#28 in Photographic film
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Fuji Superia X-TRA 3 Pack ISO 400 36 Exp. 35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures

Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 2

We found 2 Reddit mentions of Fuji Superia X-TRA 3 Pack ISO 400 36 Exp. 35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures. Here are the top ones.

Fuji Superia X-TRA 3 Pack ISO 400 36 Exp. 35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Function: The Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400 is a high-speed daylight-balanced color negative film that produces vibrant, yet naturally appearing colors with smooth skin tones
  • Application: Ideal for either outdoors or lower light situations indoors
  • Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400: Features three 36-exposure rolls of 35mm film
  • Versatility: It is also suitable for portraits as well as fast action photography
  • Optimal Picture Quality: This film has excellent sharpness with extreme sharp depiction of all aspects of the subject, from overall form to texture details
Specs:
Height9.1 Inches
Length9.1 Inches
Weight0.06 Pounds
Width9.1 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 2 comments on Fuji Superia X-TRA 3 Pack ISO 400 36 Exp. 35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures:

u/Rashkh ยท 1 pointr/photography

There are differences and similarities between shooting analog and digital. The basic principles are the same. Shutter speed, aperture, and ISO operate the same way.

The differences come down to the different mediums. I feel that digital is a better learning tool than analog because you can immediately see what effect a change in settings has on an image whereas with film you have to send it off to get developed.

As for the quality, film cameras are essentially lightproof boxes. It's the lens and the film that will influence the quality of the final image. In that sense, there isn't much difference between the cameras you mentioned. I would recommend going with Canon or Nikon because they were the most popular for a long time. As such, there are a lot more lenses out there which means they'll be cheaper. Consider something like a 50mm f/1.8 as a first lens.

The issue you may have with analog photography is, ironically, the cost. With digital you pay once and you're done. Take all the photos you want, throw them on your computer, and enjoy looking at them. With film, you have to constantly buy rolls of film and you have to constantly get them developed. I don't know what the prices are where you live but in the long run a film camera is going to wind up being more expensive.

As an example of cost, you can pick up some Fuji film for $21. To get them digitized at Mpix, a very good printing place, is going to cost $0.19 per image. That comes out to about $0.40 per image plus shipping in order to just get a file which would have been free on a digital camera.

So that's something to consider for the long term.

u/venividivici1220 ยท 1 pointr/Cameras

Fuji Superia X-TRA 3 Pack ISO 400 36 Exp. 35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07FWMYFXS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_HLNBDbKCVPBKX

so this film will do??