Reddit mentions: The best valuation books
We found 68 Reddit comments discussing the best valuation books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 28 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.
1. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 5th Edition
- Prentice Hall Press
- It ensures you get the best usage for a longer period
- It ensures you get the best usage for a longer period
Features:
Specs:
Height | 10.279507 Inches |
Length | 7.350379 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.47007600388 Pounds |
Width | 1.881886 Inches |
2. The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public
Specs:
Color | Cream |
Height | 8.56 Inches |
Length | 5.56 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | May 2012 |
Weight | 0.00220462262 Pounds |
Width | 0.4 Inches |
3. HBR Guide to Buying a Small Business: Think Big, Buy Small, Own Your Own Company (HBR Guide Series)
- Harvard Business School Press
Features:
Specs:
Height | 8.9 Inches |
Length | 5 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0.78043640748 Pounds |
Width | 0.9 Inches |
4. The Little Book of Valuation: How to Value a Company, Pick a Stock and Profit
- Super Speed: Up to 1200mbps wireless speed, With 802.11ac technology, perfect for smooth HD video, audio streaming and online gaming
- Super speed USB 3.0 port: Up to 10x faster than USB 2.0. And it comes with a 2 feet USB extension cable
- Dual band wireless design: Working in the less congested band for more stable and better performance
- Two high gain external antenna: With stronger signal penetration strength, wider wireless coverage, providing better performance and stability
- Universal Design: Innovative mini design & Works with windows 10, windows 7, windows 8.1, windows 8, windows vista, windows xp of 32bit or 64bit, etc.
Features:
Specs:
Height | 6.999986 Inches |
Length | 4.799203 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0.62611282408 Pounds |
Width | 0.999998 Inches |
5. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height | 9.901555 Inches |
Length | 7.098411 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.61999034204 Pounds |
Width | 1.799209 Inches |
6. Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Business (Columbia Business School Publishing)
- Columbia University Press
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.1 Inches |
Length | 6.4 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 1.25 Pounds |
Width | 1.2 Inches |
7. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of any Asset, University Edition
- Wiley
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.99998 inches |
Length | 7.098411 inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.40393732528 Pounds |
Width | 1.799209 inches |
8. The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public
Specs:
Release date | April 2022 |
9. Valuation Workbook: Step-by-Step Exercises and Tests to Help You Master Valuation
- mahogany body, maple top and flame maple veneer
- PRS designed tremolo bridge
- A 22-fret, wide-fat mahogany neck with rosewood fretboard adds to the rich tones of this instrument
- The PRS designed treble and bass humbuckers give you a va-riety of great sounds for whatever style of music you play.
- Gig bag included
Features:
Specs:
Height | 10 Inches |
Length | 7 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | July 2013 |
Weight | 0.94357848136 Pounds |
Width | 0.6 Inches |
10. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset, Second Edition
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.92124 Inches |
Length | 7.32282 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 4.01902703626 Pounds |
Width | 2.27160963 Inches |
11. The Dark Side of Valuation: Valuing Old Tech, New Tech, and New Economy Companies
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 6.25 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 2.1495070545 Pounds |
Width | 1.25 Inches |
12. Value Drivers: The Manager's Guide for Driving Corporate Value Creation
ISBN13: 9780471861218Condition: NewNotes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
Specs:
Height | 8.051165 Inches |
Length | 4.7244 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0.67902376696 Pounds |
Width | 0.779526 Inches |
13. Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Business (Columbia Business School Publishing)
- Two-sided chest piece with tunable diaphragms on both the adult and pediatric sides^Single-piece tunable diaphragm is easy to attach, and easier to clean because its surface is smooth without crevices^Pediatric side converts to a traditional open bell by replacing the single-piece diaphragm with a non-chill rim^Next-generation tubing provides longer life due to improved resistance to skin oils and alcohol; less likely to pick up stains^Small tunable diaphragm is useful for pediatric, small, or thin patients; around bandages; and for carotid assessment
Features:
Specs:
Release date | January 2017 |
14. Damodaran on Valuation: Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance
Specs:
Height | 10.098405 inches |
Length | 7.40156 inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.22315827044 Pounds |
Width | 1.499997 inches |
15. Angel: How to Invest in Technology Startups—Timeless Advice from an Angel Investor Who Turned $100,000 into $100,000,000
- Reference Book
Features:
Specs:
Release date | July 2017 |
16. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (Wiley Finance)
- Raised bezel protects your screen and back camera
- Built-in screen protector
- Sleek and form-fitting
Features:
Specs:
Height | 10.200767 Inches |
Length | 7.40156 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 2.95860355604 Pounds |
Width | 1.700784 Inches |
17. The Art of Distressed M&A: Buying, Selling, and Financing Troubled and Insolvent Companies (Art of M&A)
McGraw-Hill
Specs:
Height | 9.3 Inches |
Length | 6.5 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 1.7857443222 Pounds |
Width | 1.49 Inches |
18. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, University Edition, 5th Edition
- Text and WorkbookValuation Workbook: Step-by-Step ISBN-13: 978-0470424643 together
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.99998 Inches |
Length | 6.999986 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.25843223236 Pounds |
Width | 1.551178 Inches |
19. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, Third Edition (University Edition)
- VARIATIONS - Over 40 Fantastic Colors/Patterns to choose from including solid colors, prints, world flags and much more
- ACCESSIBLE - Build with a zippered back which runs from the back of the neck down to the base of the spine for easy dressing and undressing
- BREATHABLE - Made of durable and breathable stretch fabric which is comfortable to wear for extended periods of time
- STRETCHY - Made of super stretchy fabric to fit most builds with its forgiving fit. Select your size based on height for best fit
- CUSTOM FIT - Available in 9 sizes including kid's sizes to get the right fit so you don't have a poor fitting skin suit
Features:
Specs:
Height | 10.019665 Inches |
Length | 7.027545 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 1.92684016988 Pounds |
Width | 1.33858 Inches |
20. The Complete Guide to Real Estate Finance for Investment Properties: How to Analyze Any Single-Family, Multifamily, or Commercial Property
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 8.999982 Inches |
Length | 6.098413 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 1.26545338388 Pounds |
Width | 0.999998 Inches |
🎓 Reddit experts on valuation books
The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where valuation books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Hello everyone!
I'm reading through the McKinsey "Valuation" (5th Edition) textbook (https://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Value-Companies/dp/0470424656) and I've had some issues that I was hoping to get answered.
Specifically, in the second chapter, the authors discuss the so called value driver formula: Value =( NOPLAT_i * (1 - g/ROIC) )/WACC-g. Where:
g = constant growth rate of earnings.
ROIC = rate of return on incremental capital invested
NOPLAT_i is the operating profit after tax (before reinvestment) in period 1.
However, then they go on to show this diagram: https://imgur.com/R7umPno, which is a matrix depicting the value of companies for different ROIC, growth rate combination. I understand the *point* of this: when ROIC < WACC, growth destroys value, and vice versa. However, I'm having trouble replicating the specifics of the numbers they get:
In this situation, WACC = 9%, and the initial NOPLAT is $100. They model it for 15 years and then use 3% perpetuity growth formula for the terminal value. I have 2 questions.
Either way, I feel like I'm missing something really obvious. Help is appreciated :)
I'm going to give you the pathway that I read that has me where I am today, its mostly going to steer you towards dollar cost averaging and passive management, but the easing of exposure to alternative strategies was invaluable and eventually brought me to value investing. Dollar cost averaging in low cost index funds is the training wheels of investing and should be the way every novice investor starts IMO.
At this point if you've taken a year or two or more to invest using what you learned in the above books you'll have a better idea of what you really want to start doing with you're money. Perhaps its value investing, and now it starts to get more technical.
By this point you'll no longer be an investment padawan and be well on your way to a master of the force. Do not be tempted by the dark side of day trading and penny stocks. Much fear there. There is no need for level 2 quotes with value investing because you're relying on your due dilligence from the previous years and quarters to take your portfolio higher, without worrying about the road bumps in the market today. You'll be able to happily live your life until the next quarter or two when its time to reevaluate and rebalance your portfolio.
Good luck.
Not in way of argument, but it's very important that the ideators of the world understand the difference between ideation and investment.
Bill Gates is well known for giving start-ups the cash
There are investors out there that throw money at ideas purely based on the idea, and nothing else. But these are the exact type of people that are being mocked in this thread - I haven't met one, myself, after many years in the field. In truth, the amount of diligence that goes behind anything beyond simple market investment is tremendous. I would argue doing research on angel investment is a sticky path. If anyone with an idea who has dreams of starting a company really wants to find that dream investor, I recommend starting with one of these books on how acquisitions work. Then work your way to understanding early-class investment. At the end of the day, they're tremendously easier to understand, and give you a better learning curve into the grit that goes into determining which - of thousands of ideas - to invest in, and which not to. There are literally thousands, if not orders of magnitude more, ideas currently being tossed around to earn money. Investors, like Bill Gates, who want to turn their money into more money, do (or pay people to do) the grit work to ensure they pick the right ones.
In this way - developers are an investor. They invest time, not money, but in essence it's exactly the same, because they could easily spend that time working on a better investment.
Books:
And maybe my favorite:
Edit/Source: I manage and perform technical due diligence for startup acquisitions for a Fortune-500 company
I think it is a self-serving myth that US companies are required to only care about the $$. A very convincing and nearly entirely believed myth, but I think it's been debunked. Now don't get me wrong, that's probably all the shareholders care about and in the end the companies are setup to care about what they want...
This book covers it way better than I can:
https://www.amazon.com/Shareholder-Value-Myth-Shareholders-Corporations-ebook/dp/B007PIZ8IO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1534453504&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=lynn+stout
"So long as a board can claim its members honestly believe that what they're doing is best for `the corporation in the long run,' courts will not interfere with a disinterested board's decisions -- even decisions that reduce share price today."
This review of the book summarizes it well:
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/26/the-shareholder-value-myth/
Valuation is like voodoo. According to the IRS, the fair market value is the most important, but in reality there are lots of factors. For example, what would the business sell for today if the owners agreed to stay on as regular full-time employees - That value might be zero if their cash flow is poor, but clearly the business is worth something (and they are not going to just give away equity based on poor income valuation)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_valuation
This Forbes article does a fair summation of the issues you are dealing with:
http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/23/small-business-valuation-entrepreneurs-finance-zwilling.html
I would probably start with asset and income valuation and then try to put a number on the existing owner non-asset goodwill defined as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodwill_(accounting)
I would avoid, "valuation based on what the founders have already put in, i.e. a % of their day-job salaries and cash." Those are sunk costs. What I mean by that can be explained by analogy: Would you pay someone $30,000 for a rusted-out, broken down 1988 Ford Ranger because the owner put $22,000 of improvements into it over its lifetime?
The owners may feel it's worth $30,000 because of their efforts, but as I often think when I am browsing Craigslist and run across an extremely overpriced vehicle, "If there's not a couple gold bars that go along with it, I'm not paying that." The reality is that the owners are going to tend to over-value the company because of sunk costs, but you have to come to a valuation based on the current realities (future earning projections can be taken into account as well, but I would be conservative in those estimates.)
There are accountants who specialize in business valuation. I would definitely retain one to work for you and not for the company. Look for someone who is a CPA and a Certified Business Analyst or Certified Valuation Analyst or American Society of Appraisers member.
There is a book that was recommended to me (I haven't read it yet) called Valuation.
http://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Edition/dp/0470424656/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top
There is also a workbook:
http://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Workbook-Step---Step-Exercises/dp/0470424648/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1395756019&amp;sr=8-5&amp;keywords=valuation+measuring+and+managing+the+value+of+companies
Again, I haven't gotten around to these yet. I did notice that the first review of Valuation has a recommendation for a book: Business Valuation which that reviewer says is the best for reviewing small, private companies. The review:
http://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Edition/product-reviews/0470424656/ref=sr_1_1_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&amp;showViewpoints=1
The book:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047037148X/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk
Good Luck!
Frankly, if you are management material, your employer will probably send you to get an MBA (likely after you're already management). I suppose you could always do it on your own, if you want.
Either way, it's really easy and won't warrant special preparation prior to starting. If you're wanting to prepare for the job rather than school, you'll have to be more specific on where you want to improve. Management, as another poster mentioned, is an entirely different discipline with its own facets of challenge. It would be like asking what books you should read to prepare for engineering; if you want it all, it will be a very long list.
My contributions below are based on my own preferences, as they're the books I felt I got the most out of, but your priorities may be entirely different:
I would also second the other recommendations of Peter Drucker (bit outdated but fundamentals are all there) and Carnegie (excellent book). There are other books with lots of great info but they tend to be course textbooks and are very, very dry reads. However, if you can get short primers on corporate accounting, operations, HR, etc. you would at least be familiar with the basics.
Edit: forgot this one but it's an easy read. It's geared towards IT but provides some insights into other facets of management.
Edit2: forgot HBR!
There are people that dedicate their lives to this question. But it basically boils down to understanding the business, analyzing financial statements, and coming up with projections of future performance. I encourage you to pick yourself up a copy of this book and use it as a reference to pick through the financial statements (10k's,10Q's) of whatever company it is you're trying to value. The bottom line is that if you really want to get an edge it's probably going to take more than just looking at some easily available statistic like PE. On the other hand, most big companies have hordes of analysts following them already whose sole job it is to estimate the value of the company, so the likelihood of you getting an edge for any large company is slim at best. There are probably more opportunities to be had with smaller companies that get less attention.
Qualitative factors are always the most important part of valuing a company as its that understanding that should drive the numbers.
Aswath Damodaran did a great talk at Google a few years back that I think you'd enjoy -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5chrxMuBoo -- and he also wrote a book called Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Business which is worth a read.
Models are just a way to express your thoughts. My best models have been around 5 lines long outlining how the key drivers translated into future earnings. My worst models have been many many pages.
As for valuations and how stocks trade, yes they're different things. A valuation should reflect what you think a company is worth, and if you buy it at that price you should get your discount rate as a return over the long-term provided all your assumptions prove to be correct.
How a stock acts is completely different. Any investor or trader should have a clear idea about whether their strategy is to predict the long-term value of a company and buy based on that, or whether it's to predict what other market participants will do which will drive prices in the short-term. Often in practice it's a combination of both even if people don't explicitly say that.
Investment Banking: Valuation, Leveraged Buyouts, and Mergers and Acquisitions by Pearl and Rosenbaum.
Damodaran on Valuation: Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance by Damodaran.
Both of these books provide solid walkthroughs of valuation.
If you want the Coles Notes of a simple DCF, here they are:
Edit: Apparently Damodaran put that entire text online for free: http://raj.rajaditi.com/finance/corp/pages.stern.nyu.edu/_adamodar/New_Home_Page/valn2ed/book.htm
Many individual stocks drastically under-perform the broader market index (e.g. S&P500, Russell3000). Historically, most of the growth in the market index comes from a select minority of "elite" stocks.
Many stocks fail. A minority hit it big. This is a deadly combination for investors whose strategy is to pick individual stocks. In fact, many mutual funds that pick individual stocks will underperform the market index in the long run when net of fees.
As an investor, you should make a choice about your own strategy:
Whatever you decide, best of luck!
For more general financial advice: Don't risk money you can't afford to lose. Buffett's wealth is the result of many years of respectable, constant growth. Large losses are very difficult to recover from and can ruin years of previous growth. To get rich you have to find a reliable strategy that compounds!
The article largely parrots Lynn Stout's mass-market book.
Professor Stout's view is not universally shared by lawyers or legal academics. In my experience of the legal academy and the bar, it's a small minority view, more in the nature of activism than revisionism. I still recommend the book, just because the reflex to oppose it requires checking one's rigor closer to the primary sources.
State legislatures are running long-overdue and very promising experiments in public benefit corporations. Many of those business forms are still too fresh and untested to recommend to clients, but the same was true of LLCs not so long ago.
There is certainly a lot of interest. Lay clients are asking about the structure. That and crowd funding :-)
Edit: Word choice
First, keep enough in your passive funds to keep you going even if you lose the rest. Pull out your SWR and that's it, no matter what. Then maybe keep another chunk passive that you only move to active after you've had some success with that.
For the active funds, it depends what you're interested in. If you want to contribute to society while making money, another option is angel investing. Look for small startups that need early funding, and have some potential for making a positive impact.
There are some books on Amazon that look decent; I've read part of this one and it sounds like a lot of work, but potentially rewarding.
But don't go into it lightly. It's easy to throw your money away.
> companies ultimately exist to serve their owners (stockholders)
Do they? Says who? We as a society allow companies to have limited liability. Shouldn't we get a social benefit in return?
Even if your narrow view is true, are the practices in this article the best way, much less the only way, to serve shareholders? My clients are often large, institutional investors, with massive holdings in a wide range of companies, including Apple. I would wager that most of them disagree that the practices in this article are clearly in their best interest, especially in the long run.
For an argument against your view, see [this book] (https://www.amazon.com/Shareholder-Value-Myth-Shareholders-Corporations/dp/1605098132).
I would read "a random walk down wall street" for a good understanding of basic theories behind investing (fundamental analysis vs technical, risk and portfolio management etc...).
Then diving into to the different schools of analysis, for fundamental analysis, I super highly recommend reading: McKinseys Book on Valuation ( http://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Edition/dp/0470424656), you might need a quick primer on accounting and corporate accounting before jumping into that book though. Warren Buffet's Essays and books and the classic "The intelligent investor" are also good resources for insights.
For portfolio management, I would study basic modern portfolio theories
( http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_portfolio_theory), and read books on portfolio management such as http://www.amazon.com/Pioneering-Portfolio-Management-Unconventional-Institutional/dp/0684864436.
But then to go even further, it will be more robust to read more about risk management and the shortfalls of such portfolio management models highlighted in the recent market crashes. "The Black Swan", "Fooled by Randomness", "Irrational Exuberance" are good books to read to more qualitatively understand risk and learn to protect yourself from it.
Forget Shkreli. The usual sources (besides in-house proprietary models) are:
(1) Macabacus. (see http://macabacus.com/learn).
(2) Rosenbaum and Pearl, Investment Banking - book and excel models
A bit more academic, but more in-depth:
(3) Penman's Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation (excellent book and he has a running example that guides you to create your own valuation spreadsheet)
(4) Dan Gode and Jim Ohlson models These guys are genuine experts from the academic side.
(5) Damodaran, as others have mentioned.
(6) McKinsey, Valuation. Some people like this one.
(7) Fernandez, Company Valuation Methods and Common Errors. Something of an acquired taste, but might be worth the read since he provides a list of the most common valuation errors. Gives analysts an awareness of how they can f**k up which can be useful.
STOP! The shareholder value myth is FALSE.
The shareholder value myth is a zombie that has taken dozens of shotgun blasts to the head, but refuses to die and needs to be put back into the ground from whence it came.
CEOs and boards act on behalf of shareholders and have some obligations, but not much more than any other employee has to their boss. Corporate chiefs are largely free to steer the business in the direction they want, so long as they are not committing blatant fraud and enriching themselves at the expense of shareholders. If shareholders don't like it, well, that's what at-will employment is for.
The myth of a legal obligation to maximize shareholder value arose as part of the financialization of the economy in the go-go, greed-is-good 80's. Ivy League business schools pushed this obligation so hard that it started to be taken as an absolute.
Here are some eye-opening resources on this topic:
Lynn Stout: The Shareholder Value Myth [book]
Lynn Stout article in the New York Times
I personally like this one the best. It has good examples of his valuations as well.
I went through the process of trying to sell a failed startup a few years ago. I read this text book on "distressed assets", which is a technical term that might help you do some research on this. I can't find the exact text book, but it was something like this one.
The basic formula is:
So as an example, with my former business I estimated that within 2 years it could bring in $500k/year revenue. I used a 2x revenues multiple to get a $1mm valuation. With a conservative 20% chance of getting there, I asked for ~$200k.
If the business is nowhere near cashflow or you don't have a good way to estimate future value... if it could make anywhere from $0 to $100mm... then I'd suggest negotiating for a large advisors % in the company just in case it becomes the next big thing.
Edit: Addressing the downvotes. (1) That's not an affiliate link to Amazon. (2) I'm not addressing OP's situation exactly, but I've been thinking about this recently and thought it might be a useful real world case of how to "value a company with no income".
This is all good advice. In terms of structuring the deal, I'd agree that a 5 year buy-out makes sense.
Take a look at the HBR Guide to Buying a Small Business (http://amzn.to/2qoPMhn) for some good ideas on how to do this. It spends a lot of time talking about the sourcing process, but the second half of the book covers your situation nicely.
This is great on valuation and the quantitative aspects...which is probably most useful in the finance sector.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Valuation-3rd-McKinsey-Company-Inc/dp/0471361917
> whoaa why has my tutor been telling me to discount each expense per year then add them up then discount the total!
Fire your tutor, lol. That makes no sense. You come up with the FCF first then discount it. I mean, I guess you can do it his way but it's stupid. In a real model your going to have so many inputs you would need to discount. Read Valuation. Then you'll actually know why it works that way and it'll be much easier. It's a pretty big book so for this topic so you'll only need to read up to Chapter 6.
Tip: Read the whole thing. It'll do you good.
Aswath Damodaran is a great starting place for any new investor interesting in valuation methods.
His blog
One of this books, Investment Valutation
The DDM chapter from the above book
Basic .xls
this podcast talks about exactly the topic you mentioned. Interview with two Harvard Business School profs, who even wrote a book on the topic.
REALLY Private Equity, with Royce Yudkoff and Rick Ruback – Invest Like the Best, EP.33
HBR Guide to Buying a Small Business
https://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Finance/dp/111887370X/ref=pd_cp_14_1?_encoding=UTF8&amp;psc=1&amp;refRID=78812C9EYCT5SWFMY51W
i'm assuming this? link if any other readers are interested.
thanks!
Thanks! I will check it out for sure. I recently read "The Complete Guide to Real Estate Finance for Investment Properties" - But even that was a bit over my head at times - http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Estate-Finance-Investment-Properties/dp/0471647128
Sounds like this would be a good start: http://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Edition/dp/0470424656
Read HBR Guide to Buying a Small Business
It's very thorough and covers everything from valuation, to raising equity, how to split profits, etc.
In general, investors want to see a 25% return on their money for this kind of deal, maybe a little more in your case due to the turnaround nature of the deal.
Also, I echo the advice to draft pro formas-- what do the financials look like after your improvements and assuming everything goes as planned. Do the improvements yield a meaningful enough change?
Finally, the owner should be willing to finance a significant portion of the deal. It's very common in small business, but especially since you're looking at a much higher risk situation.
https://www.amazon.com/HBR-Guide-Buying-Small-Business/dp/1633692507/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1487885144&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=buying+a+small+business
This should do the trick: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Little-Book-Valuation-Company-Profits/dp/1118004779/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1478977766&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=damodaran
You value the company and then you compare your value to the price.
Learning to fill in one of these spreadsheets is pretty meaningless. There are so many adjustments to make in a DCF depending on each company and/or industry you should try to start from the bottom up. If you're a beginner and really want to learn how to do a full DCF I'd recommend getting one of the below books to start learning from scratch.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Finance/dp/0470424656
or
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Investment-Valuation-Techniques-Determining-Finance/dp/1118130731
This is very good if you are into valuation:
https://www.amazon.com/Investment-Valuation-Techniques-Determining-University/dp/1118130731/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1541756197&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=Aswath+Damodaran
While it is but a part in the M&A process, the book "Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies" by McKinsey is one of the bibles on Valuation.
Amazon link.
Is this the same one just newer? Would you recommend?
I understand. So you're a number-crunching-guy :-)
Here is a reading tip for you:
https://www.amazon.com/Narrative-Numbers-Business-Columbia-Publishing/dp/0231180489/
If this is basically a video version of this book, it's nothing more than an intro to finance course. Nothing here for anyone other than a newbie.
His text, however, is quite a bit more detailed and thus worth going through, although as I've said before, his infatuation with DCF is sometimes hard to overlook. But his section on calculating "fundamental" multiples is something I've only found in 2 other investment books/texts, so definitely worth it.
For $50 and a couple of dozen hours spent reading, you'll get an entire MBA's valuation education by reading Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies from McKinsey.
Yes, the PEG ratio is useless as are P/E, P/B, etc. if one does not know the implicit assumptions these quick-and-dirty valuation methods make. I recommend reading chapter four of this book by Damodaran.
Note: if you build a DCF model, it will imply a specific P/E, PEG, etc.
For a general Damodaran text, consider Investment Valuation
That's today's normal, but it wasn't always that way. And it probably shouldn't be now. Good book here.
http://www.macabacus.com
http://www.amazon.com/Investment-Banking-Valuation-Leveraged-Acquisitions/dp/0470442204
http://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Companies-Edition/dp/0470424656
And a little later down the road upon graduation: http://www.cfainstitute.org/programs/cfaprogram/Pages/index.aspx
https://www.amazon.com/Investment-Valuation-Tools-Techniques-Determining/dp/111801152X
read more from Aswath Damodaran, he's one of the most highly regarded equity valuations experts. In addition, read the news from a reputable source (WSJ, FTs...) multiple times every day.
Be patient.
This? https://www.amazon.com/Valuation-Measuring-Managing-Value-Companies/dp/0470424656
This is wrong. Shareholder maximization as legal obligation is a myth. Lynn Stout who is an academic legal professor wrote about this. The corporation is under no legal obligation to do such a thing
http://www.amazon.com/Shareholder-Value-Myth-Shareholders-Corporations/dp/1605098132/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1421299436&amp;sr=1-1-catcorr&amp;keywords=Shareholder+myth
This is a complex subject. Here are a couple of books, though you might not need the 2nd one (I'm not sure what's involved in an education in Economics).
Valuation
How to Read a Financial Report
PDF Warning - The Investment Checklist