#822 in Reference books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 2

We found 2 Reddit mentions of Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking. Here are the top ones.

Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height8.52 Inches
Length5.76 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateAugust 2004
Weight0.65 Pounds
Width0.69 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 2 comments on Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking:

u/abookaday · 2 pointsr/energy

ayellowbunny :

>That is another fallacy: Its no fallacy because you are a pin head...LOL

>I guess you couldn't find any facts to refute batteries being an economically viable: No need for me to prove anything. You're the idiot saying batteries are viable. So its up to you to provide a link where the factory has not burned down.. LOL

>All the PV cells use an MEMC silicon ingot: I will point out that MEMC provides ingots on contract to every pv manufacturer world wide include Setek and Siemens. You comment just provides you have no clue what you are talking about for the 19th time.

>I never falsely espoused I was wasting my time: I'm just waiting to see your reaction when you realize I am deleting the comments after we are done... LOL

>The fact remains you have not really said anything interesting or important. Plus, its clear you have no clue how any of this works and that is why you cannot just move on. I find your ignorant rant -funny.


>That is another fallacy: Its no fallacy because you are a pin head...LOL

Well the ownness is on you to learn what a fallacy is.

>I guess you couldn't find any facts to refute batteries being an economically viable: No need for me to prove anything. You're the idiot saying batteries are viable. So its up to you to provide a link where the factory has not burned down.. LOL

Well, it’s clear you don’t understand how a supported argument works. May I suggest reading [Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking.] (http://www.amazon.com/Being-Logical-Guide-Good-Thinking/dp/1400061717)
In addition, I really think you don’t understand the difference between product viability and temporary production halt.

>All the PV cells use an MEMC silicon ingot: I will point out that MEMC provides ingots on contract to every pv manufacturer world wide include Setek and Siemens. You comment just provides you have no clue what you are talking about for the 19th time.

All of your are patently posits are false. Do you know what vertical integration is? You should read up on Canadian Solar! Also curious how you didn't respond again about non-Silcon PVs.

>I never falsely espoused I was wasting my time: I'm just waiting to see your reaction when you realize I am deleting the comments after we are done... LOL

You did twice say I was wasting your time and even expressed exasperation, and yet you continue to reply thus evidencing you don’t consider this a waste of your time. Hence you did falsely espouse.
I’m not really sure what you’re looking for. I guess I’m confused why you would delete your replies which you hold to be correct. Although I’m not too concerned as all of your comments older than 16 hours have been deleted. I suppose that's just your MO, ayellowbunny. Besides, you’re aware our conversation is fully cached by Google, yes?


>The fact remains you have not really said anything interesting or important.

Well that is your opinion to hold, but hardly an objective fact.

>Plus, its clear you have no clue how any of this works and that is why you cannot just move on. I find your ignorant rant -funny.

You should as your “sister” about projection.

Finally, I’m very glad to hear you no longer consider talking with me a waste of your time. :)


And for simplicity’s sake:
>I'm sure she will enjoy psychoanalyzing your comments.

Sure. There isn’t much there to analyze, much less make a thorough assessment, but best of luck to her.

u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/reddit.com

I also recommend the book, Being Logical. It is about effective logical thinking, that will help us in arguments and finally writing essays.

> McInerny, in Being Logical, becomes to thinking what Strunk and White have long been to writing. A voice of common sense, a voice reminding us what the essentials are.
> Consider the following McInerny reminder: "The whole purpose of reasoning, of logic, is to arrive at the truth of things. This is often an arduous task, as truth can sometimes be painfully elusive. But not to pursue truth would be absurd, since it is the only thing that gives meaning to all of our endeavors."