#17,560 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Making Starships and Stargates: The Science of Interstellar Transport and Absurdly Benign Wormholes (Springer Praxis Books)

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 5

We found 5 Reddit mentions of Making Starships and Stargates: The Science of Interstellar Transport and Absurdly Benign Wormholes (Springer Praxis Books). Here are the top ones.

Making Starships and Stargates: The Science of Interstellar Transport and Absurdly Benign Wormholes (Springer Praxis Books)
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Springer
Specs:
Height9.45 Inches
Length6.61 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateDecember 2012
Weight1.1904962148 Pounds
Width0.7 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 5 comments on Making Starships and Stargates: The Science of Interstellar Transport and Absurdly Benign Wormholes (Springer Praxis Books):

u/[deleted] · 34 pointsr/IAmA

Dr. Kaku,

Thanks so much for the AMA.

I have a few questions, but I haven’t yet had a chance to read your new book, so I apologize if you’ve answered these explicitly already:

  • On the last Skeptics Guide to the Universe podcast, you mentioned that distant memory implantation techniques may allow us to learn something like Calculus at the push of a button. Do you have any ethical concerns about instantaneous learning, or does the benefit to widespread mathematical and scientific literacy outweigh the negatives?

  • What’s your favorite recent paper in theoretical physics?

  • Finally, your thoughts as a physicist: do you find any theoretical spacecraft travel/propulsion techniques compelling? This book – Making Starships and Stargates was mentioned during NASA’s Advanced Concepts Symposium, and I was wondering if you’d read it or followed the research?

    EDIT: After reading the book (my first M. Kaku book), and observing how carefully all of the legitimate and rigorous questions are avoided in the AMA, I am astoundingly disappointed at the quality of the "science" Kaku conducts. Pseudo-science and drivel. I feel like my brain needs a shower.

u/spacerfirstclass · 18 pointsr/SpaceXLounge

Not directly related to SpaceX, but pretty exciting news, it could really open up the solar system (thus makes Mars colonization easier, so not totally unrelated to SpaceX ;-) ). This drive is similar in effect to EMDrive, but is much less controversial and has much better theoretical foundation, it's also less well-known. To see a layman's explanation of this drive, see: https://boingboing.net/2014/11/24/the-quest-for-a-reactionless-s.html, there's also a book: Making Starships and Stargates: The Science of Interstellar Transport and Absurdly Benign Wormholes

NIAC is NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts, it's a program to provide small amount of funding for TRL 1 breakthrough technologies, this is the best part of NASA IMHO, really what NASA should be doing.

u/ItsAConspiracy · 3 pointsr/Futurology

Isn't it guaranteed by Noether's theorem?

McCulloch's blog is entertaining, if you haven't seen it.

I also have Woodward's book but haven't read it yet.

u/IAmMulletron · 2 pointsr/EmDrive

He's known as GIThruster and Ron Stahl on NSF. Both banned. A Woodward crony. His MO is to plug pseudoscience books on Amazon.com. http://www.amazon.com/Making-Starships-Stargates-Interstellar-Transport/dp/1461456223

He completely blew up EmDrive thread 1.

u/Mindrust · 1 pointr/Futurology

This is probably the 2nd time I've seen Woodward mentioned on reddit. It's about time he's got some exposure. If there's any chance of a breakthrough propulsion scheme that actually works, then my money is on Woodward.

He also wrote a book recently, if anyone is interested in the details of his propulsion scheme: Making Starships and Stargates