#29,449 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 2

We found 2 Reddit mentions of On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth. Here are the top ones.

On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
Liberty Fund
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateOctober 1993
Weight1.62701149356 Pounds
Width1 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 2 comments on On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth:

u/MetaMemeticMagician · 1 pointr/TheNewRight

Reactionary Thought

Chartism – Thomas Carlyle
Latter-Day Pamphlets – Thomas Carlyle

The Bow of Ulysses – James Anthony Froude
Popular Government – Henry Summers Maine

Shooting Niagara – Carlyle
The Occasional Discourse – Carlyle
On Heroes, Hero Worship & the Heroic in History – Carlyle

The Handbook of Traditional Living – Raido
Men Among the Ruins – Julius Evola
Ride the Tiger – Julius Evola
Revolt Against the Modern World – Julius Evola

Reflections of a Russian Statesman – Konstantin Pobedonostsev
Popular Government – Henry Maine
Patriarcha (the Natural Power of Kings) – Sir Robert Filmer
Decline of the West – Oswald Spengler
Hour of Decision – Oswald Spengler
On Power – Jouvenel
Against Democracy and Equality – Tomislav Sunic
New Culture, New Right – Michael O’Meara
Why We Fight – Guillaume Faye
The Rising Tide of Color – Lothrop Stoddard
Liberty or Equality – Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
Democracy: The God that Failed – Hans-Hermann Hoppe

****

Economics

Economics in One Lesson – Henry Hazlitt
Basic Economics – Thomas Sowell
That Which is Seen and That Which is Not Seen – Frederic Bastiat***
Man, Economy, and State – Murray Rothbard
Human Action – Ludwig von Mises

****

​

u/chewingofthecud · 1 pointr/CapitalismVSocialism

Bertrand de Jouvenel's On Power is indispensable to have a realistic view of power in modern times. He was a liberal intellectual whose analysis and conclusions are so much at odds with each other that it's hard to see how he managed to stay committed to his liberalism.