#1,289 in Biographies
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Worm: The First Digital World War

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 2

We found 2 Reddit mentions of Worm: The First Digital World War. Here are the top ones.

Worm: The First Digital World War
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Made of ABS material. Sturdy and terrific for making those DIY projects. Easy to drill and shape openings for many items like meters, LCDs, sockets, LEDs, buttons and so on.
  • Six screw holes inside. If wanted to make one to go in it, such as attaching a prototype board, there would be no problem mounting it.
  • Solid construction and IP65 waterproof rating to protect against dust, corrosion and splashing water.
  • Inner dimension: Approx. 5.98 x 3.3 x 2.12 inches(152 x 84 x 54mm). Average wall thickness is 0.095 inches (2.4mm).
  • Ideal for electronic projects, Arduino enclosure, power supply units, temperature controller box, etc.
Specs:
Release dateApril 2018

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 2 comments on Worm: The First Digital World War:

u/CheeseGrill ยท 2 pointsr/technology

Thanks, this was very informative. I've become interested in this sort of stuff after reading a book about the stuxnet thing.

And on your last comment, "Even if this hole has been plugged, there might be more." Won't there always be people attempting to create/utilize holes to access information? People will always try and make money or have fun, accessing computers and information is one way to do that. Right?

u/amaxen ยท 1 pointr/moderatepolitics

I think the thing to keep in mind is that there are no known US federal government employees who are even halfway competent in this field, and obviously there are no journalistic resources who know what they're talking about. I've been reading through the book on the Confikker worm which happened about five years ago and it's abundantly clear that US intel agencies and journalists are bumbling amateurs who are easily manipulated. You should discount any conclusions that rest on those sources. As to what actually happened, at a certain level of assumed skill then you literally can't prove that any particular group or individual was involved in this leak. There wasn't good forensics on the machines themselves, and there has been a great deal of speculation in the absence of any real solid evidence that isn't itself questionable.