(Part 3) Best products from r/DebateFascism

We found 25 comments on r/DebateFascism discussing the most recommended products. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 105 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the products ranked 41-60. You can also go back to the previous section.

Top comments mentioning products on r/DebateFascism:

u/BelfortAndBastion · 1 pointr/DebateFascism

Not yet. The book is so new that it hasn't shown up on Google's radar yet. But, we're hoping that it will soon.

In the meanwhile ( he said, boringly and predictably) you can get the book for free through August 26 here:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Kind-Gentle-Fascist-ebook/dp/B00EOZFK0M/

u/chewingofthecud · 1 pointr/DebateFascism

I'm leaning toward this one. Check out we website "textkit" for lots of good resources for learning Greek (many of them free).

u/Stari_tradicionalist · 3 pointsr/DebateFascism

I have asked similar question almost year ago, so far I have found good books on him only in French. Perhaps you can read French, so I will put them here.

Maurras put synthesis of his ideas in this 100 pages long text.
http://www.nation-francaise.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Maurras-Charles-Mes-id%C3%A9es-politiques.pdf

Two good biographies recommended to me by French acquaintances are Charles Maurras - Le maître et l'action and Charles Maurras : Le chaos et l'ordre. First one is more political in nature and shorter. (so they told me)

About English books, you will find some of his position described in Fascism In Its Epoch (alternative title: The Three Faces of Fascism ) by Ernest Notle, and Action Française; Royalism And Reaction In Twentieth-Century France by Eugen Weber (which I skimmed).

Other than that, there are some short articles floating around on Internet.









u/Ahimeir · 1 pointr/DebateFascism

I suggest Mussolini's Intellectuals by A. James Gregor if you want to read up on Italian fascism.

u/poltsi · 1 pointr/DebateFascism

I've always suggested Andrew Heywood's: political ideologies because it gives a nice overview of all political ideologies.

u/SuaveCrouton · 1 pointr/DebateFascism

I recommend this book to you

Hitler himself was on a cocktail of drugs involving methamphetamines predominantly.

u/OvrWtchAccnt · -1 pointsr/DebateFascism

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristinakillgrove/2015/07/18/these-red-haired-chinese-mummies-come-from-all-over-eurasia-dna-reveals/#43e3a3bd3e2c


I never said ancient china was white. but the redheads come from europe. and on top of that it was rarely peasants who where mummified. these things are 4000 years old.

Ill also suggest a book to anyone interested, bhuddism is a religion possibly founded by whites. https://www.amazon.com/Martial-Arts-Blue-Eyed-Red-Bearded-Barbarian-ebook/dp/B00N9P5V5M

u/dmt477 · 4 pointsr/DebateFascism

Alright, I'll waste my time.

  • First of all before even speaking of Degrelle, one must mention the country he is from (Belgium). Or rather, the non-country. It is a country divided in 3 nations (Wallonia, Flanders, and a German part) who do not share any national spirit whatsoever. The individual parts usually have more allegiance to (respectively) France, Holland, and Germany. The point is that individual Belgian citizens do not put much stock (at the time especially) in their "nation". Historically Belgium has been a corridor for the REAL nations surrounding them (German, French, and Dutch).

  • Onto Degrelle himself. It is a long story (and you would do well to read his biographies and books before you even comment), but Degrelle initally (long before WW2) founded a quasi-fascist party, called Rex. Degrelle was above all a Walloon Nationalist. He actually hated Germans (as all Walloons did with memory of German occupation during WW1). However when Germany invaded Belgium (to attack France), the Belgian government used this as a pretext to massacre the Rexists (also the French troops also went into Belgium, this is rarely mentioned).

  • In the new order of 1940, which was a German dominated Europe, Degrelle made a move. He decided to essentially carve a dominant Belgium within the German Imperium, and not be slaves, by showing the Germans that the Belgians were Aryan warriors worthy of a place of honor in their Germanic Reich (and not be treated like conquered territory like France or Russia). The Nazi plan at the time was to wipe Belgium from the map and make it a German colony. They had little respect for Degrelle, and for Belgium in general (and why should they? Belgium was belligerent against Germany pre-WW2. It was conqueror's right!). Degrelle petitioned for the creation of a Belgian division of volunteers when Germany invaded Russia, and as part of these 1000 strong, he volunteered as a private(when he could be officer due to his education) in the hell of the German campaign on the USSR. The Walloon Legion ended up from the butt of jokes by racist Germans (against Walloons), through its feat of arms and comradery with German soldiers, to a mythical division which was eventually given the honor of being integrated in the SS(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walloon_Legion). Degrelle himself elevated himself to the SS equivalent rank of Colonel (again, from Private, surviving numerous firefights), and by the end of the war even as future fuhrer of Wallonia.

    It is apparent from the historical records that Degrelle was not a traitor. The Walloon Legion fought for a nationalistic Germanic Belgium and not for subjugation. This is why millions of volunteers in Europe for in the foreign SS divisions. They were not traitors but Europeans who wanted to carve a space in the German imperium, showing the militaristic Germans with militarism, what they were made of.

    But superficial non-fascistic people cannot understand any of this.

    I suggest before you just engage in slurs against a dead man, you read "Campaign in Russia" by Degrelle, aswell as numerous documentaries on youtube. Campaign in Russia, is a mesmerising military book, just google "Campaign in Russia pdf" and you will find it. I highly recommend. Here are some reviews: https://www.amazon.com/Campaign-Russia-Waffen-Eastern-Front/dp/0939484188
u/Vendetta55 · 3 pointsr/DebateFascism

An astute and ruthless military leader, the problem is that he lacked the vision, charisma, and connection to the needs of the people necessary to be an effective statesman. Later in life, he became a much better leader in Taiwan, but a little too late at that point. I would suggest reading the book Jay Taylor did on Chiang Kai Shek which reexamines his life in light of new documents available, and dispels myths about him. I think he could have expelled Bolsheviks while allowing council communists a seat at the table, so to speak. The early KMT wasn't completely against socialism, after all.

u/DebateTheKingfish · 3 pointsr/DebateFascism

Guild Socialism re-stated by G. D. H. Cole

Postcapitalism by Paul Mason

Fidel Castro: My Life

Empire by Hardt and Negri

Community and Society by Ferdinand Tönnies

u/xfLyFPS · 3 pointsr/DebateFascism

People with liberal arts degrees aren't becoming authors or poets anymore, they're becoming secretaries and McJobs workers.

Worthless, by Aaron Clarey.