#2,503 in History books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of The Riddle of the Labyrinth: The Quest to Crack an Ancient Code

Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 1

We found 1 Reddit mentions of The Riddle of the Labyrinth: The Quest to Crack an Ancient Code. Here are the top ones.

The Riddle of the Labyrinth: The Quest to Crack an Ancient Code
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
Specs:
Height7.9 Inches
Length5.3 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateApril 2014
Weight0.65 Pounds
Width1.2 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 1 comment on The Riddle of the Labyrinth: The Quest to Crack an Ancient Code:

u/tubamann ยท 5 pointsr/audible

I've a few recommendations here, both about writing and about langauge as a whole

  • Cuneiform by Irving Finkel as a (very) short but nice introduction to Cuneiform. I enjoyed it a lot, especially since I couldn't seem to find other popularized introductions to the subject.
  • Empires of the Word by Nicholas Ostler. This is a behemoth, a world history in the context of languages. I love the book, although it can be a bit information heavy at times. The focus is on langauges, but comes with lots of nice examples of writing as well. (I found this book through The Language Instinct by Stephen Pinker, which is tries to describe language from a neurological PoV, an amazing book)
  • Breaking the Maya Code by Michael Coe, one of the players in the breaking of the Maya script. I didn't know a thing about mayan language or script before reading this, and albeit being too detailed on who-did-what, the mayan script is beautiful and this books documents this wonderfully.
  • The Riddle of the Labyrinth by Margalit Fox. The theme is similar as the one above, but this is focused on the decipherment of Linear B, where both script and language was unknown. Very recommended, especially in the methodology on how to catalogue large number of correlations between script pairs in the time before SQL...

    I'm following this thread closely... :)