#7,433 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Pathophysiology of Heart Disease: A Collaborative Project of Medical Students and Faculty (PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HEART DISEASE (LILLY))
Sentiment score: 4
Reddit mentions: 8
We found 8 Reddit mentions of Pathophysiology of Heart Disease: A Collaborative Project of Medical Students and Faculty (PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HEART DISEASE (LILLY)). Here are the top ones.
Buying options
View on Amazon.comor
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height | 10 Inches |
Length | 7 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 2.00179733896 Pounds |
Width | 1 Inches |
Lily's
http://www.amazon.com/Pathophysiology-Heart-Disease-Collaborative-PATHOPHYSIOLOGY/dp/1605477230
Buy Lilly
This book is unequivocally the greatest book I have ever read.
I get a hard on just thinking about it. Probably better than pathoma honestly, it's just a super limited scope of information so it's only good for cardio
https://www.amazon.com/Pathophysiology-Heart-Disease-Collaborative-Students/dp/1605477230
> Robert S. Lilly
My bad, it was Leonard Lilly.
https://www.amazon.com/Pathophysiology-Heart-Disease-Collaborative-PATHOPHYSIOLOGY/dp/1605477230
Grapfruit and a handful of other things interact with heart drugs, these interactions aren't covered in too much detail in the textbook
All you need:
http://www.amazon.com/Pathophysiology-Heart-Disease-Collaborative-PATHOPHYSIOLOGY/dp/1605477230
This book is excellent.
No problem, I'm glad it was helpful!
This is the book we used in school. I would say it is pretty advanced as far as EMS goes, but if you're think you're up for it, this could be an excellent read for a paramedic looking to really focus on cardiac pathophysiology. Make sure you've got the basics down first, then try it out.
These are EXCELLENT books. I bought both.
Cardiovascular: http://www.amazon.com/Pathophysiology-Heart-Disease-Collaborative-PATHOPHYSIOLOGY/dp/1605477230
Nephrology: http://www.amazon.com/Renal-Pathophysiology-Lippincott-Williams-Wilkins/dp/1451173385/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1412406478&sr=1-1&keywords=renal+pathophysiology
I've always understood a stress test to be considered positive if chest discomfort is reproduced or EKG abnormalities consistent with ischemic heart disease develop. Reproducible stable angina is enough to consider the test positive even in the absence of EKG changes.
Tests are considered markedly positive if:
Pharmacologic and nuclear testing are necessary in patients with absolute contraindications to exercise stress testing, such as severe arthritis, lower limb amputation etc.
All this info is from: Pathophysiology of Heart Disease, 5th edition (Lilly).
EDIT: Reading your statement again you are correct in that you cannot make a diagnosis, but you should consider the stress test positive when making your diagnosis.