Best products from r/TheBluePill

Oookay, I totally didn't forget, I had a lot of work, followed by surprise drive-in date and then motorcycle adventures. Anyways!

I love my anthologies, but which have the most beta heroes? The Mammoth Book of Ghost Romance wins in that category. I particularly enjoyed "Old Salt," "Hat-Trick" and "Seventeen Coppers." If you want a free read on the ghosty-beta-hero front, enjoy the short Haunted, not to be confused with the god-awful YA romance of the same name.

If you want to go more historical, A Midsummer's Magic has a charmingly oblivious sorceress at its center and the poor bugger who is head over heels for her. This was free when I picked it up...it was okay, my main nitpick is the the book takes a lot of time to establish how much the heroine doesn't want to have children/go through childbirth and yet the book still end in babies. Eeeh.

Since, like, everything is shifters, I have read a couple. I like Before Midnight because it was a good idea for a retelling of Cinderella with werewolves. The execution is a little poor, but hey, it's free. If you want something a lot more raunchy, I also like Wilder's Mate, though I don't know if it'd qualify for your quest. It's steampunk, Wild West werewolves. With ex-prostitute mad scientist ladies.

I actually have a whole bunch of new ones queued up, so I was thinking about maybe posting up a regular list on /r/getfeminine to help with content.

https://m.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/how-do-i-love-thee-sonnet-43

>How Do I Love Thee? (Sonnet 43)
Elizabeth Barrett Browning, 1806 - 1861

>How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight
For the ends of being and ideal grace.
I love thee to the level of every day’s
Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light.
I love thee freely, as men strive for right.
I love thee purely, as they turn from praise.
I love thee with the passion put to use
In my old griefs, and with my childhood’s faith.
I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
With my lost saints. I love thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life; and, if God choose,
I shall but love thee better after death.



https://www.amazon.com/Desiring-Voices-Sonneteers-Petrarchism-Literature/dp/0809323079

Who the fuck has ever started a war for love outside of mythology? How would anyone call that a good thing? How is Paris kidnapping Helen because she was the most beautiful woman in the world anything other than selfish infatuation, or as you say, tingles.

Symphonies were generally written for money and prestige not love.

Romanticism had little to do with actual romance.

Np, also I had a bit of a typo in my comment, my pet theory was actually that our higher cognitive function allows us to deviate from primal instinct to some extent but ultimately not enough to where we are perfectly moral, non-animalistic creatures-- we are very much driven by basic need, since that helps us survive and gets propagated throughout generations, the other things our intellect affords us such as awareness of our insignificance in the grand scheme of things or philosophy, art, etc. are just fortunate by-products of our abstraction ability, which was selected due to it's ability to aid us in survival and reproduction, consequently it is subservient to those basic drives.

Some other books I haven't even touched yet (but plan to) but which also have a good reputation:

https://www.amazon.com/Our-Inner-Ape-Primatologist-Explains/dp/1594481962

https://www.amazon.com/Chimpanzee-Politics-Power-among-Apes/dp/0801886562/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=6KQC849RMQDHAHCNND0J

https://www.amazon.com/SEX-AT-DAWN-STRAY-MEANS/dp/B00KEVTNSK/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1498547954&sr=1-1&keywords=sex+at+dawn

https://www.amazon.com/What-Do-Women-Want-Adventures/dp/0061906093/ref=pd_sim_14_5?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=0061906093&pd_rd_r=2RBWQA67MBBA734QWF20&pd_rd_w=B1B9p&pd_rd_wg=HueSP&psc=1&refRID=2RBWQA67MBBA734QWF20

https://www.amazon.com/Moral-Animal-Science-Evolutionary-Psychology/dp/0679763996/ref=pd_sim_14_89?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=0679763996&pd_rd_r=Q4WSH2CZDEQX8RASGQ0T&pd_rd_w=oCsRh&pd_rd_wg=mKnBF&psc=1&refRID=Q4WSH2CZDEQX8RASGQ0T

Anyone who is offended at the thought of you liking them, based on your respective status, is an asshole. Man, woman whatever an elitist shit bag is an elitist shitbag.

But for the love of god, do not accept any philosophy that describes the motivations of "women in general". People do make value judgments when they decide who to have sex with, and yes there are some broad qualities that increase your value.

But thinking that there's one magic key to the way all women think is insane. Women and men want different things at different times for different reasons.

The links you posted are an unverifiable story about a deranged woman, and an article about the importance of self confidence warped to fit a TRP agenda.

If you're interested about how value enters into sexual selection for women, and what motivates women to have sex in general here's a great book

http://www.amazon.com/Why-Women-Have-Sex-Understanding-ebook/dp/B002N44XRC/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1425167921&sr=1-1&keywords=why+women+have+sex

It's written by two well respected PHD's in evolutionary biology and presents verifiable conclusions without politicization.

I have a deep and abiding love for The Princess Diaries, though I was honestly rather disappointed in the book. I think I read The Boy Next Door in high school when I was still naive enough and young enough to be scandalized by the sex. I'll have to give it another try.

I don't mind if there's an alpha dude so long as he's not an alphole and not the main romantic interest.

As weird as it sounds, Julia Kent's Shopping for a Billionaire really took me by surprise. I like the hero, as he's nice and funny enough to keep him from being an ass. He's rooting for the heroine, too. The book was also pretty side-splitting, though it's rife with current references that won't age all that well.

interesting, but i would hardly consider that article as a means to justify you're suggestion of disney creating pro-lgbt storyboards as an effective measure to curtail youth suicide in that marginalized group. most of disney's stories are left to interpretation, and that way anyone can apply it to situational events in their life. some people even already consider that disney has promoted lgbt for a long time...

https://www.amazon.com/Tinker-Belles-Evil-Queens-Company/dp/0814731236?tag=harpersbazaar_auto-append-20&ascsubtag=[artid|10056.a.21506[src|

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/film-tv/news/a21506/disney-gay-lgbt-characters-history/

i do stand up for people caring about other people's rights, but i feel the energy can go to more effective measures other than trying to get a media corporation to force out an lgbt character (which is what i assume you want) on the off chance it will reduce suicide in teens.

you're funny, i guess that's why people just don't waste their time with people like you. not worth the time or breath in having an intelligent discussion, because it always leads to aggression or verbal attacks. sigh.

This book helped me become conversationally funnier, which is useful in attracting women. In particular, saying things that are slightly inappropriate is pretty easy. Then you can move onto harder stuff.

From my personal experience though, being more handsome, specifically losing weight, was more important than working on my personality.

Well, not really even that, if we're being serious and not just mocking redpillers. Solipsism just acknowledges that we only ever experience our own minds, therefore we can only ever be certain of the existence of our own minds, and nothing more than that. It doesn't mean that the external world doesn't exist, just that we can never really be sure.

Epistemology is really, really fun. I strongly recommend this excellent primer on the history of epistemology.

>I know this is an unpopular thing to say, but I think a lot of women interpret "freak in the sheets" to mean that acting kinkier will impress men or set them apart from apart from other women.

Yes, the wild popularity of writers like Cherise Sinclair is due to women catering to men....

(read her books if you like where shades of gray was headed but you didn't really like the road it was on or its choice of travel attire)

If anyone's curious, there have been more than a few philosophy of biology books from a feminist perspective. The Case of the Female Orgasm made a big splash about a decade ago in critiquing the whole Masters & Johnson legacy on sex. It's an interesting read and the author was a student of Stephen Jay Gould. Not to mention I think some feminists would have a hard time accepting one of its conclusions, that being the male orgasm drove the evolution of the female one.

Also, this is supposed to be pretty good as well, though I can't say I've read it.

I don't have a bias if you have evidence contradicting my claim I would seriously consider it. To make my case more clear compare the distribution in table 3 and 4 in the paper. If you don't under stand statistics take a statistics course.

If you want to understand the evolutionary theory read this book: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0679763996/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1495379507&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=the+moral+animal

https://www.amazon.com/Moral-Animal-Science-Evolutionary-Psychology/dp/0679763996

​

https://www.amazon.com/Red-Queen-Evolution-Human-Nature/dp/0060556579

​

https://www.amazon.com/Blank-Slate-Modern-Denial-Nature/dp/0142003344

​

https://www.amazon.com/Sperm-Wars-Infidelity-Conflict-Bedroom/dp/1560258489/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1549572306&sr=1-1&keywords=sperm+wars

​

https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Male-Rollo-Tomassi/dp/1492777862/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1549572332&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=sperm+the+rationale+male

​