#222,955 in Books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party

Sentiment score: -2
Reddit mentions: 7

We found 7 Reddit mentions of The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party. Here are the top ones.

The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Smart note-taking becomes your forte when you have this Blue Sky Professional Hardcover Executive Notebook with its durable charcoal gray textured cover built for ongoing use
  • Designed for writing and note-taking, each page is ruled on both sides, making it easy to jot down concepts and ideas during seminars and meetings
  • The 160 charcoal-lined pages are printed on high quality white paper for clean writing space, securely held together by gold twin wire binding
  • Sturdy twin-wire binding is built for portability, so you don’t have to worry about spiral wires coming loose as you shuffle your trusted notebook from home to office
  • Journal-size spiral notebook easily fits inside a purse, backpack or briefcase for anyone with a busy life that needs a professional note-taking solution
Specs:
Height8.38 Inches
Length5.44 Inches
Number of items1
Weight0.6393405598 Pounds
Width0.76 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 7 comments on The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party:

u/All4Trump · 3 pointsr/The_Donald

Book recommendation:

The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party

by David Horowitz

https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Party-Hillary-Radicals-Democratic/dp/1595551034

u/ieatbrainsnomnom · 3 pointsr/AskThe_Donald
u/curi · 2 pointsr/IntellectualDarkWeb

I'm an author of the article. You can read about my pro-Israel and pro-Jewish views if you search my blog. George Soros is a major funder of leftwing causes. Here is some info about what I don't like about him:

https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Party-Hillary-Radicals-Democratic/dp/1595551034

https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/george-soros/

u/Super_Throwaway_Boy · -4 pointsr/ShitPoliticsSays

>You can’t deny that reddit overall leans left

In as much as people do? Sure.

>or that the big social media companies (twitter especially) have a bias against conservatives.

Do they have a bias? Or is it that conservatives are bad for business when it comes to these social media companies?

>That is nowhere near a majority view on reddit.

I guess we'll have to wait and see, won't we?

>I have never called Hillary a communist and I haven’t seen this kind of thing said unironically anywhere. Also irrelevant to anything being discussed here.

https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Party-Hillary-Radicals-Democratic/dp/1595551034

The right loves this kind of crap. Go look around, it's not hard to find. Everyone they don't like is a communist, a socialist, or a "globalist."

>Paul Joseph Watson was recently banned from twitter and Facebook, along with Sargon and Dankula’s official campaign accounts and to my knowledge none of them have broken TOS. Meanwhile several accounts who tried to dox and harass kids from Covington Catholic have faced no reprocussions (just to name 1 example)

Okay. So look at it from their perspective. They believe that guys like PJW are harmful to their platform. Either they harm profits or harm their public image. Why shouldn't they ban them?

>Legally, these companies have argued that they aren’t liable for the posts on their site (the platform side) while also saying they can decide which posts are allowed (the publisher side).

And this is true. Do you disagree?

>The way they’re acting is similar to if your phone company cut off your calls if you started saying things over the phone they didn’t like.

Why would they do that without a profit motive?