Reddit mentions: The best patent law books
We found 3 Reddit comments discussing the best patent law books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 3 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.
1. Patent Law in a Nutshell (Nutshells)
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 7.25 Inches |
Length | 4.75 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | December 2012 |
Weight | 1.05 Pounds |
Width | 1 Inches |
2. Patent It Yourself (11th Edition)
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height | 10.5 Inches |
Length | 8.25 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.05 Pounds |
Width | 1.25 Inches |
3. How to Write a Patent Application 2nd Ed (Intellectual Property Law Library)
- Acrylic Tape: this sealing tape is manufactured with an impact-resistant backing that ensures protection of surfaces against abrasion, wear, marks, or scratches
- Squeak Reduction: adhering suitably to metallic or plastic surfaces, the heavy-duty tape helps minimize squeaking and rattling caused from vibration or wear. The thin tape forms a “slip plane” effect that ensures frictionless contact
- Applications: this high-tack tape can be reliably used on the surfaces of painted metallic and plastic materials — ideal to be used at manufacturing, distribution, and automotive industries. The film tape is resistant to abrasion
- Longevity: the sealing tape does not let ink, adhesive, or other tacky substances stick to its surface. The self-lubricating tape lasts longer than PTFE tapes in sliding applications
- Specifications: the acrylic tape roll measures 3/4 in. in width and is 15 ft. long. The backing thickness of the tape is 7.0 mil.
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.75 Inches |
Length | 7.5 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0 Pounds |
Width | 4 Inches |
🎓 Reddit experts on patent law books
The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where patent law books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Hey, those are literally my specialties! (I'm a lawyer / registered patent attorney / former media law professor.)
If you're just getting into these areas, the In a Nutshell books are actually a pretty decent place to start.
http://www.amazon.com/Patent-Law-Nutshell-Martin-Adelman/dp/0314279997
http://www.amazon.com/Global-Internet-Nutshell-Michael-Rustad/dp/0314283307
Cyber/internet law is kind of a nebulous concept, because it's primarily regular law, applied to the internet. It's one of those things that non-lawyers like to argue about, because everyone has ideas about how things should work, and so there's a lot of popular media written for a lay audience. For thought leaders when it comes to internet law, I'd recommend Lawrence Lessig, Ryan Calo, Jonathan Zittrain, Jack Goldsmith and Tim Wu. There are also groups, like the EFF and the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, that have a lot of good resources.
Patent law is different -- it's incredibly complex, which is why it has its own additional exam that attorneys need to pass in order to prosecute patents (not to litigate them, though). Laypeople still have their own ideas about patent law, but generally those ideas boil down to "patent trolls are bad, mmmmkay?" Due to the complexity of the field, there's not much written for non-lawyers.
A lot of laypeople tend to conflate patent law with copyright law, and the fact that you didn't mention it here suggests that you may be doing the same. To quickly disambiguate them, patents prevent you from synthesizing a patented pharmaceutical, whereas copyrights prevent you from pirating movies.
Copyright law is pretty hotly contested amongst the laity, and more than a few lawyers think that the field needs a bit of reform. However, whereas non-lawyers tend to think that copyright law needs reform because of some misguided notion about how the internet makes sharing information easy, so we shouldn't have copyrights, the legal community tends to think copyright reform should focus on things like reducing the term of copyright protection to a more reasonable number of decades.
When you look for thought leaders about copyright, despite it being a pretty popular topic on the internet, you're not going to find as much (although, you'll see a lot of the same people who talk about internet law also writing about copyright). The reason for this is that the whole internet piracy/copyright debate basically went nowhere way back in the late 90s/early 2000s, and it's reached a pretty stable, logical place in the law. There are pro-piracy websites written by non-lawyers (e.g., Torrent Freak) that are kind of the holocaust-deniers of copyright law (and thus get the appropriate adoration from like-minded folks), but I'm having a hard time coming up with many academic writers of note that supports that position. Charles Nesson (who actually founded the Berkman Center, if I'm remembering right) could probably be called sympathetic, but I'm not very familiar with his work.
Make sure you ordered the latest edition, patent law has gone through some changes in the last 5 years or so. The first few chapters of Nolo's Patent it Yourself give a terrific overview of the patent system, explaining what is and isn't patentable, different types of patents and the types of protection they provided, etc. Great book.
You seem like an intelligent person. Don't get scared away from trying it yourself. I didn't...
I like this book. It is certainly thick enough.
http://www.amazon.com/Application-Intellectual-Property-Practising-Institute/dp/1402412959