#205,405 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We Need? (Debating Ethics)

Sentiment score: 0
Reddit mentions: 1

We found 1 Reddit mentions of Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We Need? (Debating Ethics). Here are the top ones.

Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We Need? (Debating Ethics)
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Seiko Japan Quartz Movement (Cal 4T57)
  • Stainless Steel Case and Band, Push Button Release Clasp
  • Mineral Crystal, Date Display, Chronograph Function
  • Case Size: 43 mm Diameter, 11 mm Thickness
  • Water Resistant - 100 M, Screw Down Caseback
Specs:
Height0.9 inches
Length8.9 inches
Number of items1
Release dateOctober 2016
Width5.9 inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 1 comment on Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We Need? (Debating Ethics):

u/ILikeBigAZ ยท 1 pointr/dgu

Well, the answers to your questions might be in his forthcoming book, which I am looking forward to reading.

And, your "therefore we have many laws" statement actually concedes his point as to the legitimacy of gun control laws. His question is whether it is ethical to use self defense as an argument against gun control law.

And correlation actually does imply causation, though of course, it doesn't prove it.

I frankly don't see good evidence that gun ownership results in a net reduction in injury rates (aka self protection), criminal or otherwise. Anecdotal reports of DGU aside.

The onus is really on the proponents like you. Can you prove that DGU results in a net increase in personal safety?