Reddit mentions of Darwin Devolves: The New Science About DNA That Challenges Evolution

> Yeah, I'd like to read it

Cool! Let me know if/when you start, maybe a few of us here can read it together and discuss.

> I'm going to see if it's on audio so can listen at work

You can! Amazon has it on Audible. :)

> What interview are you referring to?

I linked it here.

That's a very tortured reading of just one of the stories of a post-resurrection appearance.

I was thinking about what you said about us deserving more proof. Frankly, I think we've got far more than we have any right to when compared to previous generations.

In Jesus' day, only a few thousand people saw him work a miracle. Only a thousand at most saw him after the resurrection. In all of human history, seeing the supernatural has been confined to a relative handful of people.

Today, though, every single person in the developed world has access to

• scientific proof the universe began at a finite moment in time
  
  
• solid evidence of intentional design in the fabric of the universe, our planet, and biology
  
  
• documented evidence of miracles
  
  
• documented evidence of a non-material aspect of humans, some would even say of life after death
  
  
• solid evidence that the gospels are trustworthy
  
  
• and evidence that whether the gospels are historically reliable or merely "religious stories", Jesus really did rise from the dead.
  
  No, we don't get to see Jesus in the flesh -- walking on water or otherwise -- but we've got more than any generation since his has had. Far more. And we're going to be held responsible for what we did with that privilege.

Where to start, there is so much to choose from, so many books, videos, images, documentaries, interview testimony. This is your own journey, if you want to know the truth, you’ll find it. Maybe look up how our sciences have been controlled, corrupted, and suppressed to start, like the 5,002 classified patents. Maybe something easy like the book Darwin Devolves would be sufficient for you to understand that macro evolution is a failed and totally disproven theory, and science needs to catch up. Maybe Lloyd Pye's work. I don’t know how someone so entrenched in scientism dogma starts, but I hope you will.

I suggest you vary your reading. Odd Jackdaw has just given you are reading list of extremely biased sources (wikipedia editors in particular are extremely hostile to anything not in keeping with atheism or evolution. )


For balance you can begin with these sites


https://evolutionnews.org
https://uncommondescent.com
https://blog.drwile.com (one of the few YEC sites I read)


For Books


Stephen Meyer's books are pretty good ( and hated by adherents of Darwinism)


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002C949BI/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
https://www.amazon.com/Darwins-Doubt-Explosive-Origin-Intelligent-ebook/dp/B0089LOM5G


and the ever loved Michael Behe


https://www.amazon.com/Darwin-Devolves-Science-Challenges-Evolution/dp/0062842617/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=michael+behe&qid=1562441940&s=gateway&sr=8-3