#18 in Digital camera accessories
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM IF Lens for Canon Auto Focus Digital SLR Cameras
Sentiment score: 3
Reddit mentions: 5
We found 5 Reddit mentions of Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM IF Lens for Canon Auto Focus Digital SLR Cameras. Here are the top ones.
or
Equipped with Sigma's own unique OS (Optical Stabilizer) technologyFour SLD elements and three Aspherical lenses provide high image quality throughout the entire zoom rangeMinimum focusing distance of 45cm/17.7 inches and a maximum magnification of 1:3.4 makes it ideal for close-up photographySuper multi-layer coating reduces flare and ghostingFor Canon digital SLR cameras
Specs:
| Color | black |
| Height | 4 Inches |
| Length | 3.1 Inches |
| Weight | 1.39 Pounds |
| Width | 3.1 Inches |
It depends on what you mean by "Work well for video".
Realistically, you're either going to be lighting a scene correctly or you're not. If you intend to be doing any run and gun shooting, then you'll need at minimum fast glass, and you won't find a fast zoom lens in your budget.
In your price range, I would pickup a Sigma superzoom, http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-18-250mm-3-5-6-3-Canon-Digital/dp/B001PGXEH4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331227039&sr=8-1
That will give you a versatile lens for a lot of situations. It's just not very fast.
You'll have hard time doing any kind of photojournalism without a telephoto zoom. With that lens, plus your 50 prime, you'll be covered for stills in most situations, except maybe low light situations where the 50 doesn't cut it.
From there, you can start investing in some nice lenses as time goes on.
I would also seriously rethink my major. Get a more marketable degree while still learning about this trade, but don't go into huge debt in hopes of becoming a cinematographer, there simply aren't enough of those gigs to go around.
I would get this:
D3300 Body Only - $309
Nikon 35mm f/1.8 G - $167
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 - $269
It's going to cost a little bit more money, but you can mitigate some of the costs by buying used. Just going from your options, I would probably go for the 70-300
If you're spending the money to take a trip to Singapore, perhaps it wouldn't be a bad idea to look for a medium-price lens that bridges the wide and tele range, and also bring the 50mm (which weighs nothing and has superpowers in low light).
I like my Sigma 18-250 for this purpose: affiliate link to Amazon. It's not the sharpest, and definitely isn't your best bet for taking pictures of people jumping around in the dark, but that's what the 50's for.
it's tough for me to spend money and know that I won't be able to use the lenses in the future.
worst case, I'm fairly certain I can add an extension tube to use EF-S lenses on FF bodies. It's not great, but it looks like it could work worst case, and if it didn't work out I could just sell it.
The Canon sounds great but some other commenters have reccomended other things in the thread:
Tamron 70-300
Sigma 18-250
Do you think any of these would be better for me than the 55-250?
This would be a great all purpose lens with plenty of zoom: Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM IF Lens for Canon Auto Focus Digital SLR Cameras https://www.amazon.com/dp/B001PGXEH4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_-qT1xb5H70BJM
I've used it with my T3i and its a good bang for the buck.