Reddit mentions: The best communications law books
We found 3 Reddit comments discussing the best communications law books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 3 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.
1. The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the nature of legal services
- Oxford University Press USA
Features:
Specs:
| Height | 9.04 Inches |
| Length | 0.78 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | September 2010 |
| Weight | 1.19710866 Pounds |
| Width | 6.16 Inches |
2. The Language of Law School: Learning to "Think Like a Lawyer"
Specs:
| Height | 6.18 Inches |
| Length | 9.24 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | February 2007 |
| Weight | 1.08908357428 Pounds |
| Width | 0.85 Inches |
3. The First Amendment (Concepts & Insights)
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
| Height | 9.5 Inches |
| Length | 6.25 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Weight | 1.04058187664 Pounds |
| Width | 0.5 Inches |
🎓 Reddit experts on communications law books
The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where communications law books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature
Shuffle: random products popular on RedditTop Reddit comments about Communications Law:
Summary
1. The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the nature of legal services
- Oxford University Press USA
Features:
Specs:
| Height | 9.04 Inches |
| Length | 0.78 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | September 2010 |
| Weight | 1.19710866 Pounds |
| Width | 6.16 Inches |
2. The Language of Law School: Learning to "Think Like a Lawyer"
Specs:
| Height | 6.18 Inches |
| Length | 9.24 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | February 2007 |
| Weight | 1.08908357428 Pounds |
| Width | 0.85 Inches |
3. The First Amendment (Concepts & Insights)
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
| Height | 9.5 Inches |
| Length | 6.25 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Weight | 1.04058187664 Pounds |
| Width | 0.5 Inches |
If you are not going into debt to pay for law school, keep at it if you enjoy it. Otherwise, consider reading this book ASAP: http://www.amazon.com/End-Lawyers-Rethinking-nature-services/dp/0199593612/ref=pd_sim_b_1
Although I'm inclined to say it really boils down to behaving like a timid, conformist, mediocre thinker, I must be wrong because there are entire books and articles written about it:
http://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Commentary/On%20Thinking%20Like%20a%20Lawyer.pdf
http://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Like-Lawyer-Introduction-Reasoning/dp/0674062485
http://www.amazon.com/Think-Like-Lawyer-Reasoning-Professionals/dp/1627221417/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1414643817&sr=1-3&keywords=think+like+a+lawyer
http://www.amazon.com/Think-Like-Lawyer-Gary-Fidel/dp/1413461476/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1414643817&sr=1-5&keywords=think+like+a+lawyer
http://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Like-Lawyer-Introduction-Reasoning/dp/0813344646/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1414643817&sr=1-6&keywords=think+like+a+lawyer
http://www.amazon.com/Language-Law-School-Learning-Lawyer/dp/019518310X/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1414643817&sr=1-8&keywords=think+like+a+lawyer
>Oh really? The 1st amendment is pretty clear.
Ah, another person who's not read much about the actual meaning or intent of the First Amendment, nor the history of the Supreme Court's first amendment decisions. There are many forms of speech that are not protected speech under the first amendment. I suggest any number of good books on the subject. State laws on threats and intimidation have been upheld by the SCOTA - several of those books will explain this to you.
> I was giving an example of why threats are meaningless without the action behind them.
Mmm.. I completely understood what you meant. I simply think you're being far too superficial and sophist. I pointed out the difference in the terms of your (rather bad) analogy. Threats are, obviously, not meaningless. Threats are an expression of intent. We frequently make decisions in our lives based on the statements of intent from others. Some people make meaningless threats, others do not. What's more, you don't even think they are meaningless. In this same thread, you say "If someone makes a threat against my life, I will always take it seriously. I'll make sure I have the means to defend myself and when the time comes I'll be able to. To not do so is foolish and naive." Cognitive dissonance much?