#303 in Digital camera lenses
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 8
We found 8 Reddit mentions of Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras. Here are the top ones.
or
F-mount lens/DX formatfilter-attachment size: 58mm, (p = 075 mm)Maximum Reproduction Ratio: 0.22x. 105-450Mm (35mm equivalent)Aperture range: f/45-63 to F/32Nikon VR image stabilizationAccess Lens settings in camera menuThe number of cameras Compatible with both lenses is limited even for compatible cameras, firmware update may be required* Fully compatible Models: D7500, D5600, D5500, D5300*, D3400, D3300*, D500 and later modelsCompatible Models with limited functions: D5, D810 series, DF, D750, D7200, D7100, D5200, Nikon 1 Series with the ft1Incompatible models: D4 series, D3 series, D2 series, D1 series, D800 series, D700, D610, D600, D300 series, D200, D100, D7000, D5100, D5000, D90, D80, D70 series, D3200, D3100, D3000, D60, D50, D40 series, film cameras
Specs:
| Color | Black |
| Height | 2.83 Inches |
| Length | 4.92 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | September 2016 |
| Weight | 0.914 Pounds |
| Width | 2.83 Inches |
I have the Nikon D3300 and use this for my nature shots. That's probably the best budget zoom, if you want more length/wider aperture it starts to get a lot more expensive.
I recently got into motorsport photography. Not quite birds but it also moves fast, requires good focus and you're far away.
I did this on a limited budget. And I'd suggest you do the same, with your 800 pounds that is very possible.
For a Camera I'd suggest one of Nikons older Pro Sports cameras, The Nikon D300 or D300s. They features a excellent autofocus system, better than many of the newer cameras suggested (like the D3300 or such).
​
The D300 should run about 200 pounds on Ebay. This is for example a good model with about 44k clicks. The D300S is a bit more. It's not crucial ,it shoots 1 frame per second more (7 opposed to the 6 of the non S model). But the D300 with a battery grip can Shoot 8 fps too so not a big deal. The 300S also does video, 720p, the 300 non S does no video. And lastly the D300s features duel card slots, a CompactFlasah slot and a SD card slot, the D300 only has a CompactFlash slot. All these things aren't really worth the extra cost to me, but they might be to you.
​
So we got 200 pounds spend there, lets add about 30 for a good Compact Flash card (Sandisk ones are solid, I'd recommend 32gb or so).
​
Now onto lenses. Since you're shooting birds you want range. Unfortunately massive reach also means massive cost. So to start out I'd recommend the new AF-P DX Nikkor 70-300 mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR . It's a newer lens with a extremely quiet autofocus motor. It's 70-300mm ( you can multiply this by 1.5 for a crop sensor body like the D300, So you reach will be 105mm - 450mm).
​
It's not super far, some telephoto lenses run up to 800mm . But it's only 300 pounds which Is very affordable for a long lens. It's absolutely crucial you get the VR version of this lens. The VR version has image stabiisation, which is important if you want to shoot long ranges and hand held.
​
So with those things we are up to 200+30+300 = 530 pounds. That's a fairly essential kit and I reckon you should be off well with that to start. I'd recommend you also buy a solid tripod. I use the Amazon Basics one, but it's not that great. I'd recommend a higher quality one. Its too short for me and it's not that sturdy, but it was cheap as chips. Regardless I'd suggest to invest once in a good tripod. ) And lastly a bag. I use this K&F Sling bag to carry it all. Spend the remainder of the money on some trips to places with actual birds :)
Mind you, these lenses don't have the widest apertures around so these work well in daylight. If you want to shoot in the evening or at night these really wont do. You'll go into 8000 pound territory there.
​
Later on I'd suggest looking at the Sigma 150-600mm F/5-6.3 DG HSM Contemporary . Which is a incredible value telephoto lens. For faster prime lenses, there is a 300mm F4 vintage Nikon that is manual focus , but does have a wider aperture and costs about 250-300 pounds used.
​
That's probably the best you can do with your limited budget. I know 800 pounds is a lot of money but wildlife photography is probably the most expensive vorm of photography.
​
​
TLDR: Buy a Nikon D300, the AF-P 70-300mm DX lens with VR. Buy a tripod/bag/CF card and later invest in the 150-600mm Sigma Contemporary.
​
The Tamron is a copy of an older FX Nikon AF-S 70-300 VR. The Tamron is supposed to be a little sharper but I don't know about the color rendition.
The Nikon AF-S 70-300 VR it is a copy of has recently fallen in price dramatically as 4 newer Nikon AF-P 70-300's have moved in. They are newer, sharper, quieter, and faster to focus but have slightly smaller apertures. If you have a newer camera and aren't also supporting and older camera I might look at the AF-P 70-300s. DX if you have a DX camera and always VR for that telephoto focal length.
AF-P DX 70-300 VR
Edit: I guess it won't let me link to a refurb one but they are out there. Check compatibility with your camera. Get the size you need DX or FX, and just stick with VR.
I have a D5600 as well. Here are some good lenses:
For filters, you'll want a CPL (Circular Polarizer/Linear) and either a set of ND filters or a variable stop one. Buy filters for your largest size lens and get step-down rings so they will work on your other lenses (rather than buying filters for each size lens you have).
Yeah, that'll come with an 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6. That's a good zoom range and you'll come to find what focal lengths your like shooting at, then you can buy faster prime lenses like the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 or the Nikon 50mm f/1.8. If you want a long lens, the best affordable one is the Nikon 70-300 f/4.5-6.3 VR (VR being Vibration Reduction, aka image stabilization), I wouldn't recommend the version without VR as it only save you $50 and it's well worth it.
For tripods, I'd definitely suggest spending a little more, and getting something like the Vanguard VEO 2 264AB for $160, which I personally have. You probably couldn't go wrong with any of their tripods, but heavier tripods tend to be more stable for longer exposures. I don't have any personal experience, but a lot of people suggest the Manfrotto brand.
If you absolutely can't wait to save up some money, the Dolica GX600B200 Proline will do a decent job at $50.
Meh, too lazy to create an account over there. If anyone is curious, I was talking about this lens :AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR . It's at least 140 $ less than the MSRP and any other retailer.
Do you mean this one? Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300 mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR Lens for DSLR Cameras (Black) https://www.amazon.in/dp/B01KJ8UMKK/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_y3YrDbH44VX5E
Seem like the 70-300mm AF-P DX would be great for your purpose. It has reasonnably good sharpness even at 300mm while not being too expensive. There's two version of this lens. The one without vibration reduction is a bit cheaper (around 300$ CAD) https://www.amazon.ca/Nikon-70-300mm-4-5-6-3G-ED-VR/dp/B01KJ8UMKK
If you add a D7200, you will be close to your budget of 1300$ CAD