Could someone correct me in responding to the "Diversity and Ethnocentrism Hate Facts"?

------------------

(Detrimental) Effects of Multiculturalism

• More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
  What is being controlled for? I would guess that wealth and diversity are related and so diverse poor neighborhoods would indeed have lower social cohesion, but not due to their diversity.
  
  
• A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. & Diversity increases psychotic experiences. & Diversity increases social adversity.
  This seems absurd on its face: I will have to read this carefully.
  
  
• Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. & Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.
  Very promising and enticing title.
  
  
• Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.
  What definition is being used for "civic health"?
  
  
• Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin.
  Sure.
  
  
• Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks.
  This seems very complex, and we will have to be careful with "X causes Y claims".
  
  
• Babies demonstrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites.
  I'll have to read this, but: does "ethnocentrism" demonstrated here imply a preference? It seems also that we would have to see how it changes after: does it become somewhat "neutral" or does it become negative? It doesn't seem contradictory for one to start in associating oneself with those around them. Additionally: are there any non-white babies? Is it a comparison between white babies and non-white people, or are there non-white babies compared with non-whites, of their same race and of different races?
  
  
• Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin.
  Sure.
  
  
• Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.
  I'll have to read this to see exactly what is being said, but this seems almost obvious: a dispersal from a dominant group to a spread of groups necessarily leaves them with less than they had. It seems almost tautological that it will affect most the largest group. I have to see what they meant by "hurt".
  
  
• Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment.
  Is it that those who are able to cause change with their vocalization are instead occupied with their concern for the diversity, and that if they redirected their focus back to the environment that this reduction of concern would disappear?
  
  
• Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.
  This seems like a base human instinct that we should seek to overcome rather than fall victim to: there are many things that make humans feel in some way "negative" but that we would never suggest getting rid of.
  
  
• Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities.
  What does "reduces" mean?
  
  
• Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.
  What controls are being made? Richer neighborhoods are more likely to be homogeneous when contrasted with poorer heterogeneous neighborhoods, and so better health may be due to the wealth rather than the homogeneity.
  
  
• Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation.
  This is perhaps one of the only links here that seems to maybe hold some value (having not yet read it): why is it that diverse cities are also segregated cities?
  
  
• Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational.
  I can accept this: race is a kind of extended family, but I would not say the only one. Additionally, ethnocentrism in a weak sense is genetically rational.
  
  
• It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you.
  What is the definition of "friends"?
  
  
• Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies.
  
  
• Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.
  I could accept this: civil war is precisely war that is inward facing, and altruism in the context of a polity is similarly inward facing. It would seemingly follow then that less civil war and more altruism could be direct byproducts of homogeneity.
  
  
• States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality.
  What definition is being used for "inequality"? "corruption"? "democracy"?
  
  
• There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar.
  Sure.
  
  

  Major Themes
  

• The existence of a preference implies that it is "good".
  
• That something is natural implies that it is "good".
  
• Shaky "X causes Y" claims when X and Y are simply co-occuring.
  
• There is the mistake that "X is good for Y" is equivalent to "not-X is bad for Y".
  
• Little control for major confounding factors: wealth, geography, age distribution, etc.
  
• The same "theme" was stated multiple times with a link to the same article, effectively making it seem as if there are more pieces of evidence than there actually are. This is worsened when academic papers are linked and then media summaries thereof are linked.
  
  

  More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
  

• "community-diversity dialectic": homophily & proximity; integration
  
• integration “provides opportunities for intergroup contact that are necessary to promote respect for diversity, but may prevent the formation of dense interpersonal networks that are necessary to promote sense of community.”
  
• "If diversity is unattainable at the neighborhood level, might it be possible at the level of the city, as essentially a network of more or less similar neighborhoods? Jane Jacobs liked to say that great cities are federations of neighborhoods."
  
• "Neal about this, he sounded a more optimistic note: “Their patchwork of segregated communities allows for both diversity and cohesion. We usually view segregation as problematic, but when it comes in the form of a patchwork of neighborhoods and enclaves that each have their own character, it may actually ‘work.’”
  
• "Robert Putnam distinguished between two types of social capital: “bonding,” which occurs within like-minded groups, and “bridging,” which occurs between them."
  
  

  A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. & Diversity increases psychotic experiences. & Diversity increases social adversity.
  

  This is an increase in risk in the minority group. Moreover, it's precisely due to an exclusionary force from the majority. This effect can not only be mitigated by higher group cohesion within the minority group, but less exclusion by the majority force.
  > In general, people living in areas of lower own-group density experienced greater social adversity that was in turn associated with reporting psychotic experiences.
  > People resident in neighbourhoods of higher own-group density experience ‘buffering’ effects from the social risk factors for psychosis.
  
  

  Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. & Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.
  

  > In the long run, however, successful immigrant societies have overcome such fragmentation by creating new, cross-cutting forms of social solidarity and more encompassing identities. Illustrations of becoming comfortable with diversity are drawn from the US military, religious institutions, and earlier waves of American immigration.
  
  (CONTINUED)

Someone shared that a "Hate Watch" subreddit has this comment linked.

When I went to see it, they only have this small thread within this larger conversation linked. It would have been just as easy to link to the conversation, as a part of the conversation. It's obvious that they're disinterested in what r/AltRight is about -- rather, they're seek only echo chamber indignation fodder.

I was once a Leftist -- but also cared about intellectual integrity (which would explain my move Right). For the Leftist who thinks they've got all the information when their leaders lead, you should know that they're giving you a square inch of a building sized mural -- they are intentionally handling and deceiving you.

Here's something I said in a different part of this conversation. A part the Propaganda Ministers don't include.

[–]AltRightNow 1 point 23 hours ago
Until you get to the White contributions, I would say exactly the same thing. We're always painted as hating everyone else, instead of loving ourselves and appreciating others.
It's true that African, Jewish, and Latin peoples have made some fine contributions to the world. And I'll give credit where credit is due. But that doesn't change the fact that most of the essential contributions to civilizing society are overwhelmingly White. And I'll give credit where credit is due.
permalinkembedsaveparenteditdisable inbox repliesdeletereply

[–]AltRightNow 1 point 18 minutes ago
This book lays out the accomplishments of civilization. I hear that a "hate watch" r/group has this conversation linked. Someone in there might be ready for something more than chanted rhetoric. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060929642/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A2FSDR5QBR3PE4

I'm waiting on my order for "The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise" shill.


It's one of the more 'kosher' books on the topic, but it's pretty well regarded and the author researched the topic for years before writing it. The whole purpose of the book is to completely demolish the myth of 'Enlightened and tolerant Muslims in the middle ages'.

The best book on the true nature of capitalism that I have encountered is Killing the Host by Michael Hudson.

Hudson and Steve Keen are the best economists I have found; they both understand the actual economy in a way that none of the Keynesians or Austrians do.

Here are some examples of how diversity lowers quality of life for everyone. "Diversity is a strength" is a lie and an empty platitude that's been pushed on the country for the last couple decades and people now regurgitate it mindlessly because they've heard it so many times. In reality, homogeneity is strength, diversity is a weakening agent.

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Are you projecting? Who says that? After all, superior is subjective.

Race matters, like it or not, believe me when I say that I wish it didn't..., but then again I wish many things, but I don't get to decide those, Nature does.

If you want to have a honest discussion about race try to inform yourself a little about our actual positions and not some Hollywood stereotype.

• For normie entry level see this:
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q
  
  
• For a more critical view read this book:
  
  https://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462
  

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.
http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes.
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin.
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks.
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.
http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities.
https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.
https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you.
http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies.
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality.
http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar.
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n2005-1.pdf

.

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Thanks. I just found this:
https://www.amazon.com/BABYLONIAN-TALMUD-ALL-VOLUMES-ILLUSTRATED-ebook/dp/B01GY0FCGQ/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1480292460&sr=1-2&keywords=the+talmud

I went to hear a Christian convert out of Islam who is a scholar of both the Bible and the Q'uran, that the Q'uran is not accurately translated into English in order to make it more palatable to the Westerner. I wonder if this same problem exists in the Talmud?

Do you have a particular Talmud that you recommend?

Besides his own work which I think reads best chronologically I enjoy Young's books. Both his biography and "Nietzsche's Philosophy of Religion" https://www.amazon.com/Nietzsches-Philosophy-Religion-Julian-Young/dp/0521681049

This. For those of you who are interested, read "Why We Get Fat and What to Do About It." Also, /r/keto is a very active community with an abundance of information and support.

It's still psychological. Sex is the cheapest thing a woman can provide. Many women give sex right and left in hope of finding a suitable man. They're not doing it for fun (even if the media tries to imprint this view into their confused minds). In reality, they're doing it out of desperation, they want to find a suitable man. Not necessarily an alpha male fuckboy. They want a man who is not a mommy's boy. Keep in mind 90% of men in Western society are mommy's boy, or if you prefer a more scientific term: they'r mother-enmeshed. They haven't gone through and overcome their mother-complex. The Western culture is organized in this way right now.

If you're interested in the deeper psychology here, I recommend [Under Saturn's Shadow: The Wounding and Healing of Men] (https://www.amazon.com/Under-Saturns-Shadow-Wounding-Psychology/dp/0919123643)

Only that the left out a few things! Like the ever-important establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 through a secret conspiracy you can find out in The creature from Jekyll Island and a ton of other instances of world Jewry collaborating against the world. However, it's a pretty great summation.

I read Across Atlantic Ice when it was released. While their theory is interesting, it's still far from being accepted.

Edit: Here's a video presenting some of the interesting DNA evidence.

That book is on my reading list, I would be in if you, or anyone else interested, can set up a good way to run a discussion.

If you don't want to spend any money and you have a kindle, there is a free kindle edition on Amazon.

The point is, traits are not '100 percent genetic'.

Give this textbook a read.

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Population-Genetics-Theory-Applications/dp/1605351539

I have a much better understanding of population genetics and genes after reading textbooks like this and others.

James Lancia. He is a former police officer, author of Downtown White Police, and responsible for a YouTube channel by the same name.

Amazon link to the book. Don't forget leaving a creative one star review.

Might want to visit some other books by Kidner. Apparently the most important person in Europe since 1550 was Lenin.

If you go to the book on amazong, "look inside" and read a little after the preface it refers to vitality as young colored people going into the work force for developed countries with an old aging population. I dont agree with it just saying.

https://www.amazon.com/Diversity-Explosion-Demographics-Remaking-America/dp/081572649X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1480844290&sr=8-1&keywords=diversity+explosion

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/442380.The_God_That_Failed


http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674002357



https://www.amazon.com/My-Awakening-Path-Racial-Understanding/dp/1892796007

http://cis.org/newcase


https://www.amazon.com/Illegals-Unacceptable-Americas-Failure-Control/dp/1595553495


https://www.amazon.com/Race-Reality-Differences-Vincent-Sarich/dp/0813340861

https://mises.org/library/socialism-economic-and-sociological-analysis

Science says otherwise:

• https://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462
  
  
• https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/04/17/the-new-enemies-of-evolutionary-science/
  
  
• http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/12/the-new-inquisitorsheretical-scientists-purged-from-academia/
  
  

Balkanization into geographic corners of the US will also happen: https://i.sli.mg/VLG2jC.png

-Source

Here is the mobile version of your link