Best products from r/911truth

The Cell Phone Calls made/received, on 9/11...wtf?!!!

It has to be placed in the overall context of the impossible cell phone calls, then the entire content and delivery of her call, to that final whisper, begins to make perfect sense but which doesn't and seems highly incongruent if the official story were accepted.

Listen to the voicemail message by scrolling about half way down Wikipedia's flight 93 page to locate the soundfile player under her name CeeCee Lyles on the right hand side. Plug in your headphones, turn up the volume and, like she says at the outset - listen VERY carefully to the whole call.

Edit to add: For anyone who's interested in some deep research regarding the entire "passenger" phone record on 9/11 which the Zelikow led 9/11 Commission relied heavily upon for it's "investigative" report/"narrative", I highly recommend the following book:

Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence

Sister_Lauren, as I've told you before, you are the only other one here who admits to agreeing with me.

And it's actually quite strange, because I don't have a vested interest in the nuke hypothesis and thus it makes no difference to me whether people agree with it or they don't.

The problem, I suppose, is I don't support the thermite/nanothermite theory or Judy Wood's DEW theory, although I don't think anyone here supports that. If they do I've certainly not heard it mentioned. Btw, except for her DEW theory, I think Wood's book is excellent, by far the best written description of the demolition of the towers there is, and I would strongly recommend that everyone reads it.

http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564

>What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground Zero.

To know what I'm talking about, just read some of the reviews.

> Chris Bollyn and Kevin Ryan

These two people have vastly different opinions on 9/11.

Chris Bollyn is a hack, a disinformation specialist who masquerades as an investigative journalist and isn't a credible source of information on anything pertaining to 9/11, he is on the same level as Judy Woods and her dustification and Dimitri Khalezov with his nuclear bombs nonsense.


Kevin Ryan on the other hand is a well respected, prominent 9/11 researcher who uses a scientific evidence based approach on the subject and not a speculative, fantasy based approach like the three that are mentioned above.

He also does not believe Israeli did 9/11 like you implied, his excellent book, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects is evidence of that fact.

So many good ones. I personally love to read anything by David Ray Griffith. This is a good one.

https://www.amazon.com/11-Ten-Years-Later-Democracy-ebook/dp/B008ZSH60G/ref=sr_1_1s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1457378240&sr=1-1&keywords=david+ray+griffin

"I had burn marks, not like you'd have from a fire, but my face was all red, my chest was red, and for three or four days there was stuff coming out of my body like you wouldn't believe. It was like shrapnel. It's still coming out. I'll look at a little pinpoint under my skin and it will be bleeding." -Sue Keane, Former Army sergeant and police officer

From the book Women at Ground Zero: Stories of Courage and Compassion

Read the back story on the patriot act. It's pretty telling.

It was huge but ready to go 45 days after 9/11. Congress didn't have enough time to read it all and were under great pressure to pass it.

The Anthrax Deception goes into quite a few details on that whole period in time.

Documentaries on side bar: The New Pearl Harbor and David Chandler’s research...

Kevin Ryan’s book Another Nineteen was a great read...

not too much more--the MSM is so controlled...there’s just a drip-by-drip release of intelligence files...

Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory is a good reply to those that push the Popular Mechanics book.

The TV didn't broadcast in "HD" video at that time. Your best bet might be to buy videos like this, which were released in the first year or so.

Great list...

and MORE FACTS:

http://911blogger.com/news/2009-10-06/facts-speak-themselves

http://rememberbuilding7.org/7-facts-about-building-7/

http://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833/

Charlie Brooker has been rewarded with a successful TV career:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Brooker

Dan Hind left the The Guardian and writes books:
"The Threat to Reason: How the Enlightenment Was Hijacked and How We Can Reclaim it"
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Threat-Reason-Enlightenment-Hijacked-Reclaim/dp/1844672530

"The Return of the Public"
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Return-Public-Dan-Hind/dp/1844675947

You can read the reviews here. Most are good. Not everybody likes me. ;) https://www.amazon.com/11-Truther-Fight-Justice-Accountability-ebook/dp/B007DVDV2S/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1468094170&sr=8-1&keywords=9%2F11+Truther

Yes I have. For a sound rebuttal to all purveyors of the official story I highly recommend the book Debunking 911 Debunking by David Ray Griffin. The evidence itself is extremely strong, but seeing the ways in which those responsible for producing the official explanation have bent over backwards to deceive, hide, and generally obfuscate the events of 9/11 is perhaps even more damning.

For example, the presence of persistent, extreme temperatures in the rubble following the destruction of the towers was well documented (took literally weeks to put out the fires) however it presented a huge problem for the NIST because that type of heat requires a source of energy not available in their fabricated version of the story. As a solution, the NIST merely pretended the molten steel never happened, despite rampant evidence. Please watch this video where it shows John Gross of the NIST smirking and then denying any evidence of molten temperatures, followed by many firefighters attesting to just that. Contrast that approach then, with a paper like this written by Steven Jones which exhaustively demonstrates how the forensic evidence clearly indicates the means by which energetics were used to demolish the towers and building 7.

The bottom line is that the 9/11 Truth movement has produced a substantial body of evidence that has to date been successfully swept under the carpet by various federal and media authorities. As such, people like me currently have little recourse aside from complaining on reddit and organizing largely impotent local groups. But until our evidence is properly addressed, we will not go away, and perhaps someday the tools necessary for combating such large scale propaganda will become available.

Philip Zelikow:

• lawyer for Barry Seal appointed at behest of George H. W. Bush.
  
  
• lawyer for Barry Seal who got him released to a halfway house with minimum security where Barry Seal was quickly assassinated by "Colombians"
  
  
• secretly in contact with Karl Rove while overseeing the entire 9/11 Commission
  
  
• worked with Condi Rice closely from 1989-1998, including writing a book together, thus making his position of investigating her for the Commission a massive conflict-of-interest
  
  
• director of Aspen Strategy Group which included Rice & Cheney
  
  
• works now for Obama

Here it is on amazon vod

Interview 27 min. - Paul Zarembka - The Hidden History of 9-11



Abstract The Hidden History of 9-11-2001


The Hidden History of 9-11-2001, Volume 23 (Research in Political Economy) (Research in Political Economy) Hardcover – July 14, 2006 Amazon


The hidden history of 9-11-2001 Slideshare

Book 1

or


Book 2

Griffin wrote a book which (I presume) is largely a response to that book:

http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Mechanics-Defenders-Conspiracy/dp/156656686X/ref=dp_return_1?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books

Not a message board, but a blog by scientist/engineer Kevin Ryan who also wrote the thoroughly investigated book "Another 19" called Digwithin

If we must go there...

I would rather suggest that people read "debunking 9/11 debunking".

Kevin Ryan might have some answers: Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part Four - Cleanup by Kevin Ryan February 11, 2010 http://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

His book "Another 19"- http://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833

Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-yMe2Nla5M

Israel is a country. This was done by individuals. And it was done in America. Perhaps you should try looking at what we actually know. https://digwithin.net/

His book: Another Nineteen

And MacQueen's excellent book: The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy

Israel did 911 (even if some Israelis were involved) is for simple-minded people unable to distinguish between the particular and the general and functions (in the minds of reasonable people) as disinformation by mischaracterizating 911 Truth.

You can't prove it definitively without a smoking gun, but there is a mindboggling amount circumstantial evidence that could be proved in a court of law more than enough for a criminal conviction if only given the opportunity.

Graeme MacQueen in his book The Anthrax Deception gives a compelling argument that the people who were responsible for 9/11 were also the people who sent the anthrax starting only one week after 9/11, which were traced to one (and maybe more) of only three labs in the world and they were Department of Defense and CIA labs here in the USA. I would try to tie that in with your essay.

https://www.amazon.com/2001-Anthrax-Deception-Domestic-Conspiracy/dp/0986073121

You can also listen him in an interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE15RSSHHFE