Best products from r/Northwestern
We found 3 comments on r/Northwestern discussing the most recommended products. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 2 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.
1. Racism: A Global Reader: A Global Reader (Sources and Studies in World History)
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
2. Nongshim Shin Ramyun Noodle Soup, Gourmet Spicy, 4.2 Ounce (Pack of 20)
- Nongshim Shin Ramyun is a classic, customizable ramyun to your preference by adding ingredients you think are the best fit for you. This is a dish that’s there for you any time of day or night.
- There’s a warm, savory, rich spice throughout the broth that satisfies from bite to bite.
- The additional toppings of shiitake mushroom slices, carrots, and scallions add some welcome bits of texture as you eat. The shiitake mushrooms in particular give nice meat-like textures.
- The broth shares the stage with the noodles a little more, which is great because the noodles have a great consistency and springiness from start to finish.
- WARNING: Spicier than your average instant noodles. Enjoy!
- If you’re afraid of the heat you can use a little less of the soup powder packet. It will take the edge off a little but you’ll still get to enjoy a warm, savory, rich spiced broth.
Features:
OH MY GOD FUCK hahah . I'm Korean, the ramen that Koco sells is literally less than $1.00 a pack in grocery stores. All Koco does is add a slice of cheese or some eggs and vegetable medley to it. No asian person orders ramyun and pays $7+ plus tax and tip in a restaurant.
Ramyun:
https://www.amazon.com/NongShim-Ramyun-Noodle-Gourmet-Spicy/dp/B00778B90S?th=1
And here's the problem: race is such a huge, complicated social concept that there's a lot of academic disagreement about what constitutes race and racism. The disagreement we're having over semantics is a serious point of contention in academic discussions of race. Neither of us is truly 'right' in the sense that there is not an objective definition to go by here, and there rarely is in such issues (gender's another big one for this kind of argument). There are entire books written around basically what we're discussing right here, so framing the debate in terms of a 'mainstream' definition (itself a subjective category) misses the point somewhat. Restricting the definition to, say, the dictionary oversimplifies a massively complex issue and limits the dialogue.
I'd argue though, that using one definition does not cheapen another. So call it what you like, the issues I describe and the problems they create are still present and deserve to be addressed.