#16,083 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 7

We found 7 Reddit mentions of Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Here are the top ones.

Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • BENCH MOUNT: Bike repair stand mounted on a bench is more stable than portable and foldable repair stand. It can handle harsh bike mechanic or maintenance jobs, such as removing and installing pedals, bottom brackets etc. Max bike weight limit: 20kg or 45 lbs.
  • FULL METAL: The workstand is made of heavy duty steel except rubber protection coating. No more broken parts! With it's 360 degree turning and side swinging clamp, it can clamp on seatpost, bike top tube, seat tube or even down tube. (Please watch our detailed video in the listing).
  • MOUNTING HOLES: Mounting flange has four predrilled holes, allowing use of bolts or lag bolts to mount ( Mounting bolts not included ).
  • DURABLE: We understand what kind of workstand riders need. The quick release & bolts are both heat treated and approved not to be stripped anytime. Workstand weight: 6.5 lbs.
  • ORDER NOW, WORRY FREE! We're so confident about our product quality that we can provide a life time warranty ! Made in Taiwan.
Specs:
Height10.25 Inches
Length7.5 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateNovember 2007
Weight4.33428807092 Pounds
Width2 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 7 comments on Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament:

u/DrKC9N · 5 pointsr/Reformed

I just picked up Beale and Carson's Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament but haven't cracked it yet. I expect it to cover your (1) thoroughly.

u/Total_Denomination · 3 pointsr/AcademicBiblical

Revelation is apocalyptic, so much of its allusions are a muddled conglomeration of thematic ideas -- not usually a specific one to pin point. So be careful when trying to specify exactly. But the book as a whole really "drips of the OT", as I had a prof once state (i.e. references the OT without explicitly referencing the OT). So when I read, I'm looking for OT allusions or echoes. So would agree that the Isaianic references are likely. These demonstrate more of supremacy rather than oneness -- although the latter really demonstrates the former, so it could be both -- especially if you hold to a Johannine authorship since "oneness" is a key theme in the Johannine corpus.

Also note where in the book these references occur. The "first and the last" in chps 1 and 2 and "the beginning and the end" in the final chapter. In the final chapter, God/Jesus have demonstrated their supremacy in their victory over death, sin, Satan, etc. so 22.13 is really the final proclamation of this supremacy. And note the three-fold repetition of the proclamation, denoting completion. They also serve as inclusio (i.e. thematic "bookends") for the book as a whole. The idea in the inclusio generally represents a guideline for authorial intent, and thus interpretation. It's also (possibly) an inclusio to the Johannie corpus as well (cf. Jn 1.1). So there's a good bit going on here, both intercontextually and intracontextually.

Just my initial thoughts. But if you're really wanting further info, I'd recommend these two commentaries: NT Use of the OT, Revelation (NIGTC). I would consider the first source a must-have reference for any NT student worth his salt.

EDIT: gloss, grammar

u/ExiledSanity · 2 pointsr/TrueChristian

I don't think this is exclusive to Matthew, the NT writers seem to use the OT in a way that modern folks would get totally blasted for.

I've been meaning to pick this book up for a while, but haven't got around to it. Might be worth considering for tackling these types of questions.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0801026938/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1484612155&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=commentary+on+the+new+testament+use+of+the+old+testament

u/WertFig · 2 pointsr/Catacombs

I think it's not a struggle to understand the NT, but a struggle to understand the OT for me. There is grace and love in the OT that we don't see. I'm no theological scholar of any standing, and certainly not an OT scholar, but despite God's earthly wrath against men in the OT, I think it only stands as a testament to his loving faithfulness to the covenant he made with Abraham and, through Abraham, with Israel.

It is tough to reconcile, sometimes. A book I've had on my Amazon wishlist has been the Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament edited G.K. Beale and D.A. Carson, hoping that it will help me resolve some of these issues in my own heart.

Edit: I hope your dissertation goes well! You chose a good season in which to write on that topic.

u/superlewis · 1 pointr/Reformed

If you want to help him in his studies rather than buy something especially for his soul, every seminarian should have Carson and Beale's Commentary on NT use of OT. It's a wee but pricy and probably won't be required for a specific class so he probably won't end up buying it himself. However, it is immensely valuable. I think that makes it a great option as a gift.