#20 in Political reference books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Comparative Politics Today: A Theoretical Framework (6th Edition)
Sentiment score: -1
Reddit mentions: 1
We found 1 Reddit mentions of Comparative Politics Today: A Theoretical Framework (6th Edition). Here are the top ones.
or
- Premium Plant-Based Ingredients: Our Whole Food Multivitamins are made with plant-based vitamins and minerals including Vitamin D3 from lichen, Vitamin E from Sunflower, and Calcium and Magnesium from marine algae.
- Whole Food Nutrition: Our multivitamins are made with real, organic fruits and vegetables for that whole food nutrition your body craves, complete with nutritional cofactors that help your body recognize and absorb the nutrients.
- Better Bioavailability: Our premium formula includes activated B vitamins like Methyl Folate, B6 P-5-P, and B12 Methylcobalamin, and chelated minerals like Selenium and Zinc for better absorption and bioavailability.
- Antioxidant Superfoods: Our formula includes antioxidant-rich herbal extracts like turmeric, ginseng, green tea, ginger, grapeseed, lutein, and maca to support your energy, brain health, heart health, and eye health.
- Healthy Gut Support: A blend of digestive enzymes and probiotics is included to help your body break down and absorb the nutrients in your multivitain and your food, and to support healthy digestion and a happy gut.
Features:
Specs:
| Height | 8.9 Inches |
| Length | 0.7 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Weight | 0.661386786 Pounds |
| Width | 5.9 Inches |
I'm struggling to accept I just read that.
Do you think that because "political science" has the word "political" in it, you're free to ignore the "science" part, and substitute in "opinion"?
Serious question.
Because you just did the equivalent of telling a Mathematician that 5 + 5 = 10 is in fact a matter of opinion.
You just told a Geologist that alternating layers of rock containing organic material being sedimentary rock is actually subjective.
You just told an English professor that two independent clauses needing to be separated by a comma and a conjunction is open to interpretation.
The term "spoiler" is a fixed concept. It's not open to what you "think" it means. The arrogance in thinking so is astounding. A propaganda tool of donors? Are you fucking kidding me? The parties say it because it's a repeated pattern proven time and time again by political scientists like Gabriel Almond and Justin Buchler. I challenge you to read Gabriel's book Comparative Politics Today because it's a good introduction to comparative politics and its theories (to clarify, theories here being scientific theories, not your opinion.)
Political science is not a secret club where we all just spout our opinions on gun control. It's a literal science that dedicates time to studying how voters behave, understanding party actions, concrete cause and effect, international relations, and a host of other topics I doubt you never considered.
Bruce Bueno De Mesquita is a political science who turned international politics and nation reactions into a mathematical problem able to predict actions based on Game Theory as just one example.
And you're going to trounce all of that because, what, you don't want to accept it? You think Political Science is actually just a big conspiracy set up by Big Pharma?
You'll go and trash a Republican for refusing to listen to science on climate change but refuse to listen to science in politics because it disagrees with your view of the world all the same?
Go away.