Best products from r/europeannationalism

The Greatest Story Never Told

The Greatest Story Never Told- Youtube

Who controls your mind

Thanks Jews! A public service announcement

Oscar winners

A bit of a joke, but the point is still the same

Revisionism in 30 minutes

Long, but thorough articles on revisionism, lots of information and sources

____

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes.

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships.

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.

[Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.] (http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf)

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin.

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks.

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites.

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin.

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational.

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you.

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies.

Ethnically homogeneous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality.

There is plenty of evidence to suggest that there are significant biological differences depending on one's race. If you can get a sample of someone's DNA, it is relatively easy to determine their race using principal component analysis. If you were to sample the DNA of numerous individuals, and then make a PCA chart, you'll see significant clustering consistent with biological races. Below is a chart from an extensive study of biological differences that arose from geographical separation. The further apart the colored dots appear, the more disparate the genetic differences are.


Chart

Link to official scientific study

As a bonus, here's another study done that analyzed the genetic data of 3,636 people. Similar results were found within the statistics. Link

Race is definitely not just a social construct. It exists within a person's genes and shows within their biology. If you give a skilled forensic anthropologist a skeleton, they are able to determine that person's race fairly easily. Even relatively loose racial associations, such as Hispanics can be determined with above average accuracy.

The biological differences extend further than just the skin or even just the skeletons and genetic makeup. Scientists have found significant differences within biological processes, such as the nervous system, between different races. In the chart I am about to show you, the races that there primarily studied were Africans, Europeans, East Asians. There was much variation that was found within their nervous systems.

Chart

Link to official scientific study

If we used the taxonomic standards that we use for animals, Homo Sapiens would have multiple subspecies. Regardless of whether or not humans can reproduce across racial boundaries, there subspecies of animals, such as different subspecies of lions and bears that can do such a thing to.

Source

Source

Now a common myth that you may have heard is that people have more differences within their own race than outside their own race. This is a common mistake that is known as Lewontin's Fallacy, also known as Lewontin's Paradox. Basically, such a statement is only accurate when you examine the frequency of different alleles at an individual locus, which gives one a very inaccurate picture of true differences between any sort of genetic populations. When scientists analyze different races while accounting for and analyzing many loci, the results are entirely different.

Chart

Link to official scientific study

Another frequently perpetuated myth is that IQ and crime can be better associated with social class than race. This is another common myth, understandably so. However, several studies across the decades, even some of the more recent ones still suggest that even when one accounts for economic factors, social factors, educational factors, parenting factors, etc. there are still is a gap that persists. There is quite a bit of scientific data to back it up, I will post additional charts and the studies that back them up.

Chart

Source

Chart

Chart

Source

Chart

Source

I love love love that thing. I tried to carve it once. I'm no match for the whittlers of 25,000 years ago. I learned about them from this series of books, highly recommend:
https://www.amazon.com/First-Humans-Origins-Illustrated-Humankind/dp/0062502654

This website includes a different link (right under the picture of the cover): http://nseuropa.blogspot.com/2013/04/ich-kampfe-i-fight.html?m=1

If that doesn't work, there's a paperback version that can be bought on Amazon for as cheap as $20:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0910667012/ref=pd_aw_sim_sbs_14_1/131-2979937-3167112?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=56T2N3AB37CVH9SXWQWE&dpPl=1&dpID=91qVObKIybL

You need to start with something less 'morally challenging'. I'd go with Steve Pinkers work, starting with 'the blank slate'.

The average wet liberal has been raised thinking that all human traits are down to environment. This book is an eye opener, but not so racially charged as to send them running.

Then start in on how brain size correlated to life outcome and IQ, and is mainly due to genes in the west. That social class and income have a large hereditary component.

The rest kind of red pills on its own by default.

I had to look it up because I didn't believe it. Turns out it's actually a thing.

No it can't. The elite have already planned out their plan from beginning to end. Read Brave New World. All of this stuff has been predicted in the '90s. There is no stopping what's coming.

1. Through the education system. Parents have very little control of what their children learn now a days. Sure you can home school them, but few parents have the time to do that. An education system that is revisionist in it's teaching can easily indoctrinate children due to children's brains not being fully developed.
   
2. How is it my problem? It is my problem because I live near a large city and the ghettos are slowly expanding. I'm rather young but I can still remember a time when some of the newer ghettos were respectable areas. Their culture and ghettoes are slowly creeping into my area, so yeah it effects me. It also effects white culture in general when monuments are torn down, even if those monuments were located in cities. While I am not from the south, there is a civil war monument here and I would be pissed off if it was destroyed.
   
3. You have a point, but you don't just move monuments, they have historical value. I understand if you were to move the monument a little bit for good reasons, we had to move ours for traffic reasons. These monuments should be legally protected. They are historical pieces of art and people should not have the power to destroy it because they don't like it. Yes, Al Sharpton is an extremist, but there have literally been mobs of people destroying confederate monuments without the permission of authorities. Would it really be that big of a stretch to say similar people may attempt to damage some of these larger monuments? It is unlikely they would be able to destroy them without explosives, but they could damage it. Look how cheap these pickaxes are: https://www.amazon.com/V-B-Manufacturing-861-03-Groundbreakers/dp/B000CZ4JAK/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1502992471&sr=8-3&keywords=pickaxe
   A mob of people with these could do substantial damage to monuments.
   
4. I never said we should force our views on others, I simply said we should be defending our culture and our monuments from those who wish to destroy them.