Reddit mentions of SAM Galaxy S10 128GB 8GB RAM SM G973F Dual Sim LTE Factory Unlocked Smartphone Prism - Black
Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 2
We found 2 Reddit mentions of SAM Galaxy S10 128GB 8GB RAM SM G973F Dual Sim LTE Factory Unlocked Smartphone Prism - Black. Here are the top ones.
or
- 8GB RAM
- 128GB ROM
- 6.1" Display Size, Unlocked Smartphone, Gorilla Glass
- International version phones may come with the start-up screen in a foreign language. Nevertheless, customer can pick a language of their choice at the time of startup
- International version Samsung do not always bear a seal. Do not be alarmed by that. It's merely a decision of the manufacturer
Features:
Specs:
| Color | Prism Black |
| Height | 5.31 Inches |
| Length | 7.87 Inches |
| Weight | 0.35053499658 Pounds |
| Width | 5.12 Inches |
I think you have an issue identifying what a baseline phone is. No shit if you jack all the specs to maximum then you'll get on expensive phone. Baseline is the default specification. Which in the S10's case is 128 GB. And here's the $600 price.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07NXVM3DG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_cW64CbPQK88C1
5? You're greatly under-exaggerating this. The Pixel 2 and 3 had a lot of QA issues, it's not unreasonable to assume that the 3a will be the same. There are already issues.
Adding a bunch of stuff actually does seem to make it stable. Did One UI or OxygenOS have the problem of two notches? Or how about shitty RAM management? You clearly have no idea how stock Android works. Stock Android is a skin in and of itself, OEMs have access to the AOSP, they don't simply add shit on top of the stock Android skin, because stock Android is Google adding their own shit on top of AOSP to create a skin.
Just because it's a Samsung AMOLED doesn't make it instantly amazing. Samsung makes many different categories of AMOLED panels. The Pixel 2 and 3 had Samsung panels and they were pretty passable for flagships. The 3a screen doesn't exactly get very bright. I'd be worried if the screen got anything but solid reviews.
Ummm, RAM management is not exactly praised by reviewers?
https://youtu.be/-lCfcD1Ct8Y
Dieter even says it's a slow phone. Which is true, if you've not used a faster phone, it will feel slow, that's the truth.
https://youtu.be/SH88jkuzICU
Your last statement is objectively wrong. $400 for 6 months and $1000 for 24 months, your actually getting it cheaper in the latter option. You're only paying a bit above $40 a month to use the phone while you're paying nearly $70 a month to use the 3a if you use it for 6 months.
>Of course the S10 5G is going to be ridiculously expensive, it's 5G. I'm not sure how this supports your point since the S10 5G is not meant to be a phone that's for the masses. It's essentially a first generation product.
My point? It was your point that "no baseline phone costs $1,300." I was just providing evidence that some do. I already clarified that I am aware that this is not a normal price for a phone. They just do exist.
>I'm not sure what's wrong with buying from third party sellers, but alright, this is literally from Samsung themselves on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07NXVM3DG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_.n74CbM1K365Q
That's a third party seller. "Ships from and sold by Tech IT Online."
I'm not saying that there is "anything wrong" with third party sellers. I'm just saying that they aren't a good measure of MSRP, as all phones can be bought for all kinds of prices on the secondary market. The baseline S10 retails for $899.
>A lot of people using OxygenOS would vehemently disagree with your statement that OxygenOS has a wealth of problems. OxygenOS is one of the better skins, with some reviewers saying it's better than stock Android. Heck, forget OxygenOS, some stock Android lovers (like Dieter from the Verge) say that One UI is better than stock Android, that's saying something when Samsung's software manages to convert people.
Yeah, and a lot of people would argue that the Pixel is the best Android version by a mile - including myself. It's just opinion. But if you google "best android skin," saying Pixel is the best is not a controversial opinion.
>No one paid $399 due to promotions can be applied to flagships as well. No one actually paid $1,000 for the S10+ because there was a trade in program worth $500 for the S9, S8 and other iPhones.
I know, I preempted that by saying it. I'm just saying that the 3A is $399. If a Galaxy S10 is $900 and a Pixel is $400, a pixel really only has to "last" like 10 months to be "worth it." I think the 670 can hold on that long, given that it seems to run Android 9 with 0 lag (and can play games like PUBG mobile on max settings with no framerate drops). It's basically just a SD845 with 2 less performance cores and 2 more efficiency cores. I don't see it crawling to a stop by Christmas.