#100 in Digital camera lenses
Reddit mentions of Sony SEL30M35 30mm f/3.5 e-mount Macro Fixed Lens
Sentiment score: 4
Reddit mentions: 7
We found 7 Reddit mentions of Sony SEL30M35 30mm f/3.5 e-mount Macro Fixed Lens. Here are the top ones.
Buying options
View on Amazon.comor
Lens not ZoomableExceptionally portable and versatile for everyday useMinimum working distance of only 9.75cm with 1:1 magnificationSimple, compact 6-group 7-element lensInternal stepping motor and Rear-focusing design for video capture
Specs:
Color | Black |
Height | 2.44094 Inches |
Length | 2.20472 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | January 2020 |
Size | 3.5in l x 3.5in w x 4.75in h |
Weight | 0.30423792156 Pounds |
Width | 2.44094 Inches |
I got my NEX-5N (body only) a month or so ago (first camera, so I'm still a beginner), along with the Sony 30mm f/3.5 macro lens and the Sigma 30mm f/2.8 prime lens.
Like everyone says about these cameras, if you're looking for excellent IQ in a small package, the NEX 5N / 7 fulfills that request. If you're looking to invest into the NEX system, I'd go for the NEX-7. Also, don't even bother with the C3; the 5N is much better for ~$100.
A short focal length means wider-angle, it doesn't necessarily mean that it'll be a macro lens although they do tend to allow you to get pretty close to your subject.
If you want macro, then you need to either get a macro lens or buy extension tubes that you use for when you want to shoot macro.
Getting a macro lens will give you macro-to-infinity focus, but obviously a dedicated lens will cost more. Getting extension tubes allows you to focus nice and close, but then you lose infinity focus while using them since you're positioning the lens further away from the camera than it was designed for while in use, although they're cheaper and generally a better way of dipping your toes into macro shooting.
Edit: Also regarding general advice for your shots, it looks like a ton of them have motion blur from camera shake. If your lenses have stabilization, make sure to use it. Whether they do or don't, it looks like you'd also benefit from bumping up your shutter speed to minimize both camera shake and the animals moving while you're taking their photos.
This one was taken with a Sony a6000 with a Sony E 30mm Macro.
For that you'll need a macro lens. The only native macro lens right now is this one (and by all accounts it performs really well).
If you are mostly taking pictures of still things or you don't mind focusing manually, the budget option would be to buy an old manual focus lens and an adapter. You can usually pick up the Rokkor 50 mm f/3.5 in the MD or MC version for about $80, and then you can get an ordinary adapter for about $20, totalling about $100 for the whole setup. The Rokkor/Minolta can't quite get to less than 5 inches, but you can definitely take pictures of small insects or the like with it.
And another unrelated thing, but I'm looking at a macro lens, and it says it has f/3.5. That seems a bit higher f than some of my lenses, but the sample pics show the background very blurred. Am I missing some setting here to make my current pictures have a more blurred background?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0054I54JU/ref=mp_s_a_1_sc_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1468605091&sr=8-1-spell&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=sony+macro+lena
Well there's the native Sony one right in your price range.
Another option is to get a set of macro tubes for your kit lens. They'll be a lot fiddlier and AF might be problematic, but the price is hard to argue with and I've seen some great pictures out of nothing but a kit lens and some cheap tubes.
A6300 is a great camera, but it isn't full-frame. If you are looking for something in the Sony realm, I would suggest the the Sony A7. It's $998 or about $800-850 used. For a little bit more, you can also get the 24-70mm kit lens, which is a great focal length for landscapes. As far as the macro lens, the Sony FE 90mm f/2.8-22 Macro G OSS is incredibly sharp. The Sony 30mm f/3.5 is a pretty good option too.