live life like this, and you want things to change".

Empathize with the emotional difficulty of their disorder, and don't force your onions of treatment (i.e. you need to check into rehab, you need to be with a therapist, etc.). "It must be tough to feel unhealthy all the time, like you could be better".

Agree on things often to build trust. "I too want you to have a higher quality life."

Partner to work towards a solution. "I would love to help you get help, and we can find someone together. I'm just here for you to get through this"

This is a great book on the subject.

Not a doctor, just a husband with a loved one with a mental illness.

u/gerop30 · 55 pointsr/slatestarcodex

As for postmodernism I'll reiterate what I was saying in the other tread : if you take the principle of charity seriously you shouldn't argue about postmodernism at all because it's not a real theory actually endorsed by any of the very diverse authors lumped together under this label.

This would be a great time for Scott to engage with these ideas by reviewing a Michel Foucault book, the guy whose ideas we're mostly talking about when we talk about postmodernism.

The perfect choice would be Madness and Civilization :

  • It's a book about the history of psychiatry. It's relevant to what Scott does so it won't be a waste of time.
  • It's clearly written. It's full of interesting historical anecdotes. It's a foundational book well respected by historians.
  • It's a good illustration of the ideas of Foucault about the relationship between power and truth.
  • More cynically, having read Foucault is a useful signalling device that'll make you look sophisticated and erudite. As a symbolic capital investment it's worth it.
u/rbaltimore · 1 pointr/PenmanshipPorn

You may be surprised to hear this, but MS is not a hereditary disorder. Your family may be like mine, wherein autoimmune disorders, in general, run in the family, but even in my family, even that is questionable. What is significantly more likely to be happening in my family (and maybe yours) has to do with epigenetics. Go down that rabbit hole, it's fascinating. The MS center I go to has been offering my family to graduate medical researchers to study if/how epigenetics has played a role in the autoimmune diseases we all seem to have (especially because we have all spent most of our lives geographically and socio-culturally close to each other.

Mental illness in early hominids or even early H. sapiens is absolutely fascinating to me, though any information we find can only be inferred from things like endocasts, other neuro-structural elements in the fossil record, and from the behavior of mammals and primates, apes in particular. It can also be inferred from mental illnesses that are found to be caused 100% by biology. This book gives a thorough overview of mental illness in animals and the research studies she cites could be looked at in the quest for our own maladies. Other things we look at are mental health disorders that we know to be found in all current human cultures, with evidence in some past cultures. Schizophrenia is a good example.

We have to be careful of culture-specific disorders and disorders that are not considered disorders in other cultures. I'll give you some reading for thins:

This book is not directly about a mental health disorder, but it shows why medical and psychological anthropology is vital to living in a melting pot like the US. I have stories from my mentor, a forensic and bioanthropologist, that are similar.

This book is an absolutely fascinating book that talks about how the mental health framework has been exported all over the world. Again, it's not directly able to talk about mental illness in early hominid species, but I think it important to understand while we are on that search.

Hopefully those books will help you with your questions, at least until more fossil evidence is found, since endocasts are not just popping up everyday!

u/kinematografi · 1 pointr/AskReddit

This is a good start

and so is this!

This is, possibly surprisingly, good too.

If you're looking to jump right into a text and think you have a grip on the language, try Foucault's Madness and Civilization It's great and pretty easy to read.

Another good introduction (or at least, MY introduction to philosophy is Slavoj Zizek. He's pretty easy to read and understand, but makes ties to Lacan, Nietzsche, Heidegger, etc in a cohesive manner that makes you want to learn more. Of his work, I'd check out The Sublime Object of Ideology, The Parallax View or watch his movie! (Which is extraordinarily entertaining for how dense it is. He's also kind of amazing in a philosophical rock star kind of way.)

Hope that gets you started!

u/awakefc · 2 pointsr/schizoaffective

I am so sorry you are going through this. I highly recommend you read the book I'm Not Sick, I Don't Need Help by Dr. Amador. His brother had SAD. Excellent book. I also suggest getting involved in NAMI if you are lucky enough to have a chapter in your area. You are in for a hard lonely battle. Be sure to take care of yourself first, then your partner (if you are lucky enough to have one). Only with those two pieces in place can you hope to take care of your son. Feel free to PM if you have questions. I wish you the best.

​

u/powprodukt · 2 pointsr/AskReddit

There is no way to convince them just by telling them. Get Xavier Amadour's book I'm Not Sick and I Don't Need Help and follow his LEAP method. it's a very practical book.

My brother developed schizophrenia after smoking weed in 2008 and I have had to fine tune these techniques.

The thing to understand is that there is cognitive impairment which leads one to believe they have all their abilities completely intact prior to the mental illness. Mental illness is not definitely not something he will accept. Trust me on this. But slowly bringing his attention to all the little things that prevent him from being the best version of who he can be in a non-judgmental way can bring progress.

If he does have Schizophrenia make sure his family gets an insurance policy before he is diagnosed. If he is already diagnosed it is extremely important that you find the right medication for him. This can take years even, but the earlier and the more consistent he is on the right meds, the better his prognosis.

Unfortunately, getting picked up by the police and the hospitalizations will be a common thing for him if he doesn't go back into remission. You need to know the signs of whether things are not getting better but getting worse (in the book) so that you can call the authorities if he needs to be in a lockdown.

This illness tests everything you thought you knew about people. My condolences on this bad news. I wish you and his family the best of luck on the long mythic road to recovery. Don't hesitate to contact me with questions.

u/SubGothius · 3 pointsr/AskReddit

Short answer (inspired by this):

  • We tend to be really good with, and have great appreciation for, systematic things such as machinery, rules, games, programming, routines, troubleshooting, administration, procedures, disciplines, rhetoric, logic and argument, etc.;
  • We tend to suck at empathic things related to "reading" people, intuitively understanding and appreciating what their inner states (emotions, motivations, attitudes, etc.) are, especially if they don't say so in just so many words.

    Also, bear in mind the difference between cognitive empathy vs. affective empathy. Women tend to be so naturally adept at all sorts of empathy that they may not realize there's a difference between caring what someone thinks or feels (or something else about their inner state) vs. knowing what they think or feel. If a man is any good at one, he's likely not so good at the other; if he can read and respond to your feelings or attitudes, he still may not actually care much about you, and if he has care and concern for you, he still may not be able to tell what you think or feel if you don't tell him about it.
u/SpicyNoodleStudios · 2 pointsr/conspiracy

Behavioral Health is Mental Health. Thank you for pointing out the scientology connection. I'm not so accurate at scrutinizing the websites for certainty, I'll post a couple more articles if you'd like to review them for anything snide.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/legislators-warned-of-patient-abuse-potential-fraud-in-50-billion-for-profit-psychiatric-behavioral-market-300575229.html

https://www.behavioral.net/article/fraud-waste-and-abuse-are-dishonorable-trinity-behavioral-healthcare-2

https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20180423.449595/full/

https://oig.hhs.gov/newsroom/spotlight/2013/cmhc.asp

Here's a book from 1994 as well, I'll point out that its like 20 years old now if you'd like to highlight that

https://www.amazon.com/Bedlam-Profiteering-Mental-Health-System/dp/0312104219

https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/welcome-ad?toURL=/clinical-care/houston-psychiatrist-gets-12-years-prison-155m-medicare-fraud

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/antifraud/as-much-as-20-percent-mental-health-funds-lost-to-fraud-waste-abuse

https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/investigations/colorado-downgrades-clear-view-behavioral-healths-license-amid-contact7-investigation

https://www.nelsonhardiman.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/HCCJ_0910_18_Rothenberg.pdf

https://www.quackwatch.org/

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/06/20/immigrant-children-forcibly-injected-drugs-lawsuit-claims/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-roving-psychologist/201109/has-psychiatry-been-corrupted-beyond-repair

u/Dr_Peach · 2 pointsr/science

In terms of modding this sub, I wish more people knew Statistics 101 because it would cut down drastically on all the asinine comments about sample size, etc. But that's a pretty dry subject for a 7-hour car ride. I recently read Oliver Sacks's The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat: And Other Clinical Tales and found his writing to be quite elegant & entertaining. I was prompted to read his books after listening to Radiolab's podcast, Remembering Oliver Sacks, which would also make for a great listen on a long car ride.

u/thatsnotgneiss · 12 pointsr/Wicca

So, I have some fairly significant mental health issues, and I have NEVER heard of anyone credible saying "don't take your meds." There are no magic rituals that can banish mental health issues. Most Wiccan ministers will actively encourage you to seek out counseling and medical care.

That being said, I have found that meditation, shadow work (which is hard as hell) and spiritual growth combined with my therapy has made huge strides in my mental health. But that is not magic, that is committing to make oneself better, which is more about Wiccan beliefs than magic.

You might want to check out Dark Shades of Illusion a book written by a Wiccan with major mental health issues.

u/AscendHealthcare · 1 pointr/alcoholism

I have a book suggestion for you called "I'm Not Sick, I Don't Need Help" It's written for families of loved ones suffering from mental health issues and it's about how to convince them to eventually seek help. Good luck!

u/PurpleJollyBastard · 1 pointr/schizophrenia

I’ve heard good things about this book and it’s usually recommended by professionals.

I Am Not Sick I Don't Need Help: How to Help Someone with Mental Illness Accept Treatment By Xavier Amador https://www.amazon.com/Not-Sick-Dont-Need-Help/dp/0967718929

Hope it helps.

u/where2cop123 · 2 pointsr/BPD

Since you're in NYC have you tried looking at getting psychodynamic psychotherapy at a psychoanalytic institute? There's Transference-focused psychotherapy at NewYork-Presbyterian Weil Cornell Hospital. I know NYP offers DBT as well, if you are to go that route.

Here is a comprehensive list of all the available therapies out there to treat BPD. Because you're in NYC, you have a wider-range of available specialized therapies, than just the more popularized DBT out there.

Edit: I also found this blog post with comments critiquing their experiences at St Lukes Roosevelt Hospital's Center for Intensive Treatment of Personality Disorders (CITPD).

Maybe you can get your father to read James F Masterson's Search For the Real Self first to ease the interpersonal burden of reconciling with the past and to rekindle and ameliorate things? It may help ease the burden as it's a simplified to-the-point introductory description of folks with not just BPD but in the perspective of personality disorders in general. Alternatively, you can parse it for a limited duration for free by borrowing it online through Open Library to see what you think of it as well - account registration is required.

u/kapu808 · 2 pointsr/AskReddit

If he's taking the meds.

The best book I've seen for friends/family of folks with mental illnesses is called I Am Not Sick; I Don't Need Help. Your friend likely has little insight into his own illness, and you may or may not be the person to be helping him. It can give you some advice for supporting him and trying to have more "normal" interactions with him.

u/Periscopia · 4 pointsr/raisedbynarcissists

Please be very careful with this whole "repressed memories" business. First, there's a long sordid history of therapists "helping" patients "remember" things that never actually happened. And second, it's not at all clear that dredging up repressed memories is beneficial.

I would strongly suggest that you see a different therapist, one with a healthy skepticism of repressed memory retrieval, and discuss whether you may have been led into believing you're remembering things.

Also, it might be helpful to read a book or two on the subject:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Myth-Repressed-Memory-Allegations/dp/0312141238/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_y

http://www.amazon.com/Try-Remember-Psychiatrys-Meaning-Memory/dp/1932594396/ref=pd_cp_b_2

http://www.amazon.com/Making-Monsters-Richard-Ofshe/dp/0684196980/ref=pd_cp_b_3


u/Pokuo · 2 pointsr/worldnews

I tried to go over my kindle highlights as I've read it quite a few years ago and wouldn't want to say something incorrect and I am now sure it blended in my memory with some other works from him that I've read like this one where he writes about 11 cases of families with schizophrenic child

https://www.amazon.com/Sanity-Madness-Family-Schizophrenics-psychology/dp/0140211578/

Anyways, you mentioned lifelong eccentricity as a factor and for me the impression of his work was in the mould of treating every patient as a part of family unit, and he tried to uncover reality of that unit, and what would strike him as odd was that parents always used similar language about patients (their kids) being normal, or 'not that weird, etc.' only until some psychotic episode or other happened, where they couldn't further repress it, and strinkingly what connected many families was that the parents wouldn't acknowledge at all their part of the problem, or situation, even if they mistreated the child in the past.
It is really interesting reading, and I don't remember that many particulars, so if you are interested I can try to get the PDF your way.

u/madfrogurt · 59 pointsr/funny

Try The Essential Difference, written by a Cambridge professor of psychology.

>Men have a tendency to analyze and construct systems while women are inclined to empathize. With fresh evidence for these claims, Baron-Cohen explores how these sex differences arise more from biological than cultural causes and shows us how each brain type contributes in various ways to what we think of as "intelligence." Emphasizing that not all men have the typically "male" brain, which he calls Type "S," and not all women have the typically female brain (Type "E"), Baron-Cohen explores the cutting-edge research that illuminates our individual differences and explains why a truly "balanced" brain is so rare.

Very roughly, most girls use toys as ways of facilitating empathy play, and most boys use toys as tools for understanding how things work, due to inherent differences of the male and female mind. This doesn't mean nurture doesn't play a part in this, just that nature shouldn't be completely disregarded.

u/lalomania · 0 pointsr/funny

The fact that we dont completely know how something works doesnt mean that we cant make observations on it based on evidence. Male and Female brains, on average, have some pretty consistent characteristics that are different from each other. There is some interesting reading to do on the subject, such as:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Essential-Difference-Truth-Female/dp/0738208442

u/icecreeeam · 1 pointr/psychology

Here's a good starter, especially the first two chapters. Rappaport and Jim Kelly and Ed Trickett laid the theoretical foundations of the field (ecological paradigm). Community interventions/prevention research goes on from there. I'm a grad student in a community psychology program - Trickett is one of my professors. :)

u/ClaesCalaes · 1 pointr/psychotherapy

Ramnerö and Törneke: The ABCs of Human Behavior
https://www.amazon.com/ABCs-Human-Behavior-Behavioral-Principles/dp/1572245387
Very thorough and basic book about fundamental behavioral analysis. You may not have heard of the authors, but trust me, it's got what you're looking for.

u/NesquikMike · -1 pointsr/ukpolitics

> The only value of living in a democracy comes from the fact that the people can change the way the state acts, and in our current system that is near impossible.

Ok, well what if the voters want more of the same? If the function of democracy is to change the way the state acts, then democracy is going against the will of the people.

> I genuinely think that you are far more deluded than the person you originally responded to.

Well, thanks. Is this really necessary, it's just abusive. I bet you wouldn't be happy about abusive people having a say in governance.

> You think that even if nobody has any real say in how the government works, everything will just turn out fine anyway.

I didn't say or mean that. I was merely alluding to the fact that democracy like all non-utopian political systems has its issues.

> You don't give any value to the idea of personal agency in terms of state governance

What does this even mean?

> and frankly you're just a bit mental.

Cool, I'll call up my GP and let them know /u/TheresanotherJoswell thinks so. Seriously though you should give this a read through before you start calling people mental.

u/dowcet · 15 pointsr/AskSocialScience

A common term for this trend is "deinstitutionalization". There is a pretty extensive Wikipedia article under that title.

Here is a critical review of the book Nowhere to Go, both of which were published in the late 1980s. This book was influential in promoting the argument that deinstitutionalization contributed to a crisis of homelessness.

Here is an interesting Washington Post blog post analyzing how deinstitutionalization worked out better for populations with developmental and intellectual disabilities than for those with psychiatric illnesses.

Finally I'll quote from the abstract of an article (published in 2006) which may still reflect the consensus supported by relevant research to date:

>Although homelessness among the chronically mentally ill is closely linked with deinstitutionalization, it is not the result of deinstitutionalization per se but of the way deinstitutionalization has been carried out. The lack of planning for structured living arrangements and for adequate treatment and rehabilitative services in the community has led to many unforeseen consequences such as homelessness, the tendency for many chronic patients to become drifters, and the shunting of many of the mentally ill into the criminal justice system. it has become clear after two decades of deinstitutionalization that what is needed is a vast expansion of community housing and other services and a whole revamping of the mental health system to meet the needs of the chronically mentally ill for support and stability. In addition, mental health professionals must accept the full extent of the dependency needs of many chronic patients.

u/PoorYarga · 0 pointsr/Guildwars2

You don't have to take my word for it, but I, a rando on the internet, wasn't the first one to make that assertion, if you'd like to read 300 pages of Foucault explaining that theory further instead.

u/lolita_toilet · 1 pointr/bookexchange

I have Inner Work and Search for the Real Self from my psychotherapy class. Would you be interested in those?

u/Angrbodas_Babies · 3 pointsr/bipolar

Hey. Sorry for your loss. Here's an unordered list of things I'd like to hear about:

  • When bipolar disorder is well managed we have long periods of living pretty run-of-the-mill lives. It does take effort to manage, so I think a good understanding of spoon theory is important for people who don't have bipolar disorder.

  • While it's our responsibility to manage our symptoms, at a certain point we really can't help what we do, and it's not our fault. Our brains literally function differently.

  • We are aware of how hard it can be for our loved ones.

  • I think it would be really useful to cover the social model of disability. It's not something that gets talked about often, and it offers some real insight into why some people have hard lives.

  • It's important to me for things like this to partner with (or something similar) someone who has bipolar disorder. Equity is important not just in terms of supporting the people who have bipolar disorder, but for your audience to get a holistic understanding of what's happening.

  • A history of how mental illness is viewed and treated. I always recommend Madness and Civilization for this: https://www.amazon.com/Madness-Civilization-History-Insanity-Reason/dp/067972110X
u/RebelTactics · 1 pointr/bipolar

You know, that's the second book in the last two hours that someone has recommended that I'd like to read but can't afford. Is there some kind of book bit torrent I can find these at? The other one is this.

u/Sherlockian_Holmes · 2 pointsr/Psychonaut

If you want the DSM-IV view, it's here.

But if you want a more in-depth discussion about the nature of madness and psychosis, perhaps this would be a good start.

u/Nymeria9 · 5 pointsr/bipolar

Read "I'm not sick and I don't need help" by Xavier Amador. It really helped me learn to deal with a similar situation.
http://www.amazon.com/Not-Sick-Dont-Need-Help/dp/0967718929

u/Triteleia · 2 pointsr/BPD

Search For The Real Self: Unmasking The Personality Disorders Of Our Age by James F. Masterson, MD. The book is the most sensible and coherent explanation on why a person develops a BP.

u/Androphobe · 1 pointr/worldnews

Not being young myself, read this http://www.amazon.co.uk/Divided-Self-Existential-Sanity-Madness/dp/0141189371
Take a herbal bath and call me in the morning.

u/thatjessiecat · 1 pointr/pics

Just look at the links and answer this question: If women's underrepresentation in maths and science is because of inherent underlying differences in the brain, then why does their participation and performance in maths and science change with time, with culture, with stereotype threat, with parental influence and with training?

And of course I'm a feminist: I believe men and women are equal and should have equal respect, rights and opportunities.

ETA: you cited Baron Cohen. You don't think he has an agenda?? http://www.amazon.com/Essential-Difference-Truth-About-Female/dp/0738208442 The difference is who has facts to back up her/his position.

u/classical_hero · 1 pointr/TrueReddit

"Do you really think that large numbers of men and women starve themselves because they want to?"

No, I think it's iatrogenic, just like multiple personality disorder. I'm not sure why I'm being downvoted for this, as Ethan Watters makes a great case for it in his book Crazy Like Us:

http://www.amazon.com/Crazy-Like-Us-Globalization-American/dp/141658708X

u/snark · 17 pointsr/politics

Yeah, this is the author of "The Myth of Mental Illness."

What a fucking douche.

u/mst2010 · 1 pointr/schizophrenia

Hi Fried, I don't agree that what gets labeled schizophrenia is a "disorder" - that's a value judgment about how people respond to adverse experiences, psychological and biological.

Also do not agree that these problems have a biological origin (if by origin one means cause); that has never been confirmed. What I believe is that there are biological and epigenetic correlates to extreme distress as the person and environment interact.

Lastly, there been many, many accounts of full recovery from a diagnosis of schizophrenia; I thought that issue was already resolved and am always sincerely surprised when people say they think schizophrenia is incurable. I'll paste in here my list of reading of intensive psychotherapeutic approaches to schizophrenia, starting from decades ago and going up till the present, which contains a few hundred cases with many stories of "cure"; I think if people were more familiar with this work they'd be a lot more optimistic:


Wilhelm Reich (1945) – Character Analysis, 3rd Edition

http://www.amazon.com/Character-Analysis-Wilhelm-Reich/dp/0374509808/

Paul Federn (1952) – Ego Psychology and the Psychoses

http://www.amazon.com/psychology-psychoses-basic-classics-psychiatry/dp/B0007DODH6/

Freida-Fromm Reichmann (1960) – Principles of Intensive Psychotherapy

http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Intensive-Psychotherapy-Phoenix-Books/dp/0226265994/

Bryce Boyer and Peter Giovacchini (1967)– Psychoanalytic Treatment of Characterological and Schizophrenic Disorders

http://www.amazon.com/Psychoanalytic-treatment-schizophrenic-characterological-disorders/dp/B0006BOYG4/

Harold Searles (1968) – Schizophrenia and Related Subjects –

http://www.amazon.com/Collected-Schizophrenia-Related-Subjects-Maresfield/dp/0946439303/

Elvin Semrad (1969) – Teaching Psychotherapy of Psychotic Patients; Supervision of Beginning Residents in the “Clinical Approach”.

http://www.amazon.com/Psychotherapy-Psychotic-Supervision-Beginning-Residents/dp/080890423X/

Bryce Boyer, ed. (1973) - Master Clinicians on Treating the Regressed Patient Volume 1

http://www.amazon.com/Master-Clinicians-Treating-Regressed-Patient/dp/0876688342

Silvano Arieti (1974) – Interpretation of Schizophrenia, 2nd Edition

http://www.amazon.com/Interpretation-Schizophrenia-Silvano-Arieti/dp/0465034292/

Vamik Volkan (1976) – Primitive Internalized Object Relations: A Clinical Study of Borderline, Narcissistic, and Schizophrenic Patients

http://www.amazon.com/Primitive-Internalized-Object-Relations-Schizophrenic/dp/0823649954/

Bertram Karon and Gary VandenBos (1977) – Psychotherapy of Schizophrenia: The Treatment of Choice

http://www.amazon.com/Psychotherapy-Schizophrenia-The-Treatment-Choice-ebook/dp/B00C1OKHWO/

Bryce Boyer, ed. (1977) - Master Clinicians on Treating the Regressed Patient Volume 2

http://www.amazon.com/Master-Clinicians-Treating-Regressed-Patient/dp/1568210043

Gaetano Benedetti (1977) – Psychotherapy of Schizophrenia

http://www.amazon.com/Psychotherapy-Schizophrenia-Master-Work/dp/1568217560/

Harold Searles (1979) – The Nonhuman Environment in Normal Development and in Schizophrenia

http://www.amazon.com/Nonhuman-Environment-Normal-Development-Schizophrenia/dp/B007BNLLNE/

Harold Searles (1979) – Countertransference and Related Subjects

http://www.amazon.com/Countertransference-Related-Subjects-Selected-Papers/dp/0823610853

Ping-Nie Pao (1979) – Schizophrenic Disorders: Theory and Treatment from a Psychodynamic Point of View

http://www.amazon.com/Schizophrenic-Disorders-Theory-Treatment-Psychodynamic/dp/0823659909/

Donald Rinsley (1980) – Treatment of the Severely Disturbed Adolescent

http://www.amazon.com/Treatment-Severely-Disturbed-Adolescent-Rinsley/dp/1568212224/

Bryce Boyer (1983) – The Regressed Patient

http://www.amazon.com/Regressed-Patient-Bryce-L-Boyer/dp/0876686269/

Herbert Rosenfeld (1985) – Psychotic States: A Psychoanalytical Approach

http://www.amazon.com/Psychotic-States-Psychoanalytic-Approach-Maresfield/dp/0950714682/

Herbert Rosenfeld (1987) – Impasse and Interpretation: Therapeutic and Anti-Therapeutic Factors in the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Psychotic, Borderline, and Neurotic Patients

http://www.amazon.com/Impasse-Interpretation-Anti-Therapeutic-Psychoanalytic-Psychoanalysis/dp/0415010128/

Bent Rosenbaum (1988) – The Language of Psychosis

http://www.amazon.com/Language-Psychosis-Bent-Rosenbaum/dp/0814774032

Thomas Ogden (1988) – The Primitive Edge of Experience

http://www.amazon.com/Primitive-Edge-Experience-Thomas-Ogden-ebook/dp/B001XCVU4E/

Edward Podvoll (1991) – The Seduction of Madness: Revolutionary Insights into the World of Psychosis and a Compassionate Approach to Recovery at Home

http://www.amazon.com/Seduction-Madness-Revolutionary-Psychosis-Compassionate/dp/0060921188/

David Rosenfeld (1992) – The Psychotic Aspects of the Personality

http://www.amazon.com/Psychotic-Aspects-Personality-David-Rosenfeld-ebook/dp/B005NYS2C6/

Gaetano Benedetti and Pier-Maria Furlan (1993) – Psychotherapy of Schizophrenia: Effective Clinical Approaches – Controversies, Critiques and Recommendations

http://www.amazon.com/Psychotherapy-Schizophrenia-Effective-Approaches-Controversies-Recommendations/dp/088937077X/

Michael Robbins (1993) – Experiences of Schizophrenia: An Integration of the Personal, Scientific, and Therapeutic

http://www.amazon.com/Experiences-Schizophrenia-Integration-Scientific-Therapeutic/dp/0898629977/

u/brutay · 35 pointsr/AskDocs

Not a doctor nor a psychiatrist, but I've had to deal with mental illness in my family. The inability to recognize clinically evident symptoms is called anosognosia and treating for it is difficult and unintuitive.

I want to mention a book for OP and any others dealing with potential anosognosia in their life:

I Am Not Sick, I Don't Need Help by Xavier Amador--written by a psychiatrist whose brother developed schizophrenia. He gives excellent advice to those wanting to advocate on behalf of family with no insight into their illness.

u/SanityInAnarchy · 1 pointr/changemyview

> I am focusing on these cases because the calls for improving mental health is cited as some kind of fix to this situation.

You're picking out specific cases and asking to solve those, when it's being cited as a way to improve the situation as a whole. If you're looking for a solution that prevents 100% of all spree killings ever, I think you're right, no practical solution exists -- very few problems of this scale are ever truly fixed, such that they can never happen again. Smallpox is the only example that comes to mind.

> How could an overhaul of mental health identify spree killers who are not already identified as having mental health issues?

Even if it didn't, I think my comment above applies -- some spree killers were identified as having mental health issues.

Increased awareness and decreased stigma could help identify people who have mental issues before they become killers.

> If you do find someone at risk for violence what then? What can you do with that information?

Depends on the level of risk, of course, but consider one of your examples: James Holmes was almost involuntarily committed. Had he been committed, he would've been held for treatment until he was much less likely to be a danger to himself or others. If he never met the criteria for release, that's sad, but that means he'd be held in an environment where he physically can't commit a spree killing.

But there are plenty of other scenarios -- you could have someone who isn't yet a danger, but may become so if they don't get help. Right now, people often don't seek help, because of the stigma -- even after the fact, Ted Kaczynski refused to make an insanity plea. There's a very good book about how difficult it can be to convince a loved one that there's even something wrong. (I can tell you from personal experience that it can be incredibly difficult -- often the illness itself will interfere with the very kind of insight the person would need to realize they're sick. We don't need to be piling societal judgement on top of that!)

And even when people seek help, therapy is expensive. And even when they can afford the therapy, even if they can afford the drugs, and even if they'll cooperate with all these things, and even if it then works perfectly and they end up graduating from the medication to being truly normal, they often won't tell anyone for fear of being seen as weird, despite how surprisingly common this is.

Fix that, and you might prevent more people from becoming dangers in the first place, or at least ensure that more people end up being detected and committed before they can kill anyone.

You could accuse me of picking out specific examples with Holmes and Kaczynski, but I only need an existence proof -- maybe this only works for Holmes, and wouldn't have helped Lanza, I don't know. My only claim here is that a) this would probably reduce the number of spree killings (but not eliminate it), and b) even if it didn't, it would improve things for the better, so we should do it anyway.