#11 in Mathematical analysis books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Introduction to Real Analysis
Sentiment score: 3
Reddit mentions: 4
We found 4 Reddit mentions of Introduction to Real Analysis. Here are the top ones.
Buying options
View on Amazon.comor
- Europe’s # 1 coffee container - Maintains aroma and rich, full coffee flavor
- Patented system creates a partial vacuum seal and keeps Coffee - Fresher for Longer
- Multiuse - Allows products to breathe and degas, without letting oxygen in
- NSF Certified, Food Grade - Airtight, Moisture free and Recyclable
- Coffee grounds or beans – 16 oz. / 500g / 1. 85 liter / Dimensions: 7-3/4" tall x 4-7/8" diameter (19. 5 cm x 12 cm)
Features:
Specs:
Height | 10.098405 Inches |
Length | 7.098411 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 1.72401488884 Pounds |
Width | 1.098423 Inches |
My university took an analysis approach to calculus. Our classes were 95% proofs and 5% application. I believe this gave us a better understanding for what calculus really is and a good introduction to later pure math courses. I would recommend you look in to [Introduction to Real Analysis by Robert G. Bartle & Donald R. Sherbert] (http://www.amazon.ca/Introduction-Real-Analysis-Robert-Bartle/dp/0471433314). The first few pages teach you the basics of proofs (proof structuring, sets, axioms, theorems such as well ordering property and etc) and then it dives into calculus. Good luck!
I also have a lot of love for the Bartle real analysis text. It's light on prerequisites other than calculus and the text spends time explaining the logical reasoning. A lot of upper-level math texts are simply a collection of theorems. The good ones present a coherent narrative that give context as each theorem is presented.
I used Intro to Real Analysis by Bartle and Sherbert for my first analysis course. I just checked, and it has quite a few examples for most sections. The book was sufficient without lecture, as far as learning proofs and applying theorem goes. It was also relatively easy to read; there are a lot of analysis books which are hard to read due to terseness. You can probably find it for cheaper too. Good luck.
I hear that Rudin's book is pretty dense, so initially, I won't be using it, though I'm not entirely familiar with Spivak/Rudin beyond the comments on Amazon/Reddit.
Instead, I'm reading from Ross and [Bartle] (https://www.amazon.ca/Introduction-Real-Analysis-Robert-Bartle/dp/0471433314) right now, which I hear are good books for people starting out in Analysis. As I progress through the series, I might start teaching from Rudin and a variety of other sources.