(Part 2) Reddit mentions: The best fascism books

>Read a book.

Here's one

I've read all those neocon books and that is not what Neocons advocate for. They are full on interventionists. I remember no less than four books that start off with nuclear mushroom cloud fantasies about Tehran.

This one is basically end of the world fanfiction

When you've finished having your mental breakdown read The Doctrine of Fascism

HR Morgan's work is great too.

Whenever you're ready to stop being ignorant and talking a load of shite about stuff you literally know nothing about you should take the time to read those, it will help you to avoid these little tantrums your ego puts you through when you're embarrassed about your ignorance.

I'd be happy to, but you all invited me. Sort of. By insulting me. Here's some reading for you in the meantime: https://www.amazon.com/Fraud-Famine-Fascism-Ukrainian-Genocide/dp/0919396518

Actually, again you have yet to provide anything conclusive to prove your claims, and again ignored the core of my post. I said that this was a tiny smidge of easily accessible data. So no front, you just need to not be lazy. Again you ignore anything that clearly proves you wrong, honestly I dont even know why I bother since you are clearly so deluded you cannot even read, let alone respond to anything outside your own (completely false) narrative.


Again nothing ad-hominem just observations any sane person would make about your replies. Your like one of those spineless politicians, when asked an uncomfortable question, you give a totally unrelated answer.



So yeah you want some book recommendations? Here you go:
http://www.amazon.com/Germany-After-First-World-War/dp/0198219385


http://www.amazon.com/Paris-1919-Months-Changed-World/dp/0375508260


http://www.amazon.com/Great-War-Modern-Memory/dp/0195133323/sr=8-1/qid=1158256555/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-5230486-6363002?ie=UTF8&s=books


http://www.amazon.com/Coming-Third-Reich-Richard-Evans/dp/B000HOJGLI/sr=1-4/qid=1158258029/ref=sr_1_4/102-5738646-8788965?ie=UTF8&s=books



http://www.amazon.com/Nazism-Fascism-Working-Class-Timothy/dp/0521437873



http://www.amazon.com/Fascist-Ideology-Territory-Expansionism-1922-1945/dp/0415216125


There are plenty more, but the expansionist rhetoric of the fascist states, especially Germany can not be overlooked. In addition early German planning to not fight a multi-front again indicates that they were indeed aware of a coming conflict in which they would be aggressors. Did they want to fight the powers they did? Well arguments can be made either way but certainly I'm sure they would rather have just been given massive tracks of land, hence the negotiations with England.



So unless you have some documents that show otherwise, this drastic oversimplification that Germany was merely responding to polish aggression is as I have said, nonsense.

The "literal definition" from Wikipedia?

By that definition, not only Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy were fascist, but a number of non-democratic regimes of the 20th century would have to be classified as fascist. While the Krelim's current rhetoric is imperialistic, bellicose and nationalistic, this is still far from amounting to an ideology of revolutionary ultra-nationalism, which is the most consensual definition of facism available in international comparative fascist studies today (if you're interested, I can recommend this one). If Putin's administration is fascist, how should one label all those Russian right-wing extremists who complain that its policies are too liberal and pro-Western?

For example, ideologies of national rebirth, which are very common in fascist countries, were present in Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, but an official and openly proclaimed ultra-nationalist ideology of national rebirth which resembles the grandiose fantasies about an imminent restoration of national greatness is lacking in Russia.

Nationalistic, militaristic and authoritarian leaders existed long before fascism was introduced to the world. Those traits may share some common ground with fascism, but to call someone fascist based just on that is plain wrong. Maybe when he begins introducing corporatism, banning labour unions and imprisoning the entire communist party will it become reasonable to call him fascist.

This is basically what the Americans did for the 1932 'holodomor famine' in Ukraine.

The Hearst press (Randolph Heart was a nazi sympathiser) sent a man called Thomas Walker to Ukraine for the 1932 famine.

Except it turns out 'Thomas Walker' wasnt Thomas Walker and that he only spent two weeks in the Soviet Union during the wrong season for the famine in 1931(not 1932) and that his passport was only stamped for Moscow. In other words if he left for Ukraine from Moscow given the travel at the time he wouldnt have made it in two weeks let alone to Ukraine and back to Moscow.

This all came out in the 1930s when Thomas Walker was arrested for something else and it came out he used photos from the Austrian and russian famines after world war 1(1910s and 1920s) as the 'Holodomor famine'(1932). The US court case revealed him as an escaped convict called Robedt Green. His faked tabloid fraud spreading nazi propaganda.

This is all completely detailed in Douglas Totttles Fraud, Famine and Fascism

https://www.amazon.com/Fraud-Famine-Fascism-Ukrainian-Genocide/dp/0919396518

An incredible online article which references the above book and goes into detail on how this propaganda (that the soviets deliberately starved Ukraine...In the same way the west state Mao deliberately starved China after Mao and the communists ended the 100 years humiliation of western, opiod addicted rule) is this one

https://lorenzoae.wordpress.com/2017/10/11/on-russia-todays-liberals/


End of story right? 'Thomas Walker' is exposed as a fraud in an American court. Nope.

The degenerate West then used this story as anti Soviet propaganda for another 50 years. Robert Conquest in his Harvest of Sorrow consistently references 'Thomas Walker'.

Anne Applebaum ( a new historian) references Thomas Walker in a book out in 2019 called Red Famine

The Pale Faces have no shame.