Reddit mentions of Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration

>And as I said, I do not believe 10/15 to be a significant difference in applications to be indicative of racism, particularly when these applications are garbage data flooding a hiring managers desk with identical resumes.

Care to give a quantitative, statistical reason as to why that's not a significant difference? Because otherwise, your notion that it's the result of flooding an employer with identical resumes is bunk. How would that lead to white candidates getting more call-backs?

> If you cannot provide them that's fairly indicative that it is not easily verifiable, no?

Here's a start. Please let me know how each one of these fails to meet your exacting standards:

The Mark of a Criminal Record

Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market

Sequencing Disadvantage: Barriers to Employment Facing Young Black and White Men with Criminal Records

Race at Work: Realities of Race and Criminal Record in the NYC Job Market (PDF)

Race and the Invisible Hand (book)

[Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration (book)] (https://www.amazon.com/Marked-Race-Crime-Finding-Incarceration/dp/0226644847/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1492906619&sr=8-1&keywords=Marked%3A+Race%2C+Crime%2C+and+Finding+Work+in+an+Era+of+Mass+Incarceration)

Heres a link to the book, "Marked," by the sociologist, Devah Pager, who did the study. Its a really great book.

http://www.amazon.com/Marked-Race-Crime-Finding-Incarceration/dp/0226644847