#2,042 in Science & math books
Reddit mentions of Slaying the Sky Dragon - Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 2
We found 2 Reddit mentions of Slaying the Sky Dragon - Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory. Here are the top ones.
or
- MADE IN THE USA - Proudly Made in the USA using Surgical Grade Stainless Steel
- FULL FLAVOR - Permanent coffee filters let all of the coffee flavor through for richer tasting coffee.
- FITS MOST MODELS - For use with model DCC-1000BK, DTC-975BKN, DCC-750 Series, DCC-1100 Series DCC-1200 Series, DCC-2200, DCC-2600, DCC-2650, DCC-2750, DCC-2800, DCC-2900 and CHW-12. Filter is form fitting and will adjust from oblong to round based on the brew basket and will hold the required shape once coffee is brewed.
- EASY TO CLEAN - These filters clean easily under running water and are dishwasher safe
Features:
Specs:
| Release date | November 2010 |
There are many who deny the CO2 based climate theory and that it's just because of the high level of political noise and a few documentaries that we all bought into the greenhouse gas theory of climate change.
I am definitely no expert in these things, however there is another side of the story that I think is plausible because as we all know, the "official story" is rarely ever the actual truth and is usually the complete opposite, used to create fear, guilt, confusion and ultimately control the population.
Here are a couple things linked below that I dug up that may be of interest.
Cheers!
https://principia-scientific.org/man-made-global-warming-fiction/
https://www.amazon.com/Slaying-Sky-Dragon-Greenhouse-Theory-ebook/dp/B004DNWJN6
Being skeptical of catastrophic anthropological global warming != denying global warming, except for in the minds of activists who seek to demonize their opponents.
The problem is that the models assume that anything that cannot explain a warming trend is due to CO2 released by man. These models produce highly inaccurate backcasts when compared to observations ( http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/02/testing-testing-is-this-model-powered-up/ ) and therefore will produce highly inaccurate forecasts. The only models that fit the past have been literally fit the past and therefore have no predictive quality ( http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/behind-the-science/1959-backcasting-with-computer-climate-models ). The problem is that there is no room for natural variation allowed in these models - all variance is chalked up to CO2 released by man.
Is there global warming? There must be otherwise we would still be in the Little Ice Age ( http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=94b7d021-c5da-4e82-b37f-53d338709fb1 ). Is global warming unprecedented? No - we have been through the Medieval Warm Period ( http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/the-medieval-warm-period-a-global-phenonmena-unprecedented-warming-or-unprecedented-data-manipulation/ ) and the Roman Warm Period ( http://www.co2science.org/subject/m/summaries/mwpantarctica.php ). So it has been much colder and much warmer in recent history due to natural variation.
So here we are with climate changing as it has been in the past, completely in the bounds of natural variation.
And are we really pumping all the CO2 into the air, or is it like the antarctic show: CO2 increases when temperatures rise ( http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/30/co2-temperatures-and-ice-ages/ )? Here is a group of scientists who show why the calculations for anthropogenic CO2 is incorrect: http://www.amazon.com/Slaying-Sky-Dragon-Greenhouse-ebook/dp/B004DNWJN6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&m=A7B2F8DUJ88VZ&s=digital-text&qid=1290760790&sr=1-1