#35 in DSLR camers
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product
Reddit mentions of Sony ILCE7S/B Alpha a7S Mirrorless Digital Camera
Sentiment score: 5
Reddit mentions: 6
We found 6 Reddit mentions of Sony ILCE7S/B Alpha a7S Mirrorless Digital Camera. Here are the top ones.
Buying options
View on Amazon.comor
NP-FW50 Lithium-Ion Rechargeable Battery (1080mAh)BC-TRW W Series Battery Charger (Black)AC AdapterMicro USB CableBody Cap
Specs:
Color | Black |
Height | 3.7 Inches |
Length | 5 Inches |
Release date | July 2014 |
Weight | 1.08 Pounds |
Width | 1.89 Inches |
Hi /u/BranFlake5 - Good question. In my view, the principal reason is price.
That said, the GH4 has a few other advantages over the A7s besides price and internal 4K:
The [$2498 A7s] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00JIWXTXG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00JIWXTXG&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) is a fabulous camera - but I am very happy that I bought the [$1698 GH4] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00I9GYG8O/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00I9GYG8O&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) and was able to keep the extra $800 in my pocket.
Best,
Bill
Hi /u/Wizard_Status - there are at least a couple of options you might want to consider [Referral Links]:
Here is a low light, slow motion example of what this camera can do:
http://vimeo.com/113896018
With this adapter, you'll have video autofocus, auto aperture and image stabilization with your Canon lenses mounted on the A7s.
Here is what this camera can do with Canon EF lenses:
http://vimeo.com/99939707
http://vimeo.com/110575149
I left the Canon 5D Mark II and Mark III off the list because neither camera can record at 1080/60p.
Hope this is helpful, good luck with your decision and Happy New Year!
A used A7s I with your choice of lens.
It says on the video description:
>Filmed with Sony a7s and Canon 5D Mark III RAW
Amazon links: A7S Canon 5d III
Lenses can cost anywhere between $300-$3000 depending on the type. Cine lenses can be a bit cheaper than photography ones since they don't need fancy features like autofocus and image stabilisation. Most video guys prefer to do everything manually.
It's amazing what consumers and amateurs can afford these days as technology progresses!
Congrats!
I started off my career with a T2i and similiar lenses. Besides camera, my first 'big' investment was in this lens. I purchased it over 5 years ago for about $600, and I could sell it today for around the same price.
For this particular shoot, I suspect the interior lighting to be much too dark for your camera and lens selection. The nifty fifty will suffice, but will be very limiting due to crop factor and focal length. You are going to want better low-light lenses such as the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8, or the Sigma 18-35.
Honestly in your situation, I would rent the Sony A7S, Speedbooster, and the 24-105 for this shoot. Conversely, you might be able to use the GH5 with the 12-35 if the lighting isn't too terrible.
You'll be much better equipped with those choices, even though it will cost a lot. But, portfolio may be more important to you now than making a few hundred bucks.... you'll have a much better end product with better gear which will serve your portfolio well.
some say the sony a7sii "makes light", rather it is just great at low light capture and has amazingly clean images/video at a high iso. That combined with a lens with a wide aperture and you get great performance. I would recommend you get a sony a7s mk1 or mk2 or a sony a6300 or a6500, depending on your budgets as all have fairly good low-light performance with the a7sii being the best of them. As for a lens, you could go for an adapter to use your canon lenses but if you do not have a canon lens with a nice wide aperture like f/1.8 or better, it would be good to pick up a lens like that. If you choose to move entirely to sony as so many people have recently, you will want a good all around lens too. Let me know if you need more help!