#7 in Mathematical infinity books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis

Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 1

We found 1 Reddit mentions of First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis. Here are the top ones.

First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • 3.5" desktop adapter bracket included
  • TRIM support (OS/driver support required)
  • Up to 90,000 IOPS Random 4KB Write
  • Max Sequential Read Up to 550MB/s and Max Sequential Write Up to 515MB/s
  • SATA 3.0 (6Gb/s) interface (backwards compatible with SATA 3Gb/s and 1.5Gb/s)
  • Max Sequential Read Up to 550MB/s and Max Sequential Write Up to 515MB/s
  • Up to 90,000 IOPS Random 4KB Write
  • SATA 3.0 (6Gb/s) interface (backwards compatible with SATA 3Gb/s and 1.5Gb/s)
  • TRIM support (OS/driver support required)
  • 3.5" desktop adapter bracket included
  • Built-in BCH ECC (Up to 55 bits correctable per 512 byte sector)
  • Asynchronous MLC NAND
  • Access Time <0.1ms
Specs:
Height9.5 Inches
Length7.25 Inches
Weight1.40434460894 Pounds
Width1 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 1 comment on First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis:

u/canyonmonkey · 1 pointr/math

It won't always be referred to as "Fourier's theorem". Some texts may refer to it as "completeness of fourier series", or they may prove more general versions of the theorem using Sturm–Liouville theory. Note that "completeness" has a technical definition, but in this context roughly means that any square-integrable periodic function can be described as a (possibly infinite) trigonometric series.

I seem to recall that A First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis was readable &amp; yet not long-winded, and had a fairly rigorous proof of Fourier's theorem by the middle of the second chapter. See Amazon.com. A free PDF from an MIT OpenCourseware that might be of use is here. I skimmed over it; it does prove what you are interested in, but I can't vouch for its readability.