#546 in Science & math books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries

Sentiment score: 3
Reddit mentions: 5

We found 5 Reddit mentions of Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries. Here are the top ones.

Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Includes a convenient Utility for scanning available networks and saving preferred networks that users usually connected with
  • Compatible with IEEE 802.11b, 802.11b and 802.11bn wireless standards
  • Includes a 4-inch 5-DdBi Screw-On Swivel Rubber Omni-Directional Antenna And a 7dBi Panel Antenna
  • Includes driver for Windows 2000, XP 32/64, Vista 32/64, Windows 7 - Mac (10.4.x/10.5.x/10.6.x/10.7/10.8/10.9/10.10)
  • High security Wireless data encryption with 64/128-bit WEP, WPA, WPA2, TKIP, AES4n, 802.1X support, WPA-PSK, WPA II-PSK, Cisco CCX support, WAPI-PSK, WAPI-CERT
Specs:
Height8.25 Inches
Length5.5 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateMay 1996
Weight0.72 Pounds
Width0.75 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 5 comments on Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries:

u/homegrownunknown · 2 pointsr/chemistry

I love science books. These are all on my bookshelf/around my apt. They aren't all chemistry, but they appeal to my science senses:

I got a coffee table book once as a gift. It's Theodore Gray's The Elements. It's beautiful, but like I said, more of a coffee table book. It's got a ton of very cool info about each atom though.

I tried The Immortal Life of Henrieta Lacks, which is all about the people and family behind HeLa cells. That was a big hit, but I didn't care for it.

I liked The Emperor of all Maladies which took a long time to read, but was super cool. It's essentially a biography of cancer. (Actually I think that's it's subtitle)

The Wizard of Quarks and Alice in Quantumland are both super cute allegories relating to partical physics and quantum physics respectively. I liked them both, though they felt low-level, tying them to high-level physics resulted in a fun read.

Unscientific America I bought on a whim and didn't really enjoy since it wasn't science enough.

The Ghost Map was a suuuper fun read about Cholera. I love reading about mass-epidemics and plague.

The Bell that Rings Light, In Search of Schrödinger's Cat, Schrödinger's Kittens, The Fabric of the Cosmos and Beyond the God Particle are all pleasure reading books that are really primers on Quantum.

I also tend to like anything by Mary Roach, which isn't necessarily chemistry or science, but is amusing and feels informative. I started with Stiff but she has a few others that I also enjoyed.

Have fun!

u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/space

I was reading somewhere that you cannot reach FTL travel, but that you can go faster than light. At this point it would require infinite amount of energy to stop you and you would travel back in time...

Try reading this book...

u/jello_aka_aron · 1 pointr/books

John Gribbin is a favorite science author of mine. In Search of Schrödinger's Cat is a cornerstone for understanding quantum physics as a layman and the follow-up Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality is also very good.

Michio Kaku is another good one. Rudy Rucker's nonfiction is definitely worth a look.

Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age is a pretty awesome account of the lab that pretty much single-handedly invented the modern computer age.

And lastly (offhand) there's nothing better than The Structure of Scientific Revolutions for a view on how our notions of what the Big Ideas are in science change.

u/airshowfan · 1 pointr/askscience

Oh good! It's even more BS-ey than I had realized!

My knowledge of quantum physics is limited to what one can learn from popular books (1, 2, 3 ). Could you try to explain the differences between the underlying models/assumptions on which Orch-OR is based, and the models/assumptions in established/standard physics? I would appreciate it.