#1,073 in Health, fitness & dieting books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Deep Nutrition: Why Your Genes Need Traditional Food

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 4

We found 4 Reddit mentions of Deep Nutrition: Why Your Genes Need Traditional Food. Here are the top ones.

Deep Nutrition: Why Your Genes Need Traditional Food
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Flatiron Books
Specs:
Height9.65 Inches
Length6.6499867 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateJanuary 2017
Weight1.69976404002 Pounds
Width1.75 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 4 comments on Deep Nutrition: Why Your Genes Need Traditional Food:

u/madwilliamflint · 5 pointsr/EatCheapAndHealthy

Lots of good advice here. Also lots of bad advice here.

Read this: https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Nutrition-Your-Genes-Traditional/dp/1250113822

u/waltrop9812 · 1 pointr/normalnudes

It hurts me to hear you say something like that. Don't do the starving thing, forget about fad diets. The links below are all you need. I know it seems trite, but I literally read a 500 page book ([Deep Nutrition by Dr. Catherine Shanahan[(https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Nutrition-Your-Genes-Traditional/dp/1250113822)) and the 2 links below dispense with the fluff and just give you the action items that will get you healthy.

u/VAOTOMARNOCU · 1 pointr/PurplePillDebate

>No, all validation is definitely NOT equal. What kind of malarkey is this?

Never said that, I said: validation from losers > no validation

>Leagues are a real thing. Not everyone, even with maximal and effective self improvement, can be top relationship or sex material. Genetics and time limits aren't fugazi.

There really isn't a fixed cap for self-improvement. It scales logarithmically with time, so it gets harder and harder and you feel like you're plateauing, but you're still improving. Also, even genetics can be changed with nutrition. Not to mention you can always save up some money for surgery in severe cases

>People are having casual sex with their approximate attractiveness matches in real life. I would look at "levels" of traits more than the "which traits."

Actually a good part of casual sex (maybe even the majority) is being had between mismatched people, SMV wise. There are too many encounters of ugly woman + decent looking dumpster-diving man, or beautiful woman + average-looking man with tight game.

>Oh, so you bullshitted your way into their pants? Who does that surprise? Enjoy having that on your conscience. People who are aware of this information or suspect it would consider you a piece of shit. You earned it well.

Well I'm not proud of it, which is why I no longer do that. But I sure as hell would rather be immoral and get laid than moral and stay incel. Also, you need experience before you can afford to be moral and still get laid (well, at least I needed)