#1,044 in Arts & photography books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Film Art: An Introduction

Sentiment score: 3
Reddit mentions: 4

We found 4 Reddit mentions of Film Art: An Introduction. Here are the top ones.

Film Art: An Introduction
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height10.25 Inches
Length0.75 Inches
Number of items1
Weight0.55 Pounds
Width8.5 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 4 comments on Film Art: An Introduction:

u/IFeelOstrichSized · 10 pointsr/TrueFilm

Okay, The Power of Film is a very well known book on film in general, its history and importance.

Film Art: An Introduction is another very popular book on film in general, focusing on techniques, criticism, and a little bit of history.

The Oxford Guide to Film Studies seems to be a good introduction to film analysis and study.

Movies and Methods seems to be a frequently recommended book on film criticism. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings seems to be more complex(with an apparently deceptive title), but very popular as well.

The Oxford History of World Cinema is a really great basic book on film history.

I have not read all these books, but I have pdf copies of several and am planning on buying some of these so, please, someone comment if you think one of my recommendations was bad or if you have a better suggestion with a similar subject.

*I added titles.

u/Loneytunes · 4 pointsr/TrueFilm

As that asshole who posted that thing, I...

A. Narcissistically think it's awesome that you're asking this question. Mostly because I asked this question, and I honestly enjoy film more because of it. I disagree completely with the idea that when one understands art more it's thus more difficult to enjoy it.

B. Literary theory is helpful with many films, especially the more standard ones. It becomes less helpful when we get into more avant garde cinema, but either way, I think it's a great jumping off point but one should preferably support the analysis that has been framed in Literary terms via Cinematic ones, because that's where the evidence to support your theory actually lies.

C. Here are my bullet points of advice, in the interest of economizing information:

  • Read some books on film theory. A really good place to start is with the work of Bordwell & Thompson, which is pretty standard practice for film students. That will give you a rudimentary and foundational vocabulary through which you can begin understanding film better, and often that's the problem is not knowing what to look for.

  • If you can, try to talk about film as much as you can with people who know more than you. I meet for drinks regularly with a former professor and screenwriter who has done more in the industry than most and is one of the smartest people I know. I can keep up with him, but he's clearly way ahead of me as he should be. I've learned and figured out specific films almost as much just talking out ideas with similarly informed people, as just sitting there watching them or reading about them.

  • Read up on a wide variety of topics, specifically philosophy, art theory and psychology as well as perhaps some science, anthropology and history. Find fields with which you are really fascinated by. Those who are interested in physics, determinism or analytic philosophy will look at and interpret film in a different way than others, I'd imagine they may be heavily structuralist and influenced by the Soviet Montage school in their own work, for instance. Someone else more interested in history and science may approach film from a sociological perspective as well as subscribe to some interesting ideas such as Jean Epstein's theory that film breaks the space time continuum. Me, myself, I'm really fascinated with psychoanalysis and abstractly cosmic concepts, things that cut to the core of human experience, and couldn't care less about free will or analytics because I don't see how they change anything phenomenologically. So it would make sense that I'm drawn to surrealism, and analyze film is a post-structural, Lacanian way, as well as drawing much of my support for interpretations from the semiotic aesthetics when I can.

  • Write stuff. Often I don't figure out a movie until I start writing, and then it just sort of comes out fully formed much of the time. If you have a blog send me a link too, I'd like to see it. Anyway.

  • Once you've determined your points of interest it will be easier to decide who to read/watch next but I find these ones were the most enlightening for me. So if you like what I said about my own viewpoint above, they will help, and I'll include some things that are standard that I don't prefer but am glad I read as well.

    Christian Metz will teach you about how film communicates information through non-verbal aesthetics. If you want to understand how to analyze film via a non-literary perspective, this is where to start.

    Hugo Munsterberg is the father of most film theory. Oddly, he doesn't seem to like movies very much, but the book has some very relevant information on the interaction between film and spectator, that is essential (assuming a relatively modern approach at least. I suppose a formalist wouldn't care too much about the meaning of the film itself and thus the relationship wouldn't matter).

    Slavoj Zizek has a lot of books on cinema, but also his documentary "The Perverts Guide to Cinema" is one of the most entertaining, as well as informative looks at film I've seen. It doesn't really address aesthetic elements as well as take a Lacanian look at why certain scenes provoke the reactions they do or what they mean, but I think that if one combines this psychological perspective with the understanding of how juxtaposition of elements conditions the viewer as evidenced by a lot of Soviet Film Theory, one can figure out the mechanism of how these meanings are being communicated. Also here's an interesting more structural take on Zizek that I've read.

    I don't find it necessarily essential to my own views, but Sergei Eisenstein has a lot of really interesting work, and his books use a lot of synonymous examples in other art to illustrate how film works differently from theater and other narrative form. It also breaks down the Soviet Montage theory better than almost any other work.

    Another essential book for many that I'm not a huge fan of yet I'd still say is pretty important to read is What Is Cinema by Andre Bazin
    Dude loves movies and is pretty enlightening for many people I just disagree with a lot of his ideas of how film should best be made.

    Andrew Sarris is a relatively important guy for understanding American film criticism. He and Pauline Kael warred for a while, and I think Pauline Kael is a blowhard ignoramous who never actually said anything relevant or informed about movies. People love her though, probably because she was an entertaining writer, and she was influential. But anyway, Sarris was the one who brought auteur theory, the dominant theory of understanding filmmaking today, to America from France.

    An interesting look at directorial style and authorship is Martin Scorese's "A Personal Journey Through American Movies". It's not comprehensive or detailed, but it will not only show you some great classical era films to look up, but he has a unique idea of the director as filling one of four roles, storyteller, illusionist, smuggler and iconoclast. As a side note, I think Scorsese sees himself as a Smuggler, and attempts to be much more so in the wake of his reaching iconic status. For a much more challenging work of film criticism from a director that is still alive, check out Histoire(s) du Cinema by Jean-Luc Godard.

    Finally I'd say Tom Gunning, who I actually met once and was fascinating to listen to, is pretty important. He's mostly focused on early film, and the development of how a film communicates narrative. He will illustrate some interesting things on spacial reasoning and editing and how logical information is communicated. For instance now in film you know which character is on the left by giving him some negative talk space in close up on the right, and when a character leaves frame on the right they enter the next from on the left if one wishes to maintain continuity of space, time and setting. Also his cinema of attractions theory is pretty interesting and explains exactly why people go watch Michael Bay movies, as well as elucidating the mentality of film-goers in the pre-Griffith era.

    Also, look around the web. Some places like Slant.com, RogerEbert.com's essays and blogs sections, or Mubi.com occasionally have some really interesting stuff. Also there are random blogs around that do really enlightening work (like mine! shameless self promotion aside, if you want it I'll send it to you but I'm not gonna be that douche) that I sometimes stumble across.

    Let me know if you have any questions or need clarification, and good luck!
u/RobotAlienProphet · 3 pointsr/Atlanta

Yeah -- this is being said in a harsh way, but it's the real deal. Film school is often very expensive, with a relatively poor ROI. And the opportunity costs of sitting in a classroom, when you could be working, are also high.

If you want to learn technical skills in other departments, since you're already in the industry, just make friends with people in the other departments and ask them to hire you on a job or two. Really -- people love giving someone with enthusiasm a chance. You'll probably have to start out at the bottom in any department you lateral to, but, hey, still cheaper than school.

If you want to learn more about film in a critical sense -- like, the why of certain technical choices -- you can teach yourself most of that:

  • First, if you like to read, there are great standard textbooks, like Bordwell & Thompson, and you can rent the videos and read along. You can also learn a ton by reading great critics, like Andrew Sarris, Robin Wood, and Jonathan Rosenbaum. Or there are online film theorists like Every Frame a Painting.
  • Second, watch everything you can get your hands on, including old movies, foreign films, experimental films, "tentpole" action pics, Netflix originals, YouTube/Vimeo, etc., etc., etc.
  • Third, try to reproduce what you see, or use it as a starting point to try something new -- an cell phone or iPad camera is perfectly good (way, way better than anything available to normal people when I was starting out). Use your household lamps or flashlights as light sources if you don't have anything else. You really will figure it out.

    If you're still not convinced, though -- I agree with the redditor above who suggests GFA, which partners with community colleges and looks to be relatively affordable.