Best products from r/redacted
We found 14 comments on r/redacted discussing the most recommended products. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 13 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.
1. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies - New Edition
- Princeton University Press
Features:
2. Richard Scarry's What Do People Do All Day? (Richard Scarry's Busy World)
Golden Books
4. The End of Southern Exceptionalism: Class, Race, and Partisan Change in the Postwar South
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
5. Sleepwalking Through History: America in the Reagan Years
- the life and times of Barry Goldwater and the rise of the radical right in America
Features:
6. The Emerging Republican Majority: Updated Edition (The James Madison Library in American Politics)
- the life and times of Barry Goldwater and the rise of the radical right in America
Features:
7. Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
8. Democrats and Republicans - Rhetoric and Reality: Comparing the Voters in Statistics and Anecdotes
Used Book in Good Condition
9. Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus
- the life and times of Barry Goldwater and the rise of the radical right in America
Features:
10. The Lost Majority: Why the Future of Government Is Up for Grabs - and Who Will Take It
13. Self Defense Laws of All 50 States (2nd Edition)
- Banpresto presents Hatsune Miku in the 2016 Team Ukyo Cycling uniform
- Minor assembly required
- For ages 15+
- Officially licensed product bears the Bandai Import Collection sticker to verify the authenticity and superior quality of genuine products authorized for distribution in the U.S
- Authentic Bandai Import Collection products are tested and comply with all U.S. consumer product safety regulations and are eligible for consumer support from Bandai
Features:
Fake news shouldn't be that hard to define. It's mostly exemplified by hyperpartisan news sources that either doesn't completely fact check it's information or presents information that is misleading due to lack of sufficient pertinent information.
I explained how propaganda works. You've proven you do not understand the difference between a conspiracy theory and an opinion.
" Clintons did have power simply because they accumulated it.
Why would they acculumate that power? The oldest reason all. She wanted it. Thats all."
Those are not the words of an epistemic rationalist, those are the ramblings of a cynic. She "wants power" is such a cartoonish unrealistic motive. The world cannot be interpreted and broken down using motifs from your typical Hollywood movie.
I've listened and read the speeches of Goeebels at the Nurenburg rallies, I've read Bryan Capland books on rationality, I've read Orwells 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World. If you want to talk about books, I suggest you try out The Believing Brain and The Myth of The Rational Voter.
Anthony Reiner was a completely separate case.
"Sounds like a man who had evidence but couldnt use it." Which just so happens to sound exactly like someone who doesn't have evidence to indict to begin with. I'd take Occram's razor on this one.
Disney owns a lot of companies. So what? Conglomeration is apart of capitalism. It only proves they are on the same side and unlikely to compete, doesn't necessarily prove they are guilty of a sinister plot simply due to association. Obviously MSM is controlled by corporations. Would you expect the worlds top grossing films to come out of some Hungarian teenagers basement? No, that is not how the free market works. The MSM is merely a pet name given to major monopolies in journalism. They are owned by corporations because that is how they get the necessary resources and funding to adapt to the growing needs of the world for information.
I like to keep it civil, but seriously? Implying that FOX news is a paragon of good journalism over any other mainstream media is laughable. This is not real journalism. I will admit to my Liberal bias, now you need to admit to yours.
Why did Trump win despite the hate? If you've ever lived in Manhattan and dealt with professional con men, then you would know. He has mastered only the art of the New York style con. Making all these impossible promises while showcasing a massive amount of confidence and bravado. He's demonized all of his opponents and critics. He's convinced you and millions like you to block out all of his criticism as meaningless propaganda. Propaganda doesn't need to come from corporations, it's all within your head m8. You put all corporate media under the same category of legitimacy as every fringe site out there. You do this to justify believing only in media that matches your beliefs, the truth doesn't matter to you because you already admitted you don't think it exist. The fact you think FOX news is exceptional helps prove my theory that you truly believe your way of thinking is superior. So you judge news by how closely it aligns with your preconceptions. You think labeling me with an overused psychology term proves anything?
Holy shit bro, you've lost the point of argument so long ago you're just treading water 50 ft below sea level and a mile off the coast. I'm not sure anything I can recommend to you for reading is anywhere near your reading level, you might want to start with this though..
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0553520598/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_rBUuzbANNFMYR
And fyi, I'm cool as a cucumber having this discussion with a child who wants to learn. However, some of us have real things to do in life other than soak up government funds, watch anime, and fap. So I'm going to have to withdraw from this discussion, not because I don't like arguing with a brick wall, but because my life is more important than informing you about socialism. Last word of advice is remember to blow on the ramen because its hot! Stay safe kiddo, and stay in school!
Don’t take my word for it.
Check out the book “The End of Southern Exceptionalism” and Noam Chompski’s documentary “Manufacturing Consent”
Both very illuminating to what we believe happened during that period vs what actually happened
The switch happened, again like you say but the Big Switch narrative came out before whites changed to the Republican Party in the 90s. The narrative came out in the 60s after the civil rights movement happened.
They WANT you to believe republicans are terrible people so you don’t check out our facts and do your own independent research. You’re much smarter than that. Don’t let them dupe you! God speed 👍
Only if you read this one... It might take you a while but I'm certain you can get through it with a thesaurus.
>Keep hammering partisan divides though, because that's gonna solve everything,
he said, without a hint of irony or self-awareness.
Again, you fundamentally fail to grasp my point: it isn't about "association," it's about rhetoric and electoral strategy.
But hey, don't let the lack of any substantial research get in the way of your very-serious opinions. I mean, not when there are paparazzi photos that can tell you what to believe.
> The key is primary sources
That's hilarious given the left's tendency to lean on anonymous sources.
Anyway, I feel like you're not even trying...
Books:
https://smile.amazon.com/End-Southern-Exceptionalism-Partisan-Postwar/dp/0674032497
https://smile.amazon.com/dp/0230116469
https://smile.amazon.com/Wrong-Race-Democratic-Partys-Buried/dp/0230610994?sa-no-redirect=1
https://smile.amazon.com/Mugged-Racial-Demagoguery-Seventies-Obama/dp/1591846560
Articles:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/09/misunderstanding_the_southern_realignment_107084.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/10/AR2010091002679.html
https://bilanreport.com/2017/03/13/debunking-the-party-switch-myth/
http://tennesseestar.com/2018/06/14/carol-swain-commentary-facts-myths-and-rewritten-history-of-the-left-as-tweeted-by-princetons-kevin-kruse/
https://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/8/picket-coulter-shreds-southern-strategy-myth-gop-s/
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/04/the-southern-strategy-debunked-again.php
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html
https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/08/myth-republican-racism-mona-charen/
https://www.dineshdsouza.com/news/myth-of-nixons-southern-strategy/
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/2787426/posts
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-02-13.html
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9506
https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2014/07/03/nixons-southern-strategy-and-a-liberal-big-lie-n1858667
https://pjmedia.com/michaelwalsh/2013/3/29/history-lesson/
https://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2012/07/11/the-southern-strategy-myth-and-the-lost-majority/
https://www.nationalreview.com/2012/05/party-civil-rights-kevin-d-williamson/?pg=1
https://hillarysamericathemovie.com/evidence/
https://www.waynedupree.com/the-democrats-big-lie-dixiecrats-switched-to-republican-party-with-racist-agenda/
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2012/01/25/the-truth-about-the-southern-strategy-the-msm-doesnt-want-you-to-know/
https://hotair.com/archives/2014/12/07/landrieu-and-the-myth-of-the-southern-realignment/
https://www.wnd.com/2014/07/nixons-southern-strategy-and-a-liberal-big-lie/
https://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-myth-of-the-racist-republicans/
http://www.aviewfromgenz.com/leftism-debunked-the-southern-strategy/
https://m.theepochtimes.com/dsouzas-death-of-a-nation-shows-democrat-plantation-still-in-business_2609079.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/SouthernStrategy/
Videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDAQRVYBEoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol7OMGBDMao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHgOLKrscCM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiprVX4os2Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxhymucVdKU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl9bFseo6fI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgLckzSibxs
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8564902/
There's really a lot of info out there about it if you would just choose not to be close-minded.
> The Southern Strategy myth is a way liberals get to white wash the Democrat party's racist roots. They get to pretend that progessives and liberals were always on the side of the angels and that Republicans now are as racist as Democrats used to be before civil rights.
> 21 Dixiecrats voted against the Civil Rights act of 1964 in the Senate. One later became a Republican and the rest stayed Democrats until they retired or were defeated. In fact the last Democrat to try to filibuster the act, Robert Byrd personally spoke for 14 hours straight against the bill. He then served in Senate Leadership from 1967-to 1989. He then served on the most powerful committee until his death.
> The south had already started moving Republican with the election of John Tower in 1960 and didn't really turn all the way Republican until the 1990s.
> It's still the police's job and illegal to do.
The latter not true in the US, I'm not aware of any exception to self-defense laws extending to using violence to stop others from using violence on innocents, except for certain duty to retreat laws and case law in some states (of course, check your state's laws!).
As for it being exclusively "the police's job", that's generally not been the American attitude, they are a relatively new 18th Century concept, and that demonstrably fails in situations like this one where we're credibly told the police were ordered to stand down. Credible in that they were nowhere to be found in all the violence videos I've seen, and last time I checked one person was arrested, and not for violence but for not clearing an area after being ordered to do so. Which is also congruent with the mayor's comments before the rioting began.