#3,357 in Science & math books

Reddit mentions of Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics

Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 1

We found 1 Reddit mentions of Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics. Here are the top ones.

Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Compatible with Macs or PCs, though design is Mac focused
  • Improves airflow around laptop; allows access to all side and rear ports
  • Frees up desktop space for a separate keyboard and mouse
  • Sleek plastic stand holds your laptop screen at eye level
  • Conforms to health safety standards for ergonomic safety and comfort
  • Sleek plastic stand holds your laptop screen at eye level
  • Frees up desktop space for a separate keyboard and mouse
  • Conforms to health safety standards for ergonomic safety and comfort
  • Improves airflow around laptop; allows access to all side and rear ports
  • Compatible with Macs or PCs, though design is Mac focused
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Number of items1
Width0.75 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 1 comment on Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics:

u/[deleted] ยท 2 pointsr/Physics

I guess Werner Heisenberg was just wasting his time writing Physics and Philosophy and Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics.

One of the problems with reconciling natural science and the humanities is that academic specialization has made everyone regard their field as the axis of knowledge. Formerly, a guy like Kant was professor of astronomy, arithmetic, metaphysics, and literature; guys like Nietzsche (who was well read in the science of his day), Russell, Heisenberg, and Schrodinger, they all were raised in a school system where you read Newton's Principia (in Latin) alongside Aristotle's Metaphysics (in Greek) in what we now call high school. That kind of education simply ceased as academia put a greater and greater emphasis on specialization and as our schools began looking more and more like factories (something Foucault documented fairly well in his Discipline & Punishment).

Arguing science can make do without philosophy or vice versa is equally silly, both historically and in terms of application. For example, apart of Gould's argument against Dawkins and others who conceive evolution in strict adaptationist terms is that they think evolution in the very terms of old metaphysics (notice how a lot of evolution papers claim things like "laughter is an adaptation to living in a group"? Yeah, Nietzsche had criticized that type of thinking and Gould followed suite in exploring exaptation). Gould was pretty familiar with continental philosophy (he leverages Foucault's work in his original article on exaptation), so it's difficult to conceive that his work on emphasizing the contingency of evolution wasn't influenced or abetted by that education.