#4 in 20th century literary criticism books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Literary Criticism
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 1
We found 1 Reddit mentions of Literary Criticism. Here are the top ones.
or
- EASILY REPAIR TIRES: Repair punctured tubeless tires or fix a flat on most vehicles without removing the tire from the rim; Rasp tool quickly removes objects from tires, and insert needle adds tire plugs
- FAST AND EFFICIENT: Car emergency kit gets you back on the road without needing to use a spare tire; Emergency tire sealant can be used as adhesive to ensure that tire leaks and punctures are completely secure
- FLEXIBLE TIRE PATCH KIT: Flat tire kit repairs car, ATV, RV, lawnmower, wheelbarrow, and other tubeless tires; The ultimate tire plug repair kit for emergencies and quick car tire plugs
- HEAVY DUTY TOOLS: Tire repair kit with plugs includes a hardened steel rasp and insert needle for durability; T-handle design provides greater leverage and improved torque compared with similar kits for car tire patches
- INCLUDED IN PACKAGING: (5) 4 inch string tire repair plugs, rasp tool, insert needle tool, and rubber tire repair cement; Add-on tire repair plug sets sold separately: 26684 (30 pack) and 26685 (100 pack)
Features:
Specs:
| Release date | May 2017 |
For a post about methodological historicism, the terms people are throwing out in response could sure use some more careful historicizing. Personally, I would call the two methods you describe "historicizing" and "strategic" or "interested" forms of reading.
Given your question, you may be interested in the work of Joseph North. His recent (and controversial) book Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History draws a broad distinction between two modes of reading: scholarship and criticism. Where that distinction gets interesting for you is when he starts characterizing the former:
>“We might call this the “historicist/contextualist” paradigm, by which I simply mean that almost all of the most influential movements in literary studies since the 1980s [i.e., since the rise of what u/drjeffy rightly calls New Historicism] have proceeded on the assumption that, for academic purposes, works of literature are chiefly of interest as diagnostic instruments for determining the state of the cultures in which they were written or read”
That looks to me a lot like what you're describing in scenario one. I'm less sure that you and he mean the same thing about scenario two, but the overlap is worth exploring if you're curious.