#15 in Mirrorless cameras
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of PANASONIC LUMIX GX85 Camera with 12-32mm Lens, 4K, 5 Axis Body Stabilization, 3 Inch Tilt and Touch Display, DMC-GX85KK (Black USA)
Sentiment score: 5
Reddit mentions: 11
We found 11 Reddit mentions of PANASONIC LUMIX GX85 Camera with 12-32mm Lens, 4K, 5 Axis Body Stabilization, 3 Inch Tilt and Touch Display, DMC-GX85KK (Black USA). Here are the top ones.
or
New 5-axis in-body sensor stabilizer works with LUMIX 2-axis optically stabilized lenses in video and still capture modes using class-leading Dual Image StabilizationEliminates the need for low-pass sensor filters while boosting fine detail resolving power by nearly 10% over existing 16-Megapixel MFT sensorsShoot lighter and faster with the modern hybrid photography performance of a Mirrorless camera and nearly half the bulk of most DSLRsThumbwheel controls, integrated viewfinder and touch control enabled tilting LCD maximize control of the photographic experienceCapture spontaneous moments with 4K imaging performance in both 4K video and exclusive 4K PHOTO and Post Focus. Dust reduction system: Supersonic wave filter
Specs:
| Color | Black |
| Height | 2.78 Inches |
| Length | 1.73 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | May 2016 |
| Size | 1.7 x 4.8 x 2.8 inches |
| Weight | 1.09 Pounds |
| Width | 4.8 Inches |
Avoid the Canon Rebel series for this. They make a great stills camera, but they're not that great for video (video footage out of them doesn't look very good).
I would go with the G7, then shoot in 4K, even if you're delivering at 1080p and then downscale the footage. The other one you should consider is the Panasonic GX85. The advantage with that one over the G7 is that it has stabilization, BUT it doesn't have a microphone input, so figure out what's more important to you.
Other than that, go for a Panasonic, no question...
m43 shooter here.
Fuji makes great stills cameras. They have notoriously bad video. It's ok for personal use, but not usable in a professional context. Here is a short sample.
Even old fuji models get feature upgrades via firmware updates - the X-E2 is nearly identical to the X-E2S due to a firmware update. Fuji glass is all good. "Fuji’s 18-55mm is regularly viewed as the non-kit lens kit lens. People rave about it’s sharpness, the quality of its bokeh."
Sony makes computers that can take pictures and video. They probably take the best pictures for a given intro price, but I personally dislike their usability. I prefer physical controls to ones on a screen.
----------------------------------
I know you didn't ask, but if you want the most compact option, m43 is the way to go. Yes, the sensor is smaller, but that means the lenses require less glass.
Olympus makes stills-oriented cameras that have ok video. Their newest camera is a rangefinder style as well, but it's $1200 without a lens.
Panasonic and Sony are competitors for the best video. The GX85 might be of interest. It is the first camera with in-body stabilized 4k video, which you might like.
----------------------------------
Size comparison
With both the Panasonic and the Sony, you will need another lens to get the best iq. The Fuji's kit lens doesn't have that problem.
If you want stills, go with the Fuji. If you want a smaller camera, Panasonic. Between these options I wouldn't get the Sony.
Good luck :)
Honestly I think you'd be a lot better off with a camera such as this one. 4k and IBIS for under $500 is an insane deal that will make you much more competitive.
I'd sell the t5i, and buy a that camera.
> A 90 second exposure of the sky is gonna give you streaky stars no matter what the focal length.
Whatever the number is. I'm not an astrophotographer, just trying to impart the importance of shooting longer than the pre-programmed exposure lengths.
As far as your suggestion of the T7i... I can't help but feel like that's a lateral upgrade at best. Marginally better video features and another kit lens for $1000; could sell the T5, get a used body and a $600 lens and be off to the races. Or a GX85 with a kit lens for $600 that has dual image stabilization and 4K video AND have $400 left over for a sexier lens.
I dunno; t2i was my first camera, t3i was my second camera, then GH3, then GH5, and then a Fuji to add into the mix. The Fuji is my favorite by a wide margin. APS-C sensor trumps the MFT sensors of the GH series, with better image quality and color science than the Canons, and a small form factor for street photography or low key videography. One of my favorite low-fi DP's shot on a t2i and a 30mm Sigma f/1.4; I don't see a reason to get a T7i over that combo.
Not trying to be Cathy Contrarian, just my two cents.
/u/bymatthew - I am a GH4 shooter, but the GX85 looks like a [very nice travel camera for $797.99] (https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-Megapixels-Stabilization/dp/B01DOKHSH0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&qid=1465790134&sr=8-1&keywords=DMC-GX85&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) - except for the lack of a microphone jack and the issues /u/AnthonyWithNoH [identified in your earlier post] (https://www.reddit.com/r/videography/comments/4noyki/opinions_on_lumix_dmcgx85/d45q4qq):
That said, if your budget can handle [$1297.99 for the US version of the GH4 (with free V-LOG)] (http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60286/51926/1036?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adorama.com%2FIPCDMCGH4K.html), you should get it, in my view.
At 4K, with V-LOG, the GH4 is a pretty amazing travel camera:
If the GH4 is too much of a stretch for your budget, the GX85 will do a great job as a travel camera, as long as you are aware of its limitations.
Hope this is helpful - and best of luck!
https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-Megapixels-Stabilization/dp/B01DOKHSH0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1485063757&sr=8-1&keywords=gx85
Set in manual video mode, 4k 30p. Had the shutter set at 1/60th. Manual focus, which is the hardest part to set. I actually had to set the focus just a bit off to help with moire. You can still see it on the sides of the screen. Ive read a few things about dealing with moire today that ill try tomorrow. Also want to try 1080p x 60p to see how it does.
https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/wiki/index#wiki_should_i_buy_this_bundle_with_a_bunch_of_accessories_in_it.3F
If you're going primarily for videography and spending $700, I'd recommend looking at the Panasonic GX85 kit instead. It's a newer camera, shoots in 4K, and has 5-axis image stabilization built in.
Micro FourThirds is a great system for the situation you're in. Small and compact. Priced affordably. Good video and still image performance. Some pros even use M43 gear.
You can still get the Panasonic GX85 with a lens for under $500 from Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-12-32mm-Stabilization-Display-DMC-GX85KK/dp/B01DOKHSH0
There's another bundle with that camera which has another lens for another $100, highly recommended. I don't have this camera personally, but I have been told it is a great camera for beginners and enthusiasts alike and has great video and still performance.
You certainly don't need a DSLR or even a standalone camera, especially just for posting to social media...but you will get FAR better photos and have FAR more control over a standalone camera.
Panasonic GX85 – awesome camera. Small, light, great image quality, packed with features and really cheap for what it can do. Panasonics are also one of the best cameras if you want to also be filming.
Depends almost entirely what your are using it for, but https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-G7KS-Mirrorless-Camera-Silver/dp/B00X409O6O/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1481906721&sr=1-3&keywords=panasonic+g7 and https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-Megapixels-Stabilization/dp/B01DOKHSH0/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1481906756&sr=8-3&keywords=panasonic+gx85
May I suggest you check out the Lumix GX85. The price just dropped to just under $700 with a lens.
Amazon Link
Check some videos made with it here: https://vimeo.com/tag:gx85