#126,973 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of The Crucifixion of Jesus, Completely Revised and Expanded: A Forensic Inquiry
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 2
We found 2 Reddit mentions of The Crucifixion of Jesus, Completely Revised and Expanded: A Forensic Inquiry. Here are the top ones.
or
- brand new, high quality
- Cast from real adult specimen
- The skull is 3 part: skull cap, base, and lower jaw.
- Anatomically accurate
- a perfect tool for medical professionals
Features:
Specs:
| Height | 9.24 Inches |
| Length | 6.3 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | April 2005 |
| Weight | 1.49032489112 Pounds |
| Width | 1.28 Inches |
There's a book I have read on this exact topic that I would recommend.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Crucifixion-Jesus-Forensic-Inquiry/dp/1590770706
It goes into great detail of the physiological and biological processes that would have occurred in the historical Jesus' body during crucifixion (I'm not religious and it's not a religious book).
Yeah, the shroud isn't a painting, a scorch or a photograph. It has 3D properties that still cannot be replicated today using modern technology. It was wrapped around a person who was tortured (scourged, speared in the side and "crowned" with a bush of thorns) and crucified in the same manner as Jesus as described by the gospels (see the work of Barbet and Zugibe). The blood on the shroud is real blood and remains red (instead of turning black or black-red shortly after it is released) due to bilirubin, a chemical compound released by the liver following immense stress. It also matches extremely well with the Sudarium of Orviedo (more than sufficient points of coincidence and same blood type -- AB), which can be historically traced some 600 years earlier than the shroud of Turin. The shroud also has a significant number of pollen grains that are local to Jerusalem. The sudarium and the pollen grains put further doubt to the idea that the shroud is a medieval forgery. If that wasn't enough, the carbon dating test is seriously disputed, see the peer reviewed paper of Raymond Rogers, who was the Director of Chemical Research for STURP.
In my opinion, the evidence for the authenticity of the shroud is very strong. People who do not research the shroud deeply have more room to be skeptical. The more you research, the more you will become convinced that the shroud is the real deal. You will also come to know that the skeptical studies used to cast doubt on the shroud clearly fall short.