#18 in Fascism books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of OWO (The Anti-Elite Series Book 5)

Sentiment score: 0
Reddit mentions: 1

We found 1 Reddit mentions of OWO (The Anti-Elite Series Book 5). Here are the top ones.

OWO (The Anti-Elite Series Book 5)
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Synthetic/mesh upper
  • Responsive EVA midsole with ABZORB cushioning
  • NB Response 2.0 performance insert
Specs:
Release dateOctober 2011

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 1 comment on OWO (The Anti-Elite Series Book 5):

u/Illumagus · 2 pointsr/Hyperianism

Part 1

Nine questions posed to you and you didn't answer any of them. Not even one! You didn't even attempt to, because you have no clue how. And yet you actually think you're in a position to argue some kind of case. That's sad. Your "number of errors per sentence" is remarkably high. Your comment is based on nothing substantial, except uninformed sophistry and arrogant cretinism. Shall we dissect it anyway?

>Essentially the universe is made of nothing. We only exist because of the nature of zero. WOW

You're getting closer. Well done? In fact, the universe is made of mathematics. We exist because of ontological mathematics and the PSR (Principle of Sufficient Reason).

>You don't think that concept has already been done before?

OM has been approached in part by Pythagoras, Leibniz, Hegel, Godel et al but no, the field of OM is entirely new to the public domain. It would be disingenuous of you to try to claim otherwise. Also, you are reducing OM to a soundbite "We exist because of zero", when in fact it is much more than that. The implications of OM are massive. OM replaces science, and in time will create far superior technology than science ever did. It is an entirely new paradigm. Rather than dismissing OM as wrong or as some sinister conspiracy, now you're trying to dismiss it as "obvious". More sophistry.

>The math way is just boring. Nobody likes math.

(Oh really? We do.) There's the human problem in a nutshell. Mathematics is the truth, yet the hordes of irrational Dunning-Kruger types reject the Truth because they don't "like" mathematics. It doesn't fit with their emotions, senses and mysticism. It doesn't fit with their semantic, irrational biases.

>And yes, I do actually understand most of this bullshit, and it's still bullshit no matter how confusing it can be at first. What an assumption it is for you to say I don't

You're changing your tune, aren't you? - now that you realize that you're hopelessly intellectually outmatched. If you actually understood OM and the PSR, you wouldn't be dismissing it as "bullshit", would you? Ergo, you don't understand it. Sad. What an assumption? It's obvious from every sentence that you wrote that you don't understand OM, didn't try to, perhaps you aren't even able to (as an extreme Sensory type, and anomic troll). What an assumption for you to assume that you know more than history's greatest geniuses - Leibniz et al. What a hilariously wrong Dunning-Kruger assumption for you to believe that you can use reason to fight against the PSR (reason!), and attempt to dismiss a position as "bullshit" when you still clearly know nothing about it!

>I'm not allowed to have an opinion??? [more whining]

Yes, you're "allowed to have your opinion". (Which is subjective, anti-rational, and formed from Dunning-Kruger misconceptions). But your opinion is objectively wrong.

>I disagreed with rationalism

Bingo. You out yourself clearly (you did before as well of course) as irrational. You are literally pitting yourself (and your subjective Dunning-Kruger opinions) against reason, against rationalism, against the PSR. How deluded can you get?

>you responded quite dogmatically

Awww... little troll got your feelings hurt? What a world, when being rational is considered being "dogmatic".

>I'm not wrong in having an opinion ... I'm not just a troll. People aren't just one single thing.

Yes you are. Your insistence on subjective, objectively wrong opinions (i.e. they go against the Principle of Sufficient Reason) shows that you are a Sophist, anomic troll, relativist, and an "all truths" charlatan. You're right, you're not just one thing! But being a troll (as you admitted yourself) shapes your entire "identity".

>Meritocracy is not some brand new idea

As elucidated by Adam Weishaupt and Michael Faust, yes it is. More charlatanry, sophistry, and strawman attacks. Keep throwing your paper planes at an adamantium fortress of logic and reason.

>It's generally how society actually works

Is this satire? Society at present is completely anti-meritocratic: a quagmire of nepotism, cronyism and entrenched elites. Now, maybe people say society is a "meritocracy", but as you've shown all too clearly, just because someone says something doesn't make it true. Review basic logic 101.

>anything else in the world with any form of a hierarchy functions because of a merit based system

No, virtually all hierarchies function based on the Peter Principle, on nepotism/cronyism, and plutocracy. It's deeply ingrained - the Old World Order has made sure of it. Meritorious candidates from unprivileged backgrounds for the most part don't stand a chance, or they may get "lucky" - but all the odds are stacked against them, in order to benefit a rigged cartel of plutocratic, dynastic elites passing on their wealth via inheritance and trust funds, and giving each other all the top jobs. There is no genuine meritocracy anywhere in the world. How can you be so simple as to claim that an anti-meritocracy is somehow a "meritocracy"? Do you just not know what the word means? Or are you so desperate to attack Hyperianism / Illuminism and troll us that you'll cling to any risible nonsense, no matter how irrational?

https://www.amazon.com/OWO-Anti-Elite-Book-Adam-Weishaupt-ebook/dp/B005VU2UMA

>You guys are really going to save the world by forcing the world to work the way it already does

The world currently functions as an anti-meritocracy. Our meritocracy is the complete opposite. Get a grip.

>That's the reality factor, known as stupidity

No, stupidity is your entire comment history. What you're actually referring to is nepotism and cronyism i.e. anti-meritocracy. And even if you did have a case, we can eliminate stupidity (=anti-meritocracy). It's defeatist and ridiculous to claim otherwise.

>there will never be a fix for stupidity

Here we go again with the defeatist and nihilistic claptrap. How irrational and in fact utterly useless to sit on your ass and claim "well, that can never be solved.. nothing can ever be solved.. wow, you're trying to solve it? look at you, you moron, you! everyone knows nothing can ever be fixed. the problems are too great. just sit on your ass like me. changing things doesn't work. just give up already".

What an utter and pathetic loser. What, are you going to whine about me being "mean" to you again? If you don't like the fire, get the fuck off the oven. It's not my role to indulge whiny and irrationally persistent trolls.