#35 in DSLR camers
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Sony ILCE7S/B Alpha a7S Mirrorless Digital Camera

Sentiment score: 5
Reddit mentions: 6

We found 6 Reddit mentions of Sony ILCE7S/B Alpha a7S Mirrorless Digital Camera. Here are the top ones.

Sony ILCE7S/B  Alpha a7S Mirrorless Digital Camera
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
NP-FW50 Lithium-Ion Rechargeable Battery (1080mAh)BC-TRW W Series Battery Charger (Black)AC AdapterMicro USB CableBody Cap
Specs:
ColorBlack
Height3.7 Inches
Length5 Inches
Release dateJuly 2014
Weight1.08 Pounds
Width1.89 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 6 comments on Sony ILCE7S/B Alpha a7S Mirrorless Digital Camera:

u/brunerww · 14 pointsr/videography

Hi /u/BranFlake5 - Good question. In my view, the principal reason is price.

That said, the GH4 has a few other advantages over the A7s besides price and internal 4K:

u/HybridCamRev · 3 pointsr/Filmmakers

Hi /u/Wizard_Status - there are at least a couple of options you might want to consider [Referral Links]:

u/provideocreator · 3 pointsr/videography

A used A7s I with your choice of lens.

u/NotABiscuit · 3 pointsr/videos

It says on the video description:

>Filmed with Sony a7s and Canon 5D Mark III RAW

Amazon links: A7S Canon 5d III

Lenses can cost anywhere between $300-$3000 depending on the type. Cine lenses can be a bit cheaper than photography ones since they don't need fancy features like autofocus and image stabilisation. Most video guys prefer to do everything manually.

It's amazing what consumers and amateurs can afford these days as technology progresses!

u/kabbage123 · 2 pointsr/videography

Congrats!

I started off my career with a T2i and similiar lenses. Besides camera, my first 'big' investment was in this lens. I purchased it over 5 years ago for about $600, and I could sell it today for around the same price.

For this particular shoot, I suspect the interior lighting to be much too dark for your camera and lens selection. The nifty fifty will suffice, but will be very limiting due to crop factor and focal length. You are going to want better low-light lenses such as the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8, or the Sigma 18-35.

Honestly in your situation, I would rent the Sony A7S, Speedbooster, and the 24-105 for this shoot. Conversely, you might be able to use the GH5 with the 12-35 if the lighting isn't too terrible.

You'll be much better equipped with those choices, even though it will cost a lot. But, portfolio may be more important to you now than making a few hundred bucks.... you'll have a much better end product with better gear which will serve your portfolio well.

u/jam6618 · 1 pointr/videography

some say the sony a7sii "makes light", rather it is just great at low light capture and has amazingly clean images/video at a high iso. That combined with a lens with a wide aperture and you get great performance. I would recommend you get a sony a7s mk1 or mk2 or a sony a6300 or a6500, depending on your budgets as all have fairly good low-light performance with the a7sii being the best of them. As for a lens, you could go for an adapter to use your canon lenses but if you do not have a canon lens with a nice wide aperture like f/1.8 or better, it would be good to pick up a lens like that. If you choose to move entirely to sony as so many people have recently, you will want a good all around lens too. Let me know if you need more help!