#31,242 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Evolution Impossible
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 2
We found 2 Reddit mentions of Evolution Impossible. Here are the top ones.
Buying options
View on Amazon.comor
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 8.9 Inches |
Length | 6 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0.57099725858 Pounds |
Width | 0.6 Inches |
I guess he could have meant this one. (Same name, written by a "doctor").
http://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Impossible-Dr-John-Ashton/dp/0890516812/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1394132469&sr=8-1&keywords=evolution+impossible
I am familiar with the Miller-Urey experiment. Problem is they produced left and right handed amino acids. Life (proteins) only uses left handed amino acids (due to the DNA structure) and right handed amino acids would destroy it. Also, having amino acids is like having letters. A far, far cry from completed books. Books take thought. Coding takes thought. DNA took thought.
​
\>>>>Things that do occur naturally within nature are therefore not analogous.
That is a circular reasoning argument. The iPhone is designed, but it does not occur naturally. You are assuming that just because something occurs in nature that it is therefore not designed. But that is the very premise I am proposing. Nature is indeed designed. And that shows there was a Designer.
\>>> as this relies on a closed system which the Earth is not.
Yes, But the energy from the sun would need a vehicle to do any good. Gas poured onto the hood of a car is worthless. It has to be poured onto a well designed engine to do good. The energy from the sun would have been worthless unless there was a system in place to utilize it.
\>>> Mutations are not the enemy of evolutionary theory.
Mutations are almost always harmful to life. DNA has a mechanism by which it attempts to correct mutations. How does this system design itself?
\>>> "Evidence" 6 - It just hurts my head to read this. Somebody doesn't understand combinations and permutations.
No - if you read PH''s who advocate this point of view - they say the same thing. The statistics against life forming by chance are astronomical. This is why many believe in asteroid seeding life theories. Read "Evolution Impossible" by Dr. Ashton. Here is his bio.
--------------
Dr. John Ashton Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Sciences at Victoria University, Melbourne, and Adjunct Professor of Applied Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, the largest Australian tertiary institution. He holds a BSc (Honors) with prize in chemistry and PhD in epistemology (a branch of philosophy dealing with the limits of knowledge), also with prize, from the University of Newcastle and an MSc in chemistry from the University of Tasmania. Dr. Ashton is a Chartered Fellow of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute, and a former Honorary Associate in the School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences at the University of Sydney.
https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Impossible-Dr-John-Ashton/dp/0890516812/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1542396973&sr=8-1&keywords=evolution+impossible+dr+john+ashton