#46,491 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World

Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 1

We found 1 Reddit mentions of Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World. Here are the top ones.

Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Number of items1
Weight1.0361726314 Pounds
Width0.75 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 1 comment on Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World:

u/smokeuptheweed9 ยท 8 pointsr/communism101

Ok now we're cooking. This book is about that basically.

https://archive.org/details/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion

Also relevant:

https://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Legal-Innovation-Western-World/dp/0521881749
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2500596

You can find those free online somewhere.

I could have just linked that at the beginning but I think it's important to think more seriously about these questions. I was referring to the American constitution and if you think about how you operationalize such a concept (which really means to define it coherently) you can think about how one would measure such a thing in the United States. Does the United States have freedom of speech? What's the relationship between the letter of the law and concrete reality? How important is the law and what does freedom of speech, if it is related to the law, relate to the withering away of the state? What is the genealogy of 'rights,' what is their material basis, and what is the limit of the concept? You can point out that every freedom in the American constitution was in the Soviet constitution and their legal system was objectively better by bourgeois liberal standards at the time period in question. But that's sort of lazy, we know socialism is superior and that liberals don't actually arrive at their ideology through reason. So who really cares what they think in their dishonestly framed questions about a theory they knows nothing about?