#19 in DSLR camers
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled

Sentiment score: 7
Reddit mentions: 17

We found 17 Reddit mentions of Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled. Here are the top ones.

Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • 20.2MP full frame CMOS sensor
  • 4.5 frames per second continuous shooting
  • 1080p HD video recording with manual controls
  • 11 point AF system
  • 3 inch LCD with 1,040,000 dots.Lens Mount:Canon EF mount
Specs:
ColorBlack
Height4.37 Inches
Length5.71 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateSeptember 2012
Sizenone
Weight1.7 Pounds
Width2.8 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 17 comments on Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled:

u/AlisonBert · 3 pointsr/photography

Yes, go for the full frame. I wish I had begun this way. Full-frames have various advantages. For example, you will have more flexibility with the lenses you can use. I love my 85mm 1.8 for portraits, but with a crop sensor, I would have to back up too far from my subject. Same for the 50mm 1.4, which I use for live performances. Full frames are also better in low light.

Canon and Nikon both have excellent full frames. I'm curious about the new Canon 6D, which looks like a great deal: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1368909139&sr=1-1&keywords=canon+6d

u/Scolez · 2 pointsr/photography

I'm looking to buy a Canon 6D that is slightly used. I was looking at third party sellers on Amazon and there are some great deals, but these sellers have little to no ratings. Is it best to avoid these altogether and buy from someone who has a lot of ratings?

Here are the deals:

  • $450 Brand New 1 rating
  • $750 Like New 0 ratings
  • $1100 Like New 0 ratings
u/brunerww · 2 pointsr/videography

Hi /u/unstablepenguin - here are a couple of real estate videos shot with the GH4 and a 7-14mm f4 lens (supplemented with a UAV for the aerials) - as far as I can see, there are no problems with low light interiors or blown windows:

http://vimeo.com/101704302

http://vimeo.com/96907146

The [$1698 GH4] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00I9GYG8O/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00I9GYG8O&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) is a much better video camera than the [$1899 6D] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009B0MZ8U/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B009B0MZ8U&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20).

The 6D has no headphone jack, no video autofocus and no video viewfinder, forcing you to use the LCD for composition and critical focus because DSLR viewfinders go blank when you record video - this can be a problem outdoors when the sun washes out most LCDs.

Hope this is helpful!

Bill

u/binary_bob · 2 pointsr/pics

the mark ii is discontinued now, the next gen is the mark iii, but i'd recommend the 6d at this point. You can look up the prices for them on amazon, but for the lazy:

canon 6d

5d mark ii

u/AaronKClark · 2 pointsr/photography

I'm running a Rebel XT from 2005. I currently have the 18-55 EFS kit lens, a 75-300 EF lens, a 50mm prime EF Lens and a Sigma 24mm Super-wide II lens.

Assuming I could only buy one or the other, would I be better served by getting the 24-105mm L IS USM lens here;

or the Canon 6D here?


u/TheRealMattyPanda · 2 pointsr/gadgets

Using DSLRs as a example.

A Canon 6D is 20.2 megapixels.

To that you can use a Canon 50mm lens for $125 or you could use a Zeiss 50mm lens for $615, both are still going into 20.2MP sensor.

Or, that Canon 6D is $999 before you get a lens, or you could get this Canon Powershot point and shoot for $209. Both are 20.2MP, but one's definitely takes a hell of a lot better pictures than the other.

u/papatonepictures · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

A Canon 6D.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U

When I was getting started, I started with a DSLR that was not a full-frame camera. A year later, and being someone who's very into portraiture as you will be, I had to upgrade to a full-frame sensor. I wish I had started with something higher-level that I could grow into, instead of something entry-level, that I grew out of. Now I have two cameras...but one of them doesn't get much use at all.

The 6D has most of the features that the 5d Mark iii has, but costs less. It's pro-sumer camera. It's a tiny bit more expensive than what you're looking to spend. But it'll be worth it.

If sensor size isn't a major concern, you could, however, take a completely different tack. Photography isn't much about the camera. You're going to need to learn about many things before you'll really know what you want in a camera. Since you're doing still photography, you could learn with an older, used DSLR, for about $100. Then, once you have a better idea for what it is you need, functionally, you can spend that big wad of cash burning a hole in your pocket.

The guys at DigitalRev did a good video about this.

http://youtu.be/T4ZvAFCt5Sk

The temptation, at the beginning, is to think that a better camera will get you better pictures (I was under that misconception myself for a very long time). While this is sort of the case, what's actually true is that knowing how to take good photos is what really matters, and you can do that with some VERY inexpensive gear.

u/r08 · 1 pointr/Canon6D

Here are some trends of pricing on amazon. (make sure to click the "3rd party used box." it's right around 1k now for 3rd party used.

http://camelcamelcamel.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/product/B009B0MZ8U?context=browse

u/provideocreator · 1 pointr/videography

Since you need to be doing photography and not video, you need a camera that's better for that. A Canon 6D would be one of your cheaper options to go full frame, which I would recommend for this. Otherwise a Canon T6i can work too with the right lens. I would go for the full frame camera if you can for this situation for sure though.

For the lens, others have recommended Rokinon and they're absolute correct for this. Go with the Rokinon 14mm f2.8 if you'll be shooting stars. That's a wide angle lens for these cameras and it lets in lots of light.

Then you'll definitely need a tripod. Just get something solid if you don't have one already. You don't want it shaking or getting blown around if it's windy. That will ruin your images.

The last thing is an intervalometer. That will allow you to select your shutter speed at take pictures continuously. You don't want to be touching the camera when shooting at night, since it will move slightly and the image won't be quite as sharp. Use this one if you choose the 6D and this one if you choose the T6i.

Lastly, as recommended, try to get good at night photography before jumping into the timelapse video area.

^This ^post ^contains ^affiliate ^links.

u/oifoefveteran · 1 pointr/pics

The conditions around here at night have been pretty stable. We've had a max of 3kt winds on the ground at night which helps to keep the skies clear from not kicking up dust.

Temps have hovered around 80-83 degrees Fahrenheit and the moon seems to disappear around 0200-0300 every night.

So far as equipment used, I was using:

Canon 6D

16-35mm f/2.8L II

u/Gaimar · 1 pointr/photography

This? Or This?

I've been looking at upgrading to a full frame, but with the smaller jobs that I've been finding that its easier to focus on what different lenses can get me because body upgrades seem to escalate the price point at an exponential rate.

u/atworkworking · 1 pointr/UFOs

Okay, so here is what I have so far:

Canon 6d Body Only - $999 Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled https://www.amazon.com/dp/B009B0MZ8U/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_ztfUAbQ2EFJEK

200mm telephoto lens - $599 Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000053HH5/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_xvfUAbCW0138S

Gimbal - $65 The OFFICIAL ROXANT PRO video camera stabilizer Limited Edition (Midnight Black) With Low Profile Handle for GoPro, Smartphone, Canon, Nikon - or any camera up to 2.1 lbs. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00S10KFTC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_YxfUAb4K36DB2

Look good?

u/nolan1971 · 1 pointr/pics

Right, but that's what /u/Inviditas was explaining. The "trick" to this picture is the settings used and the length of the exposure. Different settings and a faster (or slower, for that matter) exposure would produce a different picture.

Incidentally, OP said that he used a Canon 6D. It's not a point-and-shoot, so there's no "factory settings".

u/Sailorcuff · 1 pointr/photography

So you're saying I should go all in and invest into the 6d with the 24-105 L?