#58,657 in Electronics
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Holga 120N Plastic Camera

Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 4

We found 4 Reddit mentions of Holga 120N Plastic Camera. Here are the top ones.

Holga 120N Plastic Camera
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • 2 film masks for either 12- 6x6 cm images or 16- 6x4.5cm images
  • Shutter Speeds: (N)ormal - 1/100s; (B)ulb - Holds Shutter Open
  • Apertures: SUNNY - f/11; SHADE/FLASH - f/8
  • Hot shoe adapter, Standard Tripod Mount (1/4-20), Uses 120 medium format film
  • Lens cap, Strap
Specs:
ColorBlack
Height1 Inches
Length1 Inches
Release dateDecember 2010
Sizenone
Weight0.75 Pounds
Width1 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 4 comments on Holga 120N Plastic Camera:

u/Chroko · 7 pointsr/photography

Translation: WAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH. WAAAAAAAAHH.

Let me guess: You have zero creative ability and you're throwing a tantrum. You need to learn to use a camera - and you need a lot more practice. It may take you 10,000 pictures to figure out what you're doing.

Anyway... for those situations with your G10:

  1. Set your G10 to use the "indoor" (or "night indoor" if there is one) scene preset. DSLRs have problems with dark indoor environments as well, usually solved by a slow sync flash mode (which you can also manually set if you want.)
  2. Set your G10 to Av mode (aperture priority), then manually set the aperture to f/2.8 (or as wide as it will go - you may have to change the zoom to get that.) You'll now have the narrowest depth possible with that lens. It won't be equivalent to a DSLR, but it will give you a slight depth-of-field effect.

    And with the depth of field, even most consumer DSLR lenses aren't that fast. Zoom lenses are f/5.6 at 200mm, for example. The depth effect isn't as pronounced as you're expecting.

    What you buy with a more expensive camera is more fidelity and control. It does not make a "better" picture. Period. Experienced photographers understand this. In the same way that pencils, pen, pastels, watercolor and oil-based paints are all different ways that an artist can create an image - the results of those different methods are not automatically greater than the other.

    ie: If you knew shit, you'd understand that you can take spectacular photos with nothing more than an iPhone. In fact, the entire Holga movement is based on a $27 camera with a plastic lens.

    If you're frustrated with your point and shoot not giving you the results you expect, you will do nothing but waste money on a DSLR, then throw a tantrum because it isn't a "push button, make art" box. DSLRs actually require more patience and skill to operate than the point-and-shoot that you failed horribly with - because they have more controls that introduce more variables to every shot.
u/[deleted] · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

interests - Old Cars (especially Studebakers), Camping, Cooking, BBQ, Photography (film and digital), brewing beer, pinstriping.


Simple Pleasures - reading to my 3 yr old every night, drinking a fresh brewed cup of coffee on the edge of a lake as the sun comes up(which I will be happily doing the end of July!), having a good beer or two with my friends on our back deck or anywhere really (again happening in July! :D), watching my kids play together (3yrold/10monthold).


One thing that would make the right addition? a camera to take it all in. Just another way to capture the perfection.

Thanks for letting me enter the stalker fun included in Pandora's Mystery Summer Box of Goodies ! :D

u/White_Hamster · 1 pointr/PostCollapse

I can understand what you're saying, but I don't agree with you. I am in the same boat as you with film cameras, I have been shooting on film for years, and while I shoot digital now, I still have a ton of film cameras that I love the connected feeling I have with them when I shoot. I don't see what's wrong with the lomo brand. I mean, their film is pretty shitty, I'll give you that, but I shoot with a few of their cameras and I love it.

There seems to be this hatred towards the hipstamatic-styled images, which never bothered me because it means more people are taking pictures. I'm not a part of any mindset that says people don't know how to take pictures and shouldn't. I mean, the quality might not be good, but how many of us when we started out (damn, around 10 years ago for me) actually took good pictures? My first I don't know how long was just riddled with bad pictures that I liked and helped me learn and improve. There's nothing wrong with it, I was starting out. And they don't do any harm just existing in the internet, whether it's a flickr account, blog or facebook album. We're not talking about commercial and fine art photography being done by novices that have tilted horizons and are just washed in messed up colors and no focus, professionals still have that same level of skill as always. So it's not having any adverse affect on photography, all it's actually doing is getting more people into it. Are they good? It's irrelevant.

I know a lot of people don't like a company charging as much as they do either, which I am mixed with. I mean, I don't mind paying $40-$50 for my Holga or Diana or whatever. Do I wanna pay $400 for a limited edition LC-A+? Not really, I can't justify spending that much on one of their cameras. Same thing with some of the cameras with a flash, the Diana Mini was over $100 with it. That I don't like.

Otherwise, yeah they're a company that saw people that had fun with film cameras like the Holga and Diana, these toy cameras were selling already, so they started selling them for $30 per Holga, which you really can't argue as being a ton of money. The Diana F+ is $40 and right now it's $66 with a flash. For what you get, that's a fantastic price. After they sold these, they made some shitty film that they could sell 3 rolls of for $12 so when you leave their site, you don't have to go through the hassle of getting 120 film shipped from yet another place (more money).

I have heard the old LOMO cameras were good, and while I haven't played with the new lubitels, I think it's at least nice that they're trying to preserve these old cameras in some fashion. I mean, they can't be as good no matter what, but if you're into the fantastic quality of these old cameras, this won't be an adequate replacement, so it's not trying to play a fast one on you.

Have you read the ten golden rules of lomography? I think it's at least interesting for any photographer, regardless of how you feel about the company.

Overall, I'm not going to hate a company for getting more people to take pictures in any way, and especially not for bringing back obscure and funky cameras.