Reddit mentions of Archeofuturism

DE comes from the assumption that the enlightenment tradition got all the fundamentals wrong and as such assumes devils advocate stances and comes to new discoveries.

So this includes:
Manosphere
Christian Traditionalism
HBD
Post-Libertarianism
Nationalism
Monarchism
Anti-democarcy

And many more unnamed and undiscovered.

It's a general classification and not a movement. Same with NRx. They represent the intellectual discourse of different alternative right groups. Basically focused on not-Euclidean right with analysis (I have a 90% article on the topic I have to beef up and edit) but is not a movement in any useful sense of the word.

I wrote a comment on outside in discussing to topic:
http://www.reddit.com/r/DarkEnlightenment/comments/21vb2b/soapjackal_discusses_the_nrx_within_to/

DE is really just HBD, American white nationalists, and post libertarian thinkers who got together to talk out of a rejecting of modernity. They have deep roots in enlightenment thought, even if they don't like it.

Archeofuturism is the creation of Guillame Faye, European new-right writer, after he saw the failures of the European new right movements and decided to take a hiatus and after a few years came out with an idea for the future. It was translated into English from french recently:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1907166106?pc_redir=1396424751&robot_redir=1

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Archeofuturism

It is basically the combination of the nominally progressive masturbation that is futurism and archaic governing structures.

The book mainly deals with the faults of the new right, the failure of modernity, the benefit of archaic governance, the use of technology, the imminent crisis, and a shorty scifi story at the end.

It's not very specific on what an archeofuturist regime formally does or how it will come about but the book is mainly designed to promote imagination of a new future.

The primary differnce between DE and Archeofuturism is one is a truth movement from the right with varying factions and archeofuturism is an idealistic call for something beyond pure atavism and reaction (as the new right and NRx are both prone todo)

I see the fact that atavism is the main draw. We don't like the world now, so we should go back to a better governance (or social engineer one) is basically the concept.

It will be the main draw and differentiation between the different factions. Americans will want republics the Germans will want kingdoms etc etc.

However this 'reaction' is only good at calling bs on modernity. It isn't prescriptive or capable of tilling the soil for a new phyle. Th-is why I'm personnaly interested in getting as many intelligent minds into non-Euclidean structured discourse and forming fraternal associations with like minded k type males to go beyond reaction and neoreaction.

The Europeans already have some atavistic phyles forming so if there isn't a German phyle that you like go forth and find those with your world view and hang with them. Begin the rough process of developing a phyle.