Best products from r/uncensorednews

Hating Valentine's: Why Islamists and the Radical Left Loathe Valentine’s Day:

Today, February 14, is Valentine’s Day, the sacred day that intimate companions mark to celebrate their love and affection for one another. If you’re thinking about making a study of how couples celebrate this day, the Muslim world and the milieus of the radical Left are not the places you should be spending your time. Indeed, it’s pretty hard to outdo Islamists and “progressives” when it comes to the hatred of Valentine’s Day. And this hatred is precisely the territory on which the contemporary romance between the Left and Islamic Supremacism is formed.

The train is never late: every year that Valentine’s comes around, the Muslim world erupts with ferocious rage, with its leaders doing everything in their power to suffocate the festivity that comes with the celebration of private romance. Imams around the world thunder against Valentine’s every year — and the celebration of the day itself is literally outlawed in Islamist states.

This year, for example, the Islamabad High Court in Pakistan banned the celebration of Valentine's Day in public places, and at an official level, and prohibited all electronic and print media from covering any festivities or mentioning of the occasion. Several cities across Muslim-majority Indonesia, meanwhile, banned people from celebrating the day. In the city of Surabaya, a group of school students, which included many girls wearing the hijab, denounced Valentine's Day. In Muslim-dominant Malaysia, the group The National Muslim Youth Association directed females not to use emoticons and perfume in a pre-Valentine's Day message.

Last year, Pakistan also banned Valentine’s Day, calling it an “insult” to Islam and warning that "strict" action against anyone daring to celebrate the day in any part of Islamabad. In the past, Valentine’s Day activities were disrupted by Jamaat-e-Islami, Pakistan's main religious party, but in the last two years the state and court now get involved to ban celebration of the day. Back on Valentine's Day in Pakistan in 2013, supporters of Jamat-e-Islami took to the streets in Peshawar to vehemently denounce the Day of Love. Demonizing it as “un-Islamic,” the Muslim protestors shouted that the day had "spread immodesty in the world." Shahzad Ahmed, the local leader of the student wing of Jamat-e-Islami, declared that the organization will not “allow” any Valentine’s Day functions, warning that if Pakistani law enforcement did not prevent Pakistanis from holding such functions, that the Jamat-e-Islami would stop them “in our own way." Khalid Waqas Chamkani, a leader in Jamat-e-Islami, calls Valentine's a “shameful day.”

These Islamist forces in Pakistan cannot, of course, completely succeed in preventing couples from showing love to each other on this special day, and so many Pakistanis still cryptically celebrate Valentine's Day and exchange presents in secret.

In Iran, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia last year, and as always, Valentine’s Day was outlawed. Under the Islamic regime in Iran, for instance, any sale or promotion of Valentine’s Day related items, including the exchange of gifts, flowers and cards, is illegal. The Iranian police consistently warn retailers against the promotion of Valentine’s Day celebrations.

Over the years, Islamic religious leaders and officials in Malaysia have warned Muslims against celebrating Valentine's Day. In Saudi Arabia, the morality police outlaw the sale of all Valentine's Day items, forcing shopkeepers to remove any red items, because the day is considered a Christian holiday.

Malaysia and Saudi Arabia are carrying the torch for the Indonesian Ulema Council in Dumai, Riau, and for the Education, Youth and Sport Agency in Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, both of which issue a dire warning each year to people against celebrating Valentine’s Day, stating that the Day of Love “is against Islam.” This is because, as the Indonesian Ulema Council 2011 judgment explained, Valentine’s Day takes young people into a "dark world.”

Malaysia's State mufti chief assistant Mat Jais Kamos always keeps his mind focused on that dark world and so, in 2014, a few days before Valentine's Day, he ordered young people to stay clear of celebrating the Day of Love: “The celebration emphasizes the relationship between two individuals rather than the love between family members or married couples," he affirmed, and department officials backed up his command by distributing leaflets to remind Muslims of the 2006 ban on Valentine’s Day issued by the state fatwa council. In Islamic Uzbekistan, meanwhile, several universities habitually make sure that students actually sign contracts promising not to celebrate Valentine's.

All these Islamic outcries against Valentine's Day reflect myriad other efforts to suffocate the day of love throughout the Muslim War. For instance, in Aceh province in Indonesia every year, Muslim clerics issue stern warnings to Muslims against observing Valentine’s Day. Tgk Feisal, general secretary of the Aceh Ulema Association (HUDA), has stated that “It is haram for Muslims to observe Valentine’s Day because it does not accord with Islamic Sharia.” He has stressed that the government must watch out for youths participating in Valentine’s Day activities in Aceh. One can only imagine what happens to the guilty parties.

As mentioned, the Saudis consistently punish the slightest hint of celebrating Valentine’s Day. The Kingdom and its religious police always officially issue a stern warning that anyone caught even thinking about Valentine’s Day will suffer some of the most painful penalties of Sharia Law. Daniel Pipes has documented how the Saudi regime takes a firm stand against Valentine’s every year and how the Saudi religious police monitor stores selling roses and other gifts.

Christian overseas workers living in Saudi Arabia from the Philippines and other countries always take extra precautions, heeding the Saudis’ warning to them specifically to avoid greeting anyone with the words “Happy Valentine’s Day” or exchanging any gift that reeks of romance. A spokesman for a Philippine workers group has commented:

> We are urging fellow Filipinos in the Middle East, especially lovers, just to celebrate their Valentine’s Day secretly and with utmost care.

The Iranian despots, meanwhile, as mentioned above, consistently try to make sure that the Saudis don’t outdo them in annihilating Valentine’s Day. Iran’s “morality” police sternly order shops to remove heart-and-flower decorations and images of couples embracing on this day — and anytime around this day.

Typical of this whole pathology in the Islamic world was a development witnessed back on February 10, 2006, when activists of the radical Kashmiri Islamic group Dukhtaran-e-Millat (Daughters of the Community) went on a rampage in Srinagar, the main city of the Indian portion of Kashmir. Some two dozen black-veiled Muslim women stormed gift and stationery shops, burning Valentine’s Day cards and posters showing couples together.

In the West, meanwhile, leftist feminists are not to be outdone by their Islamist allies in reviling — and trying to exterminate — Valentine’s Day. Throughout many Women’s Studies Programs on American campuses, for instance, you will find the demonization of this day, since, as the disciples of Andrea Dworkin angrily explain, the day is a manifestation of how capitalist and homophobic patriarchs brainwash and oppress women -- and push them into spheres of powerlessness.

https://www.amazon.com/Human-Accomplishment-Pursuit-Excellence-Sciences/dp/0060929642

This is the book in question.

> European people's relied on circumstance?

Once it is a happening. Twice it is coincidence. Thrice it is a pattern. The European land is the best as far as evolutionary benefits goes. Best nutrition, weather, resources etc. Yes. This is why we are here today. This is why by the evolutionary process the achievements of Europeans number 90-95% of all.

> How much of it was won through the spoils of war instead of self innovation?

Precisely? No clue. However when are the means more important than the end? And by what metric do you judge war to be inherently negative? By war men know the fullness of life. By war we reveal the worst of humanity yes, but also the best minds, the most innovative discoveries and forms of progress.

> This "my people" shit just seems like a way for people who haven't accomplished shit to feel a part of the accomplishment of their ancestors.

The idea is simple. Our ancestors fought, bleed, sacrificed and constantly pushed for better. We live on their shoulders and the greatness that was their existence. What we have today: safe and prosperous societies, those things came about because of their goodwill. The conclusion is that we should strive to be as best as we can be. To honor them and ourselves. To match their greatness and eventually surpass it. That is the idea of "my people". A never ending passion to better yourself and what is yours. I believe this is what everyone of all people on Earth should be doing. Love for your own does not need hatred for others.

> However culture is learned and not predetermined by your genetics.

To some degree yes. However genetics dictate the level of intelligence of the individual. They tell about the likelihood for addictions, the speak of capability to understand and innovate. Genes are everything. If the genes of humans coded for roughly the same capacity all across the board then how come there are still groups of people in Africa that are living in mud huts? Surely if the biological capacity were there, they would have evolved beyond that point a long time ago. 5,000 years ago. Culture is an expression of genetics.

I know you're aiming for a standard "but what about men" argument but out of curiousity -- what do you think the gender balance of the rank-and-file would look like if you exclusively promoted men to senior positions?

If frequenting hard-right subreddits has left you feeling like thinking about gender issues is morally offensive (because they want you to think like that), here's how you can work out the answer with science (and food!):

First of all, buy yourself shitloads of black and white M&M's (if you haven't boycotted them for supporting gay pride or something) and split them evenly between two bowls.

In this experiment:

• The bowls represent a company
  
• The M&M's represent low-level employees.
  
• The black ones represent female employees and the white ones represent male employees ^(because ^there's ^only ^two ^genders ^kek ^sjw ^cuck).
  
• Eating an M&M represents an employees promotion out of a scrub level position and into the world of senior staff.
  
  Now, for bowl number one, we're going to treat it like a perfect, angelic company that doesn't have filthy leftie gender quotas, nor does it have any form of sexism. So to represent this, just indescriminately grab fistfulls of candy and shove them in your gormless face.
  
  Bowl number two however, represents the kind of sexist company that feminists are always getting their panties in a twist over but you don't think it actually exists because you've never seen it. To represent this, only eat the white candy from this bowl.
  
  If 5 pounds of chocolate hasn't left you feeling diabetic enough, feel free to top up the bowls as often as you'd like -- as long as you add the same total candy to each, it won't effect the outcome at all.
  
  Now.. after the doctors have amputated your toes and admonished you for attempting something that in the end wasn't even really science: Which bowl has the most black M&M's?
  
  Edit: Reply away, but I've been banned for being "disruptive" -- a reason that is broad enough that it can be used to censor any dissenting opinion and keep this a happy little echo-y safe space. Be sure to check the public mod log for other dubious bans and deletions

Remember when they call someone a Nazi or a fascist, throw this at them.


https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0767917189

Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.

Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.

I encourage people interested in this to read the book, Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History. This was a victory for the nation state, which remains the single best ordering for our civil society.

Not only that but when she was talking she was acting like she was getting coaching. I didn't see anything in her ear but they make speakers as small as a grain of rice now. She was hesitating in weird spots and several times I though to myself that she must have an earpiece in getting talking points.

Here's a link for an amazon cheap earpiece, I'm sure the government has much better quality stuff.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00CT5SQJQ/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1473345711&sr=8-1&pi=SY200_QL40&keywords=spy+earpiece&dpPl=1&dpID=41zC4xeMfrL&ref=plSrch

If you really are interested you should read a book called Certain Samaritans, I think you will like it.


https://www.amazon.com/Certain-Samaritans-Esther-Pohl-Lovejoy/dp/1258279371


http://www.ourstory.info/library/2-ww1/Lovejoy/awhTC.html

You win this complementary Saudi Hijab. https://www.amazon.com/Hayaa-Clothing-Layers-Tie-back-Chiffon/dp/B01LZ2OOOX

Removable eyemesh for when you're feeling flirty.

This is actually complicated stuff.

If you really want to learn more, I'd suggest you start here: https://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Hypotheses-E-Wayne-Courtney-ebook/dp/B072J38X28/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1499910514&sr=8-3&keywords=null+hypothesis

When discussing the effects of fast twitch muscle fiber, that gets into an area of biology that I'm not an expert in. I don't have a good reference, but I bet your local community college could give you some good places to start researching.

>The first link you posted is merely a PDF document from the CIA reporting on Syria.

Ha, I thought this was sarcasm, then you went on and made the most retarded argument about how official documents arent evidence because of their size (this document in particular is 28 pages). Good luck using that one in court.

What the fuck do you think intelligence agencies do? The Art of War is from 5th century BC. People have been mastering this craft for over a thousand years. Theres institutes dedicated only to writing up new ideas, from overthrowing governments to you-fucking-name-it, using memetics for population control

If a bank has been robbed, and in my bookcase, you find the plans to rob that bank in particular, no mather how old those plans are, or how thick the plan is, it is reason for suspicion to say the least. In the case of EU/USA deliberatly creating ISIS, not just this document but papertrails, pictures, emails have been released. You're just waiting for the unbiased truthspeakers CNN to cover it.

About books, here's one, go ahead and read up what the founding fathers wrote on criminal governments and militia. Or read this book about the CIA using 'Economic Hitmen'.

Or see what information has come up thanks to the Freedom of Information act..

All they need is the uniform and they're good to go. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Controversy-Black-Nazis-Powerwolf-Publications/dp/1483954072

Just remembered about a good book on radical ideologies I read a few years ago. It's called Rules for Radicals. Hillary Clinton was highly influenced by Alinsky's work and she even wrote her thesis about him.

Piggybacking on /u/haplogreenleaf 's comment, if you're interested in learning more on why this is I'd suggest reading Dark Ghetto: Dilemmas of Social Power and I'm Not a Racist, But..The Moral Quandary of Race

Fixing these imbalances is the honest to god real question here. What changes can we as a society make to facilitate equality between races. Really tough question. Obama is more the classist type, get people out of the ghetto and you remove the race problem. While others suggest focusing systemic changes based on a race specifically (the problem with this is whites historically don't vote for something that doesn't benefit their worse off).

https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Ascent-1889-1939-Volker-Ullrich/dp/038535438X/ref=la_B001I7UCXO_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1506029592&sr=1-1

I'm a trained historian, and I purchased this book from Amazon, following which I wrote a thoughtful 5-star review. Some days later not only did Amazon delete my review of the book, they deleted all my reviews.

Bezos is an Alt-Left tyrant lying hypocrite cuck and Amazon web-managers are LBGTQIA+ f*ckin' cucks.

x. x.

Clarey, "Worthless"
https://www.amazon.com/Worthless-Young-Persons-Indispensable-Choosing/dp/1467978302

https://www.amazon.com/Thicker-Than-Blood-Racial-Statistics/dp/0816639094

You and /u/DiscoLollipop

IIRC it's from this book: https://www.amazon.com/Slavery-Terrorism-Islam-Historical-Contemporary/dp/0958454981

>When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non -muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Am- sterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections,